General Information of This Drug
Drug ID DRG00042
Drug Name Tubugis
Target(s) Microtubule (MT)  Target Info 
Structure
Formula
C43H66N6O8S
#Ro5 Violations (Lipinski): 3 Molecular Weight (mw) 827.1
Lipid-water partition coefficient (xlogp) 4.4
Hydrogen Bond Donor Count (hbonddonor) 4
Hydrogen Bond Acceptor Count (hbondacc) 11
Rotatable Bond Count (rotbonds) 24
PubChem CID
76013049
Canonical smiles
CCCCNC(=O)CN(C(CC(C1=NC(=CS1)C(=O)NC(CC2=CC=CC=C2)CC(C)C(=O)O)OC(=O)C)C(C)C)C(=O)C(C(C)CC)NC(=O)C3CCCCN3C
InChI
InChI=1S/C43H66N6O8S/c1-9-11-20-44-37(51)25-49(42(54)38(28(5)10-2)47-40(53)34-19-15-16-21-48(34)8)35(27(3)4)24-36(57-30(7)50)41-46-33(26-58-41)39(52)45-32(22-29(6)43(55)56)23-31-17-13-12-14-18-31/h12-14,17-18,26-29,32,34-36,38H,9-11,15-16,19-25H2,1-8H3,(H,44,51)(H,45,52)(H,47,53)(H,55,56)
InChIKey
VKOLUZBARXJQRZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N
IUPAC Name
4-[[2-[1-acetyloxy-3-[[2-(butylamino)-2-oxoethyl]-[3-methyl-2-[(1-methylpiperidine-2-carbonyl)amino]pentanoyl]amino]-4-methylpentyl]-1,3-thiazole-4-carbonyl]amino]-2-methyl-5-phenylpentanoic acid
Each Peptide-drug Conjugate Related to This Drug
Full Information of The Activity Data of The PDC(s) Related to This Drug
Tubugi-1-NPY [Investigative]
Revealed Based on the Cell Line Data
Click To Hide/Show 11 Activity Data Related to This Level
Experiment 1 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [1]
Indication Tumor
Efficacy Data Half Maximal Inhibitory Concentration (IC50) 205 ± 49 nM
Description
As shown in Table 1, the cytotoxic potency of the tubugi-1-SH was - in case of HT-29 and PC-3 - by factors 5 to 8 higher compared to the entire peptide-toxin conjugate 8. The only slight increase of cytotoxic activity of compound 9 compared to the complete conjugate 8 in Colo320 cells is most likely caused by a generally weak responsiveness of Colo320 cells towards tubugi-1-SH and the entire conjugate tubugi-1-SS-NPY. When compared with HT-29 and PC-3 cells, the IC50 value of tubugi-1-SH is by factor 10 higher in Colo320. Since the membrane passage of tubugi-1-SH is not depending on a NPY receptor, there have to be other explanations for the reduced cytotoxic impact of tubugi-1 and corresponding derivatives in Colo320, rather than the NPY Y1 receptor expression level.

   Click to Show/Hide
In Vitro Model Prostate carcinoma PC-3 cell CVCL_0035
Experiment 2 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [1]
Indication Tumor
Efficacy Data Half Maximal Inhibitory Concentration (IC50) 452 ± 60 nM
Description
As shown in Table 1, the cytotoxic potency of the tubugi-1-SH was - in case of HT-29 and PC-3 - by factors 5 to 8 higher compared to the entire peptide-toxin conjugate 8. The only slight increase of cytotoxic activity of compound 9 compared to the complete conjugate 8 in Colo320 cells is most likely caused by a generally weak responsiveness of Colo320 cells towards tubugi-1-SH and the entire conjugate tubugi-1-SS-NPY. When compared with HT-29 and PC-3 cells, the IC50 value of tubugi-1-SH is by factor 10 higher in Colo320. Since the membrane passage of tubugi-1-SH is not depending on a NPY receptor, there have to be other explanations for the reduced cytotoxic impact of tubugi-1 and corresponding derivatives in Colo320, rather than the NPY Y1 receptor expression level.

   Click to Show/Hide
In Vitro Model Colon cancer HT29 cell CVCL_A8EZ
Experiment 3 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [1]
Indication Tumor
Efficacy Data Half Maximal Inhibitory Concentration (IC50) 706 ± 185 nM
Description
As shown in Table 1, the cytotoxic potency of the tubugi-1-SH was - in case of HT-29 and PC-3 - by factors 5 to 8 higher compared to the entire peptide-toxin conjugate 8. The only slight increase of cytotoxic activity of compound 9 compared to the complete conjugate 8 in Colo320 cells is most likely caused by a generally weak responsiveness of Colo320 cells towards tubugi-1-SH and the entire conjugate tubugi-1-SS-NPY. When compared with HT-29 and PC-3 cells, the IC50 value of tubugi-1-SH is by factor 10 higher in Colo320. Since the membrane passage of tubugi-1-SH is not depending on a NPY receptor, there have to be other explanations for the reduced cytotoxic impact of tubugi-1 and corresponding derivatives in Colo320, rather than the NPY Y1 receptor expression level.

   Click to Show/Hide
In Vitro Model Colon adenocarcinoma COLO 320 cell CVCL_1989
Experiment 4 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [1]
Indication Tumor
Efficacy Data Cell viability 0%
Administration Time 72 h
Administration Dosage 10 µM
Description
The 72 h treatment is more effective than the 6 h pulse treatment. Notably, in vitro antitumor activities of 8 were found to correlate very good with the hY1R expression levels, as detected by gene expression analyses using RT-qPCR. Both the cytotoxic activity and the hY1R expression level rank in the order SK-N-MC > MDA-MB-468 > MDA-MB-231 > 184B5, what proofs the hY1R-specific and -selective nature of the mode of antitumor action of the designed PDC 8. Importantly, the activity of 8 against the selected normal breast cell line 184B5 is in the same order of magnitude as for the hY1R-deficient tumor cell line (MDA-MB-231), both tested at even higher concentration of the PDC than for the Y1 cell lines.

   Click to Show/Hide
In Vitro Model Askin tumor SK-N-MC cell CVCL_0530
Experiment 5 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [1]
Indication Tumor
Efficacy Data Cell viability 2%
Administration Time 6 h
Administration Dosage 10 µM
Description
The 72 h treatment is more effective than the 6 h pulse treatment. Notably, in vitro antitumor activities of 8 were found to correlate very good with the hY1R expression levels, as detected by gene expression analyses using RT-qPCR. Both the cytotoxic activity and the hY1R expression level rank in the order SK-N-MC > MDA-MB-468 > MDA-MB-231 > 184B5, what proofs the hY1R-specific and -selective nature of the mode of antitumor action of the designed PDC 8. Importantly, the activity of 8 against the selected normal breast cell line 184B5 is in the same order of magnitude as for the hY1R-deficient tumor cell line (MDA-MB-231), both tested at even higher concentration of the PDC than for the Y1 cell lines.

   Click to Show/Hide
In Vitro Model Askin tumor SK-N-MC cell CVCL_0530
Experiment 6 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [1]
Indication Tumor
Efficacy Data Cell viability 5%
Administration Time 72 h
Administration Dosage 10 µM
Description
The 72 h treatment is more effective than the 6 h pulse treatment. Notably, in vitro antitumor activities of 8 were found to correlate very good with the hY1R expression levels, as detected by gene expression analyses using RT-qPCR. Both the cytotoxic activity and the hY1R expression level rank in the order SK-N-MC > MDA-MB-468 > MDA-MB-231 > 184B5, what proofs the hY1R-specific and -selective nature of the mode of antitumor action of the designed PDC 8. Importantly, the activity of 8 against the selected normal breast cell line 184B5 is in the same order of magnitude as for the hY1R-deficient tumor cell line (MDA-MB-231), both tested at even higher concentration of the PDC than for the Y1 cell lines.

   Click to Show/Hide
In Vitro Model Breast adenocarcinoma MDA-MB-468 cell CVCL_0419
Experiment 7 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [1]
Indication Tumor
Efficacy Data Cell viability 10%
Administration Time 6 h
Administration Dosage 10 µM
Description
The 72 h treatment is more effective than the 6 h pulse treatment. Notably, in vitro antitumor activities of 8 were found to correlate very good with the hY1R expression levels, as detected by gene expression analyses using RT-qPCR. Both the cytotoxic activity and the hY1R expression level rank in the order SK-N-MC > MDA-MB-468 > MDA-MB-231 > 184B5, what proofs the hY1R-specific and -selective nature of the mode of antitumor action of the designed PDC 8. Importantly, the activity of 8 against the selected normal breast cell line 184B5 is in the same order of magnitude as for the hY1R-deficient tumor cell line (MDA-MB-231), both tested at even higher concentration of the PDC than for the Y1 cell lines.

   Click to Show/Hide
In Vitro Model Breast adenocarcinoma MDA-MB-468 cell CVCL_0419
Experiment 8 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [1]
Indication Tumor
Efficacy Data Cell viability 20%
Administration Time 72 h
Administration Dosage 10 µM
Description
The 72 h treatment is more effective than the 6 h pulse treatment. Notably, in vitro antitumor activities of 8 were found to correlate very good with the hY1R expression levels, as detected by gene expression analyses using RT-qPCR. Both the cytotoxic activity and the hY1R expression level rank in the order SK-N-MC > MDA-MB-468 > MDA-MB-231 > 184B5, what proofs the hY1R-specific and -selective nature of the mode of antitumor action of the designed PDC 8. Importantly, the activity of 8 against the selected normal breast cell line 184B5 is in the same order of magnitude as for the hY1R-deficient tumor cell line (MDA-MB-231), both tested at even higher concentration of the PDC than for the Y1 cell lines.

   Click to Show/Hide
In Vitro Model Breast adenocarcinoma MDA-MB-231 cell CVCL_0062
Experiment 9 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [1]
Indication Tumor
Efficacy Data Cell viability 20%
Administration Time 72 h
Administration Dosage 10 µM
Description
The 72 h treatment is more effective than the 6 h pulse treatment. Notably, in vitro antitumor activities of 8 were found to correlate very good with the hY1R expression levels, as detected by gene expression analyses using RT-qPCR. Both the cytotoxic activity and the hY1R expression level rank in the order SK-N-MC > MDA-MB-468 > MDA-MB-231 > 184B5, what proofs the hY1R-specific and -selective nature of the mode of antitumor action of the designed PDC 8. Importantly, the activity of 8 against the selected normal breast cell line 184B5 is in the same order of magnitude as for the hY1R-deficient tumor cell line (MDA-MB-231), both tested at even higher concentration of the PDC than for the Y1 cell lines.

   Click to Show/Hide
In Vitro Model Normal Normal mammary gland epithelium Homo sapiens
Experiment 10 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [1]
Indication Tumor
Efficacy Data Cell viability 35%
Administration Time 6 h
Administration Dosage 10 µM
Description
The 72 h treatment is more effective than the 6 h pulse treatment. Notably, in vitro antitumor activities of 8 were found to correlate very good with the hY1R expression levels, as detected by gene expression analyses using RT-qPCR. Both the cytotoxic activity and the hY1R expression level rank in the order SK-N-MC > MDA-MB-468 > MDA-MB-231 > 184B5, what proofs the hY1R-specific and -selective nature of the mode of antitumor action of the designed PDC 8. Importantly, the activity of 8 against the selected normal breast cell line 184B5 is in the same order of magnitude as for the hY1R-deficient tumor cell line (MDA-MB-231), both tested at even higher concentration of the PDC than for the Y1 cell lines.

   Click to Show/Hide
In Vitro Model Breast adenocarcinoma MDA-MB-231 cell CVCL_0062
Experiment 11 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [1]
Indication Tumor
Efficacy Data Cell viability 50%
Administration Time 6 h
Administration Dosage 10 µM
Description
The 72 h treatment is more effective than the 6 h pulse treatment. Notably, in vitro antitumor activities of 8 were found to correlate very good with the hY1R expression levels, as detected by gene expression analyses using RT-qPCR. Both the cytotoxic activity and the hY1R expression level rank in the order SK-N-MC > MDA-MB-468 > MDA-MB-231 > 184B5, what proofs the hY1R-specific and -selective nature of the mode of antitumor action of the designed PDC 8. Importantly, the activity of 8 against the selected normal breast cell line 184B5 is in the same order of magnitude as for the hY1R-deficient tumor cell line (MDA-MB-231), both tested at even higher concentration of the PDC than for the Y1 cell lines.

   Click to Show/Hide
In Vitro Model Normal Normal mammary gland epithelium Homo sapiens
References
Ref 1 Synthesis of a tubugi-1-toxin conjugate by a modulizable disulfide linker system with a neuropeptide Y analogue showing selectivity for hY1R-overexpressing tumor cells. Beilstein J Org Chem. 2019 Jan 10;15:96-105. doi: 10.3762/bjoc.15.11. eCollection 2019.