General Information of This Peptide-drug Conjugate (PDC)
PDC ID
PDC_00239
PDC Name
Melflufen
PDC Status
Approved
Indication
In total 5 Indication(s)
Multiple myeloma
Multiple myeloma
Relapsed/Refractory multiple myeloma
lymphoma
Breast cancer
Structure
Peptide Name
p-Fluorophenylalanine
 Peptide Info 
Receptor Name
Aminopeptidases
 Receptor Info 
Drug Name
Melphalan
 Drug Info 
Therapeutic Target
Human Deoxyribonucleic acid (hDNA)
 Target Info 
Linker Name
Acetic acid
 Linker Info 
Peptide Modified Type
The modification of binding with chemical macromolecules
Modified Segment
F
Formula
C24H30Cl2FN3O3
#Ro5 Violations (Lipinski): 1 Molecular Weight 498.426
Lipid-water partition coefficient (xlogp) 3.2701
Hydrogen Bond Donor Count (hbonddonor) 2
Hydrogen Bond Acceptor Count (hbondacc) 5
Rotatable Bond Count (rotbonds) 13
Full List of Activity Data of This Peptide-drug Conjugate
Identified from the Human Clinical Data
Click To Hide/Show 402 Activity Data Related to This Level
Experiment 1 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [1]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Adverse event rate
97.00%
Patients Enrolled
Patients with multi-refractory multiple myeloma.
Administration Time 14.3 week (median)
Administration Dosage 40 mg with dexamethasone (40 mg)
MOA of PDC
Melflufen is highly lipophilic, which promotes its rapid uptake by cells. Once within the cell, melflufen releases its hydrophilic alkylator payloads via the hydrolytic activity of intracellular peptidases (e.g., aminopeptidases). Aminopeptidases are Zn2+-dependent metalloproteinases that remove amino acids at the N-terminal position from oligopeptides and have been associated with multiple tumorigenic processes such as proliferation, apoptosis, differentiation, angiogenesis, and motility. The dependence of melflufen on aminopeptidases was initially demonstrated by the reduced cytotoxic activity of melflufen-but not the alkylator melphalan-when cells were pretreated with bestatin, an antibiotic that is a potent aminopeptidase inhibitor. In addition, structure analogs designed to resist peptide hydrolysis (N-methyl derivative and derivative with D-amino acid) were shown to be almost 100-fold less potent than melflufen. Subsequent in vitro studies demonstrated that hydrolytic cleavage of melflufen by aminopeptidases releases alkylator payloads, including melphalan. In vitro, the activity of melflufen is multi-pronged, including induction of DNA damage, induction of apoptosis, inhibition of VEGF-dependent cell migration, and inhibition of tumor-associated angiogenesis, which have been further reviewed elsewhere. Downregulation of aminopeptidases resulted in reduced melflufen-mediated cytotoxic activity and apoptotic signaling in cultured cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 2 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [1]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Adverse event rate
97.00%
MOA of PDC
Melflufen is highly lipophilic, which promotes its rapid uptake by cells. Once within the cell, melflufen releases its hydrophilic alkylator payloads via the hydrolytic activity of intracellular peptidases (e.g., aminopeptidases). Aminopeptidases are Zn2+-dependent metalloproteinases that remove amino acids at the N-terminal position from oligopeptides and have been associated with multiple tumorigenic processes such as proliferation, apoptosis, differentiation, angiogenesis, and motility. The dependence of melflufen on aminopeptidases was initially demonstrated by the reduced cytotoxic activity of melflufen-but not the alkylator melphalan-when cells were pretreated with bestatin, an antibiotic that is a potent aminopeptidase inhibitor. In addition, structure analogs designed to resist peptide hydrolysis (N-methyl derivative and derivative with D-amino acid) were shown to be almost 100-fold less potent than melflufen. Subsequent in vitro studies demonstrated that hydrolytic cleavage of melflufen by aminopeptidases releases alkylator payloads, including melphalan. In vitro, the activity of melflufen is multi-pronged, including induction of DNA damage, induction of apoptosis, inhibition of VEGF-dependent cell migration, and inhibition of tumor-associated angiogenesis, which have been further reviewed elsewhere. Downregulation of aminopeptidases resulted in reduced melflufen-mediated cytotoxic activity and apoptotic signaling in cultured cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
Overall, 97% of patients experienced any-grade AEs and 85% of patients experienced Grades 3/4 AEs.
In Vivo Model 75 patients with multiple myeloma.
Experiment 3 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [1]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Adverse event rate
100.00%
Patients Enrolled
Patients with multi-refractory multiple myeloma.
Administration Time 28-day cycle
Administration Dosage 40 mg with dexamethasone (40 mg)
MOA of PDC
Melflufen is highly lipophilic, which promotes its rapid uptake by cells. Once within the cell, melflufen releases its hydrophilic alkylator payloads via the hydrolytic activity of intracellular peptidases (e.g., aminopeptidases). Aminopeptidases are Zn2+-dependent metalloproteinases that remove amino acids at the N-terminal position from oligopeptides and have been associated with multiple tumorigenic processes such as proliferation, apoptosis, differentiation, angiogenesis, and motility. The dependence of melflufen on aminopeptidases was initially demonstrated by the reduced cytotoxic activity of melflufen-but not the alkylator melphalan-when cells were pretreated with bestatin, an antibiotic that is a potent aminopeptidase inhibitor. In addition, structure analogs designed to resist peptide hydrolysis (N-methyl derivative and derivative with D-amino acid) were shown to be almost 100-fold less potent than melflufen. Subsequent in vitro studies demonstrated that hydrolytic cleavage of melflufen by aminopeptidases releases alkylator payloads, including melphalan. In vitro, the activity of melflufen is multi-pronged, including induction of DNA damage, induction of apoptosis, inhibition of VEGF-dependent cell migration, and inhibition of tumor-associated angiogenesis, which have been further reviewed elsewhere. Downregulation of aminopeptidases resulted in reduced melflufen-mediated cytotoxic activity and apoptotic signaling in cultured cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 4 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [2]
Indication Relapsed/Refractory multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Anemia
9%
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (melflufen), a first-in-class alkylating peptide-drug conjugate, plus dexamethasone was approved in Europe for use in patients with triple-class refractory relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) with 3 prior lines of therapy and without prior autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) or with a time to progression >36 months after prior ASCT. The randomized LIGHTHOUSE study (NCT04649060) assessed melflufen plus daratumumab and dexamethasone (melflufen group) versus daratumumab in patients with RRMM with disease refractory to an immunomodulatory agent and a proteasome inhibitor or who had received 3 prior lines of therapy including an immunomodulatory agent and a proteasome inhibitor. A partial clinical hold issued by the US Food and Drug Administration for all melflufen studies led to financial constraints and premature study closure on February 23rd 2022 (data cut-off date). In total, 54 of 240 planned patients were randomized (melflufen group, N=27; daratumumab group, N=27). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was not reached in the melflufen group versus 4.9 months in the daratumumab group (Hazard Ratio: 0.18 [95% Confidence Interval, 0.05-0.65]; P=0.0032) at a median follow-up time of 7.1 and 6.6 months, respectively. Overall response rate (ORR) was 59% in the melflufen group versus 30% in the daratumumab group (P=0.0300). The most common grade 3 treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen group versus daratumumab group were neutropenia (50% vs. 12%), thrombocytopenia (50% vs. 8%), and anemia (32% vs. 19%). Melflufen plus daratumumab and dexamethasone demonstrated superior PFS and ORR versus daratumumab in RRMM and a safety profile comparable to previously published melflufen studies.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
The safety population included patients who received ≥1 dose of melflufen, daratumumab, or dexamethasone (melflufen group) and 26 patients who received daratumumab monotherapy. In the safety population, ≥1 TEAE was reported in 21 patients (96%) with melflufen, daratumumab, and dexamethasone and 22 patients (85%) with daratumumab. Overall, grade ≥3 TEAE occurred in 18 patients (82%) with melflufen, daratumumab, and dexamethasone and 14 patients (54%) with daratumumab. The most common hematologic grade ≥3 TEAE were neutropenia (melflufen group, 11 patients [50%]; daratumumab group, 3 patients [12%]), thrombocytopenia (melflufen group, 11 patients [50%]; daratumumab group, 2 patients [8%]), and anemia (melflufen group, 7 patients [32%]; daratumumab group, 5 patients [19%]). The most common non-hematologic grade ≥3 TEAE were pneumonia (melflufen group, 2 patients [9%]; daratumumab group, 2 patients [8%]) and femur fracture (melflufen group, 0 patients [0%]; daratumumab group, 2 patients [8%]); of these, 1 event (5%) of pneumonia in the melflufen group and 1 event (4%) of femur fracture in the daratumumab group were considered treatment-related TEAE by the investigator. Serious AE occurred in 6 patients (27%) with melflufen, daratumumab, and dexamethasone, and 12 patients (46%) with daratumumab. The most common serious AE (occurring in ≥4 patients overall) were anemia (melflufen group, 2 patients [9%]; daratumumab group, 3 patients [12%]) and pneumonia (melflufen group, 2 patients [9%]; daratumumab group, 2 patients [8%]). TEAE leading to treatment discontinuation occurred in 2 patients (9%) in the melflufen group (neutropenia and thrombocytopenia, N=1 each) and 4 patients (15%) in the daratumumab group (anemia, disease progression, hypercalcemia, and renal failure, N=1 each). Overall, 5 patients died on study before the crossover: 2 patients who received melflufen, daratumumab, and dexamethasone (1 due to disease progression and 1 due to unknown reasons, both >30 days after the last dose of study treatment) and 3 patients who received daratumumab (1 due to disease progression and 1 due to unknown reasons, both ≤30 days after the last dose of study treatment and 1 due to an AE [COVID-19 pneumonia], >30 days after the last dose of study treatment). In addition, one patient who crossed over to receive melflufen, daratumumab, and dexamethasone after progression on daratumumab died.

   Click to Show/Hide
In Vivo Model 22 relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.
Related Clinical Trial
NCT Number NCT04649060 Clinical Status Phase 3
Clinical Description This was a randomized, controlled, open-label, Phase 3 multicenter study which enrolled patients with Relapsed-Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM) who were either double refractory to an Immunomodulatory Drug (IMiD) and a Proteasome Inhibitor (PI) (regardless of the number of prior lines of therapy), or had received at least 3 prior lines of therapy including an IMiD and a PI. Patients received treatment with melflufen+dexamethasone+daratumumab or daratumumab until documented progressive disease, unacceptable toxicity, or patient/treating physician decision. Patients in the daratumumab treatment arm had the option to receive treatment with melflufen+dexamethasone+daratumumab after confirmed progressive disease.
Experiment 5 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [2]
Indication Relapsed/Refractory multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Anemia
32%
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (melflufen), a first-in-class alkylating peptide-drug conjugate, plus dexamethasone was approved in Europe for use in patients with triple-class refractory relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) with 3 prior lines of therapy and without prior autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) or with a time to progression >36 months after prior ASCT. The randomized LIGHTHOUSE study (NCT04649060) assessed melflufen plus daratumumab and dexamethasone (melflufen group) versus daratumumab in patients with RRMM with disease refractory to an immunomodulatory agent and a proteasome inhibitor or who had received 3 prior lines of therapy including an immunomodulatory agent and a proteasome inhibitor. A partial clinical hold issued by the US Food and Drug Administration for all melflufen studies led to financial constraints and premature study closure on February 23rd 2022 (data cut-off date). In total, 54 of 240 planned patients were randomized (melflufen group, N=27; daratumumab group, N=27). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was not reached in the melflufen group versus 4.9 months in the daratumumab group (Hazard Ratio: 0.18 [95% Confidence Interval, 0.05-0.65]; P=0.0032) at a median follow-up time of 7.1 and 6.6 months, respectively. Overall response rate (ORR) was 59% in the melflufen group versus 30% in the daratumumab group (P=0.0300). The most common grade 3 treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen group versus daratumumab group were neutropenia (50% vs. 12%), thrombocytopenia (50% vs. 8%), and anemia (32% vs. 19%). Melflufen plus daratumumab and dexamethasone demonstrated superior PFS and ORR versus daratumumab in RRMM and a safety profile comparable to previously published melflufen studies.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
The safety population included patients who received ≥1 dose of melflufen, daratumumab, or dexamethasone (melflufen group) and 26 patients who received daratumumab monotherapy. In the safety population, ≥1 TEAE was reported in 21 patients (96%) with melflufen, daratumumab, and dexamethasone and 22 patients (85%) with daratumumab. Overall, grade ≥3 TEAE occurred in 18 patients (82%) with melflufen, daratumumab, and dexamethasone and 14 patients (54%) with daratumumab. The most common hematologic grade ≥3 TEAE were neutropenia (melflufen group, 11 patients [50%]; daratumumab group, 3 patients [12%]), thrombocytopenia (melflufen group, 11 patients [50%]; daratumumab group, 2 patients [8%]), and anemia (melflufen group, 7 patients [32%]; daratumumab group, 5 patients [19%]). The most common non-hematologic grade ≥3 TEAE were pneumonia (melflufen group, 2 patients [9%]; daratumumab group, 2 patients [8%]) and femur fracture (melflufen group, 0 patients [0%]; daratumumab group, 2 patients [8%]); of these, 1 event (5%) of pneumonia in the melflufen group and 1 event (4%) of femur fracture in the daratumumab group were considered treatment-related TEAE by the investigator. Serious AE occurred in 6 patients (27%) with melflufen, daratumumab, and dexamethasone, and 12 patients (46%) with daratumumab. The most common serious AE (occurring in ≥4 patients overall) were anemia (melflufen group, 2 patients [9%]; daratumumab group, 3 patients [12%]) and pneumonia (melflufen group, 2 patients [9%]; daratumumab group, 2 patients [8%]). TEAE leading to treatment discontinuation occurred in 2 patients (9%) in the melflufen group (neutropenia and thrombocytopenia, N=1 each) and 4 patients (15%) in the daratumumab group (anemia, disease progression, hypercalcemia, and renal failure, N=1 each). Overall, 5 patients died on study before the crossover: 2 patients who received melflufen, daratumumab, and dexamethasone (1 due to disease progression and 1 due to unknown reasons, both >30 days after the last dose of study treatment) and 3 patients who received daratumumab (1 due to disease progression and 1 due to unknown reasons, both ≤30 days after the last dose of study treatment and 1 due to an AE [COVID-19 pneumonia], >30 days after the last dose of study treatment). In addition, one patient who crossed over to receive melflufen, daratumumab, and dexamethasone after progression on daratumumab died.

   Click to Show/Hide
In Vivo Model 22 relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.
Related Clinical Trial
NCT Number NCT04649060 Clinical Status Phase 3
Clinical Description This was a randomized, controlled, open-label, Phase 3 multicenter study which enrolled patients with Relapsed-Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM) who were either double refractory to an Immunomodulatory Drug (IMiD) and a Proteasome Inhibitor (PI) (regardless of the number of prior lines of therapy), or had received at least 3 prior lines of therapy including an IMiD and a PI. Patients received treatment with melflufen+dexamethasone+daratumumab or daratumumab until documented progressive disease, unacceptable toxicity, or patient/treating physician decision. Patients in the daratumumab treatment arm had the option to receive treatment with melflufen+dexamethasone+daratumumab after confirmed progressive disease.
Experiment 6 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [3]
Indication Relapsed/Refractory multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Anemia
64.30%
Patients Enrolled
14 patients with relapsed refractory multiple myeloma.
Administration Time 28-day cycle
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that utilizes increased peptidase expression to selectively release potent alkylating agents inside tumor cells. Melflufen is hydrolyzed by peptidases and esterases to melphalan either directly or through an intermediate metabolite, desethyl-melflufen. The high lipophilicity of melflufen facilitates passive diffusion across cell membranes. The activity and tolerability of melflufen in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) were demonstrated in the O-12-M1 (NCT01897714), OCEAN (NCT03151811), and HORIZON (NCT02963493) trials.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
Overall, at least one TEAE was reported in 13 (92.9%) and 13 (100.0%) patients in Arms A and B, respectively (Table 3). During cycle 1, 9 patients (64.3%) and 12 patients (92.3%), respectively, had at least one TEAE. Cumulatively, grade 3 or 4 AEs occurred in 12 (85.7%) and 12 (92.3%) patients, respectively, and serious AEs were reported in 5 (35.7%) and 9 (69.2%) patients, respectively. The most common any-grade AEs in Arms A and B, respectively, were thrombocytopenia (10 [71.4%]; 10 [76.9%]), neutropenia (9 [64.3%]; 9 [69.2%]), and anemia (9 [64.3%]; 7 [53.8%]). No phlebitis or local-infusion-related reactions were reported based on pre- and post-infusion inspection of the IV site, and there were no extravasations observed in Arm A or B. Similarly, VIP scores collected on Day 1 post-infusion and on Day 8 indicated that patients had healthy IV sites (VIP score of 0) with no signs of phlebitis following PVC administration of melflufen. The most common non-hematological AE was positive SARS-CoV-2 test (Arm A: 2 [14.3%]; Arm B: 4 [30.8%]). Pneumonia was the most common serious AE (Arm A: 2 [14.3%]; Arm B: 2 [15.4%]). The most common AE considered related to melflufen and/or dexamethasone by investigators was thrombocytopenia (Arm A: 10 [71.4%]; Arm B: 10 [76.9%]). AEs led to treatment discontinuation in 3 (21.4%) and 6 (46.2%) patients in Arms A and B, respectively.

   Click to Show/Hide
Half life period 75.6 h
Related Clinical Trial
NCT Number NCT04412707 Clinical Status Phase 2
Clinical Description This is a randomized, two-period, cross-over Phase 2 study, comparing PK, and assessing safety and tolerability and efficacy of peripheral and central intravenous administration of melflufen in patients with RRMM. It is an international study, enrolling patients in US and Europe. The study will enroll patients following at least 2 lines of prior therapy.
Experiment 7 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [4]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Anemia
43.00%
Patients Enrolled
157 patients with multiple myeloma.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melflufen is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate, targeting aminopeptidase which has an increased expression in fast-growing and aggressive malignancies. The lipophilicity of melflufen allows for passive diffusion, selectively targeting myeloma cells. Once inside the cell, melflufen is hydrolyzed to active alkylating metabolites melphalan and desethyl-melflufen. Melflufen and the active metabolites trigger irreversible DNA damage, inhibit proliferation, induces apoptosis, and express antiangiogenic effects. In addition, melflufen demonstrated activity in myeloma cells with documented impaired or absent Tp53 expression and documented resistance to bortezomib, dexamethasone, and melphalan.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
Based on the safety data collected during the HORIZON trial, treatment emergent adverse events occurred in 100% of patients including 100 patients (64%) having at least 1 CTCAE grade 4 adverse effect. Hematologic grade 3 or 4 adverse effects including thrombocytopenia (76%), neutropenia (79%), anemia (43%), and infections (11%) were the most commonly reported. Other adverse effects, such as fatigue (55%), nausea (32%), diarrhea (27%), and decreased appetite (14%), were similar to other alkylating agents. Pyrexia (24%), including febrile neutropenia (5%), and respiratory tract infections (24%) were contributed to hematologic toxicities.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 8 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [1]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Anemia
64.00%
Patients Enrolled
Patients with multi-refractory multiple myeloma.
MOA of PDC
Melflufen is highly lipophilic, which promotes its rapid uptake by cells. Once within the cell, melflufen releases its hydrophilic alkylator payloads via the hydrolytic activity of intracellular peptidases (e.g., aminopeptidases). Aminopeptidases are Zn2+-dependent metalloproteinases that remove amino acids at the N-terminal position from oligopeptides and have been associated with multiple tumorigenic processes such as proliferation, apoptosis, differentiation, angiogenesis, and motility. The dependence of melflufen on aminopeptidases was initially demonstrated by the reduced cytotoxic activity of melflufen-but not the alkylator melphalan-when cells were pretreated with bestatin, an antibiotic that is a potent aminopeptidase inhibitor. In addition, structure analogs designed to resist peptide hydrolysis (N-methyl derivative and derivative with D-amino acid) were shown to be almost 100-fold less potent than melflufen. Subsequent in vitro studies demonstrated that hydrolytic cleavage of melflufen by aminopeptidases releases alkylator payloads, including melphalan. In vitro, the activity of melflufen is multi-pronged, including induction of DNA damage, induction of apoptosis, inhibition of VEGF-dependent cell migration, and inhibition of tumor-associated angiogenesis, which have been further reviewed elsewhere. Downregulation of aminopeptidases resulted in reduced melflufen-mediated cytotoxic activity and apoptotic signaling in cultured cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
Melflufen plus dexamethasone was generally manageable in this heavily pretreated patient population [51]. All patients experienced ≥1 AE, most commonly hematologic AEs including thrombocytopenia (73%), neutropenia (69%), and anemia (64%). The most common non-hematologic AEs included pyrexia (40%), asthenia (31%), fatigue (29%), nausea (27%), and diarrhea (24%).

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 9 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [3]
Indication Relapsed/Refractory multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Arthralgia
7.10%
Patients Enrolled
14 patients with relapsed refractory multiple myeloma.
Administration Time 28-day cycle
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that utilizes increased peptidase expression to selectively release potent alkylating agents inside tumor cells. Melflufen is hydrolyzed by peptidases and esterases to melphalan either directly or through an intermediate metabolite, desethyl-melflufen. The high lipophilicity of melflufen facilitates passive diffusion across cell membranes. The activity and tolerability of melflufen in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) were demonstrated in the O-12-M1 (NCT01897714), OCEAN (NCT03151811), and HORIZON (NCT02963493) trials.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
Overall, at least one TEAE was reported in 13 (92.9%) and 13 (100.0%) patients in Arms A and B, respectively (Table 3). During cycle 1, 9 patients (64.3%) and 12 patients (92.3%), respectively, had at least one TEAE. Cumulatively, grade 3 or 4 AEs occurred in 12 (85.7%) and 12 (92.3%) patients, respectively, and serious AEs were reported in 5 (35.7%) and 9 (69.2%) patients, respectively. The most common any-grade AEs in Arms A and B, respectively, were thrombocytopenia (10 [71.4%]; 10 [76.9%]), neutropenia (9 [64.3%]; 9 [69.2%]), and anemia (9 [64.3%]; 7 [53.8%]). No phlebitis or local-infusion-related reactions were reported based on pre- and post-infusion inspection of the IV site, and there were no extravasations observed in Arm A or B. Similarly, VIP scores collected on Day 1 post-infusion and on Day 8 indicated that patients had healthy IV sites (VIP score of 0) with no signs of phlebitis following PVC administration of melflufen. The most common non-hematological AE was positive SARS-CoV-2 test (Arm A: 2 [14.3%]; Arm B: 4 [30.8%]). Pneumonia was the most common serious AE (Arm A: 2 [14.3%]; Arm B: 2 [15.4%]). The most common AE considered related to melflufen and/or dexamethasone by investigators was thrombocytopenia (Arm A: 10 [71.4%]; Arm B: 10 [76.9%]). AEs led to treatment discontinuation in 3 (21.4%) and 6 (46.2%) patients in Arms A and B, respectively.

   Click to Show/Hide
Half life period 75.6 h
Related Clinical Trial
NCT Number NCT04412707 Clinical Status Phase 2
Clinical Description This is a randomized, two-period, cross-over Phase 2 study, comparing PK, and assessing safety and tolerability and efficacy of peripheral and central intravenous administration of melflufen in patients with RRMM. It is an international study, enrolling patients in US and Europe. The study will enroll patients following at least 2 lines of prior therapy.
Experiment 10 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [1]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Asthenia
31.00%
Patients Enrolled
Patients with multi-refractory multiple myeloma.
MOA of PDC
Melflufen is highly lipophilic, which promotes its rapid uptake by cells. Once within the cell, melflufen releases its hydrophilic alkylator payloads via the hydrolytic activity of intracellular peptidases (e.g., aminopeptidases). Aminopeptidases are Zn2+-dependent metalloproteinases that remove amino acids at the N-terminal position from oligopeptides and have been associated with multiple tumorigenic processes such as proliferation, apoptosis, differentiation, angiogenesis, and motility. The dependence of melflufen on aminopeptidases was initially demonstrated by the reduced cytotoxic activity of melflufen-but not the alkylator melphalan-when cells were pretreated with bestatin, an antibiotic that is a potent aminopeptidase inhibitor. In addition, structure analogs designed to resist peptide hydrolysis (N-methyl derivative and derivative with D-amino acid) were shown to be almost 100-fold less potent than melflufen. Subsequent in vitro studies demonstrated that hydrolytic cleavage of melflufen by aminopeptidases releases alkylator payloads, including melphalan. In vitro, the activity of melflufen is multi-pronged, including induction of DNA damage, induction of apoptosis, inhibition of VEGF-dependent cell migration, and inhibition of tumor-associated angiogenesis, which have been further reviewed elsewhere. Downregulation of aminopeptidases resulted in reduced melflufen-mediated cytotoxic activity and apoptotic signaling in cultured cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
Melflufen plus dexamethasone was generally manageable in this heavily pretreated patient population [51]. All patients experienced ≥1 AE, most commonly hematologic AEs including thrombocytopenia (73%), neutropenia (69%), and anemia (64%). The most common non-hematologic AEs included pyrexia (40%), asthenia (31%), fatigue (29%), nausea (27%), and diarrhea (24%).

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 11 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [3]
Indication Relapsed/Refractory multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Back pain
14.30%
Patients Enrolled
14 patients with relapsed refractory multiple myeloma.
Administration Time 28-day cycle
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that utilizes increased peptidase expression to selectively release potent alkylating agents inside tumor cells. Melflufen is hydrolyzed by peptidases and esterases to melphalan either directly or through an intermediate metabolite, desethyl-melflufen. The high lipophilicity of melflufen facilitates passive diffusion across cell membranes. The activity and tolerability of melflufen in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) were demonstrated in the O-12-M1 (NCT01897714), OCEAN (NCT03151811), and HORIZON (NCT02963493) trials.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
Overall, at least one TEAE was reported in 13 (92.9%) and 13 (100.0%) patients in Arms A and B, respectively (Table 3). During cycle 1, 9 patients (64.3%) and 12 patients (92.3%), respectively, had at least one TEAE. Cumulatively, grade 3 or 4 AEs occurred in 12 (85.7%) and 12 (92.3%) patients, respectively, and serious AEs were reported in 5 (35.7%) and 9 (69.2%) patients, respectively. The most common any-grade AEs in Arms A and B, respectively, were thrombocytopenia (10 [71.4%]; 10 [76.9%]), neutropenia (9 [64.3%]; 9 [69.2%]), and anemia (9 [64.3%]; 7 [53.8%]). No phlebitis or local-infusion-related reactions were reported based on pre- and post-infusion inspection of the IV site, and there were no extravasations observed in Arm A or B. Similarly, VIP scores collected on Day 1 post-infusion and on Day 8 indicated that patients had healthy IV sites (VIP score of 0) with no signs of phlebitis following PVC administration of melflufen. The most common non-hematological AE was positive SARS-CoV-2 test (Arm A: 2 [14.3%]; Arm B: 4 [30.8%]). Pneumonia was the most common serious AE (Arm A: 2 [14.3%]; Arm B: 2 [15.4%]). The most common AE considered related to melflufen and/or dexamethasone by investigators was thrombocytopenia (Arm A: 10 [71.4%]; Arm B: 10 [76.9%]). AEs led to treatment discontinuation in 3 (21.4%) and 6 (46.2%) patients in Arms A and B, respectively.

   Click to Show/Hide
Half life period 75.6 h
Related Clinical Trial
NCT Number NCT04412707 Clinical Status Phase 2
Clinical Description This is a randomized, two-period, cross-over Phase 2 study, comparing PK, and assessing safety and tolerability and efficacy of peripheral and central intravenous administration of melflufen in patients with RRMM. It is an international study, enrolling patients in US and Europe. The study will enroll patients following at least 2 lines of prior therapy.
Experiment 12 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [2]
Indication Relapsed/Refractory multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Best confirmed response
4%
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (melflufen), a first-in-class alkylating peptide-drug conjugate, plus dexamethasone was approved in Europe for use in patients with triple-class refractory relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) with 3 prior lines of therapy and without prior autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) or with a time to progression >36 months after prior ASCT. The randomized LIGHTHOUSE study (NCT04649060) assessed melflufen plus daratumumab and dexamethasone (melflufen group) versus daratumumab in patients with RRMM with disease refractory to an immunomodulatory agent and a proteasome inhibitor or who had received 3 prior lines of therapy including an immunomodulatory agent and a proteasome inhibitor. A partial clinical hold issued by the US Food and Drug Administration for all melflufen studies led to financial constraints and premature study closure on February 23rd 2022 (data cut-off date). In total, 54 of 240 planned patients were randomized (melflufen group, N=27; daratumumab group, N=27). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was not reached in the melflufen group versus 4.9 months in the daratumumab group (Hazard Ratio: 0.18 [95% Confidence Interval, 0.05-0.65]; P=0.0032) at a median follow-up time of 7.1 and 6.6 months, respectively. Overall response rate (ORR) was 59% in the melflufen group versus 30% in the daratumumab group (P=0.0300). The most common grade 3 treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen group versus daratumumab group were neutropenia (50% vs. 12%), thrombocytopenia (50% vs. 8%), and anemia (32% vs. 19%). Melflufen plus daratumumab and dexamethasone demonstrated superior PFS and ORR versus daratumumab in RRMM and a safety profile comparable to previously published melflufen studies.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the ITT population, with a median follow-up of 7.1 months in the melflufen group, the median PFS was not reached (NR) and with a median follow-up of 6.6 months in the daratumumab group, the median PFS was 4.9 months (95% CI: 3.4-NR; HR: 0.18 [95% CI: 0.05-0.65]; log-rankP=0.0032). OS was immature, with 2 events (7%) in the melflufen group and 4 events (15%) in the daratumumab group (HR: 0.47 [95% CI: 0.09-2.57]; log-rankP=0.3721) at a median follow-up of 7.6 months and 6.6 months, respectively. The ORR was 59% (95% CI: 39-78) in the melflufen group and 30% (95% CI: 14-50) in the daratumumab group (P=0.0300). More patients in the melflufen group had a complete response (CR; 1 patient [4%]vs. 0 patients [0%]) and very good partial response (VGPR; 4 patients [15%]vs. 3 patients [11%]) compared with the daratumumab group.

   Click to Show/Hide
In Vivo Model 27 Intent-to-treat (ITT) population.
Related Clinical Trial
NCT Number NCT04649060 Clinical Status Phase 3
Clinical Description This was a randomized, controlled, open-label, Phase 3 multicenter study which enrolled patients with Relapsed-Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM) who were either double refractory to an Immunomodulatory Drug (IMiD) and a Proteasome Inhibitor (PI) (regardless of the number of prior lines of therapy), or had received at least 3 prior lines of therapy including an IMiD and a PI. Patients received treatment with melflufen+dexamethasone+daratumumab or daratumumab until documented progressive disease, unacceptable toxicity, or patient/treating physician decision. Patients in the daratumumab treatment arm had the option to receive treatment with melflufen+dexamethasone+daratumumab after confirmed progressive disease.
Experiment 13 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [2]
Indication Relapsed/Refractory multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Best confirmed response
7%
Patients Enrolled
14 patients no prior ASCT or TTP >36 months after ASCT.
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (melflufen), a first-in-class alkylating peptide-drug conjugate, plus dexamethasone was approved in Europe for use in patients with triple-class refractory relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) with 3 prior lines of therapy and without prior autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) or with a time to progression >36 months after prior ASCT. The randomized LIGHTHOUSE study (NCT04649060) assessed melflufen plus daratumumab and dexamethasone (melflufen group) versus daratumumab in patients with RRMM with disease refractory to an immunomodulatory agent and a proteasome inhibitor or who had received 3 prior lines of therapy including an immunomodulatory agent and a proteasome inhibitor. A partial clinical hold issued by the US Food and Drug Administration for all melflufen studies led to financial constraints and premature study closure on February 23rd 2022 (data cut-off date). In total, 54 of 240 planned patients were randomized (melflufen group, N=27; daratumumab group, N=27). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was not reached in the melflufen group versus 4.9 months in the daratumumab group (Hazard Ratio: 0.18 [95% Confidence Interval, 0.05-0.65]; P=0.0032) at a median follow-up time of 7.1 and 6.6 months, respectively. Overall response rate (ORR) was 59% in the melflufen group versus 30% in the daratumumab group (P=0.0300). The most common grade 3 treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen group versus daratumumab group were neutropenia (50% vs. 12%), thrombocytopenia (50% vs. 8%), and anemia (32% vs. 19%). Melflufen plus daratumumab and dexamethasone demonstrated superior PFS and ORR versus daratumumab in RRMM and a safety profile comparable to previously published melflufen studies.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
Efficacy endpoints were more pronounced in favor of the melflufen group compared with the daratumumab group among patients with no prior ASCT or TTP >36 months after a prior ASCT (melflufen group, N=14; daratumumab group, N=15). Median PFS was NR in the melflufen group and 3.9 months (95% CI: 1.4-4.9) in the daratumumab group (HR, 0.06 [95% CI: 0.01-0.49]; log-rank P=0.0005). Fewer OS events were reported in the melflufen group (1 event [7%] vs. 4 events [27%] in the daratumumab group; log-rank P=0.0369). The ORR was 64% (95% CI: 35-87) in the melflufen group and 13% (95% CI: 2-41) in the daratumumab group (P=0.0055). More patients in the melflufen group had a CR (1 patient [7%] vs. 0 patients [0%]) or VGPR (2 patients [14%] vs. 1 patient [7%]) compared with the daratumumab group.

   Click to Show/Hide
Related Clinical Trial
NCT Number NCT04649060 Clinical Status Phase 3
Clinical Description This was a randomized, controlled, open-label, Phase 3 multicenter study which enrolled patients with Relapsed-Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM) who were either double refractory to an Immunomodulatory Drug (IMiD) and a Proteasome Inhibitor (PI) (regardless of the number of prior lines of therapy), or had received at least 3 prior lines of therapy including an IMiD and a PI. Patients received treatment with melflufen+dexamethasone+daratumumab or daratumumab until documented progressive disease, unacceptable toxicity, or patient/treating physician decision. Patients in the daratumumab treatment arm had the option to receive treatment with melflufen+dexamethasone+daratumumab after confirmed progressive disease.
Experiment 14 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [5]
Indication Relapsed/Refractory multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Bleeding
100%
Patients Enrolled
153 patients refractory to prior alkylators (melflufen, n=78; pomalidomide, n=75).
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (melflufen), a first-in-class alkylating peptide-drug conjugate, plus dexamethasone demonstrated superior progression-free survival (PFS), but not overall survival (OS), versus pomalidomide plus dexamethasone in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma in the OCEAN study. Time to progression (TTP) <36 months after a prior autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) was a negative prognostic factor for OS with melflufen. This post hoc exploratory analysis evaluated patients refractory to prior alkylators (e.g., cyclophosphamide and melphalan) in OCEAN. In 153 patients refractory to prior alkylators (melflufen, n = 78; pomalidomide, n = 75), the melflufen and pomalidomide arms had similar median PFS (5.6 months [95% CI, 4.2-8.3] vs. 4.7 months [95% CI, 3.1-7.3]; hazard ratio [HR], 0.92 [95% CI, 0.63-1.33]) and OS (23.4 months [95% CI, 14.4-31.7] vs. 20.0 months [95% CI, 12.0-28.7]; HR, 0.92 [95% CI, 0.62-1.38]). Among alkylator-refractory patients with a TTP 36 months after a prior ASCT or no prior ASCT (melflufen, n = 54; pomalidomide, n = 53), the observed median PFS and OS were longer in the melflufen arm than the pomalidomide arm. The safety profile of melflufen was consistent with previous reports. These results suggest that melflufen is safe and effective in patients with alkylator-refractory disease, suggesting differentiated activity from other alkylators.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
Overall, the safety profile of melflufen plus dexamethasone in the alkylator-refractory group was consistent between treatment arms (Table 2). In the melflufen and pomalidomide arms, respectively, the frequency of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs; 99% vs. 97%), Grade 3 or 4 TEAEs (85% vs. 82%), serious TEAEs (49% vs. 53%), and fatal TEAEs (19% vs. 16%) were similar (Table 2). However, melflufen compared with pomalidomide saw more dose modifications (76% vs. 67%) and dose reductions (47% vs. 14%), comparable dose delays (57% vs. 51%) but less treatment discontinuation (27% vs. 34%). When comparing patients refractory and not refractory to prior alkylators, rates of TEAEs were generally comparable except for slightly lower rates of serious and fatal TEAEs observed in patients not refractory to alkylators. Among Grade 3 or 4 TEAEs of special interest, melflufen saw more thrombocytopenia (73% vs. 14%), neutropenia (65% vs. 55%), and leukopenia or white blood cell decrease (14% vs. 3%), but less infection (15% vs. 26%), than pomalidomide. Notably, melflufen compared with pomalidomide saw a longer median time to dose reduction (106 days [range, 28-443] vs. 47 days [range, 28-225]), Grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia (52 days [range, 15-451] vs. 19 days [range, 8-91]), and Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia (36 days [range, 8-561] vs. 22 days [range, 8-470]).

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 15 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [3]
Indication Relapsed/Refractory multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Bone pain
14.30%
Patients Enrolled
14 patients with relapsed refractory multiple myeloma.
Administration Time 28-day cycle
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that utilizes increased peptidase expression to selectively release potent alkylating agents inside tumor cells. Melflufen is hydrolyzed by peptidases and esterases to melphalan either directly or through an intermediate metabolite, desethyl-melflufen. The high lipophilicity of melflufen facilitates passive diffusion across cell membranes. The activity and tolerability of melflufen in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) were demonstrated in the O-12-M1 (NCT01897714), OCEAN (NCT03151811), and HORIZON (NCT02963493) trials.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
Overall, at least one TEAE was reported in 13 (92.9%) and 13 (100.0%) patients in Arms A and B, respectively (Table 3). During cycle 1, 9 patients (64.3%) and 12 patients (92.3%), respectively, had at least one TEAE. Cumulatively, grade 3 or 4 AEs occurred in 12 (85.7%) and 12 (92.3%) patients, respectively, and serious AEs were reported in 5 (35.7%) and 9 (69.2%) patients, respectively. The most common any-grade AEs in Arms A and B, respectively, were thrombocytopenia (10 [71.4%]; 10 [76.9%]), neutropenia (9 [64.3%]; 9 [69.2%]), and anemia (9 [64.3%]; 7 [53.8%]). No phlebitis or local-infusion-related reactions were reported based on pre- and post-infusion inspection of the IV site, and there were no extravasations observed in Arm A or B. Similarly, VIP scores collected on Day 1 post-infusion and on Day 8 indicated that patients had healthy IV sites (VIP score of 0) with no signs of phlebitis following PVC administration of melflufen. The most common non-hematological AE was positive SARS-CoV-2 test (Arm A: 2 [14.3%]; Arm B: 4 [30.8%]). Pneumonia was the most common serious AE (Arm A: 2 [14.3%]; Arm B: 2 [15.4%]). The most common AE considered related to melflufen and/or dexamethasone by investigators was thrombocytopenia (Arm A: 10 [71.4%]; Arm B: 10 [76.9%]). AEs led to treatment discontinuation in 3 (21.4%) and 6 (46.2%) patients in Arms A and B, respectively.

   Click to Show/Hide
Half life period 75.6 h
Related Clinical Trial
NCT Number NCT04412707 Clinical Status Phase 2
Clinical Description This is a randomized, two-period, cross-over Phase 2 study, comparing PK, and assessing safety and tolerability and efficacy of peripheral and central intravenous administration of melflufen in patients with RRMM. It is an international study, enrolling patients in US and Europe. The study will enroll patients following at least 2 lines of prior therapy.
Experiment 16 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [3]
Indication Relapsed/Refractory multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data C-reactive protein increase
14.30%
Patients Enrolled
14 patients with relapsed refractory multiple myeloma.
Administration Time 28-day cycle
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that utilizes increased peptidase expression to selectively release potent alkylating agents inside tumor cells. Melflufen is hydrolyzed by peptidases and esterases to melphalan either directly or through an intermediate metabolite, desethyl-melflufen. The high lipophilicity of melflufen facilitates passive diffusion across cell membranes. The activity and tolerability of melflufen in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) were demonstrated in the O-12-M1 (NCT01897714), OCEAN (NCT03151811), and HORIZON (NCT02963493) trials.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
Overall, at least one TEAE was reported in 13 (92.9%) and 13 (100.0%) patients in Arms A and B, respectively (Table 3). During cycle 1, 9 patients (64.3%) and 12 patients (92.3%), respectively, had at least one TEAE. Cumulatively, grade 3 or 4 AEs occurred in 12 (85.7%) and 12 (92.3%) patients, respectively, and serious AEs were reported in 5 (35.7%) and 9 (69.2%) patients, respectively. The most common any-grade AEs in Arms A and B, respectively, were thrombocytopenia (10 [71.4%]; 10 [76.9%]), neutropenia (9 [64.3%]; 9 [69.2%]), and anemia (9 [64.3%]; 7 [53.8%]). No phlebitis or local-infusion-related reactions were reported based on pre- and post-infusion inspection of the IV site, and there were no extravasations observed in Arm A or B. Similarly, VIP scores collected on Day 1 post-infusion and on Day 8 indicated that patients had healthy IV sites (VIP score of 0) with no signs of phlebitis following PVC administration of melflufen. The most common non-hematological AE was positive SARS-CoV-2 test (Arm A: 2 [14.3%]; Arm B: 4 [30.8%]). Pneumonia was the most common serious AE (Arm A: 2 [14.3%]; Arm B: 2 [15.4%]). The most common AE considered related to melflufen and/or dexamethasone by investigators was thrombocytopenia (Arm A: 10 [71.4%]; Arm B: 10 [76.9%]). AEs led to treatment discontinuation in 3 (21.4%) and 6 (46.2%) patients in Arms A and B, respectively.

   Click to Show/Hide
Half life period 75.6 h
Related Clinical Trial
NCT Number NCT04412707 Clinical Status Phase 2
Clinical Description This is a randomized, two-period, cross-over Phase 2 study, comparing PK, and assessing safety and tolerability and efficacy of peripheral and central intravenous administration of melflufen in patients with RRMM. It is an international study, enrolling patients in US and Europe. The study will enroll patients following at least 2 lines of prior therapy.
Experiment 17 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [4]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Clinical benefit rate
23%
Patients Enrolled
81 patients with multiple myeloma.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melflufen is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate, targeting aminopeptidase which has an increased expression in fast-growing and aggressive malignancies. The lipophilicity of melflufen allows for passive diffusion, selectively targeting myeloma cells. Once inside the cell, melflufen is hydrolyzed to active alkylating metabolites melphalan and desethyl-melflufen. Melflufen and the active metabolites trigger irreversible DNA damage, inhibit proliferation, induces apoptosis, and express antiangiogenic effects. In addition, melflufen demonstrated activity in myeloma cells with documented impaired or absent Tp53 expression and documented resistance to bortezomib, dexamethasone, and melphalan.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
The phase I arm established 40 mg of melflufen as the maximum tolerated dose in combination with dexamethasone. The phase II arm found an overall response rate (ORR) of 31% (14 patients) and clinical benefit rate, defined as first occurrence of disease response including minimal response or better, of 49% (22 patients) in the melflufen and dexamethasone group compared with an ORR of 8% (1 patient) and clinical benefit rate of 23% (3 patients) in the melflufen group. Based on these findings, melflufen 40 mg plus dexamethasone 40 mg was deemed a feasible treatment regimen for relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma and appropriate to proceed to a larger phase II trial.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 18 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Clinical benefit rate
47%
Patients Enrolled
246 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 19 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Clinical benefit rate
50%
Patients Enrolled
246 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 20 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [3]
Indication Relapsed/Refractory multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Clinical benefit rate (CBR)
57.10%
Patients Enrolled
14 patients with relapsed refractory multiple myeloma.
Administration Time 28-day cycle
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that utilizes increased peptidase expression to selectively release potent alkylating agents inside tumor cells. Melflufen is hydrolyzed by peptidases and esterases to melphalan either directly or through an intermediate metabolite, desethyl-melflufen. The high lipophilicity of melflufen facilitates passive diffusion across cell membranes. The activity and tolerability of melflufen in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) were demonstrated in the O-12-M1 (NCT01897714), OCEAN (NCT03151811), and HORIZON (NCT02963493) trials.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In Arm A, 4 of the 14 patients achieved an overall response (ORR 28.6% [95% CI: 8.4-58.1]) including 1 patient with CR, and the CBR was 57.1% (95% CI: 28.9-82.3). In Arm B, 1 of the 13 patients achieved an overall response (ORR 7.7% [95% CI: 0.2-36.0]), consisting of a PR, and the CBR was 15.4% (95% CI: 1.9-45.4). In the overall study population, 5 patients had an overall response (ORR 18.5% [95% CI: 6.3-38.1]). DOR data were insufficient to evaluate due to early termination of the study, the low number of patient events (1 in Arm A, 0 in Arm B), and the limited number of responses. Based on the 5 patients who had a response of PR or better at study termination (4 in Arm A, 1 in Arm B), the median TTR was 2.4 months in Arm A, 5.1 months in Arm B, and 2.6 months overall. Based on the 8 and 5 progression events in Arm A and Arm B, respectively, the median TTP was 5.8 months and 4.8 months, respectively, with a median TTP of 5.8 months in the overall population. The median PFS was 5.2 months (95% CI: 2.7 to not evaluable) and 2.9 months (95% CI: 1.5-4.6) in Arms A and B, respectively. For the overall study population, median PFS was 3.7 months (95% CI: 2.7-5.8).

   Click to Show/Hide
Half life period 75.6 h
Related Clinical Trial
NCT Number NCT04412707 Clinical Status Phase 2
Clinical Description This is a randomized, two-period, cross-over Phase 2 study, comparing PK, and assessing safety and tolerability and efficacy of peripheral and central intravenous administration of melflufen in patients with RRMM. It is an international study, enrolling patients in US and Europe. The study will enroll patients following at least 2 lines of prior therapy.
Experiment 21 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [7]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Clinical benefit response rate (CBRR)
23%
Administration Time Iv infusion of 40 mg melflufen on day 1 of each 28-day treatment cycle
Administration Dosage Melflufen 40 mg (Single Agent)
MOA of PDC
The antineoplastic activity of melflufen is dependent upon the expression of aminopeptidases, like APN (also known as CD18), which cleave melflufen into melphalan and p-Fluorophenylalanine. Following aminopeptidase-dependent cleavage, the hydrophilic alkylating metabolite melphalan accumulates in myeloma cells. This enrichment of the cytotoxic payload has a substantial impact on the antimyeloma activity of melflufen.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the phase 2 single-agent cohort, the overall response rate was 8% (one of 13 patients; 02-360) and the clinical benefit rate was 23% (three of 13; 5-54).
In Vivo Model Aged 18 years or older, had relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma, had received two or more previous lines of therapy (including lenalidomide and bortezomib).
Related Clinical Trial
NCT Number NCT01897714 Clinical Status Phase 1/2
Clinical Description The study will explore escalating doses of melflufen in combination with dexamethasone in small groups of patients to find the maximum tolerated dose of melflufen. That dose will then be used to determine the efficacy and safety profile of melflufen in combination with dexamethasone in a larger group of patients.
Experiment 22 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [7]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Clinical benefit response rate (CBRR)
49%
Administration Time Iv infusion of 40 mg melflufen on day 1 of each 21-day or 28-day treatment cycles, in combination with 40 mg dexamet hasone (oral or iv) on days 1, 8 and 15 of each 21-day treatment cycles. for any patients on the 28-day treatment sc hedule, an additional dose of 40 mg dexamet hasone was administered on day 22 of each treatment cycle
Administration Dosage Melflufen 40 mg + Dexamethasone
MOA of PDC
The antineoplastic activity of melflufen is dependent upon the expression of aminopeptidases, like APN (also known as CD18), which cleave melflufen into melphalan and p-Fluorophenylalanine. Following aminopeptidase-dependent cleavage, the hydrophilic alkylating metabolite melphalan accumulates in myeloma cells. This enrichment of the cytotoxic payload has a substantial impact on the antimyeloma activity of melflufen.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In phase 2, patients treated with combination therapy achieved an overall response rate of 31% (14 of 45 patients; 95% CI 18-47) and clinical benefit rate of 49% (22 of 45; 34-64)
In Vivo Model Aged 18 years or older, had relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma, had received two or more previous lines of therapy (including lenalidomide and bortezomib).
Related Clinical Trial
NCT Number NCT01897714 Clinical Status Phase 1/2
Clinical Description The study will explore escalating doses of melflufen in combination with dexamethasone in small groups of patients to find the maximum tolerated dose of melflufen. That dose will then be used to determine the efficacy and safety profile of melflufen in combination with dexamethasone in a larger group of patients.
Experiment 23 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [2]
Indication Relapsed/Refractory multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Complete response (CR)
14%
Patients Enrolled
14 patients no prior ASCT or TTP >36 months after ASCT.
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (melflufen), a first-in-class alkylating peptide-drug conjugate, plus dexamethasone was approved in Europe for use in patients with triple-class refractory relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) with 3 prior lines of therapy and without prior autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) or with a time to progression >36 months after prior ASCT. The randomized LIGHTHOUSE study (NCT04649060) assessed melflufen plus daratumumab and dexamethasone (melflufen group) versus daratumumab in patients with RRMM with disease refractory to an immunomodulatory agent and a proteasome inhibitor or who had received 3 prior lines of therapy including an immunomodulatory agent and a proteasome inhibitor. A partial clinical hold issued by the US Food and Drug Administration for all melflufen studies led to financial constraints and premature study closure on February 23rd 2022 (data cut-off date). In total, 54 of 240 planned patients were randomized (melflufen group, N=27; daratumumab group, N=27). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was not reached in the melflufen group versus 4.9 months in the daratumumab group (Hazard Ratio: 0.18 [95% Confidence Interval, 0.05-0.65]; P=0.0032) at a median follow-up time of 7.1 and 6.6 months, respectively. Overall response rate (ORR) was 59% in the melflufen group versus 30% in the daratumumab group (P=0.0300). The most common grade 3 treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen group versus daratumumab group were neutropenia (50% vs. 12%), thrombocytopenia (50% vs. 8%), and anemia (32% vs. 19%). Melflufen plus daratumumab and dexamethasone demonstrated superior PFS and ORR versus daratumumab in RRMM and a safety profile comparable to previously published melflufen studies.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
Efficacy endpoints were more pronounced in favor of the melflufen group compared with the daratumumab group among patients with no prior ASCT or TTP >36 months after a prior ASCT (melflufen group, N=14; daratumumab group, N=15). Median PFS was NR in the melflufen group and 3.9 months (95% CI: 1.4-4.9) in the daratumumab group (HR, 0.06 [95% CI: 0.01-0.49]; log-rank P=0.0005). Fewer OS events were reported in the melflufen group (1 event [7%] vs. 4 events [27%] in the daratumumab group; log-rank P=0.0369). The ORR was 64% (95% CI: 35-87) in the melflufen group and 13% (95% CI: 2-41) in the daratumumab group (P=0.0055). More patients in the melflufen group had a CR (1 patient [7%] vs. 0 patients [0%]) or VGPR (2 patients [14%] vs. 1 patient [7%]) compared with the daratumumab group.

   Click to Show/Hide
Related Clinical Trial
NCT Number NCT04649060 Clinical Status Phase 3
Clinical Description This was a randomized, controlled, open-label, Phase 3 multicenter study which enrolled patients with Relapsed-Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM) who were either double refractory to an Immunomodulatory Drug (IMiD) and a Proteasome Inhibitor (PI) (regardless of the number of prior lines of therapy), or had received at least 3 prior lines of therapy including an IMiD and a PI. Patients received treatment with melflufen+dexamethasone+daratumumab or daratumumab until documented progressive disease, unacceptable toxicity, or patient/treating physician decision. Patients in the daratumumab treatment arm had the option to receive treatment with melflufen+dexamethasone+daratumumab after confirmed progressive disease.
Experiment 24 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [2]
Indication Relapsed/Refractory multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Complete response (CR)
15%
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (melflufen), a first-in-class alkylating peptide-drug conjugate, plus dexamethasone was approved in Europe for use in patients with triple-class refractory relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) with 3 prior lines of therapy and without prior autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) or with a time to progression >36 months after prior ASCT. The randomized LIGHTHOUSE study (NCT04649060) assessed melflufen plus daratumumab and dexamethasone (melflufen group) versus daratumumab in patients with RRMM with disease refractory to an immunomodulatory agent and a proteasome inhibitor or who had received 3 prior lines of therapy including an immunomodulatory agent and a proteasome inhibitor. A partial clinical hold issued by the US Food and Drug Administration for all melflufen studies led to financial constraints and premature study closure on February 23rd 2022 (data cut-off date). In total, 54 of 240 planned patients were randomized (melflufen group, N=27; daratumumab group, N=27). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was not reached in the melflufen group versus 4.9 months in the daratumumab group (Hazard Ratio: 0.18 [95% Confidence Interval, 0.05-0.65]; P=0.0032) at a median follow-up time of 7.1 and 6.6 months, respectively. Overall response rate (ORR) was 59% in the melflufen group versus 30% in the daratumumab group (P=0.0300). The most common grade 3 treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen group versus daratumumab group were neutropenia (50% vs. 12%), thrombocytopenia (50% vs. 8%), and anemia (32% vs. 19%). Melflufen plus daratumumab and dexamethasone demonstrated superior PFS and ORR versus daratumumab in RRMM and a safety profile comparable to previously published melflufen studies.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the ITT population, with a median follow-up of 7.1 months in the melflufen group, the median PFS was not reached (NR) and with a median follow-up of 6.6 months in the daratumumab group, the median PFS was 4.9 months (95% CI: 3.4-NR; HR: 0.18 [95% CI: 0.05-0.65]; log-rankP=0.0032). OS was immature, with 2 events (7%) in the melflufen group and 4 events (15%) in the daratumumab group (HR: 0.47 [95% CI: 0.09-2.57]; log-rankP=0.3721) at a median follow-up of 7.6 months and 6.6 months, respectively. The ORR was 59% (95% CI: 39-78) in the melflufen group and 30% (95% CI: 14-50) in the daratumumab group (P=0.0300). More patients in the melflufen group had a complete response (CR; 1 patient [4%]vs. 0 patients [0%]) and very good partial response (VGPR; 4 patients [15%]vs. 3 patients [11%]) compared with the daratumumab group.

   Click to Show/Hide
In Vivo Model 27 Intent-to-treat (ITT) population.
Related Clinical Trial
NCT Number NCT04649060 Clinical Status Phase 3
Clinical Description This was a randomized, controlled, open-label, Phase 3 multicenter study which enrolled patients with Relapsed-Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM) who were either double refractory to an Immunomodulatory Drug (IMiD) and a Proteasome Inhibitor (PI) (regardless of the number of prior lines of therapy), or had received at least 3 prior lines of therapy including an IMiD and a PI. Patients received treatment with melflufen+dexamethasone+daratumumab or daratumumab until documented progressive disease, unacceptable toxicity, or patient/treating physician decision. Patients in the daratumumab treatment arm had the option to receive treatment with melflufen+dexamethasone+daratumumab after confirmed progressive disease.
Experiment 25 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [3]
Indication Relapsed/Refractory multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Complete response (CR)
7.10%
Patients Enrolled
14 patients with relapsed refractory multiple myeloma.
Administration Time 28-day cycle
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that utilizes increased peptidase expression to selectively release potent alkylating agents inside tumor cells. Melflufen is hydrolyzed by peptidases and esterases to melphalan either directly or through an intermediate metabolite, desethyl-melflufen. The high lipophilicity of melflufen facilitates passive diffusion across cell membranes. The activity and tolerability of melflufen in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) were demonstrated in the O-12-M1 (NCT01897714), OCEAN (NCT03151811), and HORIZON (NCT02963493) trials.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In Arm A, 4 of the 14 patients achieved an overall response (ORR 28.6% [95% CI: 8.4-58.1]) including 1 patient with CR, and the CBR was 57.1% (95% CI: 28.9-82.3). In Arm B, 1 of the 13 patients achieved an overall response (ORR 7.7% [95% CI: 0.2-36.0]), consisting of a PR, and the CBR was 15.4% (95% CI: 1.9-45.4). In the overall study population, 5 patients had an overall response (ORR 18.5% [95% CI: 6.3-38.1]). DOR data were insufficient to evaluate due to early termination of the study, the low number of patient events (1 in Arm A, 0 in Arm B), and the limited number of responses. Based on the 5 patients who had a response of PR or better at study termination (4 in Arm A, 1 in Arm B), the median TTR was 2.4 months in Arm A, 5.1 months in Arm B, and 2.6 months overall. Based on the 8 and 5 progression events in Arm A and Arm B, respectively, the median TTP was 5.8 months and 4.8 months, respectively, with a median TTP of 5.8 months in the overall population. The median PFS was 5.2 months (95% CI: 2.7 to not evaluable) and 2.9 months (95% CI: 1.5-4.6) in Arms A and B, respectively. For the overall study population, median PFS was 3.7 months (95% CI: 2.7-5.8).

   Click to Show/Hide
Half life period 75.6 h
Related Clinical Trial
NCT Number NCT04412707 Clinical Status Phase 2
Clinical Description This is a randomized, two-period, cross-over Phase 2 study, comparing PK, and assessing safety and tolerability and efficacy of peripheral and central intravenous administration of melflufen in patients with RRMM. It is an international study, enrolling patients in US and Europe. The study will enroll patients following at least 2 lines of prior therapy.
Experiment 26 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Complete response (CR)
0%
Patients Enrolled
246 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 27 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Complete response (CR)
1%
Patients Enrolled
246 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 28 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Complete response (CR)
2%
Patients Enrolled
246 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 29 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Complete response (CR)
3%
Patients Enrolled
246 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 30 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [4]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Decreased appetite
14%
Patients Enrolled
157 patients with multiple myeloma.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melflufen is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate, targeting aminopeptidase which has an increased expression in fast-growing and aggressive malignancies. The lipophilicity of melflufen allows for passive diffusion, selectively targeting myeloma cells. Once inside the cell, melflufen is hydrolyzed to active alkylating metabolites melphalan and desethyl-melflufen. Melflufen and the active metabolites trigger irreversible DNA damage, inhibit proliferation, induces apoptosis, and express antiangiogenic effects. In addition, melflufen demonstrated activity in myeloma cells with documented impaired or absent Tp53 expression and documented resistance to bortezomib, dexamethasone, and melphalan.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
Based on the safety data collected during the HORIZON trial, treatment emergent adverse events occurred in 100% of patients including 100 patients (64%) having at least 1 CTCAE grade 4 adverse effect. Hematologic grade 3 or 4 adverse effects including thrombocytopenia (76%), neutropenia (79%), anemia (43%), and infections (11%) were the most commonly reported. Other adverse effects, such as fatigue (55%), nausea (32%), diarrhea (27%), and decreased appetite (14%), were similar to other alkylating agents. Pyrexia (24%), including febrile neutropenia (5%), and respiratory tract infections (24%) were contributed to hematologic toxicities.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 31 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [4]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Diarrhea
27%
Patients Enrolled
157 patients with multiple myeloma.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melflufen is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate, targeting aminopeptidase which has an increased expression in fast-growing and aggressive malignancies. The lipophilicity of melflufen allows for passive diffusion, selectively targeting myeloma cells. Once inside the cell, melflufen is hydrolyzed to active alkylating metabolites melphalan and desethyl-melflufen. Melflufen and the active metabolites trigger irreversible DNA damage, inhibit proliferation, induces apoptosis, and express antiangiogenic effects. In addition, melflufen demonstrated activity in myeloma cells with documented impaired or absent Tp53 expression and documented resistance to bortezomib, dexamethasone, and melphalan.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
Based on the safety data collected during the HORIZON trial, treatment emergent adverse events occurred in 100% of patients including 100 patients (64%) having at least 1 CTCAE grade 4 adverse effect. Hematologic grade 3 or 4 adverse effects including thrombocytopenia (76%), neutropenia (79%), anemia (43%), and infections (11%) were the most commonly reported. Other adverse effects, such as fatigue (55%), nausea (32%), diarrhea (27%), and decreased appetite (14%), were similar to other alkylating agents. Pyrexia (24%), including febrile neutropenia (5%), and respiratory tract infections (24%) were contributed to hematologic toxicities.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 32 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [1]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Diarrhea
24.00%
Patients Enrolled
Patients with multi-refractory multiple myeloma.
MOA of PDC
Melflufen is highly lipophilic, which promotes its rapid uptake by cells. Once within the cell, melflufen releases its hydrophilic alkylator payloads via the hydrolytic activity of intracellular peptidases (e.g., aminopeptidases). Aminopeptidases are Zn2+-dependent metalloproteinases that remove amino acids at the N-terminal position from oligopeptides and have been associated with multiple tumorigenic processes such as proliferation, apoptosis, differentiation, angiogenesis, and motility. The dependence of melflufen on aminopeptidases was initially demonstrated by the reduced cytotoxic activity of melflufen-but not the alkylator melphalan-when cells were pretreated with bestatin, an antibiotic that is a potent aminopeptidase inhibitor. In addition, structure analogs designed to resist peptide hydrolysis (N-methyl derivative and derivative with D-amino acid) were shown to be almost 100-fold less potent than melflufen. Subsequent in vitro studies demonstrated that hydrolytic cleavage of melflufen by aminopeptidases releases alkylator payloads, including melphalan. In vitro, the activity of melflufen is multi-pronged, including induction of DNA damage, induction of apoptosis, inhibition of VEGF-dependent cell migration, and inhibition of tumor-associated angiogenesis, which have been further reviewed elsewhere. Downregulation of aminopeptidases resulted in reduced melflufen-mediated cytotoxic activity and apoptotic signaling in cultured cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
Melflufen plus dexamethasone was generally manageable in this heavily pretreated patient population [51]. All patients experienced ≥1 AE, most commonly hematologic AEs including thrombocytopenia (73%), neutropenia (69%), and anemia (64%). The most common non-hematologic AEs included pyrexia (40%), asthenia (31%), fatigue (29%), nausea (27%), and diarrhea (24%).

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 33 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [3]
Indication Relapsed/Refractory multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Fatigue
7.10%
Patients Enrolled
14 patients with relapsed refractory multiple myeloma.
Administration Time 28-day cycle
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that utilizes increased peptidase expression to selectively release potent alkylating agents inside tumor cells. Melflufen is hydrolyzed by peptidases and esterases to melphalan either directly or through an intermediate metabolite, desethyl-melflufen. The high lipophilicity of melflufen facilitates passive diffusion across cell membranes. The activity and tolerability of melflufen in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) were demonstrated in the O-12-M1 (NCT01897714), OCEAN (NCT03151811), and HORIZON (NCT02963493) trials.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
Overall, at least one TEAE was reported in 13 (92.9%) and 13 (100.0%) patients in Arms A and B, respectively (Table 3). During cycle 1, 9 patients (64.3%) and 12 patients (92.3%), respectively, had at least one TEAE. Cumulatively, grade 3 or 4 AEs occurred in 12 (85.7%) and 12 (92.3%) patients, respectively, and serious AEs were reported in 5 (35.7%) and 9 (69.2%) patients, respectively. The most common any-grade AEs in Arms A and B, respectively, were thrombocytopenia (10 [71.4%]; 10 [76.9%]), neutropenia (9 [64.3%]; 9 [69.2%]), and anemia (9 [64.3%]; 7 [53.8%]). No phlebitis or local-infusion-related reactions were reported based on pre- and post-infusion inspection of the IV site, and there were no extravasations observed in Arm A or B. Similarly, VIP scores collected on Day 1 post-infusion and on Day 8 indicated that patients had healthy IV sites (VIP score of 0) with no signs of phlebitis following PVC administration of melflufen. The most common non-hematological AE was positive SARS-CoV-2 test (Arm A: 2 [14.3%]; Arm B: 4 [30.8%]). Pneumonia was the most common serious AE (Arm A: 2 [14.3%]; Arm B: 2 [15.4%]). The most common AE considered related to melflufen and/or dexamethasone by investigators was thrombocytopenia (Arm A: 10 [71.4%]; Arm B: 10 [76.9%]). AEs led to treatment discontinuation in 3 (21.4%) and 6 (46.2%) patients in Arms A and B, respectively.

   Click to Show/Hide
Half life period 75.6 h
Related Clinical Trial
NCT Number NCT04412707 Clinical Status Phase 2
Clinical Description This is a randomized, two-period, cross-over Phase 2 study, comparing PK, and assessing safety and tolerability and efficacy of peripheral and central intravenous administration of melflufen in patients with RRMM. It is an international study, enrolling patients in US and Europe. The study will enroll patients following at least 2 lines of prior therapy.
Experiment 34 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [4]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Fatigue
55%
Patients Enrolled
157 patients with multiple myeloma.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melflufen is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate, targeting aminopeptidase which has an increased expression in fast-growing and aggressive malignancies. The lipophilicity of melflufen allows for passive diffusion, selectively targeting myeloma cells. Once inside the cell, melflufen is hydrolyzed to active alkylating metabolites melphalan and desethyl-melflufen. Melflufen and the active metabolites trigger irreversible DNA damage, inhibit proliferation, induces apoptosis, and express antiangiogenic effects. In addition, melflufen demonstrated activity in myeloma cells with documented impaired or absent Tp53 expression and documented resistance to bortezomib, dexamethasone, and melphalan.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
Based on the safety data collected during the HORIZON trial, treatment emergent adverse events occurred in 100% of patients including 100 patients (64%) having at least 1 CTCAE grade 4 adverse effect. Hematologic grade 3 or 4 adverse effects including thrombocytopenia (76%), neutropenia (79%), anemia (43%), and infections (11%) were the most commonly reported. Other adverse effects, such as fatigue (55%), nausea (32%), diarrhea (27%), and decreased appetite (14%), were similar to other alkylating agents. Pyrexia (24%), including febrile neutropenia (5%), and respiratory tract infections (24%) were contributed to hematologic toxicities.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 35 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [1]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Fatigue
29%
Patients Enrolled
Patients with multi-refractory multiple myeloma.
MOA of PDC
Melflufen is highly lipophilic, which promotes its rapid uptake by cells. Once within the cell, melflufen releases its hydrophilic alkylator payloads via the hydrolytic activity of intracellular peptidases (e.g., aminopeptidases). Aminopeptidases are Zn2+-dependent metalloproteinases that remove amino acids at the N-terminal position from oligopeptides and have been associated with multiple tumorigenic processes such as proliferation, apoptosis, differentiation, angiogenesis, and motility. The dependence of melflufen on aminopeptidases was initially demonstrated by the reduced cytotoxic activity of melflufen-but not the alkylator melphalan-when cells were pretreated with bestatin, an antibiotic that is a potent aminopeptidase inhibitor. In addition, structure analogs designed to resist peptide hydrolysis (N-methyl derivative and derivative with D-amino acid) were shown to be almost 100-fold less potent than melflufen. Subsequent in vitro studies demonstrated that hydrolytic cleavage of melflufen by aminopeptidases releases alkylator payloads, including melphalan. In vitro, the activity of melflufen is multi-pronged, including induction of DNA damage, induction of apoptosis, inhibition of VEGF-dependent cell migration, and inhibition of tumor-associated angiogenesis, which have been further reviewed elsewhere. Downregulation of aminopeptidases resulted in reduced melflufen-mediated cytotoxic activity and apoptotic signaling in cultured cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
Melflufen plus dexamethasone was generally manageable in this heavily pretreated patient population [51]. All patients experienced ≥1 AE, most commonly hematologic AEs including thrombocytopenia (73%), neutropenia (69%), and anemia (64%). The most common non-hematologic AEs included pyrexia (40%), asthenia (31%), fatigue (29%), nausea (27%), and diarrhea (24%).

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 36 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [1]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade ≥3 adverse event
82%
Patients Enrolled
Patients with multi-refractory multiple myeloma.
MOA of PDC
Melflufen is highly lipophilic, which promotes its rapid uptake by cells. Once within the cell, melflufen releases its hydrophilic alkylator payloads via the hydrolytic activity of intracellular peptidases (e.g., aminopeptidases). Aminopeptidases are Zn2+-dependent metalloproteinases that remove amino acids at the N-terminal position from oligopeptides and have been associated with multiple tumorigenic processes such as proliferation, apoptosis, differentiation, angiogenesis, and motility. The dependence of melflufen on aminopeptidases was initially demonstrated by the reduced cytotoxic activity of melflufen-but not the alkylator melphalan-when cells were pretreated with bestatin, an antibiotic that is a potent aminopeptidase inhibitor. In addition, structure analogs designed to resist peptide hydrolysis (N-methyl derivative and derivative with D-amino acid) were shown to be almost 100-fold less potent than melflufen. Subsequent in vitro studies demonstrated that hydrolytic cleavage of melflufen by aminopeptidases releases alkylator payloads, including melphalan. In vitro, the activity of melflufen is multi-pronged, including induction of DNA damage, induction of apoptosis, inhibition of VEGF-dependent cell migration, and inhibition of tumor-associated angiogenesis, which have been further reviewed elsewhere. Downregulation of aminopeptidases resulted in reduced melflufen-mediated cytotoxic activity and apoptotic signaling in cultured cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
Melflufen-related Grade ≥3 AEs occurred in 82% of patients.
Experiment 37 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [1]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse event
82%
Patients Enrolled
Patients with multi-refractory multiple myeloma.
Administration Time 28-day cycle
Administration Dosage 40 mg with dexamethasone (40 mg)
MOA of PDC
Melflufen is highly lipophilic, which promotes its rapid uptake by cells. Once within the cell, melflufen releases its hydrophilic alkylator payloads via the hydrolytic activity of intracellular peptidases (e.g., aminopeptidases). Aminopeptidases are Zn2+-dependent metalloproteinases that remove amino acids at the N-terminal position from oligopeptides and have been associated with multiple tumorigenic processes such as proliferation, apoptosis, differentiation, angiogenesis, and motility. The dependence of melflufen on aminopeptidases was initially demonstrated by the reduced cytotoxic activity of melflufen-but not the alkylator melphalan-when cells were pretreated with bestatin, an antibiotic that is a potent aminopeptidase inhibitor. In addition, structure analogs designed to resist peptide hydrolysis (N-methyl derivative and derivative with D-amino acid) were shown to be almost 100-fold less potent than melflufen. Subsequent in vitro studies demonstrated that hydrolytic cleavage of melflufen by aminopeptidases releases alkylator payloads, including melphalan. In vitro, the activity of melflufen is multi-pronged, including induction of DNA damage, induction of apoptosis, inhibition of VEGF-dependent cell migration, and inhibition of tumor-associated angiogenesis, which have been further reviewed elsewhere. Downregulation of aminopeptidases resulted in reduced melflufen-mediated cytotoxic activity and apoptotic signaling in cultured cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 38 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 1-2 abdominal mass
0%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 39 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 1-2 anaemia
24%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 40 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 1-2 asthenia
12%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 41 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 1-2 brain oedema
0%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 42 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 1-2 bronchitis
4%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 43 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 1-2 cardiac arrest
0%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 44 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 1-2 cardiac failure acute
0%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 45 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 1-2 cerebral haemorrhage
0%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 46 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 1-2 cerebrovascular insufficiency
0%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 47 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 1-2 constipation
7%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 48 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 1-2 covid-19 pneumonia
0%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 49 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 1-2 craniocerebral injury
0%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 50 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 1-2 death for unknown reason
0%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 51 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 1-2 diarrhoea
12%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 52 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 1-2 escherichia sepsis
0%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 53 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 1-2 fatigue
14%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 54 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 1-2 general physical health deterioration < 1%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 55 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 1-2 haematological treatment-emergent adverse event
8%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 56 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 1-2 leukopenia
4%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 57 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 1-2 lower respiratory tract infection
1%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 58 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 1-2 lymphopenia
1%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 59 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 1-2 multiple organ dysfunction syndrome
0%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 60 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 1-2 myelodysplastic syndromes < 1%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 61 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 1-2 nausea
13%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 62 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 1-2 neutropenia
6%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 63 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 1-2 neutrophil count decreased
1%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 64 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 1-2 non-haematological treatment-emergent adverse event
44%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 65 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 1-2 oesophageal carcinoma
0%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 66 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 1-2 pancytopenia
1%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 67 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 1-2 platelet count decreased
3%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 68 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 1-2 pleural effusion < 1%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 69 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 1-2 pneumonia
3%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 70 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 1-2 post-procedural complication
0%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 71 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 1-2 pulmonary embolism
0%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 72 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 1-2 pulmonary oedema
0%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 73 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 1-2 pyrexia
13%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 74 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 1-2 renal failure
1%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 75 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 1-2 respiratory arrest
0%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 76 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 1-2 respiratory failure
0%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 77 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 1-2 sepsis < 1%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 78 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 1-2 septic shock
0%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 79 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 1-2 subdural haematoma
0%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 80 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 1-2 sudden cardiac death
0%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 81 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 1-2 sudden death
0%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 82 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 1-2 thrombocytopenia
7%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 83 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 1-2 upper respiratory tract infection
11%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 84 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 1-2 urinary tract infection
4%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 85 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 1-2 white blood cell count decreased
4%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 86 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 3 abdominal mass
0%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 87 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 3 anaemia
40%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 88 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 3 asthenia
2%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 89 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 3 brain oedema
0%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 90 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 3 bronchitis
1%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 91 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 3 cardiac arrest
0%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 92 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 3 cardiac failure acute
0%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 93 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 3 cerebral haemorrhage
0%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 94 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 3 cerebrovascular insufficiency
0%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 95 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 3 constipation
0%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 96 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 3 covid-19 pneumonia
2%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 97 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 3 craniocerebral injury
0%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 98 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 3 death for unknown reason
0%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 99 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 3 diarrhoea
1%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 100 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 3 escherichia sepsis
0%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 101 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 3 fatigue
0%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 102 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 3 general physical health deterioration
1%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 103 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 3 haematological treatment-emergent adverse event
33%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 104 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 3 leukopenia
6%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 105 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 3 lower respiratory tract infection
1%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 106 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 3 lymphopenia
2%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 107 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 3 multiple organ dysfunction syndrome
0%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 108 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 3 myelodysplastic syndromes
0%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 109 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 3 nausea < 1%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 110 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 3 neutropenia
28%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 111 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 3 neutrophil count decreased
8%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 112 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 3 non-haematological treatment-emergent adverse event
32%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 113 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 3 oesophageal carcinoma
0%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 114 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 3 pancytopenia < 1%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 115 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 3 platelet count decreased
8%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 116 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 3 pleural effusion
0%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 117 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 3 pneumonia
4%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 118 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 3 post-procedural complication
0%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 119 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 3 pulmonary embolism
1%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 120 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 3 pulmonary oedema
0%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 121 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 3 pyrexia
1%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 122 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 3 renal failure
0%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 123 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 3 respiratory arrest
0%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 124 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 3 respiratory failure < 1%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 125 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 3 sepsis < 1%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 126 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 3 septic shock
0%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 127 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 3 subdural haematoma
0%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 128 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 3 sudden cardiac death
0%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 129 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 3 sudden death
0%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 130 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 3 thrombocytopenia
32%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 131 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 3 upper respiratory tract infection
1%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 132 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 3 urinary tract infection
0%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 133 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 3 white blood cell count decreased
3%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 134 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [1]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 3/4 adverse events
85%
Patients Enrolled
Patients with multi-refractory multiple myeloma.
Administration Time 14.3 week (median)
Administration Dosage 40 mg with dexamethasone (40 mg)
MOA of PDC
Melflufen is highly lipophilic, which promotes its rapid uptake by cells. Once within the cell, melflufen releases its hydrophilic alkylator payloads via the hydrolytic activity of intracellular peptidases (e.g., aminopeptidases). Aminopeptidases are Zn2+-dependent metalloproteinases that remove amino acids at the N-terminal position from oligopeptides and have been associated with multiple tumorigenic processes such as proliferation, apoptosis, differentiation, angiogenesis, and motility. The dependence of melflufen on aminopeptidases was initially demonstrated by the reduced cytotoxic activity of melflufen-but not the alkylator melphalan-when cells were pretreated with bestatin, an antibiotic that is a potent aminopeptidase inhibitor. In addition, structure analogs designed to resist peptide hydrolysis (N-methyl derivative and derivative with D-amino acid) were shown to be almost 100-fold less potent than melflufen. Subsequent in vitro studies demonstrated that hydrolytic cleavage of melflufen by aminopeptidases releases alkylator payloads, including melphalan. In vitro, the activity of melflufen is multi-pronged, including induction of DNA damage, induction of apoptosis, inhibition of VEGF-dependent cell migration, and inhibition of tumor-associated angiogenesis, which have been further reviewed elsewhere. Downregulation of aminopeptidases resulted in reduced melflufen-mediated cytotoxic activity and apoptotic signaling in cultured cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 135 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [1]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 3/4 adverse events
85%
MOA of PDC
Melflufen is highly lipophilic, which promotes its rapid uptake by cells. Once within the cell, melflufen releases its hydrophilic alkylator payloads via the hydrolytic activity of intracellular peptidases (e.g., aminopeptidases). Aminopeptidases are Zn2+-dependent metalloproteinases that remove amino acids at the N-terminal position from oligopeptides and have been associated with multiple tumorigenic processes such as proliferation, apoptosis, differentiation, angiogenesis, and motility. The dependence of melflufen on aminopeptidases was initially demonstrated by the reduced cytotoxic activity of melflufen-but not the alkylator melphalan-when cells were pretreated with bestatin, an antibiotic that is a potent aminopeptidase inhibitor. In addition, structure analogs designed to resist peptide hydrolysis (N-methyl derivative and derivative with D-amino acid) were shown to be almost 100-fold less potent than melflufen. Subsequent in vitro studies demonstrated that hydrolytic cleavage of melflufen by aminopeptidases releases alkylator payloads, including melphalan. In vitro, the activity of melflufen is multi-pronged, including induction of DNA damage, induction of apoptosis, inhibition of VEGF-dependent cell migration, and inhibition of tumor-associated angiogenesis, which have been further reviewed elsewhere. Downregulation of aminopeptidases resulted in reduced melflufen-mediated cytotoxic activity and apoptotic signaling in cultured cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
Overall, 97% of patients experienced any-grade AEs and 85% of patients experienced Grades 3/4 AEs.
In Vivo Model 75 patients with multiple myeloma.
Experiment 136 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 4 abdominal mass
0%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 137 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [4]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 4 adverse effect
64%
Patients Enrolled
157 patients with multiple myeloma.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melflufen is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate, targeting aminopeptidase which has an increased expression in fast-growing and aggressive malignancies. The lipophilicity of melflufen allows for passive diffusion, selectively targeting myeloma cells. Once inside the cell, melflufen is hydrolyzed to active alkylating metabolites melphalan and desethyl-melflufen. Melflufen and the active metabolites trigger irreversible DNA damage, inhibit proliferation, induces apoptosis, and express antiangiogenic effects. In addition, melflufen demonstrated activity in myeloma cells with documented impaired or absent Tp53 expression and documented resistance to bortezomib, dexamethasone, and melphalan.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
Based on the safety data collected during the HORIZON trial, treatment emergent adverse events occurred in 100% of patients including 100 patients (64%) having at least 1 CTCAE grade 4 adverse effect. Hematologic grade 3 or 4 adverse effects including thrombocytopenia (76%), neutropenia (79%), anemia (43%), and infections (11%) were the most commonly reported. Other adverse effects, such as fatigue (55%), nausea (32%), diarrhea (27%), and decreased appetite (14%), were similar to other alkylating agents. Pyrexia (24%), including febrile neutropenia (5%), and respiratory tract infections (24%) were contributed to hematologic toxicities.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 138 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 4 anaemia
2%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 139 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 4 asthenia
0%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 140 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 4 brain oedema
0%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 141 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 4 bronchitis
0%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 142 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 4 cardiac arrest
0%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 143 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 4 cardiac failure acute
0%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 144 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 4 cerebral haemorrhage
0%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 145 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 4 cerebrovascular insufficiency
0%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 146 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 4 constipation
0%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 147 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 4 covid-19 pneumonia
0%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 148 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 4 craniocerebral injury
0%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 149 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 4 death for unknown reason
0%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 150 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 4 diarrhoea
0%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 151 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 4 escherichia sepsis < 1%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 152 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 4 fatigue
0%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 153 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 4 general physical health deterioration
0%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 154 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 4 haematological treatment-emergent adverse event
53%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 155 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 4 leukopenia
1%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 156 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 4 lower respiratory tract infection
0%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 157 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 4 lymphopenia
2%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 158 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 4 multiple organ dysfunction syndrome
0%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 159 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 4 myelodysplastic syndromes
0%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 160 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 4 nausea
0%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 161 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 4 neutropenia
26%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 162 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 4 neutrophil count decreased
4%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 163 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 4 non-haematological treatment-emergent adverse event
2%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 164 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 4 oesophageal carcinoma
0%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 165 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 4 pancytopenia < 1%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 166 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 4 platelet count decreased
7%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 167 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 4 pleural effusion
0%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 168 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 4 pneumonia
0%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 169 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 4 post-procedural complication
0%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 170 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 4 pulmonary embolism
0%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 171 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 4 pulmonary oedema
0%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 172 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 4 pyrexia
0%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 173 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 4 renal failure
0%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 174 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 4 respiratory arrest
0%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 175 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 4 respiratory failure < 1%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 176 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 4 sepsis
0%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 177 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 4 septic shock
0%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 178 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 4 subdural haematoma
0%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 179 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 4 sudden cardiac death
0%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 180 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 4 sudden death
0%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 181 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 4 thrombocytopenia
31%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 182 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 4 upper respiratory tract infection
0%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 183 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 4 urinary tract infection
0%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 184 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 4 white blood cell count decreased
3%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 185 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 5 abdominal mass
1%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 186 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 5 asthenia < 1%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 187 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 5 brain oedema < 1%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 188 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 5 bronchitis
0%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 189 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 5 cardiac arrest < 1%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 190 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 5 cardiac failure acute < 1%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 191 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 5 cerebral haemorrhage < 1%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 192 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 5 cerebrovascular insufficiency
0%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 193 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 5 constipation
0%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 194 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 5 covid-19 pneumonia
3%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 195 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 5 craniocerebral injury
0%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 196 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 5 death for unknown reason
0%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 197 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 5 diarrhoea
0%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 198 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 5 escherichia sepsis
0%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 199 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 5 fatigue
0%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 200 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 5 general physical health deterioration
0%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 201 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 5 haematological treatment-emergent adverse event
1%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 202 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 5 lower respiratory tract infection
0%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 203 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 5 multiple organ dysfunction syndrome
1%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 204 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 5 myelodysplastic syndromes
0%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 205 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 5 nausea
0%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 206 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 5 neutropenia < 1%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 207 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 5 non-haematological treatment-emergent adverse event
11%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 208 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 5 oesophageal carcinoma < 1%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 209 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 5 pancytopenia < 1%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 210 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 5 pleural effusion
0%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 211 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 5 pneumonia
1%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 212 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 5 post-procedural complication < 1%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 213 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 5 pulmonary embolism < 1%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 214 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 5 pulmonary oedema < 1%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 215 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 5 pyrexia
0%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 216 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 5 renal failure
1%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 217 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 5 respiratory arrest
0%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 218 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 5 respiratory failure
1%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 219 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 5 sepsis
0%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 220 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 5 septic shock
0%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 221 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 5 subdural haematoma < 1%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 222 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 5 sudden cardiac death
0%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 223 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 5 sudden death
0%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 224 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 5 upper respiratory tract infection
0%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 225 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Grade 5 urinary tract infection
1%
Patients Enrolled
228 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 226 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [8]
Indication lymphoma
Efficacy Data Half Maximal Inhibitory Concentration (IC50)
0.078 μM
Description
The cytotoxicity of melflufen in primary human lymphoma cells, plotted as dose response curves with survival index (SI %) for each concentration tested. Sensitivity towards melflufen varied considerably (>300 fold) and the IC50range from 2.7 nM to 0.55 uM. The efficacy of melflufen corresponded to a 13- to 455-fold potency improvement (p< 0.001) compared to melphalan.

   Click to Show/Hide
In Vitro Model Lymphoma Primary human lymphoma cell Homo sapiens
Experiment 227 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [9]
Indication Relapsed/Refractory multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Hazard ratio
62%
Patients Enrolled
37 relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma patients aged 75 years.
MOA of PDC
In summary, the interpretation of the results from the OCEAN study were impacted by the heterogeneity of the population, with age and previous success of ASCT therapy identified as prognostic factors with study therapies. The safety profile of melflufen and dexamethasone is primarily characterized by hematologic AEs that are clinically manageable. Observed infection rates, which included COVID-19, were generally low. Taken together, these data support the use of melflufen and dexamethasone in patients who have not received a previous ASCT or who underwent a successful ASCT (ie, TTP >36 months post-ASCT). In addition, the favorable efficacy profile and convenience of monthly outpatient infusions, especially for patients without access to other therapeutics such as CAR T-cell therapy or bispecific antibodies, bode well for this combination translating successfully into real-world practice.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In this updated survival analysis, median OS (95% CI) was 20.2 months (15.8-24.3) with melflufen and 24.0 months (19.1-28.7) with pomalidomide (HR, 1.14 [95% CI, 0.91-1.43]; P =.24), with a median follow-up time of 31.8 months and 29.8 months, respectively. Because of imbalance in the number of patients who were randomized but not treated, survival was also evaluated in the safety population: median OS (95% CI) was 21.3 months (16.6-24.8) with melflufen and 24.0 months (19.8-28.7) with pomalidomide (HR, 1.12 [95% CI, 0.89-1.42]; P =.33), with the curves overlapping until 10 months after randomization. Sensitivity analyses revealed that the uneven distribution of randomized but not treated patients impacted OS, but not PFS. Although a similar number of patients received subsequent therapy after OCEAN (melflufen group, 169/246 [69%] patients; pomalidomide group, 164/249 [66%] patients), the type of subsequent therapy and timing of subsequent therapy initiation differed between treatment groups.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 228 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [9]
Indication Relapsed/Refractory multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Hazard ratio
103%
Patients Enrolled
113 relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma patients aged 65-74 years.
MOA of PDC
In summary, the interpretation of the results from the OCEAN study were impacted by the heterogeneity of the population, with age and previous success of ASCT therapy identified as prognostic factors with study therapies. The safety profile of melflufen and dexamethasone is primarily characterized by hematologic AEs that are clinically manageable. Observed infection rates, which included COVID-19, were generally low. Taken together, these data support the use of melflufen and dexamethasone in patients who have not received a previous ASCT or who underwent a successful ASCT (ie, TTP >36 months post-ASCT). In addition, the favorable efficacy profile and convenience of monthly outpatient infusions, especially for patients without access to other therapeutics such as CAR T-cell therapy or bispecific antibodies, bode well for this combination translating successfully into real-world practice.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In this updated survival analysis, median OS (95% CI) was 20.2 months (15.8-24.3) with melflufen and 24.0 months (19.1-28.7) with pomalidomide (HR, 1.14 [95% CI, 0.91-1.43]; P =.24), with a median follow-up time of 31.8 months and 29.8 months, respectively. Because of imbalance in the number of patients who were randomized but not treated, survival was also evaluated in the safety population: median OS (95% CI) was 21.3 months (16.6-24.8) with melflufen and 24.0 months (19.8-28.7) with pomalidomide (HR, 1.12 [95% CI, 0.89-1.42]; P =.33), with the curves overlapping until 10 months after randomization. Sensitivity analyses revealed that the uneven distribution of randomized but not treated patients impacted OS, but not PFS. Although a similar number of patients received subsequent therapy after OCEAN (melflufen group, 169/246 [69%] patients; pomalidomide group, 164/249 [66%] patients), the type of subsequent therapy and timing of subsequent therapy initiation differed between treatment groups.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 229 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [9]
Indication Relapsed/Refractory multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Hazard ratio
168%
Patients Enrolled
96 relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma patients aged <65 years.
MOA of PDC
In summary, the interpretation of the results from the OCEAN study were impacted by the heterogeneity of the population, with age and previous success of ASCT therapy identified as prognostic factors with study therapies. The safety profile of melflufen and dexamethasone is primarily characterized by hematologic AEs that are clinically manageable. Observed infection rates, which included COVID-19, were generally low. Taken together, these data support the use of melflufen and dexamethasone in patients who have not received a previous ASCT or who underwent a successful ASCT (ie, TTP >36 months post-ASCT). In addition, the favorable efficacy profile and convenience of monthly outpatient infusions, especially for patients without access to other therapeutics such as CAR T-cell therapy or bispecific antibodies, bode well for this combination translating successfully into real-world practice.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In this updated survival analysis, median OS (95% CI) was 20.2 months (15.8-24.3) with melflufen and 24.0 months (19.1-28.7) with pomalidomide (HR, 1.14 [95% CI, 0.91-1.43]; P =.24), with a median follow-up time of 31.8 months and 29.8 months, respectively. Because of imbalance in the number of patients who were randomized but not treated, survival was also evaluated in the safety population: median OS (95% CI) was 21.3 months (16.6-24.8) with melflufen and 24.0 months (19.8-28.7) with pomalidomide (HR, 1.12 [95% CI, 0.89-1.42]; P =.33), with the curves overlapping until 10 months after randomization. Sensitivity analyses revealed that the uneven distribution of randomized but not treated patients impacted OS, but not PFS. Although a similar number of patients received subsequent therapy after OCEAN (melflufen group, 169/246 [69%] patients; pomalidomide group, 164/249 [66%] patients), the type of subsequent therapy and timing of subsequent therapy initiation differed between treatment groups.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 230 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [9]
Indication Relapsed/Refractory multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Hemorrhage
1%
Patients Enrolled
101 relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma patients with TTP <36 month Post-ASCTb.
MOA of PDC
In summary, the interpretation of the results from the OCEAN study were impacted by the heterogeneity of the population, with age and previous success of ASCT therapy identified as prognostic factors with study therapies. The safety profile of melflufen and dexamethasone is primarily characterized by hematologic AEs that are clinically manageable. Observed infection rates, which included COVID-19, were generally low. Taken together, these data support the use of melflufen and dexamethasone in patients who have not received a previous ASCT or who underwent a successful ASCT (ie, TTP >36 months post-ASCT). In addition, the favorable efficacy profile and convenience of monthly outpatient infusions, especially for patients without access to other therapeutics such as CAR T-cell therapy or bispecific antibodies, bode well for this combination translating successfully into real-world practice.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
Given the prognostic importance of TTP <36 months post-ASCT in OCEAN, we evaluated this prognostic factor in a post hoc analysis from the HORIZON study. Among 110 patients with triple-class refractory disease who had received ≥3 prior lines of therapy, 77 (70%) had received a previous ASCT and 58 (53%) had TTP <36 months post-ASCT (Suppl. Table S3). In patients with a TTP >36 months post-ASCT or no ASCT versus patients with a TTP <36 months post-ASCT, ORR was higher (29% vs 22%; Suppl. Table S4) and median DOR (7.6 months vs 3.9 months) and median PFS (4.2 months vs 3.4 months) were longer. Since pomalidomide and lenalidomide both belong to the immunomodulatory drugs, we analyzed if the duration of previous treatment with lenalidomide could have impacted the results. The median duration of lenalidomide was 14.4 months in patients with ASCT and TTP < 36 months, 38.3 months in patients with ASCT and TTP > 36 months, and 14.6 months in patients with no previous ASCT. However, the median PFS for patients treated with pomalidomide did not differ substantially between these groups of patients. The safety profile of melflufen and dexamethasone was generally consistent between patients with a TTP >36 months post-ASCT or no ASCT and patients with a TTP <36 months post-ASCT. In OCEAN among the melflufen group, the frequency of grade 3/4 TEAEs (88% and 92%), serious TEAEs (44% and 38%), and fatal adverse events (AEs; 11% and 13%) was similar in patients with a TTP >36 months post-ASCT or no ASCT and patients with TTP <36 months. However, patients with a TTP >36 months post-ASCT or no ASCT had lower rates of TEAEs leading to treatment discontinuation (23% and 31%), the longer median duration of study treatment (35.1 weeks vs 15.1 weeks), and longer median time to experiencing grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia (11.2 weeks vs 4.1 weeks) and grade 3/4 neutropenia (4.8 weeks vs 2.1 weeks) than patients with a TTP <36 months post-ASCT. In HORIZON, patients with a TTP >36 months post-ASCT or no ASCT had lower rates of grade 3/4 TEAEs (88% and 98%), but higher rates of serious TEAEs (64% and 53%) and similar rates of TEAEs leading to treatment discontinuation (29% and 33%) than patients with a TTP <36 months post-ASCT.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 231 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [9]
Indication Relapsed/Refractory multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Hemorrhage
3%
Patients Enrolled
145 patients who has relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma with no previous ASCT or TTP >36 month Post-ASCTa.
MOA of PDC
In summary, the interpretation of the results from the OCEAN study were impacted by the heterogeneity of the population, with age and previous success of ASCT therapy identified as prognostic factors with study therapies. The safety profile of melflufen and dexamethasone is primarily characterized by hematologic AEs that are clinically manageable. Observed infection rates, which included COVID-19, were generally low. Taken together, these data support the use of melflufen and dexamethasone in patients who have not received a previous ASCT or who underwent a successful ASCT (ie, TTP >36 months post-ASCT). In addition, the favorable efficacy profile and convenience of monthly outpatient infusions, especially for patients without access to other therapeutics such as CAR T-cell therapy or bispecific antibodies, bode well for this combination translating successfully into real-world practice.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
Given the prognostic importance of TTP <36 months post-ASCT in OCEAN, we evaluated this prognostic factor in a post hoc analysis from the HORIZON study. Among 110 patients with triple-class refractory disease who had received ≥3 prior lines of therapy, 77 (70%) had received a previous ASCT and 58 (53%) had TTP <36 months post-ASCT (Suppl. Table S3). In patients with a TTP >36 months post-ASCT or no ASCT versus patients with a TTP <36 months post-ASCT, ORR was higher (29% vs 22%; Suppl. Table S4) and median DOR (7.6 months vs 3.9 months) and median PFS (4.2 months vs 3.4 months) were longer. Since pomalidomide and lenalidomide both belong to the immunomodulatory drugs, we analyzed if the duration of previous treatment with lenalidomide could have impacted the results. The median duration of lenalidomide was 14.4 months in patients with ASCT and TTP < 36 months, 38.3 months in patients with ASCT and TTP > 36 months, and 14.6 months in patients with no previous ASCT. However, the median PFS for patients treated with pomalidomide did not differ substantially between these groups of patients. The safety profile of melflufen and dexamethasone was generally consistent between patients with a TTP >36 months post-ASCT or no ASCT and patients with a TTP <36 months post-ASCT. In OCEAN among the melflufen group, the frequency of grade 3/4 TEAEs (88% and 92%), serious TEAEs (44% and 38%), and fatal adverse events (AEs; 11% and 13%) was similar in patients with a TTP >36 months post-ASCT or no ASCT and patients with TTP <36 months. However, patients with a TTP >36 months post-ASCT or no ASCT had lower rates of TEAEs leading to treatment discontinuation (23% and 31%), the longer median duration of study treatment (35.1 weeks vs 15.1 weeks), and longer median time to experiencing grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia (11.2 weeks vs 4.1 weeks) and grade 3/4 neutropenia (4.8 weeks vs 2.1 weeks) than patients with a TTP <36 months post-ASCT. In HORIZON, patients with a TTP >36 months post-ASCT or no ASCT had lower rates of grade 3/4 TEAEs (88% and 98%), but higher rates of serious TEAEs (64% and 53%) and similar rates of TEAEs leading to treatment discontinuation (29% and 33%) than patients with a TTP <36 months post-ASCT.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 232 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [9]
Indication Relapsed/Refractory multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Infection
11%
Patients Enrolled
101 relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma patients with TTP <36 month Post-ASCTb.
MOA of PDC
In summary, the interpretation of the results from the OCEAN study were impacted by the heterogeneity of the population, with age and previous success of ASCT therapy identified as prognostic factors with study therapies. The safety profile of melflufen and dexamethasone is primarily characterized by hematologic AEs that are clinically manageable. Observed infection rates, which included COVID-19, were generally low. Taken together, these data support the use of melflufen and dexamethasone in patients who have not received a previous ASCT or who underwent a successful ASCT (ie, TTP >36 months post-ASCT). In addition, the favorable efficacy profile and convenience of monthly outpatient infusions, especially for patients without access to other therapeutics such as CAR T-cell therapy or bispecific antibodies, bode well for this combination translating successfully into real-world practice.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
Given the prognostic importance of TTP <36 months post-ASCT in OCEAN, we evaluated this prognostic factor in a post hoc analysis from the HORIZON study. Among 110 patients with triple-class refractory disease who had received ≥3 prior lines of therapy, 77 (70%) had received a previous ASCT and 58 (53%) had TTP <36 months post-ASCT (Suppl. Table S3). In patients with a TTP >36 months post-ASCT or no ASCT versus patients with a TTP <36 months post-ASCT, ORR was higher (29% vs 22%; Suppl. Table S4) and median DOR (7.6 months vs 3.9 months) and median PFS (4.2 months vs 3.4 months) were longer. Since pomalidomide and lenalidomide both belong to the immunomodulatory drugs, we analyzed if the duration of previous treatment with lenalidomide could have impacted the results. The median duration of lenalidomide was 14.4 months in patients with ASCT and TTP < 36 months, 38.3 months in patients with ASCT and TTP > 36 months, and 14.6 months in patients with no previous ASCT. However, the median PFS for patients treated with pomalidomide did not differ substantially between these groups of patients. The safety profile of melflufen and dexamethasone was generally consistent between patients with a TTP >36 months post-ASCT or no ASCT and patients with a TTP <36 months post-ASCT. In OCEAN among the melflufen group, the frequency of grade 3/4 TEAEs (88% and 92%), serious TEAEs (44% and 38%), and fatal adverse events (AEs; 11% and 13%) was similar in patients with a TTP >36 months post-ASCT or no ASCT and patients with TTP <36 months. However, patients with a TTP >36 months post-ASCT or no ASCT had lower rates of TEAEs leading to treatment discontinuation (23% and 31%), the longer median duration of study treatment (35.1 weeks vs 15.1 weeks), and longer median time to experiencing grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia (11.2 weeks vs 4.1 weeks) and grade 3/4 neutropenia (4.8 weeks vs 2.1 weeks) than patients with a TTP <36 months post-ASCT. In HORIZON, patients with a TTP >36 months post-ASCT or no ASCT had lower rates of grade 3/4 TEAEs (88% and 98%), but higher rates of serious TEAEs (64% and 53%) and similar rates of TEAEs leading to treatment discontinuation (29% and 33%) than patients with a TTP <36 months post-ASCT.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 233 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [9]
Indication Relapsed/Refractory multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Infection
15%
Patients Enrolled
145 patients who has relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma with no previous ASCT or TTP >36 month Post-ASCTa.
MOA of PDC
In summary, the interpretation of the results from the OCEAN study were impacted by the heterogeneity of the population, with age and previous success of ASCT therapy identified as prognostic factors with study therapies. The safety profile of melflufen and dexamethasone is primarily characterized by hematologic AEs that are clinically manageable. Observed infection rates, which included COVID-19, were generally low. Taken together, these data support the use of melflufen and dexamethasone in patients who have not received a previous ASCT or who underwent a successful ASCT (ie, TTP >36 months post-ASCT). In addition, the favorable efficacy profile and convenience of monthly outpatient infusions, especially for patients without access to other therapeutics such as CAR T-cell therapy or bispecific antibodies, bode well for this combination translating successfully into real-world practice.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
Given the prognostic importance of TTP <36 months post-ASCT in OCEAN, we evaluated this prognostic factor in a post hoc analysis from the HORIZON study. Among 110 patients with triple-class refractory disease who had received ≥3 prior lines of therapy, 77 (70%) had received a previous ASCT and 58 (53%) had TTP <36 months post-ASCT (Suppl. Table S3). In patients with a TTP >36 months post-ASCT or no ASCT versus patients with a TTP <36 months post-ASCT, ORR was higher (29% vs 22%; Suppl. Table S4) and median DOR (7.6 months vs 3.9 months) and median PFS (4.2 months vs 3.4 months) were longer. Since pomalidomide and lenalidomide both belong to the immunomodulatory drugs, we analyzed if the duration of previous treatment with lenalidomide could have impacted the results. The median duration of lenalidomide was 14.4 months in patients with ASCT and TTP < 36 months, 38.3 months in patients with ASCT and TTP > 36 months, and 14.6 months in patients with no previous ASCT. However, the median PFS for patients treated with pomalidomide did not differ substantially between these groups of patients. The safety profile of melflufen and dexamethasone was generally consistent between patients with a TTP >36 months post-ASCT or no ASCT and patients with a TTP <36 months post-ASCT. In OCEAN among the melflufen group, the frequency of grade 3/4 TEAEs (88% and 92%), serious TEAEs (44% and 38%), and fatal adverse events (AEs; 11% and 13%) was similar in patients with a TTP >36 months post-ASCT or no ASCT and patients with TTP <36 months. However, patients with a TTP >36 months post-ASCT or no ASCT had lower rates of TEAEs leading to treatment discontinuation (23% and 31%), the longer median duration of study treatment (35.1 weeks vs 15.1 weeks), and longer median time to experiencing grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia (11.2 weeks vs 4.1 weeks) and grade 3/4 neutropenia (4.8 weeks vs 2.1 weeks) than patients with a TTP <36 months post-ASCT. In HORIZON, patients with a TTP >36 months post-ASCT or no ASCT had lower rates of grade 3/4 TEAEs (88% and 98%), but higher rates of serious TEAEs (64% and 53%) and similar rates of TEAEs leading to treatment discontinuation (29% and 33%) than patients with a TTP <36 months post-ASCT.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 234 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [4]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Infection rate
11%
Patients Enrolled
157 patients with multiple myeloma.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melflufen is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate, targeting aminopeptidase which has an increased expression in fast-growing and aggressive malignancies. The lipophilicity of melflufen allows for passive diffusion, selectively targeting myeloma cells. Once inside the cell, melflufen is hydrolyzed to active alkylating metabolites melphalan and desethyl-melflufen. Melflufen and the active metabolites trigger irreversible DNA damage, inhibit proliferation, induces apoptosis, and express antiangiogenic effects. In addition, melflufen demonstrated activity in myeloma cells with documented impaired or absent Tp53 expression and documented resistance to bortezomib, dexamethasone, and melphalan.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
Based on the safety data collected during the HORIZON trial, treatment emergent adverse events occurred in 100% of patients including 100 patients (64%) having at least 1 CTCAE grade 4 adverse effect. Hematologic grade 3 or 4 adverse effects including thrombocytopenia (76%), neutropenia (79%), anemia (43%), and infections (11%) were the most commonly reported. Other adverse effects, such as fatigue (55%), nausea (32%), diarrhea (27%), and decreased appetite (14%), were similar to other alkylating agents. Pyrexia (24%), including febrile neutropenia (5%), and respiratory tract infections (24%) were contributed to hematologic toxicities.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 235 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [5]
Indication Relapsed/Refractory multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Infections
73.33%
Patients Enrolled
153 patients refractory to prior alkylators (melflufen, n=78; pomalidomide, n=75).
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (melflufen), a first-in-class alkylating peptide-drug conjugate, plus dexamethasone demonstrated superior progression-free survival (PFS), but not overall survival (OS), versus pomalidomide plus dexamethasone in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma in the OCEAN study. Time to progression (TTP) <36 months after a prior autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) was a negative prognostic factor for OS with melflufen. This post hoc exploratory analysis evaluated patients refractory to prior alkylators (e.g., cyclophosphamide and melphalan) in OCEAN. In 153 patients refractory to prior alkylators (melflufen, n = 78; pomalidomide, n = 75), the melflufen and pomalidomide arms had similar median PFS (5.6 months [95% CI, 4.2-8.3] vs. 4.7 months [95% CI, 3.1-7.3]; hazard ratio [HR], 0.92 [95% CI, 0.63-1.33]) and OS (23.4 months [95% CI, 14.4-31.7] vs. 20.0 months [95% CI, 12.0-28.7]; HR, 0.92 [95% CI, 0.62-1.38]). Among alkylator-refractory patients with a TTP 36 months after a prior ASCT or no prior ASCT (melflufen, n = 54; pomalidomide, n = 53), the observed median PFS and OS were longer in the melflufen arm than the pomalidomide arm. The safety profile of melflufen was consistent with previous reports. These results suggest that melflufen is safe and effective in patients with alkylator-refractory disease, suggesting differentiated activity from other alkylators.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
Overall, the safety profile of melflufen plus dexamethasone in the alkylator-refractory group was consistent between treatment arms (Table 2). In the melflufen and pomalidomide arms, respectively, the frequency of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs; 99% vs. 97%), Grade 3 or 4 TEAEs (85% vs. 82%), serious TEAEs (49% vs. 53%), and fatal TEAEs (19% vs. 16%) were similar (Table 2). However, melflufen compared with pomalidomide saw more dose modifications (76% vs. 67%) and dose reductions (47% vs. 14%), comparable dose delays (57% vs. 51%) but less treatment discontinuation (27% vs. 34%). When comparing patients refractory and not refractory to prior alkylators, rates of TEAEs were generally comparable except for slightly lower rates of serious and fatal TEAEs observed in patients not refractory to alkylators. Among Grade 3 or 4 TEAEs of special interest, melflufen saw more thrombocytopenia (73% vs. 14%), neutropenia (65% vs. 55%), and leukopenia or white blood cell decrease (14% vs. 3%), but less infection (15% vs. 26%), than pomalidomide. Notably, melflufen compared with pomalidomide saw a longer median time to dose reduction (106 days [range, 28-443] vs. 47 days [range, 28-225]), Grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia (52 days [range, 15-451] vs. 19 days [range, 8-91]), and Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia (36 days [range, 8-561] vs. 22 days [range, 8-470]).

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 236 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [3]
Indication Relapsed/Refractory multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Leukopenia
14.30%
Patients Enrolled
14 patients with relapsed refractory multiple myeloma.
Administration Time 28-day cycle
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that utilizes increased peptidase expression to selectively release potent alkylating agents inside tumor cells. Melflufen is hydrolyzed by peptidases and esterases to melphalan either directly or through an intermediate metabolite, desethyl-melflufen. The high lipophilicity of melflufen facilitates passive diffusion across cell membranes. The activity and tolerability of melflufen in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) were demonstrated in the O-12-M1 (NCT01897714), OCEAN (NCT03151811), and HORIZON (NCT02963493) trials.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
Overall, at least one TEAE was reported in 13 (92.9%) and 13 (100.0%) patients in Arms A and B, respectively (Table 3). During cycle 1, 9 patients (64.3%) and 12 patients (92.3%), respectively, had at least one TEAE. Cumulatively, grade 3 or 4 AEs occurred in 12 (85.7%) and 12 (92.3%) patients, respectively, and serious AEs were reported in 5 (35.7%) and 9 (69.2%) patients, respectively. The most common any-grade AEs in Arms A and B, respectively, were thrombocytopenia (10 [71.4%]; 10 [76.9%]), neutropenia (9 [64.3%]; 9 [69.2%]), and anemia (9 [64.3%]; 7 [53.8%]). No phlebitis or local-infusion-related reactions were reported based on pre- and post-infusion inspection of the IV site, and there were no extravasations observed in Arm A or B. Similarly, VIP scores collected on Day 1 post-infusion and on Day 8 indicated that patients had healthy IV sites (VIP score of 0) with no signs of phlebitis following PVC administration of melflufen. The most common non-hematological AE was positive SARS-CoV-2 test (Arm A: 2 [14.3%]; Arm B: 4 [30.8%]). Pneumonia was the most common serious AE (Arm A: 2 [14.3%]; Arm B: 2 [15.4%]). The most common AE considered related to melflufen and/or dexamethasone by investigators was thrombocytopenia (Arm A: 10 [71.4%]; Arm B: 10 [76.9%]). AEs led to treatment discontinuation in 3 (21.4%) and 6 (46.2%) patients in Arms A and B, respectively.

   Click to Show/Hide
Half life period 75.6 h
Related Clinical Trial
NCT Number NCT04412707 Clinical Status Phase 2
Clinical Description This is a randomized, two-period, cross-over Phase 2 study, comparing PK, and assessing safety and tolerability and efficacy of peripheral and central intravenous administration of melflufen in patients with RRMM. It is an international study, enrolling patients in US and Europe. The study will enroll patients following at least 2 lines of prior therapy.
Experiment 237 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [5]
Indication Relapsed/Refractory multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Leukopenia
71.43%
Patients Enrolled
153 patients refractory to prior alkylators (melflufen, n=78; pomalidomide, n=75).
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (melflufen), a first-in-class alkylating peptide-drug conjugate, plus dexamethasone demonstrated superior progression-free survival (PFS), but not overall survival (OS), versus pomalidomide plus dexamethasone in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma in the OCEAN study. Time to progression (TTP) <36 months after a prior autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) was a negative prognostic factor for OS with melflufen. This post hoc exploratory analysis evaluated patients refractory to prior alkylators (e.g., cyclophosphamide and melphalan) in OCEAN. In 153 patients refractory to prior alkylators (melflufen, n = 78; pomalidomide, n = 75), the melflufen and pomalidomide arms had similar median PFS (5.6 months [95% CI, 4.2-8.3] vs. 4.7 months [95% CI, 3.1-7.3]; hazard ratio [HR], 0.92 [95% CI, 0.63-1.33]) and OS (23.4 months [95% CI, 14.4-31.7] vs. 20.0 months [95% CI, 12.0-28.7]; HR, 0.92 [95% CI, 0.62-1.38]). Among alkylator-refractory patients with a TTP 36 months after a prior ASCT or no prior ASCT (melflufen, n = 54; pomalidomide, n = 53), the observed median PFS and OS were longer in the melflufen arm than the pomalidomide arm. The safety profile of melflufen was consistent with previous reports. These results suggest that melflufen is safe and effective in patients with alkylator-refractory disease, suggesting differentiated activity from other alkylators.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
Overall, the safety profile of melflufen plus dexamethasone in the alkylator-refractory group was consistent between treatment arms (Table 2). In the melflufen and pomalidomide arms, respectively, the frequency of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs; 99% vs. 97%), Grade 3 or 4 TEAEs (85% vs. 82%), serious TEAEs (49% vs. 53%), and fatal TEAEs (19% vs. 16%) were similar (Table 2). However, melflufen compared with pomalidomide saw more dose modifications (76% vs. 67%) and dose reductions (47% vs. 14%), comparable dose delays (57% vs. 51%) but less treatment discontinuation (27% vs. 34%). When comparing patients refractory and not refractory to prior alkylators, rates of TEAEs were generally comparable except for slightly lower rates of serious and fatal TEAEs observed in patients not refractory to alkylators. Among Grade 3 or 4 TEAEs of special interest, melflufen saw more thrombocytopenia (73% vs. 14%), neutropenia (65% vs. 55%), and leukopenia or white blood cell decrease (14% vs. 3%), but less infection (15% vs. 26%), than pomalidomide. Notably, melflufen compared with pomalidomide saw a longer median time to dose reduction (106 days [range, 28-443] vs. 47 days [range, 28-225]), Grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia (52 days [range, 15-451] vs. 19 days [range, 8-91]), and Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia (36 days [range, 8-561] vs. 22 days [range, 8-470]).

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 238 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [7]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Maximum tolerated dose
40 mg
Administration Time Intravenous (iv) infusion of 15 milligram (mg) melflufen on day 1 of each 21-day treatment cycle, in combination with 40 mg dexamet hasone (oral or iv) on days 1, 8 and 15 of each 21-day treatment cycle
Administration Dosage Melflufen 15 mg + Dexamethasone
MOA of PDC
The antineoplastic activity of melflufen is dependent upon the expression of aminopeptidases, like APN (also known as CD18), which cleave melflufen into melphalan and p-Fluorophenylalanine. Following aminopeptidase-dependent cleavage, the hydrophilic alkylating metabolite melphalan accumulates in myeloma cells. This enrichment of the cytotoxic payload has a substantial impact on the antimyeloma activity of melflufen.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In phase 1, the established maximum tolerated dose was 40 mg of melflufen in combination with dexamethasone.
In Vivo Model Aged 18 years or older, had relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma, had received two or more previous lines of therapy (including lenalidomide and bortezomib).
Related Clinical Trial
NCT Number NCT01897714 Clinical Status Phase 1/2
Clinical Description The study will explore escalating doses of melflufen in combination with dexamethasone in small groups of patients to find the maximum tolerated dose of melflufen. That dose will then be used to determine the efficacy and safety profile of melflufen in combination with dexamethasone in a larger group of patients.
Experiment 239 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [7]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Maximum tolerated dose
40 mg
Administration Time Iv infusion of 25 mg melflufen on day 1 of each 21-day treatment cycle, in combination with 40 mg dexamet hasone (oral or iv) on days 1, 8 and 15 of each 21-day treatment cycle
Administration Dosage Melflufen 25 mg + Dexamethasone
MOA of PDC
The antineoplastic activity of melflufen is dependent upon the expression of aminopeptidases, like APN (also known as CD18), which cleave melflufen into melphalan and p-Fluorophenylalanine. Following aminopeptidase-dependent cleavage, the hydrophilic alkylating metabolite melphalan accumulates in myeloma cells. This enrichment of the cytotoxic payload has a substantial impact on the antimyeloma activity of melflufen.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In phase 1, the established maximum tolerated dose was 41 mg of melflufen in combination with dexamethasone.
In Vivo Model Aged 18 years or older, had relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma, had received two or more previous lines of therapy (including lenalidomide and bortezomib).
Related Clinical Trial
NCT Number NCT01897714 Clinical Status Phase 1/2
Clinical Description The study will explore escalating doses of melflufen in combination with dexamethasone in small groups of patients to find the maximum tolerated dose of melflufen. That dose will then be used to determine the efficacy and safety profile of melflufen in combination with dexamethasone in a larger group of patients.
Experiment 240 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [7]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Maximum tolerated dose
40 mg
Administration Time Iv infusion of 40 mg melflufen on day 1 of each 21-day treatment cycle, in combination with 40 mg dexamet hasone (oral or iv) on days 1, 8 and 15 of each 21-day treatment cycle
Administration Dosage Melflufen 40 mg + Dexamethasone
MOA of PDC
The antineoplastic activity of melflufen is dependent upon the expression of aminopeptidases, like APN (also known as CD18), which cleave melflufen into melphalan and p-Fluorophenylalanine. Following aminopeptidase-dependent cleavage, the hydrophilic alkylating metabolite melphalan accumulates in myeloma cells. This enrichment of the cytotoxic payload has a substantial impact on the antimyeloma activity of melflufen.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In phase 1, the established maximum tolerated dose was 42 mg of melflufen in combination with dexamethasone.
In Vivo Model Aged 18 years or older, had relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma, had received two or more previous lines of therapy (including lenalidomide and bortezomib).
Related Clinical Trial
NCT Number NCT01897714 Clinical Status Phase 1/2
Clinical Description The study will explore escalating doses of melflufen in combination with dexamethasone in small groups of patients to find the maximum tolerated dose of melflufen. That dose will then be used to determine the efficacy and safety profile of melflufen in combination with dexamethasone in a larger group of patients.
Experiment 241 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [7]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Maximum tolerated dose
40 mg
Administration Time Iv infusion of 55 mg melflufen on day 1 of each 21-day treatment cycle, in combination with 40 mg dexamet hasone (oral or iv) on days 1, 8 and 15 of each 21-day treatment cycle
Administration Dosage Melflufen 55 mg + Dexamethasone
MOA of PDC
The antineoplastic activity of melflufen is dependent upon the expression of aminopeptidases, like APN (also known as CD18), which cleave melflufen into melphalan and p-Fluorophenylalanine. Following aminopeptidase-dependent cleavage, the hydrophilic alkylating metabolite melphalan accumulates in myeloma cells. This enrichment of the cytotoxic payload has a substantial impact on the antimyeloma activity of melflufen.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In phase 1, the established maximum tolerated dose was 43 mg of melflufen in combination with dexamethasone.
In Vivo Model Aged 18 years or older, had relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma, had received two or more previous lines of therapy (including lenalidomide and bortezomib).
Related Clinical Trial
NCT Number NCT01897714 Clinical Status Phase 1/2
Clinical Description The study will explore escalating doses of melflufen in combination with dexamethasone in small groups of patients to find the maximum tolerated dose of melflufen. That dose will then be used to determine the efficacy and safety profile of melflufen in combination with dexamethasone in a larger group of patients.
Experiment 242 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [4]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Median duration of response
4.4 months
Patients Enrolled
Patients with triple-class refractory disease group multiple myeloma.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melflufen is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate, targeting aminopeptidase which has an increased expression in fast-growing and aggressive malignancies. The lipophilicity of melflufen allows for passive diffusion, selectively targeting myeloma cells. Once inside the cell, melflufen is hydrolyzed to active alkylating metabolites melphalan and desethyl-melflufen. Melflufen and the active metabolites trigger irreversible DNA damage, inhibit proliferation, induces apoptosis, and express antiangiogenic effects. In addition, melflufen demonstrated activity in myeloma cells with documented impaired or absent Tp53 expression and documented resistance to bortezomib, dexamethasone, and melphalan.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
The primary outcome of the study was ORR, defined based on the International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) uniform response criteria. Investigators included a preplanned subgroup analysis in patients with triple-class refractory disease defined as refractory to at least 1 immunomodulator, 1 proteosome inhibitor, and 1 anti-CD38 antibody. From December 28, 2016, to October 14, 2019, investigators enrolled 157 patients across 17 sites that received at least 1 dose of melflufen. Patient baseline demographics included median age of 65 years old, an average of 5 previous lines of therapy, and 98% of patients were refractory to their previous line of therapy. A total of 131 patients (83%) discontinued treatment due to either disease progression or adverse effects. The median ORR was 29% (22%-37%) for the all treatment group and 26% (18%-35%) in the triple-class refractory disease group. The median duration of at least partial response or better was 5.5 months (3.9-7.6 months) in the all treatment group and 4.4 months (3.4-7.6 months) in the triple-class refractory disease group. Median overall survival (OS) was 11.6 months (9.3-15.4 months) in the all treatment group and 16.5 months (11.5-18.5 months) in the triple-class refractory group.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 243 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [4]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Median duration of response
5.5 months
Patients Enrolled
157 patients with multiple myeloma.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melflufen is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate, targeting aminopeptidase which has an increased expression in fast-growing and aggressive malignancies. The lipophilicity of melflufen allows for passive diffusion, selectively targeting myeloma cells. Once inside the cell, melflufen is hydrolyzed to active alkylating metabolites melphalan and desethyl-melflufen. Melflufen and the active metabolites trigger irreversible DNA damage, inhibit proliferation, induces apoptosis, and express antiangiogenic effects. In addition, melflufen demonstrated activity in myeloma cells with documented impaired or absent Tp53 expression and documented resistance to bortezomib, dexamethasone, and melphalan.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
The primary outcome of the study was ORR, defined based on the International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) uniform response criteria. Investigators included a preplanned subgroup analysis in patients with triple-class refractory disease defined as refractory to at least 1 immunomodulator, 1 proteosome inhibitor, and 1 anti-CD38 antibody. From December 28, 2016, to October 14, 2019, investigators enrolled 157 patients across 17 sites that received at least 1 dose of melflufen. Patient baseline demographics included median age of 65 years old, an average of 5 previous lines of therapy, and 98% of patients were refractory to their previous line of therapy. A total of 131 patients (83%) discontinued treatment due to either disease progression or adverse effects. The median ORR was 29% (22%-37%) for the all treatment group and 26% (18%-35%) in the triple-class refractory disease group. The median duration of at least partial response or better was 5.5 months (3.9-7.6 months) in the all treatment group and 4.4 months (3.4-7.6 months) in the triple-class refractory disease group. Median overall survival (OS) was 11.6 months (9.3-15.4 months) in the all treatment group and 16.5 months (11.5-18.5 months) in the triple-class refractory group.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 244 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [1]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Median duration of response
4.4 months
Patients Enrolled
Patients evaluable for response.
MOA of PDC
Melflufen is highly lipophilic, which promotes its rapid uptake by cells. Once within the cell, melflufen releases its hydrophilic alkylator payloads via the hydrolytic activity of intracellular peptidases (e.g., aminopeptidases). Aminopeptidases are Zn2+-dependent metalloproteinases that remove amino acids at the N-terminal position from oligopeptides and have been associated with multiple tumorigenic processes such as proliferation, apoptosis, differentiation, angiogenesis, and motility. The dependence of melflufen on aminopeptidases was initially demonstrated by the reduced cytotoxic activity of melflufen-but not the alkylator melphalan-when cells were pretreated with bestatin, an antibiotic that is a potent aminopeptidase inhibitor. In addition, structure analogs designed to resist peptide hydrolysis (N-methyl derivative and derivative with D-amino acid) were shown to be almost 100-fold less potent than melflufen. Subsequent in vitro studies demonstrated that hydrolytic cleavage of melflufen by aminopeptidases releases alkylator payloads, including melphalan. In vitro, the activity of melflufen is multi-pronged, including induction of DNA damage, induction of apoptosis, inhibition of VEGF-dependent cell migration, and inhibition of tumor-associated angiogenesis, which have been further reviewed elsewhere. Downregulation of aminopeptidases resulted in reduced melflufen-mediated cytotoxic activity and apoptotic signaling in cultured cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
Among 125 patients evaluable for response, the ORR (≥PR) was 29%, with 1 patient achieving a stringent complete response (CR) and 10 patients achieving a VGPR. The median duration of response was 4.4 months. The ORR was 21% among 47 patients with high-risk cytogenetics, 24% among 93 patients with triple-class refractory disease, and 24% among 42 patients with extramedullary disease.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 245 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [9]
Indication Relapsed/Refractory multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Median duration of treatment
15.1 weeks
Patients Enrolled
101 relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma patients with TTP <36 month Post-ASCTb.
MOA of PDC
In summary, the interpretation of the results from the OCEAN study were impacted by the heterogeneity of the population, with age and previous success of ASCT therapy identified as prognostic factors with study therapies. The safety profile of melflufen and dexamethasone is primarily characterized by hematologic AEs that are clinically manageable. Observed infection rates, which included COVID-19, were generally low. Taken together, these data support the use of melflufen and dexamethasone in patients who have not received a previous ASCT or who underwent a successful ASCT (ie, TTP >36 months post-ASCT). In addition, the favorable efficacy profile and convenience of monthly outpatient infusions, especially for patients without access to other therapeutics such as CAR T-cell therapy or bispecific antibodies, bode well for this combination translating successfully into real-world practice.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
Given the prognostic importance of TTP <36 months post-ASCT in OCEAN, we evaluated this prognostic factor in a post hoc analysis from the HORIZON study. Among 110 patients with triple-class refractory disease who had received ≥3 prior lines of therapy, 77 (70%) had received a previous ASCT and 58 (53%) had TTP <36 months post-ASCT (Suppl. Table S3). In patients with a TTP >36 months post-ASCT or no ASCT versus patients with a TTP <36 months post-ASCT, ORR was higher (29% vs 22%; Suppl. Table S4) and median DOR (7.6 months vs 3.9 months) and median PFS (4.2 months vs 3.4 months) were longer. Since pomalidomide and lenalidomide both belong to the immunomodulatory drugs, we analyzed if the duration of previous treatment with lenalidomide could have impacted the results. The median duration of lenalidomide was 14.4 months in patients with ASCT and TTP < 36 months, 38.3 months in patients with ASCT and TTP > 36 months, and 14.6 months in patients with no previous ASCT. However, the median PFS for patients treated with pomalidomide did not differ substantially between these groups of patients. The safety profile of melflufen and dexamethasone was generally consistent between patients with a TTP >36 months post-ASCT or no ASCT and patients with a TTP <36 months post-ASCT. In OCEAN among the melflufen group, the frequency of grade 3/4 TEAEs (88% and 92%), serious TEAEs (44% and 38%), and fatal adverse events (AEs; 11% and 13%) was similar in patients with a TTP >36 months post-ASCT or no ASCT and patients with TTP <36 months. However, patients with a TTP >36 months post-ASCT or no ASCT had lower rates of TEAEs leading to treatment discontinuation (23% and 31%), the longer median duration of study treatment (35.1 weeks vs 15.1 weeks), and longer median time to experiencing grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia (11.2 weeks vs 4.1 weeks) and grade 3/4 neutropenia (4.8 weeks vs 2.1 weeks) than patients with a TTP <36 months post-ASCT. In HORIZON, patients with a TTP >36 months post-ASCT or no ASCT had lower rates of grade 3/4 TEAEs (88% and 98%), but higher rates of serious TEAEs (64% and 53%) and similar rates of TEAEs leading to treatment discontinuation (29% and 33%) than patients with a TTP <36 months post-ASCT.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 246 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [9]
Indication Relapsed/Refractory multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Median duration of treatment
35.1 weeks
Patients Enrolled
145 patients who has relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma with no previous ASCT or TTP >36 month Post-ASCTa.
MOA of PDC
In summary, the interpretation of the results from the OCEAN study were impacted by the heterogeneity of the population, with age and previous success of ASCT therapy identified as prognostic factors with study therapies. The safety profile of melflufen and dexamethasone is primarily characterized by hematologic AEs that are clinically manageable. Observed infection rates, which included COVID-19, were generally low. Taken together, these data support the use of melflufen and dexamethasone in patients who have not received a previous ASCT or who underwent a successful ASCT (ie, TTP >36 months post-ASCT). In addition, the favorable efficacy profile and convenience of monthly outpatient infusions, especially for patients without access to other therapeutics such as CAR T-cell therapy or bispecific antibodies, bode well for this combination translating successfully into real-world practice.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
Given the prognostic importance of TTP <36 months post-ASCT in OCEAN, we evaluated this prognostic factor in a post hoc analysis from the HORIZON study. Among 110 patients with triple-class refractory disease who had received ≥3 prior lines of therapy, 77 (70%) had received a previous ASCT and 58 (53%) had TTP <36 months post-ASCT (Suppl. Table S3). In patients with a TTP >36 months post-ASCT or no ASCT versus patients with a TTP <36 months post-ASCT, ORR was higher (29% vs 22%; Suppl. Table S4) and median DOR (7.6 months vs 3.9 months) and median PFS (4.2 months vs 3.4 months) were longer. Since pomalidomide and lenalidomide both belong to the immunomodulatory drugs, we analyzed if the duration of previous treatment with lenalidomide could have impacted the results. The median duration of lenalidomide was 14.4 months in patients with ASCT and TTP < 36 months, 38.3 months in patients with ASCT and TTP > 36 months, and 14.6 months in patients with no previous ASCT. However, the median PFS for patients treated with pomalidomide did not differ substantially between these groups of patients. The safety profile of melflufen and dexamethasone was generally consistent between patients with a TTP >36 months post-ASCT or no ASCT and patients with a TTP <36 months post-ASCT. In OCEAN among the melflufen group, the frequency of grade 3/4 TEAEs (88% and 92%), serious TEAEs (44% and 38%), and fatal adverse events (AEs; 11% and 13%) was similar in patients with a TTP >36 months post-ASCT or no ASCT and patients with TTP <36 months. However, patients with a TTP >36 months post-ASCT or no ASCT had lower rates of TEAEs leading to treatment discontinuation (23% and 31%), the longer median duration of study treatment (35.1 weeks vs 15.1 weeks), and longer median time to experiencing grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia (11.2 weeks vs 4.1 weeks) and grade 3/4 neutropenia (4.8 weeks vs 2.1 weeks) than patients with a TTP <36 months post-ASCT. In HORIZON, patients with a TTP >36 months post-ASCT or no ASCT had lower rates of grade 3/4 TEAEs (88% and 98%), but higher rates of serious TEAEs (64% and 53%) and similar rates of TEAEs leading to treatment discontinuation (29% and 33%) than patients with a TTP <36 months post-ASCT.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 247 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [4]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Median overall survival (mOS)
19.7 months
Patients Enrolled
Patients with multiple myeloma.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melflufen is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate, targeting aminopeptidase which has an increased expression in fast-growing and aggressive malignancies. The lipophilicity of melflufen allows for passive diffusion, selectively targeting myeloma cells. Once inside the cell, melflufen is hydrolyzed to active alkylating metabolites melphalan and desethyl-melflufen. Melflufen and the active metabolites trigger irreversible DNA damage, inhibit proliferation, induces apoptosis, and express antiangiogenic effects. In addition, melflufen demonstrated activity in myeloma cells with documented impaired or absent Tp53 expression and documented resistance to bortezomib, dexamethasone, and melphalan.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
The FDA announced on July 28, 2021, all ongoing melflufen clinical trials are to suspend enrollment until a complete safety analysis can be performed. This recommendation is based on preliminary OCEAN trial OS data. The hazard ratio for OS was 1.104 (0.846-1.441) when comparing the 2 treatment arms, favoring pomalidomide plus dexamethasone. At a median follow-up of 19.1 months, the median OS for the melflufen arm was 19.7 months (15.1-25.6) compared with 25 months (18.1-31.9) in the pomalidomide arm. At this time, no further recommendations have been made by the FDA concerning the continuation of melflufen clinical trials.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 248 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [4]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Median overall survival (mOS)
11.6 months
Patients Enrolled
157 patients with multiple myeloma.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melflufen is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate, targeting aminopeptidase which has an increased expression in fast-growing and aggressive malignancies. The lipophilicity of melflufen allows for passive diffusion, selectively targeting myeloma cells. Once inside the cell, melflufen is hydrolyzed to active alkylating metabolites melphalan and desethyl-melflufen. Melflufen and the active metabolites trigger irreversible DNA damage, inhibit proliferation, induces apoptosis, and express antiangiogenic effects. In addition, melflufen demonstrated activity in myeloma cells with documented impaired or absent Tp53 expression and documented resistance to bortezomib, dexamethasone, and melphalan.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
The primary outcome of the study was ORR, defined based on the International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) uniform response criteria. Investigators included a preplanned subgroup analysis in patients with triple-class refractory disease defined as refractory to at least 1 immunomodulator, 1 proteosome inhibitor, and 1 anti-CD38 antibody. From December 28, 2016, to October 14, 2019, investigators enrolled 157 patients across 17 sites that received at least 1 dose of melflufen. Patient baseline demographics included median age of 65 years old, an average of 5 previous lines of therapy, and 98% of patients were refractory to their previous line of therapy. A total of 131 patients (83%) discontinued treatment due to either disease progression or adverse effects. The median ORR was 29% (22%-37%) for the all treatment group and 26% (18%-35%) in the triple-class refractory disease group. The median duration of at least partial response or better was 5.5 months (3.9-7.6 months) in the all treatment group and 4.4 months (3.4-7.6 months) in the triple-class refractory disease group. Median overall survival (OS) was 11.6 months (9.3-15.4 months) in the all treatment group and 16.5 months (11.5-18.5 months) in the triple-class refractory group.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 249 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [4]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Median overall survival (mOS)
16.5 months
Patients Enrolled
Patients with triple-class refractory disease group multiple myeloma.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melflufen is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate, targeting aminopeptidase which has an increased expression in fast-growing and aggressive malignancies. The lipophilicity of melflufen allows for passive diffusion, selectively targeting myeloma cells. Once inside the cell, melflufen is hydrolyzed to active alkylating metabolites melphalan and desethyl-melflufen. Melflufen and the active metabolites trigger irreversible DNA damage, inhibit proliferation, induces apoptosis, and express antiangiogenic effects. In addition, melflufen demonstrated activity in myeloma cells with documented impaired or absent Tp53 expression and documented resistance to bortezomib, dexamethasone, and melphalan.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
The primary outcome of the study was ORR, defined based on the International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) uniform response criteria. Investigators included a preplanned subgroup analysis in patients with triple-class refractory disease defined as refractory to at least 1 immunomodulator, 1 proteosome inhibitor, and 1 anti-CD38 antibody. From December 28, 2016, to October 14, 2019, investigators enrolled 157 patients across 17 sites that received at least 1 dose of melflufen. Patient baseline demographics included median age of 65 years old, an average of 5 previous lines of therapy, and 98% of patients were refractory to their previous line of therapy. A total of 131 patients (83%) discontinued treatment due to either disease progression or adverse effects. The median ORR was 29% (22%-37%) for the all treatment group and 26% (18%-35%) in the triple-class refractory disease group. The median duration of at least partial response or better was 5.5 months (3.9-7.6 months) in the all treatment group and 4.4 months (3.4-7.6 months) in the triple-class refractory disease group. Median overall survival (OS) was 11.6 months (9.3-15.4 months) in the all treatment group and 16.5 months (11.5-18.5 months) in the triple-class refractory group.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 250 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [1]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Median overall survival (mOS)
8.1 months
Patients Enrolled
Patients with extramedullary disease.
MOA of PDC
Melflufen is highly lipophilic, which promotes its rapid uptake by cells. Once within the cell, melflufen releases its hydrophilic alkylator payloads via the hydrolytic activity of intracellular peptidases (e.g., aminopeptidases). Aminopeptidases are Zn2+-dependent metalloproteinases that remove amino acids at the N-terminal position from oligopeptides and have been associated with multiple tumorigenic processes such as proliferation, apoptosis, differentiation, angiogenesis, and motility. The dependence of melflufen on aminopeptidases was initially demonstrated by the reduced cytotoxic activity of melflufen-but not the alkylator melphalan-when cells were pretreated with bestatin, an antibiotic that is a potent aminopeptidase inhibitor. In addition, structure analogs designed to resist peptide hydrolysis (N-methyl derivative and derivative with D-amino acid) were shown to be almost 100-fold less potent than melflufen. Subsequent in vitro studies demonstrated that hydrolytic cleavage of melflufen by aminopeptidases releases alkylator payloads, including melphalan. In vitro, the activity of melflufen is multi-pronged, including induction of DNA damage, induction of apoptosis, inhibition of VEGF-dependent cell migration, and inhibition of tumor-associated angiogenesis, which have been further reviewed elsewhere. Downregulation of aminopeptidases resulted in reduced melflufen-mediated cytotoxic activity and apoptotic signaling in cultured cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
The median PFS and OS were 4.2 and 11.6 months for all patients, 4.0 and 11.3 months for patients with triple-class refractory disease, and 3.0 and 8.1 months for patients with extramedullary disease, respectively.
Experiment 251 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [1]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Median overall survival (mOS)
11.3 months
Patients Enrolled
Patients with triple-class refractory disease.
MOA of PDC
Melflufen is highly lipophilic, which promotes its rapid uptake by cells. Once within the cell, melflufen releases its hydrophilic alkylator payloads via the hydrolytic activity of intracellular peptidases (e.g., aminopeptidases). Aminopeptidases are Zn2+-dependent metalloproteinases that remove amino acids at the N-terminal position from oligopeptides and have been associated with multiple tumorigenic processes such as proliferation, apoptosis, differentiation, angiogenesis, and motility. The dependence of melflufen on aminopeptidases was initially demonstrated by the reduced cytotoxic activity of melflufen-but not the alkylator melphalan-when cells were pretreated with bestatin, an antibiotic that is a potent aminopeptidase inhibitor. In addition, structure analogs designed to resist peptide hydrolysis (N-methyl derivative and derivative with D-amino acid) were shown to be almost 100-fold less potent than melflufen. Subsequent in vitro studies demonstrated that hydrolytic cleavage of melflufen by aminopeptidases releases alkylator payloads, including melphalan. In vitro, the activity of melflufen is multi-pronged, including induction of DNA damage, induction of apoptosis, inhibition of VEGF-dependent cell migration, and inhibition of tumor-associated angiogenesis, which have been further reviewed elsewhere. Downregulation of aminopeptidases resulted in reduced melflufen-mediated cytotoxic activity and apoptotic signaling in cultured cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
The median PFS and OS were 4.2 and 11.6 months for all patients, 4.0 and 11.3 months for patients with triple-class refractory disease, and 3.0 and 8.1 months for patients with extramedullary disease, respectively.
Experiment 252 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [1]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Median overall survival (mOS)
11.6 months
Patients Enrolled
All patients.
MOA of PDC
Melflufen is highly lipophilic, which promotes its rapid uptake by cells. Once within the cell, melflufen releases its hydrophilic alkylator payloads via the hydrolytic activity of intracellular peptidases (e.g., aminopeptidases). Aminopeptidases are Zn2+-dependent metalloproteinases that remove amino acids at the N-terminal position from oligopeptides and have been associated with multiple tumorigenic processes such as proliferation, apoptosis, differentiation, angiogenesis, and motility. The dependence of melflufen on aminopeptidases was initially demonstrated by the reduced cytotoxic activity of melflufen-but not the alkylator melphalan-when cells were pretreated with bestatin, an antibiotic that is a potent aminopeptidase inhibitor. In addition, structure analogs designed to resist peptide hydrolysis (N-methyl derivative and derivative with D-amino acid) were shown to be almost 100-fold less potent than melflufen. Subsequent in vitro studies demonstrated that hydrolytic cleavage of melflufen by aminopeptidases releases alkylator payloads, including melphalan. In vitro, the activity of melflufen is multi-pronged, including induction of DNA damage, induction of apoptosis, inhibition of VEGF-dependent cell migration, and inhibition of tumor-associated angiogenesis, which have been further reviewed elsewhere. Downregulation of aminopeptidases resulted in reduced melflufen-mediated cytotoxic activity and apoptotic signaling in cultured cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
The median PFS and OS were 4.2 and 11.6 months for all patients, 4.0 and 11.3 months for patients with triple-class refractory disease, and 3.0 and 8.1 months for patients with extramedullary disease, respectively.
Experiment 253 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [1]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Median overall survival (mOS)
15.5 months
Patients Enrolled
Patients with multi-refractory multiple myeloma.
MOA of PDC
Melflufen is highly lipophilic, which promotes its rapid uptake by cells. Once within the cell, melflufen releases its hydrophilic alkylator payloads via the hydrolytic activity of intracellular peptidases (e.g., aminopeptidases). Aminopeptidases are Zn2+-dependent metalloproteinases that remove amino acids at the N-terminal position from oligopeptides and have been associated with multiple tumorigenic processes such as proliferation, apoptosis, differentiation, angiogenesis, and motility. The dependence of melflufen on aminopeptidases was initially demonstrated by the reduced cytotoxic activity of melflufen-but not the alkylator melphalan-when cells were pretreated with bestatin, an antibiotic that is a potent aminopeptidase inhibitor. In addition, structure analogs designed to resist peptide hydrolysis (N-methyl derivative and derivative with D-amino acid) were shown to be almost 100-fold less potent than melflufen. Subsequent in vitro studies demonstrated that hydrolytic cleavage of melflufen by aminopeptidases releases alkylator payloads, including melphalan. In vitro, the activity of melflufen is multi-pronged, including induction of DNA damage, induction of apoptosis, inhibition of VEGF-dependent cell migration, and inhibition of tumor-associated angiogenesis, which have been further reviewed elsewhere. Downregulation of aminopeptidases resulted in reduced melflufen-mediated cytotoxic activity and apoptotic signaling in cultured cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
Among the 13 patients who received single-agent melflufen, the median number of prior therapies was 5 (range, 4-8), the ORR was 8% (1 PR), median PFS was 4.4 months, and median OS was 15.5 months.
Experiment 254 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [9]
Indication Relapsed/Refractory multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Median overall survival (mOS)
16.2 months
Patients Enrolled
96 relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma patients aged <65 years.
MOA of PDC
In summary, the interpretation of the results from the OCEAN study were impacted by the heterogeneity of the population, with age and previous success of ASCT therapy identified as prognostic factors with study therapies. The safety profile of melflufen and dexamethasone is primarily characterized by hematologic AEs that are clinically manageable. Observed infection rates, which included COVID-19, were generally low. Taken together, these data support the use of melflufen and dexamethasone in patients who have not received a previous ASCT or who underwent a successful ASCT (ie, TTP >36 months post-ASCT). In addition, the favorable efficacy profile and convenience of monthly outpatient infusions, especially for patients without access to other therapeutics such as CAR T-cell therapy or bispecific antibodies, bode well for this combination translating successfully into real-world practice.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In this updated survival analysis, median OS (95% CI) was 20.2 months (15.8-24.3) with melflufen and 24.0 months (19.1-28.7) with pomalidomide (HR, 1.14 [95% CI, 0.91-1.43]; P =.24), with a median follow-up time of 31.8 months and 29.8 months, respectively. Because of imbalance in the number of patients who were randomized but not treated, survival was also evaluated in the safety population: median OS (95% CI) was 21.3 months (16.6-24.8) with melflufen and 24.0 months (19.8-28.7) with pomalidomide (HR, 1.12 [95% CI, 0.89-1.42]; P =.33), with the curves overlapping until 10 months after randomization. Sensitivity analyses revealed that the uneven distribution of randomized but not treated patients impacted OS, but not PFS. Although a similar number of patients received subsequent therapy after OCEAN (melflufen group, 169/246 [69%] patients; pomalidomide group, 164/249 [66%] patients), the type of subsequent therapy and timing of subsequent therapy initiation differed between treatment groups.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 255 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [9]
Indication Relapsed/Refractory multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Median overall survival (mOS)
20.5 months
Patients Enrolled
113 relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma patients aged 65-74 years.
MOA of PDC
In summary, the interpretation of the results from the OCEAN study were impacted by the heterogeneity of the population, with age and previous success of ASCT therapy identified as prognostic factors with study therapies. The safety profile of melflufen and dexamethasone is primarily characterized by hematologic AEs that are clinically manageable. Observed infection rates, which included COVID-19, were generally low. Taken together, these data support the use of melflufen and dexamethasone in patients who have not received a previous ASCT or who underwent a successful ASCT (ie, TTP >36 months post-ASCT). In addition, the favorable efficacy profile and convenience of monthly outpatient infusions, especially for patients without access to other therapeutics such as CAR T-cell therapy or bispecific antibodies, bode well for this combination translating successfully into real-world practice.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In this updated survival analysis, median OS (95% CI) was 20.2 months (15.8-24.3) with melflufen and 24.0 months (19.1-28.7) with pomalidomide (HR, 1.14 [95% CI, 0.91-1.43]; P =.24), with a median follow-up time of 31.8 months and 29.8 months, respectively. Because of imbalance in the number of patients who were randomized but not treated, survival was also evaluated in the safety population: median OS (95% CI) was 21.3 months (16.6-24.8) with melflufen and 24.0 months (19.8-28.7) with pomalidomide (HR, 1.12 [95% CI, 0.89-1.42]; P =.33), with the curves overlapping until 10 months after randomization. Sensitivity analyses revealed that the uneven distribution of randomized but not treated patients impacted OS, but not PFS. Although a similar number of patients received subsequent therapy after OCEAN (melflufen group, 169/246 [69%] patients; pomalidomide group, 164/249 [66%] patients), the type of subsequent therapy and timing of subsequent therapy initiation differed between treatment groups.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 256 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [5]
Indication Relapsed/Refractory multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Median overall survival (mOS)
23.4 months
Patients Enrolled
153 patients refractory to prior alkylators (melflufen, n=78; pomalidomide, n=75).
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (melflufen), a first-in-class alkylating peptide-drug conjugate, plus dexamethasone demonstrated superior progression-free survival (PFS), but not overall survival (OS), versus pomalidomide plus dexamethasone in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma in the OCEAN study. Time to progression (TTP) <36 months after a prior autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) was a negative prognostic factor for OS with melflufen. This post hoc exploratory analysis evaluated patients refractory to prior alkylators (e.g., cyclophosphamide and melphalan) in OCEAN. In 153 patients refractory to prior alkylators (melflufen, n = 78; pomalidomide, n = 75), the melflufen and pomalidomide arms had similar median PFS (5.6 months [95% CI, 4.2-8.3] vs. 4.7 months [95% CI, 3.1-7.3]; hazard ratio [HR], 0.92 [95% CI, 0.63-1.33]) and OS (23.4 months [95% CI, 14.4-31.7] vs. 20.0 months [95% CI, 12.0-28.7]; HR, 0.92 [95% CI, 0.62-1.38]). Among alkylator-refractory patients with a TTP 36 months after a prior ASCT or no prior ASCT (melflufen, n = 54; pomalidomide, n = 53), the observed median PFS and OS were longer in the melflufen arm than the pomalidomide arm. The safety profile of melflufen was consistent with previous reports. These results suggest that melflufen is safe and effective in patients with alkylator-refractory disease, suggesting differentiated activity from other alkylators.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the overall alkylator-refractory group, the melflufen and pomalidomide arms saw a similar median PFS (5.6 months [95% CI, 4.2-8.3] vs. 4.7 months [95% CI, 3.1-7.3]; HR, 0.92 [95% CI, 0.63-1.33]) and median OS (23.4 months [14.4-31.7] vs. 20.0 months [12.0-28.7]; HR, 0.92 [95% CI, 0.62-1.38]). Corresponding results were observed when evaluating PFS and OS in subgroups by type of prior alkylating agent received. In the melflufen and pomalidomide arms, the ORR was 24.4% and 28.0% in patients refractory to alkylators overall, 22.2% and 25.0% in patients refractory to cyclophosphamide, and 33.3% and 26.1% in patients refractory to melphalan, respectively.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 257 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [9]
Indication Relapsed/Refractory multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Median overall survival (mOS)
26.5 months
Patients Enrolled
37 relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma patients aged 75 years.
MOA of PDC
In summary, the interpretation of the results from the OCEAN study were impacted by the heterogeneity of the population, with age and previous success of ASCT therapy identified as prognostic factors with study therapies. The safety profile of melflufen and dexamethasone is primarily characterized by hematologic AEs that are clinically manageable. Observed infection rates, which included COVID-19, were generally low. Taken together, these data support the use of melflufen and dexamethasone in patients who have not received a previous ASCT or who underwent a successful ASCT (ie, TTP >36 months post-ASCT). In addition, the favorable efficacy profile and convenience of monthly outpatient infusions, especially for patients without access to other therapeutics such as CAR T-cell therapy or bispecific antibodies, bode well for this combination translating successfully into real-world practice.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In this updated survival analysis, median OS (95% CI) was 20.2 months (15.8-24.3) with melflufen and 24.0 months (19.1-28.7) with pomalidomide (HR, 1.14 [95% CI, 0.91-1.43]; P =.24), with a median follow-up time of 31.8 months and 29.8 months, respectively. Because of imbalance in the number of patients who were randomized but not treated, survival was also evaluated in the safety population: median OS (95% CI) was 21.3 months (16.6-24.8) with melflufen and 24.0 months (19.8-28.7) with pomalidomide (HR, 1.12 [95% CI, 0.89-1.42]; P =.33), with the curves overlapping until 10 months after randomization. Sensitivity analyses revealed that the uneven distribution of randomized but not treated patients impacted OS, but not PFS. Although a similar number of patients received subsequent therapy after OCEAN (melflufen group, 169/246 [69%] patients; pomalidomide group, 164/249 [66%] patients), the type of subsequent therapy and timing of subsequent therapy initiation differed between treatment groups.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 258 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [10]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Median progression-free survival (mPFS)
6.8 months
Administration Time 15.5 months
MOA of PDC
Melflufen, a highly lipophilic PDC, takes a novel approach by taking advantage of increased aminopeptidase activity to selectively increase the release and concentration of cytotoxic alkylating agents inside of tumor cells. Being highly lipophilic, melflufen does not require active transport, a process that may be defective in cancer cells and contribute to chemoresistance, but instead rapidly enters cells via passive diffusion. The lipophilic nature of melflufen also likely results in its favorable distribution to bone marrow, a fatty tissue, and the physiological component most relevant to MM. Once inside the tumor cells, melflufen is rapidly hydrolyzed by aminopeptidases, enzymes that are found in normal cells but are overexpressed in MM and upon which cancer cells are particularly dependent. This hydrolysis releases potent alkylating agents - most notably melphalan and des-ethyl melflufen - within the cells. Aminopeptidase-driven release of these hydrophilic molecules, which cannot readily diffuse out, thereby results in intracellular trapping. Leveraging high tumor cell aminopeptidase concentrations to rapidly drive intracellular alkylating agent release may provide a safety advantage over alkylators, such as melphalan, which lack such a mechanism for tumor cell targeting, particularly in tumors with an aggressive phenotype.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
OCEAN randomized patients to 28-day cycles of melflufen 40 mg intravenous on day 1 plus dexamethasone 40 mg oral (days 1, 8, 15, and 22) or pomalidomide 4 mg oral (days 1-21) plus dexamethasone 40 mg oral (days 1, 8, 15, and 22). The primary objective was to compare the PFS of melflufen plus dexamethasone and pomalidomide plus dexamethasone by independent review. Secondary endpoints include comparing ORR, OS, and safety and tolerability. Notably, the OCEAN patient population and study design mirrored those of the MM-003 study to allow for the most robust comparison between melflufen and pomalidomide. Primary results of the OCEAN trial were recently published, with additional survival follow-up ongoing. In total, 495 patients were randomized (246 to the melflufen arm and 249 to the pomalidomide arm). The study met its primary endpoints, with melflufen plus dexamethasone demonstrating a superior PFS to pomalidomide plus dexamethasone (median PFS: 6.8 months vs 4.9 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.79 [95% CI, 0.64-0.98]; P = 0.03), but OS favored pomalidomide plus dexamethasone (median OS: 19.8 months vs 25.0 months; HR, 1.10 [95% CI, 0.85-1.44]; not significant). However, additional exploratory and post-hoc analyses identified previous ASCT and age as significant prognostic factors, which is not surprising given that transplant eligibility and age are generally correlated. Patients who had not received a previous ASCT (melflufen, n = 121; pomalidomide, n = 129) had better PFS and OS with melflufen plus dexamethasone than with pomalidomide plus dexamethasone (median PFS: 9.3 months vs 4.6 months; HR, 0.59 [95% CI, 0.44-0.79]; P < 0.001; median OS: 21.6 months vs 16.5 months; HR, 0.78 [95% CI, 0.55-1.12]; not significant), while patients who had received previous ASCT (melflufen, n = 125; pomalidomide, n = 120) saw similar PFS between groups but worse OS with melflufen plus dexamethasone than with pomalidomide plus dexamethasone (median PFS: 4.4 months vs 5.2 months; HR, 1.06 [95% CI, 0.79-1.43]; not significant; median OS: 16.7 months vs 31.0 months; HR, 1.61 [95% CI, 1.09-2.40]; P = 0.02). In patients aged ≥75, PFS was more favorable with melflufen (HR, 0.43 [95% CI, 0.24-0.76]; P = 0.003) but in patients aged <65, OS data favored pomalidomide (HR, 1.71 [95% CI, 1.09-2.69]; P = 0.02). Safety was evaluated in patients who received at least one dose of study medication (melflufen, n = 228; pomalidomide, n = 246).

   Click to Show/Hide
Related Clinical Trial
NCT Number NCT03151811 Clinical Status Phase 3
Clinical Description This was a randomized, controlled, open-label, Phase 3 multicenter study which enrolled patients with RRMM following 2-4 lines of prior therapy and who were refractory to lenalidomide in the last line of therapy as demonstrated by disease progression on or within 60 days of completion of the last dose of lenalidomide. Patients received either melflufen+dex or pomalidomide+dex.
Experiment 259 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [10]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Median progression-free survival (mPFS)
4.2 months
Administration Time 14 months
MOA of PDC
Melflufen, a highly lipophilic PDC, takes a novel approach by taking advantage of increased aminopeptidase activity to selectively increase the release and concentration of cytotoxic alkylating agents inside of tumor cells. Being highly lipophilic, melflufen does not require active transport, a process that may be defective in cancer cells and contribute to chemoresistance, but instead rapidly enters cells via passive diffusion. The lipophilic nature of melflufen also likely results in its favorable distribution to bone marrow, a fatty tissue, and the physiological component most relevant to MM. Once inside the tumor cells, melflufen is rapidly hydrolyzed by aminopeptidases, enzymes that are found in normal cells but are overexpressed in MM and upon which cancer cells are particularly dependent. This hydrolysis releases potent alkylating agents - most notably melphalan and des-ethyl melflufen - within the cells. Aminopeptidase-driven release of these hydrophilic molecules, which cannot readily diffuse out, thereby results in intracellular trapping. Leveraging high tumor cell aminopeptidase concentrations to rapidly drive intracellular alkylating agent release may provide a safety advantage over alkylators, such as melphalan, which lack such a mechanism for tumor cell targeting, particularly in tumors with an aggressive phenotype.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
Extensive subgroup analyses have been carried out using O-12-M1 and HORIZON data. In HORIZON, patients with triple-refractory disease and those with disease refractory to anti-CD38 mAbs in the last line had efficacy outcomes similar to those in the overall patient population. Patients with MM refractory to anti-CD38 mAbs in the last line (n = 63) had better response (ORR 35% versus 31%), median PFS (4.6 versus 3.4 months) and OS (15.4 versus 9.3 months) than patients in the MAMMOTH trial treated with conventional chemotherapy (n = 275). Baseline characteristics were similar in these two trials, except that in HORIZON, patients were more heavily pretreated (median 5 versus 4 therapies). Among patients in HORIZON whose disease was alkylator-refractory in any prior line (n = 92), the ORR was 21% and median PFS was 3.8 months. None of the seven patients with melphalan-refractory disease, however, had an objective response by independent review. This contrasts with the 44% ORR observed in nine patients with melphalan-refractory disease in O-12-M1. All seven patients in HORIZON, however, were at least triple-class refractory, and none had achieved a CR in any prior line.

   Click to Show/Hide
Related Clinical Trial
NCT Number NCT02963493 Clinical Status Phase 2
Clinical Description This study will evaluate melflufen in combination with dexamethasone in adult patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma in whose disease is refractory to pomalidomide and/or an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody. All patients in the study will be treated with melflufen on Day 1 and dexamethasone on Days 1, 8, 15 and 22 of each 28-day cycle.
Experiment 260 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [10]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Median progression-free survival (mPFS)
5.7 months
Administration Time 27.9 months
MOA of PDC
Melflufen, a highly lipophilic PDC, takes a novel approach by taking advantage of increased aminopeptidase activity to selectively increase the release and concentration of cytotoxic alkylating agents inside of tumor cells. Being highly lipophilic, melflufen does not require active transport, a process that may be defective in cancer cells and contribute to chemoresistance, but instead rapidly enters cells via passive diffusion. The lipophilic nature of melflufen also likely results in its favorable distribution to bone marrow, a fatty tissue, and the physiological component most relevant to MM. Once inside the tumor cells, melflufen is rapidly hydrolyzed by aminopeptidases, enzymes that are found in normal cells but are overexpressed in MM and upon which cancer cells are particularly dependent. This hydrolysis releases potent alkylating agents - most notably melphalan and des-ethyl melflufen - within the cells. Aminopeptidase-driven release of these hydrophilic molecules, which cannot readily diffuse out, thereby results in intracellular trapping. Leveraging high tumor cell aminopeptidase concentrations to rapidly drive intracellular alkylating agent release may provide a safety advantage over alkylators, such as melphalan, which lack such a mechanism for tumor cell targeting, particularly in tumors with an aggressive phenotype.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
Forty-five patients received melflufen plus dexamethasone in the phase II portion of the study. The median age was 66 years, 67% were male, the median prior therapies were 4 (range, 3-5), 67% were double refractory (PI and IMiD), 58% had received previous ASCT, 20% had International Staging System (ISS) stage 3 disease, and 44% had high-risk cytogenetics. At a median follow-up time of 27.9 months, the ORR in this cohort was 31% (95% CI: 18-47), including 11% very good partial response (VGPR). No complete responses (CRs) occurred. Interestingly, among patients whose disease was refractory to melphalan in any prior line, the ORR was 44%. The CBR was 49% (95% CI: 34-64), the median duration of response (DOR) was 8.4 months (95% CI: 4.6-9.6), and median PFS was 5.7 months (95% CI: 3.7-9.2). A recently published longer term data analysis reported that at a median 46-month follow-up, the median overall survival (OS) was 20.7 months (95% CI: 11.8-41.3).

   Click to Show/Hide
Related Clinical Trial
NCT Number NCT01897714 Clinical Status Phase 1/2
Clinical Description The study will explore escalating doses of melflufen in combination with dexamethasone in small groups of patients to find the maximum tolerated dose of melflufen. That dose will then be used to determine the efficacy and safety profile of melflufen in combination with dexamethasone in a larger group of patients.
Experiment 261 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [10]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Median progression-free survival (mPFS)
11.5 months
Administration Time 11.9 months
MOA of PDC
Melflufen, a highly lipophilic PDC, takes a novel approach by taking advantage of increased aminopeptidase activity to selectively increase the release and concentration of cytotoxic alkylating agents inside of tumor cells. Being highly lipophilic, melflufen does not require active transport, a process that may be defective in cancer cells and contribute to chemoresistance, but instead rapidly enters cells via passive diffusion. The lipophilic nature of melflufen also likely results in its favorable distribution to bone marrow, a fatty tissue, and the physiological component most relevant to MM. Once inside the tumor cells, melflufen is rapidly hydrolyzed by aminopeptidases, enzymes that are found in normal cells but are overexpressed in MM and upon which cancer cells are particularly dependent. This hydrolysis releases potent alkylating agents - most notably melphalan and des-ethyl melflufen - within the cells. Aminopeptidase-driven release of these hydrophilic molecules, which cannot readily diffuse out, thereby results in intracellular trapping. Leveraging high tumor cell aminopeptidase concentrations to rapidly drive intracellular alkylating agent release may provide a safety advantage over alkylators, such as melphalan, which lack such a mechanism for tumor cell targeting, particularly in tumors with an aggressive phenotype.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
Results for 33 patients in the melflufen/daratumumab/dexamethasone arm and 10 in the melflufen/bortezomib/dexamethasone arm have been previously reported. Patients in the daratumumab-containing arm had a median age of 64, and a median of two prior therapies. High-risk cytogenetics were present in 42%, and 61% were refractory to their last therapy. At a median treatment duration of 8.4 months, the ORR was 70%, consisting of one sCR, one CR, and ten VGPRs, and median PFS was 11.5 months. No DLTS were reported, and the most common grade ≥3 treatment-related AEs were neutropenia (58%) and thrombocytopenia (55%). There were two fatal AEs (myeloma progression and sepsis; general physical health deterioration) of which sepsis was considered treatment related. In the melflufen/bortezomib/dexamethasone arm, the median age was 71 years, and patients had a median

   Click to Show/Hide
Related Clinical Trial
NCT Number NCT03481556 Clinical Status Phase 1/2
Clinical Description This is an open-label Phase 1/2a study which will enroll patients that have relapsed or relapsed-refractory multiple myeloma to combination regimens of melflufen with currently approved agents. Patients will receive either melflufen+dexamethasone+bortezomib or melflufen+dexamethasone+daratumumab.
Experiment 262 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [1]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Median progression-free survival (mPFS)
Not reached
Patients Enrolled
Patients with multi-refractory multiple myeloma.
Administration Time 9.3 month (median)
Administration Dosage 30 or 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melflufen is highly lipophilic, which promotes its rapid uptake by cells. Once within the cell, melflufen releases its hydrophilic alkylator payloads via the hydrolytic activity of intracellular peptidases (e.g., aminopeptidases). Aminopeptidases are Zn2+-dependent metalloproteinases that remove amino acids at the N-terminal position from oligopeptides and have been associated with multiple tumorigenic processes such as proliferation, apoptosis, differentiation, angiogenesis, and motility. The dependence of melflufen on aminopeptidases was initially demonstrated by the reduced cytotoxic activity of melflufen-but not the alkylator melphalan-when cells were pretreated with bestatin, an antibiotic that is a potent aminopeptidase inhibitor. In addition, structure analogs designed to resist peptide hydrolysis (N-methyl derivative and derivative with D-amino acid) were shown to be almost 100-fold less potent than melflufen. Subsequent in vitro studies demonstrated that hydrolytic cleavage of melflufen by aminopeptidases releases alkylator payloads, including melphalan. In vitro, the activity of melflufen is multi-pronged, including induction of DNA damage, induction of apoptosis, inhibition of VEGF-dependent cell migration, and inhibition of tumor-associated angiogenesis, which have been further reviewed elsewhere. Downregulation of aminopeptidases resulted in reduced melflufen-mediated cytotoxic activity and apoptotic signaling in cultured cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 263 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [1]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Median progression-free survival (mPFS)
3.0 months
Patients Enrolled
Patients with extramedullary disease.
MOA of PDC
Melflufen is highly lipophilic, which promotes its rapid uptake by cells. Once within the cell, melflufen releases its hydrophilic alkylator payloads via the hydrolytic activity of intracellular peptidases (e.g., aminopeptidases). Aminopeptidases are Zn2+-dependent metalloproteinases that remove amino acids at the N-terminal position from oligopeptides and have been associated with multiple tumorigenic processes such as proliferation, apoptosis, differentiation, angiogenesis, and motility. The dependence of melflufen on aminopeptidases was initially demonstrated by the reduced cytotoxic activity of melflufen-but not the alkylator melphalan-when cells were pretreated with bestatin, an antibiotic that is a potent aminopeptidase inhibitor. In addition, structure analogs designed to resist peptide hydrolysis (N-methyl derivative and derivative with D-amino acid) were shown to be almost 100-fold less potent than melflufen. Subsequent in vitro studies demonstrated that hydrolytic cleavage of melflufen by aminopeptidases releases alkylator payloads, including melphalan. In vitro, the activity of melflufen is multi-pronged, including induction of DNA damage, induction of apoptosis, inhibition of VEGF-dependent cell migration, and inhibition of tumor-associated angiogenesis, which have been further reviewed elsewhere. Downregulation of aminopeptidases resulted in reduced melflufen-mediated cytotoxic activity and apoptotic signaling in cultured cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
The median PFS and OS were 4.2 and 11.6 months for all patients, 4.0 and 11.3 months for patients with triple-class refractory disease, and 3.0 and 8.1 months for patients with extramedullary disease, respectively.
Experiment 264 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [1]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Median progression-free survival (mPFS)
4.0 months
Patients Enrolled
Patients with triple-class refractory disease.
MOA of PDC
Melflufen is highly lipophilic, which promotes its rapid uptake by cells. Once within the cell, melflufen releases its hydrophilic alkylator payloads via the hydrolytic activity of intracellular peptidases (e.g., aminopeptidases). Aminopeptidases are Zn2+-dependent metalloproteinases that remove amino acids at the N-terminal position from oligopeptides and have been associated with multiple tumorigenic processes such as proliferation, apoptosis, differentiation, angiogenesis, and motility. The dependence of melflufen on aminopeptidases was initially demonstrated by the reduced cytotoxic activity of melflufen-but not the alkylator melphalan-when cells were pretreated with bestatin, an antibiotic that is a potent aminopeptidase inhibitor. In addition, structure analogs designed to resist peptide hydrolysis (N-methyl derivative and derivative with D-amino acid) were shown to be almost 100-fold less potent than melflufen. Subsequent in vitro studies demonstrated that hydrolytic cleavage of melflufen by aminopeptidases releases alkylator payloads, including melphalan. In vitro, the activity of melflufen is multi-pronged, including induction of DNA damage, induction of apoptosis, inhibition of VEGF-dependent cell migration, and inhibition of tumor-associated angiogenesis, which have been further reviewed elsewhere. Downregulation of aminopeptidases resulted in reduced melflufen-mediated cytotoxic activity and apoptotic signaling in cultured cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
The median PFS and OS were 4.2 and 11.6 months for all patients, 4.0 and 11.3 months for patients with triple-class refractory disease, and 3.0 and 8.1 months for patients with extramedullary disease, respectively.
Experiment 265 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [1]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Median progression-free survival (mPFS)
4.2 months
Patients Enrolled
Patients with multi-refractory multiple myeloma.
Administration Time 14.3 week (median)
Administration Dosage 40 mg with dexamethasone (40 mg)
MOA of PDC
Melflufen is highly lipophilic, which promotes its rapid uptake by cells. Once within the cell, melflufen releases its hydrophilic alkylator payloads via the hydrolytic activity of intracellular peptidases (e.g., aminopeptidases). Aminopeptidases are Zn2+-dependent metalloproteinases that remove amino acids at the N-terminal position from oligopeptides and have been associated with multiple tumorigenic processes such as proliferation, apoptosis, differentiation, angiogenesis, and motility. The dependence of melflufen on aminopeptidases was initially demonstrated by the reduced cytotoxic activity of melflufen-but not the alkylator melphalan-when cells were pretreated with bestatin, an antibiotic that is a potent aminopeptidase inhibitor. In addition, structure analogs designed to resist peptide hydrolysis (N-methyl derivative and derivative with D-amino acid) were shown to be almost 100-fold less potent than melflufen. Subsequent in vitro studies demonstrated that hydrolytic cleavage of melflufen by aminopeptidases releases alkylator payloads, including melphalan. In vitro, the activity of melflufen is multi-pronged, including induction of DNA damage, induction of apoptosis, inhibition of VEGF-dependent cell migration, and inhibition of tumor-associated angiogenesis, which have been further reviewed elsewhere. Downregulation of aminopeptidases resulted in reduced melflufen-mediated cytotoxic activity and apoptotic signaling in cultured cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 266 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [1]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Median progression-free survival (mPFS)
4.2 months
Patients Enrolled
All patients.
MOA of PDC
Melflufen is highly lipophilic, which promotes its rapid uptake by cells. Once within the cell, melflufen releases its hydrophilic alkylator payloads via the hydrolytic activity of intracellular peptidases (e.g., aminopeptidases). Aminopeptidases are Zn2+-dependent metalloproteinases that remove amino acids at the N-terminal position from oligopeptides and have been associated with multiple tumorigenic processes such as proliferation, apoptosis, differentiation, angiogenesis, and motility. The dependence of melflufen on aminopeptidases was initially demonstrated by the reduced cytotoxic activity of melflufen-but not the alkylator melphalan-when cells were pretreated with bestatin, an antibiotic that is a potent aminopeptidase inhibitor. In addition, structure analogs designed to resist peptide hydrolysis (N-methyl derivative and derivative with D-amino acid) were shown to be almost 100-fold less potent than melflufen. Subsequent in vitro studies demonstrated that hydrolytic cleavage of melflufen by aminopeptidases releases alkylator payloads, including melphalan. In vitro, the activity of melflufen is multi-pronged, including induction of DNA damage, induction of apoptosis, inhibition of VEGF-dependent cell migration, and inhibition of tumor-associated angiogenesis, which have been further reviewed elsewhere. Downregulation of aminopeptidases resulted in reduced melflufen-mediated cytotoxic activity and apoptotic signaling in cultured cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
The median PFS and OS were 4.2 and 11.6 months for all patients, 4.0 and 11.3 months for patients with triple-class refractory disease, and 3.0 and 8.1 months for patients with extramedullary disease, respectively.
Experiment 267 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [9]
Indication Relapsed/Refractory multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Median progression-free survival (mPFS)
4.4 months
Patients Enrolled
96 relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma patients aged <65 years.
MOA of PDC
In summary, the interpretation of the results from the OCEAN study were impacted by the heterogeneity of the population, with age and previous success of ASCT therapy identified as prognostic factors with study therapies. The safety profile of melflufen and dexamethasone is primarily characterized by hematologic AEs that are clinically manageable. Observed infection rates, which included COVID-19, were generally low. Taken together, these data support the use of melflufen and dexamethasone in patients who have not received a previous ASCT or who underwent a successful ASCT (ie, TTP >36 months post-ASCT). In addition, the favorable efficacy profile and convenience of monthly outpatient infusions, especially for patients without access to other therapeutics such as CAR T-cell therapy or bispecific antibodies, bode well for this combination translating successfully into real-world practice.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In this updated survival analysis, median OS (95% CI) was 20.2 months (15.8-24.3) with melflufen and 24.0 months (19.1-28.7) with pomalidomide (HR, 1.14 [95% CI, 0.91-1.43]; P =.24), with a median follow-up time of 31.8 months and 29.8 months, respectively. Because of imbalance in the number of patients who were randomized but not treated, survival was also evaluated in the safety population: median OS (95% CI) was 21.3 months (16.6-24.8) with melflufen and 24.0 months (19.8-28.7) with pomalidomide (HR, 1.12 [95% CI, 0.89-1.42]; P =.33), with the curves overlapping until 10 months after randomization. Sensitivity analyses revealed that the uneven distribution of randomized but not treated patients impacted OS, but not PFS. Although a similar number of patients received subsequent therapy after OCEAN (melflufen group, 169/246 [69%] patients; pomalidomide group, 164/249 [66%] patients), the type of subsequent therapy and timing of subsequent therapy initiation differed between treatment groups.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 268 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [1]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Median progression-free survival (mPFS)
4.4 months
Patients Enrolled
Patients with multi-refractory multiple myeloma.
MOA of PDC
Melflufen is highly lipophilic, which promotes its rapid uptake by cells. Once within the cell, melflufen releases its hydrophilic alkylator payloads via the hydrolytic activity of intracellular peptidases (e.g., aminopeptidases). Aminopeptidases are Zn2+-dependent metalloproteinases that remove amino acids at the N-terminal position from oligopeptides and have been associated with multiple tumorigenic processes such as proliferation, apoptosis, differentiation, angiogenesis, and motility. The dependence of melflufen on aminopeptidases was initially demonstrated by the reduced cytotoxic activity of melflufen-but not the alkylator melphalan-when cells were pretreated with bestatin, an antibiotic that is a potent aminopeptidase inhibitor. In addition, structure analogs designed to resist peptide hydrolysis (N-methyl derivative and derivative with D-amino acid) were shown to be almost 100-fold less potent than melflufen. Subsequent in vitro studies demonstrated that hydrolytic cleavage of melflufen by aminopeptidases releases alkylator payloads, including melphalan. In vitro, the activity of melflufen is multi-pronged, including induction of DNA damage, induction of apoptosis, inhibition of VEGF-dependent cell migration, and inhibition of tumor-associated angiogenesis, which have been further reviewed elsewhere. Downregulation of aminopeptidases resulted in reduced melflufen-mediated cytotoxic activity and apoptotic signaling in cultured cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
Among the 13 patients who received single-agent melflufen, the median number of prior therapies was 5 (range, 4-8), the ORR was 8% (1 PR), median PFS was 4.4 months, and median OS was 15.5 months.
Experiment 269 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [5]
Indication Relapsed/Refractory multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Median progression-free survival (mPFS)
5.6 months
Patients Enrolled
153 patients refractory to prior alkylators (melflufen, n=78; pomalidomide, n=75).
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (melflufen), a first-in-class alkylating peptide-drug conjugate, plus dexamethasone demonstrated superior progression-free survival (PFS), but not overall survival (OS), versus pomalidomide plus dexamethasone in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma in the OCEAN study. Time to progression (TTP) <36 months after a prior autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) was a negative prognostic factor for OS with melflufen. This post hoc exploratory analysis evaluated patients refractory to prior alkylators (e.g., cyclophosphamide and melphalan) in OCEAN. In 153 patients refractory to prior alkylators (melflufen, n = 78; pomalidomide, n = 75), the melflufen and pomalidomide arms had similar median PFS (5.6 months [95% CI, 4.2-8.3] vs. 4.7 months [95% CI, 3.1-7.3]; hazard ratio [HR], 0.92 [95% CI, 0.63-1.33]) and OS (23.4 months [95% CI, 14.4-31.7] vs. 20.0 months [95% CI, 12.0-28.7]; HR, 0.92 [95% CI, 0.62-1.38]). Among alkylator-refractory patients with a TTP 36 months after a prior ASCT or no prior ASCT (melflufen, n = 54; pomalidomide, n = 53), the observed median PFS and OS were longer in the melflufen arm than the pomalidomide arm. The safety profile of melflufen was consistent with previous reports. These results suggest that melflufen is safe and effective in patients with alkylator-refractory disease, suggesting differentiated activity from other alkylators.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the overall alkylator-refractory group, the melflufen and pomalidomide arms saw a similar median PFS (5.6 months [95% CI, 4.2-8.3] vs. 4.7 months [95% CI, 3.1-7.3]; HR, 0.92 [95% CI, 0.63-1.33]) and median OS (23.4 months [14.4-31.7] vs. 20.0 months [12.0-28.7]; HR, 0.92 [95% CI, 0.62-1.38]). Corresponding results were observed when evaluating PFS and OS in subgroups by type of prior alkylating agent received. In the melflufen and pomalidomide arms, the ORR was 24.4% and 28.0% in patients refractory to alkylators overall, 22.2% and 25.0% in patients refractory to cyclophosphamide, and 33.3% and 26.1% in patients refractory to melphalan, respectively.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 270 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [1]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Median progression-free survival (mPFS)
5.7 months
Patients Enrolled
Patients with multi-refractory multiple myeloma.
Administration Time 28-day cycle
Administration Dosage 40 mg with dexamethasone (40 mg)
MOA of PDC
Melflufen is highly lipophilic, which promotes its rapid uptake by cells. Once within the cell, melflufen releases its hydrophilic alkylator payloads via the hydrolytic activity of intracellular peptidases (e.g., aminopeptidases). Aminopeptidases are Zn2+-dependent metalloproteinases that remove amino acids at the N-terminal position from oligopeptides and have been associated with multiple tumorigenic processes such as proliferation, apoptosis, differentiation, angiogenesis, and motility. The dependence of melflufen on aminopeptidases was initially demonstrated by the reduced cytotoxic activity of melflufen-but not the alkylator melphalan-when cells were pretreated with bestatin, an antibiotic that is a potent aminopeptidase inhibitor. In addition, structure analogs designed to resist peptide hydrolysis (N-methyl derivative and derivative with D-amino acid) were shown to be almost 100-fold less potent than melflufen. Subsequent in vitro studies demonstrated that hydrolytic cleavage of melflufen by aminopeptidases releases alkylator payloads, including melphalan. In vitro, the activity of melflufen is multi-pronged, including induction of DNA damage, induction of apoptosis, inhibition of VEGF-dependent cell migration, and inhibition of tumor-associated angiogenesis, which have been further reviewed elsewhere. Downregulation of aminopeptidases resulted in reduced melflufen-mediated cytotoxic activity and apoptotic signaling in cultured cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 271 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [9]
Indication Relapsed/Refractory multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Median progression-free survival (mPFS)
7.2 months
Patients Enrolled
113 relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma patients aged 65-74 years.
MOA of PDC
In summary, the interpretation of the results from the OCEAN study were impacted by the heterogeneity of the population, with age and previous success of ASCT therapy identified as prognostic factors with study therapies. The safety profile of melflufen and dexamethasone is primarily characterized by hematologic AEs that are clinically manageable. Observed infection rates, which included COVID-19, were generally low. Taken together, these data support the use of melflufen and dexamethasone in patients who have not received a previous ASCT or who underwent a successful ASCT (ie, TTP >36 months post-ASCT). In addition, the favorable efficacy profile and convenience of monthly outpatient infusions, especially for patients without access to other therapeutics such as CAR T-cell therapy or bispecific antibodies, bode well for this combination translating successfully into real-world practice.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In this updated survival analysis, median OS (95% CI) was 20.2 months (15.8-24.3) with melflufen and 24.0 months (19.1-28.7) with pomalidomide (HR, 1.14 [95% CI, 0.91-1.43]; P =.24), with a median follow-up time of 31.8 months and 29.8 months, respectively. Because of imbalance in the number of patients who were randomized but not treated, survival was also evaluated in the safety population: median OS (95% CI) was 21.3 months (16.6-24.8) with melflufen and 24.0 months (19.8-28.7) with pomalidomide (HR, 1.12 [95% CI, 0.89-1.42]; P =.33), with the curves overlapping until 10 months after randomization. Sensitivity analyses revealed that the uneven distribution of randomized but not treated patients impacted OS, but not PFS. Although a similar number of patients received subsequent therapy after OCEAN (melflufen group, 169/246 [69%] patients; pomalidomide group, 164/249 [66%] patients), the type of subsequent therapy and timing of subsequent therapy initiation differed between treatment groups.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 272 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [9]
Indication Relapsed/Refractory multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Median progression-free survival (mPFS)
9.3 months
Patients Enrolled
37 relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma patients aged 75 years.
MOA of PDC
In summary, the interpretation of the results from the OCEAN study were impacted by the heterogeneity of the population, with age and previous success of ASCT therapy identified as prognostic factors with study therapies. The safety profile of melflufen and dexamethasone is primarily characterized by hematologic AEs that are clinically manageable. Observed infection rates, which included COVID-19, were generally low. Taken together, these data support the use of melflufen and dexamethasone in patients who have not received a previous ASCT or who underwent a successful ASCT (ie, TTP >36 months post-ASCT). In addition, the favorable efficacy profile and convenience of monthly outpatient infusions, especially for patients without access to other therapeutics such as CAR T-cell therapy or bispecific antibodies, bode well for this combination translating successfully into real-world practice.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In this updated survival analysis, median OS (95% CI) was 20.2 months (15.8-24.3) with melflufen and 24.0 months (19.1-28.7) with pomalidomide (HR, 1.14 [95% CI, 0.91-1.43]; P =.24), with a median follow-up time of 31.8 months and 29.8 months, respectively. Because of imbalance in the number of patients who were randomized but not treated, survival was also evaluated in the safety population: median OS (95% CI) was 21.3 months (16.6-24.8) with melflufen and 24.0 months (19.8-28.7) with pomalidomide (HR, 1.12 [95% CI, 0.89-1.42]; P =.33), with the curves overlapping until 10 months after randomization. Sensitivity analyses revealed that the uneven distribution of randomized but not treated patients impacted OS, but not PFS. Although a similar number of patients received subsequent therapy after OCEAN (melflufen group, 169/246 [69%] patients; pomalidomide group, 164/249 [66%] patients), the type of subsequent therapy and timing of subsequent therapy initiation differed between treatment groups.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 273 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [1]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Median progression-free survival (mPFS)
14.3 months
Patients Enrolled
Patients with multi-refractory multiple myeloma.
Administration Time 6.2 month (median)
Administration Dosage 30 or 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melflufen is highly lipophilic, which promotes its rapid uptake by cells. Once within the cell, melflufen releases its hydrophilic alkylator payloads via the hydrolytic activity of intracellular peptidases (e.g., aminopeptidases). Aminopeptidases are Zn2+-dependent metalloproteinases that remove amino acids at the N-terminal position from oligopeptides and have been associated with multiple tumorigenic processes such as proliferation, apoptosis, differentiation, angiogenesis, and motility. The dependence of melflufen on aminopeptidases was initially demonstrated by the reduced cytotoxic activity of melflufen-but not the alkylator melphalan-when cells were pretreated with bestatin, an antibiotic that is a potent aminopeptidase inhibitor. In addition, structure analogs designed to resist peptide hydrolysis (N-methyl derivative and derivative with D-amino acid) were shown to be almost 100-fold less potent than melflufen. Subsequent in vitro studies demonstrated that hydrolytic cleavage of melflufen by aminopeptidases releases alkylator payloads, including melphalan. In vitro, the activity of melflufen is multi-pronged, including induction of DNA damage, induction of apoptosis, inhibition of VEGF-dependent cell migration, and inhibition of tumor-associated angiogenesis, which have been further reviewed elsewhere. Downregulation of aminopeptidases resulted in reduced melflufen-mediated cytotoxic activity and apoptotic signaling in cultured cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 274 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [9]
Indication Relapsed/Refractory multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Median time to dose reduction
10.1 weeks
Patients Enrolled
101 relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma patients with TTP <36 month Post-ASCTb.
MOA of PDC
In summary, the interpretation of the results from the OCEAN study were impacted by the heterogeneity of the population, with age and previous success of ASCT therapy identified as prognostic factors with study therapies. The safety profile of melflufen and dexamethasone is primarily characterized by hematologic AEs that are clinically manageable. Observed infection rates, which included COVID-19, were generally low. Taken together, these data support the use of melflufen and dexamethasone in patients who have not received a previous ASCT or who underwent a successful ASCT (ie, TTP >36 months post-ASCT). In addition, the favorable efficacy profile and convenience of monthly outpatient infusions, especially for patients without access to other therapeutics such as CAR T-cell therapy or bispecific antibodies, bode well for this combination translating successfully into real-world practice.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
Given the prognostic importance of TTP <36 months post-ASCT in OCEAN, we evaluated this prognostic factor in a post hoc analysis from the HORIZON study. Among 110 patients with triple-class refractory disease who had received ≥3 prior lines of therapy, 77 (70%) had received a previous ASCT and 58 (53%) had TTP <36 months post-ASCT (Suppl. Table S3). In patients with a TTP >36 months post-ASCT or no ASCT versus patients with a TTP <36 months post-ASCT, ORR was higher (29% vs 22%; Suppl. Table S4) and median DOR (7.6 months vs 3.9 months) and median PFS (4.2 months vs 3.4 months) were longer. Since pomalidomide and lenalidomide both belong to the immunomodulatory drugs, we analyzed if the duration of previous treatment with lenalidomide could have impacted the results. The median duration of lenalidomide was 14.4 months in patients with ASCT and TTP < 36 months, 38.3 months in patients with ASCT and TTP > 36 months, and 14.6 months in patients with no previous ASCT. However, the median PFS for patients treated with pomalidomide did not differ substantially between these groups of patients. The safety profile of melflufen and dexamethasone was generally consistent between patients with a TTP >36 months post-ASCT or no ASCT and patients with a TTP <36 months post-ASCT. In OCEAN among the melflufen group, the frequency of grade 3/4 TEAEs (88% and 92%), serious TEAEs (44% and 38%), and fatal adverse events (AEs; 11% and 13%) was similar in patients with a TTP >36 months post-ASCT or no ASCT and patients with TTP <36 months. However, patients with a TTP >36 months post-ASCT or no ASCT had lower rates of TEAEs leading to treatment discontinuation (23% and 31%), the longer median duration of study treatment (35.1 weeks vs 15.1 weeks), and longer median time to experiencing grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia (11.2 weeks vs 4.1 weeks) and grade 3/4 neutropenia (4.8 weeks vs 2.1 weeks) than patients with a TTP <36 months post-ASCT. In HORIZON, patients with a TTP >36 months post-ASCT or no ASCT had lower rates of grade 3/4 TEAEs (88% and 98%), but higher rates of serious TEAEs (64% and 53%) and similar rates of TEAEs leading to treatment discontinuation (29% and 33%) than patients with a TTP <36 months post-ASCT.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 275 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [9]
Indication Relapsed/Refractory multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Median time to dose reduction
21.6 weeks
Patients Enrolled
145 patients who has relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma with no previous ASCT or TTP >36 month Post-ASCTa.
MOA of PDC
In summary, the interpretation of the results from the OCEAN study were impacted by the heterogeneity of the population, with age and previous success of ASCT therapy identified as prognostic factors with study therapies. The safety profile of melflufen and dexamethasone is primarily characterized by hematologic AEs that are clinically manageable. Observed infection rates, which included COVID-19, were generally low. Taken together, these data support the use of melflufen and dexamethasone in patients who have not received a previous ASCT or who underwent a successful ASCT (ie, TTP >36 months post-ASCT). In addition, the favorable efficacy profile and convenience of monthly outpatient infusions, especially for patients without access to other therapeutics such as CAR T-cell therapy or bispecific antibodies, bode well for this combination translating successfully into real-world practice.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
Given the prognostic importance of TTP <36 months post-ASCT in OCEAN, we evaluated this prognostic factor in a post hoc analysis from the HORIZON study. Among 110 patients with triple-class refractory disease who had received ≥3 prior lines of therapy, 77 (70%) had received a previous ASCT and 58 (53%) had TTP <36 months post-ASCT (Suppl. Table S3). In patients with a TTP >36 months post-ASCT or no ASCT versus patients with a TTP <36 months post-ASCT, ORR was higher (29% vs 22%; Suppl. Table S4) and median DOR (7.6 months vs 3.9 months) and median PFS (4.2 months vs 3.4 months) were longer. Since pomalidomide and lenalidomide both belong to the immunomodulatory drugs, we analyzed if the duration of previous treatment with lenalidomide could have impacted the results. The median duration of lenalidomide was 14.4 months in patients with ASCT and TTP < 36 months, 38.3 months in patients with ASCT and TTP > 36 months, and 14.6 months in patients with no previous ASCT. However, the median PFS for patients treated with pomalidomide did not differ substantially between these groups of patients. The safety profile of melflufen and dexamethasone was generally consistent between patients with a TTP >36 months post-ASCT or no ASCT and patients with a TTP <36 months post-ASCT. In OCEAN among the melflufen group, the frequency of grade 3/4 TEAEs (88% and 92%), serious TEAEs (44% and 38%), and fatal adverse events (AEs; 11% and 13%) was similar in patients with a TTP >36 months post-ASCT or no ASCT and patients with TTP <36 months. However, patients with a TTP >36 months post-ASCT or no ASCT had lower rates of TEAEs leading to treatment discontinuation (23% and 31%), the longer median duration of study treatment (35.1 weeks vs 15.1 weeks), and longer median time to experiencing grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia (11.2 weeks vs 4.1 weeks) and grade 3/4 neutropenia (4.8 weeks vs 2.1 weeks) than patients with a TTP <36 months post-ASCT. In HORIZON, patients with a TTP >36 months post-ASCT or no ASCT had lower rates of grade 3/4 TEAEs (88% and 98%), but higher rates of serious TEAEs (64% and 53%) and similar rates of TEAEs leading to treatment discontinuation (29% and 33%) than patients with a TTP <36 months post-ASCT.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 276 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [9]
Indication Relapsed/Refractory multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Median time to grade 3/4 neutropenia
2.1 weeks
Patients Enrolled
101 relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma patients with TTP <36 month Post-ASCTb.
MOA of PDC
In summary, the interpretation of the results from the OCEAN study were impacted by the heterogeneity of the population, with age and previous success of ASCT therapy identified as prognostic factors with study therapies. The safety profile of melflufen and dexamethasone is primarily characterized by hematologic AEs that are clinically manageable. Observed infection rates, which included COVID-19, were generally low. Taken together, these data support the use of melflufen and dexamethasone in patients who have not received a previous ASCT or who underwent a successful ASCT (ie, TTP >36 months post-ASCT). In addition, the favorable efficacy profile and convenience of monthly outpatient infusions, especially for patients without access to other therapeutics such as CAR T-cell therapy or bispecific antibodies, bode well for this combination translating successfully into real-world practice.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
Given the prognostic importance of TTP <36 months post-ASCT in OCEAN, we evaluated this prognostic factor in a post hoc analysis from the HORIZON study. Among 110 patients with triple-class refractory disease who had received ≥3 prior lines of therapy, 77 (70%) had received a previous ASCT and 58 (53%) had TTP <36 months post-ASCT (Suppl. Table S3). In patients with a TTP >36 months post-ASCT or no ASCT versus patients with a TTP <36 months post-ASCT, ORR was higher (29% vs 22%; Suppl. Table S4) and median DOR (7.6 months vs 3.9 months) and median PFS (4.2 months vs 3.4 months) were longer. Since pomalidomide and lenalidomide both belong to the immunomodulatory drugs, we analyzed if the duration of previous treatment with lenalidomide could have impacted the results. The median duration of lenalidomide was 14.4 months in patients with ASCT and TTP < 36 months, 38.3 months in patients with ASCT and TTP > 36 months, and 14.6 months in patients with no previous ASCT. However, the median PFS for patients treated with pomalidomide did not differ substantially between these groups of patients. The safety profile of melflufen and dexamethasone was generally consistent between patients with a TTP >36 months post-ASCT or no ASCT and patients with a TTP <36 months post-ASCT. In OCEAN among the melflufen group, the frequency of grade 3/4 TEAEs (88% and 92%), serious TEAEs (44% and 38%), and fatal adverse events (AEs; 11% and 13%) was similar in patients with a TTP >36 months post-ASCT or no ASCT and patients with TTP <36 months. However, patients with a TTP >36 months post-ASCT or no ASCT had lower rates of TEAEs leading to treatment discontinuation (23% and 31%), the longer median duration of study treatment (35.1 weeks vs 15.1 weeks), and longer median time to experiencing grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia (11.2 weeks vs 4.1 weeks) and grade 3/4 neutropenia (4.8 weeks vs 2.1 weeks) than patients with a TTP <36 months post-ASCT. In HORIZON, patients with a TTP >36 months post-ASCT or no ASCT had lower rates of grade 3/4 TEAEs (88% and 98%), but higher rates of serious TEAEs (64% and 53%) and similar rates of TEAEs leading to treatment discontinuation (29% and 33%) than patients with a TTP <36 months post-ASCT.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 277 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [9]
Indication Relapsed/Refractory multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Median time to grade 3/4 neutropenia
4.8 weeks
Patients Enrolled
145 patients who has relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma with no previous ASCT or TTP >36 month Post-ASCTa.
MOA of PDC
In summary, the interpretation of the results from the OCEAN study were impacted by the heterogeneity of the population, with age and previous success of ASCT therapy identified as prognostic factors with study therapies. The safety profile of melflufen and dexamethasone is primarily characterized by hematologic AEs that are clinically manageable. Observed infection rates, which included COVID-19, were generally low. Taken together, these data support the use of melflufen and dexamethasone in patients who have not received a previous ASCT or who underwent a successful ASCT (ie, TTP >36 months post-ASCT). In addition, the favorable efficacy profile and convenience of monthly outpatient infusions, especially for patients without access to other therapeutics such as CAR T-cell therapy or bispecific antibodies, bode well for this combination translating successfully into real-world practice.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
Given the prognostic importance of TTP <36 months post-ASCT in OCEAN, we evaluated this prognostic factor in a post hoc analysis from the HORIZON study. Among 110 patients with triple-class refractory disease who had received ≥3 prior lines of therapy, 77 (70%) had received a previous ASCT and 58 (53%) had TTP <36 months post-ASCT (Suppl. Table S3). In patients with a TTP >36 months post-ASCT or no ASCT versus patients with a TTP <36 months post-ASCT, ORR was higher (29% vs 22%; Suppl. Table S4) and median DOR (7.6 months vs 3.9 months) and median PFS (4.2 months vs 3.4 months) were longer. Since pomalidomide and lenalidomide both belong to the immunomodulatory drugs, we analyzed if the duration of previous treatment with lenalidomide could have impacted the results. The median duration of lenalidomide was 14.4 months in patients with ASCT and TTP < 36 months, 38.3 months in patients with ASCT and TTP > 36 months, and 14.6 months in patients with no previous ASCT. However, the median PFS for patients treated with pomalidomide did not differ substantially between these groups of patients. The safety profile of melflufen and dexamethasone was generally consistent between patients with a TTP >36 months post-ASCT or no ASCT and patients with a TTP <36 months post-ASCT. In OCEAN among the melflufen group, the frequency of grade 3/4 TEAEs (88% and 92%), serious TEAEs (44% and 38%), and fatal adverse events (AEs; 11% and 13%) was similar in patients with a TTP >36 months post-ASCT or no ASCT and patients with TTP <36 months. However, patients with a TTP >36 months post-ASCT or no ASCT had lower rates of TEAEs leading to treatment discontinuation (23% and 31%), the longer median duration of study treatment (35.1 weeks vs 15.1 weeks), and longer median time to experiencing grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia (11.2 weeks vs 4.1 weeks) and grade 3/4 neutropenia (4.8 weeks vs 2.1 weeks) than patients with a TTP <36 months post-ASCT. In HORIZON, patients with a TTP >36 months post-ASCT or no ASCT had lower rates of grade 3/4 TEAEs (88% and 98%), but higher rates of serious TEAEs (64% and 53%) and similar rates of TEAEs leading to treatment discontinuation (29% and 33%) than patients with a TTP <36 months post-ASCT.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 278 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [9]
Indication Relapsed/Refractory multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Median time to grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia
4.1 weeks
Patients Enrolled
101 relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma patients with TTP <36 month Post-ASCTb.
MOA of PDC
In summary, the interpretation of the results from the OCEAN study were impacted by the heterogeneity of the population, with age and previous success of ASCT therapy identified as prognostic factors with study therapies. The safety profile of melflufen and dexamethasone is primarily characterized by hematologic AEs that are clinically manageable. Observed infection rates, which included COVID-19, were generally low. Taken together, these data support the use of melflufen and dexamethasone in patients who have not received a previous ASCT or who underwent a successful ASCT (ie, TTP >36 months post-ASCT). In addition, the favorable efficacy profile and convenience of monthly outpatient infusions, especially for patients without access to other therapeutics such as CAR T-cell therapy or bispecific antibodies, bode well for this combination translating successfully into real-world practice.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
Given the prognostic importance of TTP <36 months post-ASCT in OCEAN, we evaluated this prognostic factor in a post hoc analysis from the HORIZON study. Among 110 patients with triple-class refractory disease who had received ≥3 prior lines of therapy, 77 (70%) had received a previous ASCT and 58 (53%) had TTP <36 months post-ASCT (Suppl. Table S3). In patients with a TTP >36 months post-ASCT or no ASCT versus patients with a TTP <36 months post-ASCT, ORR was higher (29% vs 22%; Suppl. Table S4) and median DOR (7.6 months vs 3.9 months) and median PFS (4.2 months vs 3.4 months) were longer. Since pomalidomide and lenalidomide both belong to the immunomodulatory drugs, we analyzed if the duration of previous treatment with lenalidomide could have impacted the results. The median duration of lenalidomide was 14.4 months in patients with ASCT and TTP < 36 months, 38.3 months in patients with ASCT and TTP > 36 months, and 14.6 months in patients with no previous ASCT. However, the median PFS for patients treated with pomalidomide did not differ substantially between these groups of patients. The safety profile of melflufen and dexamethasone was generally consistent between patients with a TTP >36 months post-ASCT or no ASCT and patients with a TTP <36 months post-ASCT. In OCEAN among the melflufen group, the frequency of grade 3/4 TEAEs (88% and 92%), serious TEAEs (44% and 38%), and fatal adverse events (AEs; 11% and 13%) was similar in patients with a TTP >36 months post-ASCT or no ASCT and patients with TTP <36 months. However, patients with a TTP >36 months post-ASCT or no ASCT had lower rates of TEAEs leading to treatment discontinuation (23% and 31%), the longer median duration of study treatment (35.1 weeks vs 15.1 weeks), and longer median time to experiencing grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia (11.2 weeks vs 4.1 weeks) and grade 3/4 neutropenia (4.8 weeks vs 2.1 weeks) than patients with a TTP <36 months post-ASCT. In HORIZON, patients with a TTP >36 months post-ASCT or no ASCT had lower rates of grade 3/4 TEAEs (88% and 98%), but higher rates of serious TEAEs (64% and 53%) and similar rates of TEAEs leading to treatment discontinuation (29% and 33%) than patients with a TTP <36 months post-ASCT.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 279 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [9]
Indication Relapsed/Refractory multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Median time to grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia
11.2 weeks
Patients Enrolled
145 patients who has relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma with no previous ASCT or TTP >36 month Post-ASCTa.
MOA of PDC
In summary, the interpretation of the results from the OCEAN study were impacted by the heterogeneity of the population, with age and previous success of ASCT therapy identified as prognostic factors with study therapies. The safety profile of melflufen and dexamethasone is primarily characterized by hematologic AEs that are clinically manageable. Observed infection rates, which included COVID-19, were generally low. Taken together, these data support the use of melflufen and dexamethasone in patients who have not received a previous ASCT or who underwent a successful ASCT (ie, TTP >36 months post-ASCT). In addition, the favorable efficacy profile and convenience of monthly outpatient infusions, especially for patients without access to other therapeutics such as CAR T-cell therapy or bispecific antibodies, bode well for this combination translating successfully into real-world practice.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
Given the prognostic importance of TTP <36 months post-ASCT in OCEAN, we evaluated this prognostic factor in a post hoc analysis from the HORIZON study. Among 110 patients with triple-class refractory disease who had received ≥3 prior lines of therapy, 77 (70%) had received a previous ASCT and 58 (53%) had TTP <36 months post-ASCT (Suppl. Table S3). In patients with a TTP >36 months post-ASCT or no ASCT versus patients with a TTP <36 months post-ASCT, ORR was higher (29% vs 22%; Suppl. Table S4) and median DOR (7.6 months vs 3.9 months) and median PFS (4.2 months vs 3.4 months) were longer. Since pomalidomide and lenalidomide both belong to the immunomodulatory drugs, we analyzed if the duration of previous treatment with lenalidomide could have impacted the results. The median duration of lenalidomide was 14.4 months in patients with ASCT and TTP < 36 months, 38.3 months in patients with ASCT and TTP > 36 months, and 14.6 months in patients with no previous ASCT. However, the median PFS for patients treated with pomalidomide did not differ substantially between these groups of patients. The safety profile of melflufen and dexamethasone was generally consistent between patients with a TTP >36 months post-ASCT or no ASCT and patients with a TTP <36 months post-ASCT. In OCEAN among the melflufen group, the frequency of grade 3/4 TEAEs (88% and 92%), serious TEAEs (44% and 38%), and fatal adverse events (AEs; 11% and 13%) was similar in patients with a TTP >36 months post-ASCT or no ASCT and patients with TTP <36 months. However, patients with a TTP >36 months post-ASCT or no ASCT had lower rates of TEAEs leading to treatment discontinuation (23% and 31%), the longer median duration of study treatment (35.1 weeks vs 15.1 weeks), and longer median time to experiencing grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia (11.2 weeks vs 4.1 weeks) and grade 3/4 neutropenia (4.8 weeks vs 2.1 weeks) than patients with a TTP <36 months post-ASCT. In HORIZON, patients with a TTP >36 months post-ASCT or no ASCT had lower rates of grade 3/4 TEAEs (88% and 98%), but higher rates of serious TEAEs (64% and 53%) and similar rates of TEAEs leading to treatment discontinuation (29% and 33%) than patients with a TTP <36 months post-ASCT.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 280 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [3]
Indication Relapsed/Refractory multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Melflufen-related adverse event rate
92.90%
Patients Enrolled
14 patients with relapsed refractory multiple myeloma.
Administration Time 28-day cycle
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that utilizes increased peptidase expression to selectively release potent alkylating agents inside tumor cells. Melflufen is hydrolyzed by peptidases and esterases to melphalan either directly or through an intermediate metabolite, desethyl-melflufen. The high lipophilicity of melflufen facilitates passive diffusion across cell membranes. The activity and tolerability of melflufen in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) were demonstrated in the O-12-M1 (NCT01897714), OCEAN (NCT03151811), and HORIZON (NCT02963493) trials.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
Overall, at least one TEAE was reported in 13 (92.9%) and 13 (100.0%) patients in Arms A and B, respectively (Table 3). During cycle 1, 9 patients (64.3%) and 12 patients (92.3%), respectively, had at least one TEAE. Cumulatively, grade 3 or 4 AEs occurred in 12 (85.7%) and 12 (92.3%) patients, respectively, and serious AEs were reported in 5 (35.7%) and 9 (69.2%) patients, respectively. The most common any-grade AEs in Arms A and B, respectively, were thrombocytopenia (10 [71.4%]; 10 [76.9%]), neutropenia (9 [64.3%]; 9 [69.2%]), and anemia (9 [64.3%]; 7 [53.8%]). No phlebitis or local-infusion-related reactions were reported based on pre- and post-infusion inspection of the IV site, and there were no extravasations observed in Arm A or B. Similarly, VIP scores collected on Day 1 post-infusion and on Day 8 indicated that patients had healthy IV sites (VIP score of 0) with no signs of phlebitis following PVC administration of melflufen. The most common non-hematological AE was positive SARS-CoV-2 test (Arm A: 2 [14.3%]; Arm B: 4 [30.8%]). Pneumonia was the most common serious AE (Arm A: 2 [14.3%]; Arm B: 2 [15.4%]). The most common AE considered related to melflufen and/or dexamethasone by investigators was thrombocytopenia (Arm A: 10 [71.4%]; Arm B: 10 [76.9%]). AEs led to treatment discontinuation in 3 (21.4%) and 6 (46.2%) patients in Arms A and B, respectively.

   Click to Show/Hide
Half life period 75.6 h
Related Clinical Trial
NCT Number NCT04412707 Clinical Status Phase 2
Clinical Description This is a randomized, two-period, cross-over Phase 2 study, comparing PK, and assessing safety and tolerability and efficacy of peripheral and central intravenous administration of melflufen in patients with RRMM. It is an international study, enrolling patients in US and Europe. The study will enroll patients following at least 2 lines of prior therapy.
Experiment 281 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Minimal response rate
15%
Patients Enrolled
246 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 282 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Minimal response rate
17%
Patients Enrolled
246 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 283 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [2]
Indication Relapsed/Refractory multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Minor response (MR)
0%
Patients Enrolled
14 patients no prior ASCT or TTP >36 months after ASCT.
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (melflufen), a first-in-class alkylating peptide-drug conjugate, plus dexamethasone was approved in Europe for use in patients with triple-class refractory relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) with 3 prior lines of therapy and without prior autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) or with a time to progression >36 months after prior ASCT. The randomized LIGHTHOUSE study (NCT04649060) assessed melflufen plus daratumumab and dexamethasone (melflufen group) versus daratumumab in patients with RRMM with disease refractory to an immunomodulatory agent and a proteasome inhibitor or who had received 3 prior lines of therapy including an immunomodulatory agent and a proteasome inhibitor. A partial clinical hold issued by the US Food and Drug Administration for all melflufen studies led to financial constraints and premature study closure on February 23rd 2022 (data cut-off date). In total, 54 of 240 planned patients were randomized (melflufen group, N=27; daratumumab group, N=27). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was not reached in the melflufen group versus 4.9 months in the daratumumab group (Hazard Ratio: 0.18 [95% Confidence Interval, 0.05-0.65]; P=0.0032) at a median follow-up time of 7.1 and 6.6 months, respectively. Overall response rate (ORR) was 59% in the melflufen group versus 30% in the daratumumab group (P=0.0300). The most common grade 3 treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen group versus daratumumab group were neutropenia (50% vs. 12%), thrombocytopenia (50% vs. 8%), and anemia (32% vs. 19%). Melflufen plus daratumumab and dexamethasone demonstrated superior PFS and ORR versus daratumumab in RRMM and a safety profile comparable to previously published melflufen studies.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
Efficacy endpoints were more pronounced in favor of the melflufen group compared with the daratumumab group among patients with no prior ASCT or TTP >36 months after a prior ASCT (melflufen group, N=14; daratumumab group, N=15). Median PFS was NR in the melflufen group and 3.9 months (95% CI: 1.4-4.9) in the daratumumab group (HR, 0.06 [95% CI: 0.01-0.49]; log-rank P=0.0005). Fewer OS events were reported in the melflufen group (1 event [7%] vs. 4 events [27%] in the daratumumab group; log-rank P=0.0369). The ORR was 64% (95% CI: 35-87) in the melflufen group and 13% (95% CI: 2-41) in the daratumumab group (P=0.0055). More patients in the melflufen group had a CR (1 patient [7%] vs. 0 patients [0%]) or VGPR (2 patients [14%] vs. 1 patient [7%]) compared with the daratumumab group.

   Click to Show/Hide
Related Clinical Trial
NCT Number NCT04649060 Clinical Status Phase 3
Clinical Description This was a randomized, controlled, open-label, Phase 3 multicenter study which enrolled patients with Relapsed-Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM) who were either double refractory to an Immunomodulatory Drug (IMiD) and a Proteasome Inhibitor (PI) (regardless of the number of prior lines of therapy), or had received at least 3 prior lines of therapy including an IMiD and a PI. Patients received treatment with melflufen+dexamethasone+daratumumab or daratumumab until documented progressive disease, unacceptable toxicity, or patient/treating physician decision. Patients in the daratumumab treatment arm had the option to receive treatment with melflufen+dexamethasone+daratumumab after confirmed progressive disease.
Experiment 284 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [4]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Nausea
32.00%
Patients Enrolled
157 patients with multiple myeloma.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melflufen is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate, targeting aminopeptidase which has an increased expression in fast-growing and aggressive malignancies. The lipophilicity of melflufen allows for passive diffusion, selectively targeting myeloma cells. Once inside the cell, melflufen is hydrolyzed to active alkylating metabolites melphalan and desethyl-melflufen. Melflufen and the active metabolites trigger irreversible DNA damage, inhibit proliferation, induces apoptosis, and express antiangiogenic effects. In addition, melflufen demonstrated activity in myeloma cells with documented impaired or absent Tp53 expression and documented resistance to bortezomib, dexamethasone, and melphalan.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
Based on the safety data collected during the HORIZON trial, treatment emergent adverse events occurred in 100% of patients including 100 patients (64%) having at least 1 CTCAE grade 4 adverse effect. Hematologic grade 3 or 4 adverse effects including thrombocytopenia (76%), neutropenia (79%), anemia (43%), and infections (11%) were the most commonly reported. Other adverse effects, such as fatigue (55%), nausea (32%), diarrhea (27%), and decreased appetite (14%), were similar to other alkylating agents. Pyrexia (24%), including febrile neutropenia (5%), and respiratory tract infections (24%) were contributed to hematologic toxicities.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 285 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [1]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Nausea
27.00%
Patients Enrolled
Patients with multi-refractory multiple myeloma.
MOA of PDC
Melflufen is highly lipophilic, which promotes its rapid uptake by cells. Once within the cell, melflufen releases its hydrophilic alkylator payloads via the hydrolytic activity of intracellular peptidases (e.g., aminopeptidases). Aminopeptidases are Zn2+-dependent metalloproteinases that remove amino acids at the N-terminal position from oligopeptides and have been associated with multiple tumorigenic processes such as proliferation, apoptosis, differentiation, angiogenesis, and motility. The dependence of melflufen on aminopeptidases was initially demonstrated by the reduced cytotoxic activity of melflufen-but not the alkylator melphalan-when cells were pretreated with bestatin, an antibiotic that is a potent aminopeptidase inhibitor. In addition, structure analogs designed to resist peptide hydrolysis (N-methyl derivative and derivative with D-amino acid) were shown to be almost 100-fold less potent than melflufen. Subsequent in vitro studies demonstrated that hydrolytic cleavage of melflufen by aminopeptidases releases alkylator payloads, including melphalan. In vitro, the activity of melflufen is multi-pronged, including induction of DNA damage, induction of apoptosis, inhibition of VEGF-dependent cell migration, and inhibition of tumor-associated angiogenesis, which have been further reviewed elsewhere. Downregulation of aminopeptidases resulted in reduced melflufen-mediated cytotoxic activity and apoptotic signaling in cultured cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
Melflufen plus dexamethasone was generally manageable in this heavily pretreated patient population [51]. All patients experienced ≥1 AE, most commonly hematologic AEs including thrombocytopenia (73%), neutropenia (69%), and anemia (64%). The most common non-hematologic AEs included pyrexia (40%), asthenia (31%), fatigue (29%), nausea (27%), and diarrhea (24%).

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 286 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [2]
Indication Relapsed/Refractory multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Neutropenia
50%
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (melflufen), a first-in-class alkylating peptide-drug conjugate, plus dexamethasone was approved in Europe for use in patients with triple-class refractory relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) with 3 prior lines of therapy and without prior autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) or with a time to progression >36 months after prior ASCT. The randomized LIGHTHOUSE study (NCT04649060) assessed melflufen plus daratumumab and dexamethasone (melflufen group) versus daratumumab in patients with RRMM with disease refractory to an immunomodulatory agent and a proteasome inhibitor or who had received 3 prior lines of therapy including an immunomodulatory agent and a proteasome inhibitor. A partial clinical hold issued by the US Food and Drug Administration for all melflufen studies led to financial constraints and premature study closure on February 23rd 2022 (data cut-off date). In total, 54 of 240 planned patients were randomized (melflufen group, N=27; daratumumab group, N=27). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was not reached in the melflufen group versus 4.9 months in the daratumumab group (Hazard Ratio: 0.18 [95% Confidence Interval, 0.05-0.65]; P=0.0032) at a median follow-up time of 7.1 and 6.6 months, respectively. Overall response rate (ORR) was 59% in the melflufen group versus 30% in the daratumumab group (P=0.0300). The most common grade 3 treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen group versus daratumumab group were neutropenia (50% vs. 12%), thrombocytopenia (50% vs. 8%), and anemia (32% vs. 19%). Melflufen plus daratumumab and dexamethasone demonstrated superior PFS and ORR versus daratumumab in RRMM and a safety profile comparable to previously published melflufen studies.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
The safety population included patients who received ≥1 dose of melflufen, daratumumab, or dexamethasone (melflufen group) and 26 patients who received daratumumab monotherapy. In the safety population, ≥1 TEAE was reported in 21 patients (96%) with melflufen, daratumumab, and dexamethasone and 22 patients (85%) with daratumumab. Overall, grade ≥3 TEAE occurred in 18 patients (82%) with melflufen, daratumumab, and dexamethasone and 14 patients (54%) with daratumumab. The most common hematologic grade ≥3 TEAE were neutropenia (melflufen group, 11 patients [50%]; daratumumab group, 3 patients [12%]), thrombocytopenia (melflufen group, 11 patients [50%]; daratumumab group, 2 patients [8%]), and anemia (melflufen group, 7 patients [32%]; daratumumab group, 5 patients [19%]). The most common non-hematologic grade ≥3 TEAE were pneumonia (melflufen group, 2 patients [9%]; daratumumab group, 2 patients [8%]) and femur fracture (melflufen group, 0 patients [0%]; daratumumab group, 2 patients [8%]); of these, 1 event (5%) of pneumonia in the melflufen group and 1 event (4%) of femur fracture in the daratumumab group were considered treatment-related TEAE by the investigator. Serious AE occurred in 6 patients (27%) with melflufen, daratumumab, and dexamethasone, and 12 patients (46%) with daratumumab. The most common serious AE (occurring in ≥4 patients overall) were anemia (melflufen group, 2 patients [9%]; daratumumab group, 3 patients [12%]) and pneumonia (melflufen group, 2 patients [9%]; daratumumab group, 2 patients [8%]). TEAE leading to treatment discontinuation occurred in 2 patients (9%) in the melflufen group (neutropenia and thrombocytopenia, N=1 each) and 4 patients (15%) in the daratumumab group (anemia, disease progression, hypercalcemia, and renal failure, N=1 each). Overall, 5 patients died on study before the crossover: 2 patients who received melflufen, daratumumab, and dexamethasone (1 due to disease progression and 1 due to unknown reasons, both >30 days after the last dose of study treatment) and 3 patients who received daratumumab (1 due to disease progression and 1 due to unknown reasons, both ≤30 days after the last dose of study treatment and 1 due to an AE [COVID-19 pneumonia], >30 days after the last dose of study treatment). In addition, one patient who crossed over to receive melflufen, daratumumab, and dexamethasone after progression on daratumumab died.

   Click to Show/Hide
In Vivo Model 22 relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.
Related Clinical Trial
NCT Number NCT04649060 Clinical Status Phase 3
Clinical Description This was a randomized, controlled, open-label, Phase 3 multicenter study which enrolled patients with Relapsed-Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM) who were either double refractory to an Immunomodulatory Drug (IMiD) and a Proteasome Inhibitor (PI) (regardless of the number of prior lines of therapy), or had received at least 3 prior lines of therapy including an IMiD and a PI. Patients received treatment with melflufen+dexamethasone+daratumumab or daratumumab until documented progressive disease, unacceptable toxicity, or patient/treating physician decision. Patients in the daratumumab treatment arm had the option to receive treatment with melflufen+dexamethasone+daratumumab after confirmed progressive disease.
Experiment 287 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [3]
Indication Relapsed/Refractory multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Neutropenia
64.30%
Patients Enrolled
14 patients with relapsed refractory multiple myeloma.
Administration Time 28-day cycle
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that utilizes increased peptidase expression to selectively release potent alkylating agents inside tumor cells. Melflufen is hydrolyzed by peptidases and esterases to melphalan either directly or through an intermediate metabolite, desethyl-melflufen. The high lipophilicity of melflufen facilitates passive diffusion across cell membranes. The activity and tolerability of melflufen in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) were demonstrated in the O-12-M1 (NCT01897714), OCEAN (NCT03151811), and HORIZON (NCT02963493) trials.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
Overall, at least one TEAE was reported in 13 (92.9%) and 13 (100.0%) patients in Arms A and B, respectively (Table 3). During cycle 1, 9 patients (64.3%) and 12 patients (92.3%), respectively, had at least one TEAE. Cumulatively, grade 3 or 4 AEs occurred in 12 (85.7%) and 12 (92.3%) patients, respectively, and serious AEs were reported in 5 (35.7%) and 9 (69.2%) patients, respectively. The most common any-grade AEs in Arms A and B, respectively, were thrombocytopenia (10 [71.4%]; 10 [76.9%]), neutropenia (9 [64.3%]; 9 [69.2%]), and anemia (9 [64.3%]; 7 [53.8%]). No phlebitis or local-infusion-related reactions were reported based on pre- and post-infusion inspection of the IV site, and there were no extravasations observed in Arm A or B. Similarly, VIP scores collected on Day 1 post-infusion and on Day 8 indicated that patients had healthy IV sites (VIP score of 0) with no signs of phlebitis following PVC administration of melflufen. The most common non-hematological AE was positive SARS-CoV-2 test (Arm A: 2 [14.3%]; Arm B: 4 [30.8%]). Pneumonia was the most common serious AE (Arm A: 2 [14.3%]; Arm B: 2 [15.4%]). The most common AE considered related to melflufen and/or dexamethasone by investigators was thrombocytopenia (Arm A: 10 [71.4%]; Arm B: 10 [76.9%]). AEs led to treatment discontinuation in 3 (21.4%) and 6 (46.2%) patients in Arms A and B, respectively.

   Click to Show/Hide
Half life period 75.6 h
Related Clinical Trial
NCT Number NCT04412707 Clinical Status Phase 2
Clinical Description This is a randomized, two-period, cross-over Phase 2 study, comparing PK, and assessing safety and tolerability and efficacy of peripheral and central intravenous administration of melflufen in patients with RRMM. It is an international study, enrolling patients in US and Europe. The study will enroll patients following at least 2 lines of prior therapy.
Experiment 288 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [4]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Neutropenia
5.00%
Patients Enrolled
157 patients with multiple myeloma.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melflufen is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate, targeting aminopeptidase which has an increased expression in fast-growing and aggressive malignancies. The lipophilicity of melflufen allows for passive diffusion, selectively targeting myeloma cells. Once inside the cell, melflufen is hydrolyzed to active alkylating metabolites melphalan and desethyl-melflufen. Melflufen and the active metabolites trigger irreversible DNA damage, inhibit proliferation, induces apoptosis, and express antiangiogenic effects. In addition, melflufen demonstrated activity in myeloma cells with documented impaired or absent Tp53 expression and documented resistance to bortezomib, dexamethasone, and melphalan.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
Based on the safety data collected during the HORIZON trial, treatment emergent adverse events occurred in 100% of patients including 100 patients (64%) having at least 1 CTCAE grade 4 adverse effect. Hematologic grade 3 or 4 adverse effects including thrombocytopenia (76%), neutropenia (79%), anemia (43%), and infections (11%) were the most commonly reported. Other adverse effects, such as fatigue (55%), nausea (32%), diarrhea (27%), and decreased appetite (14%), were similar to other alkylating agents. Pyrexia (24%), including febrile neutropenia (5%), and respiratory tract infections (24%) were contributed to hematologic toxicities.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 289 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [4]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Neutropenia
79.00%
Patients Enrolled
157 patients with multiple myeloma.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melflufen is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate, targeting aminopeptidase which has an increased expression in fast-growing and aggressive malignancies. The lipophilicity of melflufen allows for passive diffusion, selectively targeting myeloma cells. Once inside the cell, melflufen is hydrolyzed to active alkylating metabolites melphalan and desethyl-melflufen. Melflufen and the active metabolites trigger irreversible DNA damage, inhibit proliferation, induces apoptosis, and express antiangiogenic effects. In addition, melflufen demonstrated activity in myeloma cells with documented impaired or absent Tp53 expression and documented resistance to bortezomib, dexamethasone, and melphalan.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
Based on the safety data collected during the HORIZON trial, treatment emergent adverse events occurred in 100% of patients including 100 patients (64%) having at least 1 CTCAE grade 4 adverse effect. Hematologic grade 3 or 4 adverse effects including thrombocytopenia (76%), neutropenia (79%), anemia (43%), and infections (11%) were the most commonly reported. Other adverse effects, such as fatigue (55%), nausea (32%), diarrhea (27%), and decreased appetite (14%), were similar to other alkylating agents. Pyrexia (24%), including febrile neutropenia (5%), and respiratory tract infections (24%) were contributed to hematologic toxicities.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 290 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [9]
Indication Relapsed/Refractory multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Neutropenia
62%
Patients Enrolled
101 relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma patients with TTP <36 month Post-ASCTb.
MOA of PDC
In summary, the interpretation of the results from the OCEAN study were impacted by the heterogeneity of the population, with age and previous success of ASCT therapy identified as prognostic factors with study therapies. The safety profile of melflufen and dexamethasone is primarily characterized by hematologic AEs that are clinically manageable. Observed infection rates, which included COVID-19, were generally low. Taken together, these data support the use of melflufen and dexamethasone in patients who have not received a previous ASCT or who underwent a successful ASCT (ie, TTP >36 months post-ASCT). In addition, the favorable efficacy profile and convenience of monthly outpatient infusions, especially for patients without access to other therapeutics such as CAR T-cell therapy or bispecific antibodies, bode well for this combination translating successfully into real-world practice.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
Given the prognostic importance of TTP <36 months post-ASCT in OCEAN, we evaluated this prognostic factor in a post hoc analysis from the HORIZON study. Among 110 patients with triple-class refractory disease who had received ≥3 prior lines of therapy, 77 (70%) had received a previous ASCT and 58 (53%) had TTP <36 months post-ASCT (Suppl. Table S3). In patients with a TTP >36 months post-ASCT or no ASCT versus patients with a TTP <36 months post-ASCT, ORR was higher (29% vs 22%; Suppl. Table S4) and median DOR (7.6 months vs 3.9 months) and median PFS (4.2 months vs 3.4 months) were longer. Since pomalidomide and lenalidomide both belong to the immunomodulatory drugs, we analyzed if the duration of previous treatment with lenalidomide could have impacted the results. The median duration of lenalidomide was 14.4 months in patients with ASCT and TTP < 36 months, 38.3 months in patients with ASCT and TTP > 36 months, and 14.6 months in patients with no previous ASCT. However, the median PFS for patients treated with pomalidomide did not differ substantially between these groups of patients. The safety profile of melflufen and dexamethasone was generally consistent between patients with a TTP >36 months post-ASCT or no ASCT and patients with a TTP <36 months post-ASCT. In OCEAN among the melflufen group, the frequency of grade 3/4 TEAEs (88% and 92%), serious TEAEs (44% and 38%), and fatal adverse events (AEs; 11% and 13%) was similar in patients with a TTP >36 months post-ASCT or no ASCT and patients with TTP <36 months. However, patients with a TTP >36 months post-ASCT or no ASCT had lower rates of TEAEs leading to treatment discontinuation (23% and 31%), the longer median duration of study treatment (35.1 weeks vs 15.1 weeks), and longer median time to experiencing grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia (11.2 weeks vs 4.1 weeks) and grade 3/4 neutropenia (4.8 weeks vs 2.1 weeks) than patients with a TTP <36 months post-ASCT. In HORIZON, patients with a TTP >36 months post-ASCT or no ASCT had lower rates of grade 3/4 TEAEs (88% and 98%), but higher rates of serious TEAEs (64% and 53%) and similar rates of TEAEs leading to treatment discontinuation (29% and 33%) than patients with a TTP <36 months post-ASCT.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 291 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [9]
Indication Relapsed/Refractory multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Neutropenia
66%
Patients Enrolled
145 patients who has relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma with no previous ASCT or TTP >36 month Post-ASCTa.
MOA of PDC
In summary, the interpretation of the results from the OCEAN study were impacted by the heterogeneity of the population, with age and previous success of ASCT therapy identified as prognostic factors with study therapies. The safety profile of melflufen and dexamethasone is primarily characterized by hematologic AEs that are clinically manageable. Observed infection rates, which included COVID-19, were generally low. Taken together, these data support the use of melflufen and dexamethasone in patients who have not received a previous ASCT or who underwent a successful ASCT (ie, TTP >36 months post-ASCT). In addition, the favorable efficacy profile and convenience of monthly outpatient infusions, especially for patients without access to other therapeutics such as CAR T-cell therapy or bispecific antibodies, bode well for this combination translating successfully into real-world practice.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
Given the prognostic importance of TTP <36 months post-ASCT in OCEAN, we evaluated this prognostic factor in a post hoc analysis from the HORIZON study. Among 110 patients with triple-class refractory disease who had received ≥3 prior lines of therapy, 77 (70%) had received a previous ASCT and 58 (53%) had TTP <36 months post-ASCT (Suppl. Table S3). In patients with a TTP >36 months post-ASCT or no ASCT versus patients with a TTP <36 months post-ASCT, ORR was higher (29% vs 22%; Suppl. Table S4) and median DOR (7.6 months vs 3.9 months) and median PFS (4.2 months vs 3.4 months) were longer. Since pomalidomide and lenalidomide both belong to the immunomodulatory drugs, we analyzed if the duration of previous treatment with lenalidomide could have impacted the results. The median duration of lenalidomide was 14.4 months in patients with ASCT and TTP < 36 months, 38.3 months in patients with ASCT and TTP > 36 months, and 14.6 months in patients with no previous ASCT. However, the median PFS for patients treated with pomalidomide did not differ substantially between these groups of patients. The safety profile of melflufen and dexamethasone was generally consistent between patients with a TTP >36 months post-ASCT or no ASCT and patients with a TTP <36 months post-ASCT. In OCEAN among the melflufen group, the frequency of grade 3/4 TEAEs (88% and 92%), serious TEAEs (44% and 38%), and fatal adverse events (AEs; 11% and 13%) was similar in patients with a TTP >36 months post-ASCT or no ASCT and patients with TTP <36 months. However, patients with a TTP >36 months post-ASCT or no ASCT had lower rates of TEAEs leading to treatment discontinuation (23% and 31%), the longer median duration of study treatment (35.1 weeks vs 15.1 weeks), and longer median time to experiencing grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia (11.2 weeks vs 4.1 weeks) and grade 3/4 neutropenia (4.8 weeks vs 2.1 weeks) than patients with a TTP <36 months post-ASCT. In HORIZON, patients with a TTP >36 months post-ASCT or no ASCT had lower rates of grade 3/4 TEAEs (88% and 98%), but higher rates of serious TEAEs (64% and 53%) and similar rates of TEAEs leading to treatment discontinuation (29% and 33%) than patients with a TTP <36 months post-ASCT.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 292 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [1]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Neutropenia
69.00%
Patients Enrolled
Patients with multi-refractory multiple myeloma.
MOA of PDC
Melflufen is highly lipophilic, which promotes its rapid uptake by cells. Once within the cell, melflufen releases its hydrophilic alkylator payloads via the hydrolytic activity of intracellular peptidases (e.g., aminopeptidases). Aminopeptidases are Zn2+-dependent metalloproteinases that remove amino acids at the N-terminal position from oligopeptides and have been associated with multiple tumorigenic processes such as proliferation, apoptosis, differentiation, angiogenesis, and motility. The dependence of melflufen on aminopeptidases was initially demonstrated by the reduced cytotoxic activity of melflufen-but not the alkylator melphalan-when cells were pretreated with bestatin, an antibiotic that is a potent aminopeptidase inhibitor. In addition, structure analogs designed to resist peptide hydrolysis (N-methyl derivative and derivative with D-amino acid) were shown to be almost 100-fold less potent than melflufen. Subsequent in vitro studies demonstrated that hydrolytic cleavage of melflufen by aminopeptidases releases alkylator payloads, including melphalan. In vitro, the activity of melflufen is multi-pronged, including induction of DNA damage, induction of apoptosis, inhibition of VEGF-dependent cell migration, and inhibition of tumor-associated angiogenesis, which have been further reviewed elsewhere. Downregulation of aminopeptidases resulted in reduced melflufen-mediated cytotoxic activity and apoptotic signaling in cultured cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
Melflufen plus dexamethasone was generally manageable in this heavily pretreated patient population [51]. All patients experienced ≥1 AE, most commonly hematologic AEs including thrombocytopenia (73%), neutropenia (69%), and anemia (64%). The most common non-hematologic AEs included pyrexia (40%), asthenia (31%), fatigue (29%), nausea (27%), and diarrhea (24%).

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 293 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [5]
Indication Relapsed/Refractory multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Neutropenia
73.85%
Patients Enrolled
153 patients refractory to prior alkylators (melflufen, n=78; pomalidomide, n=75).
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (melflufen), a first-in-class alkylating peptide-drug conjugate, plus dexamethasone demonstrated superior progression-free survival (PFS), but not overall survival (OS), versus pomalidomide plus dexamethasone in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma in the OCEAN study. Time to progression (TTP) <36 months after a prior autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) was a negative prognostic factor for OS with melflufen. This post hoc exploratory analysis evaluated patients refractory to prior alkylators (e.g., cyclophosphamide and melphalan) in OCEAN. In 153 patients refractory to prior alkylators (melflufen, n = 78; pomalidomide, n = 75), the melflufen and pomalidomide arms had similar median PFS (5.6 months [95% CI, 4.2-8.3] vs. 4.7 months [95% CI, 3.1-7.3]; hazard ratio [HR], 0.92 [95% CI, 0.63-1.33]) and OS (23.4 months [95% CI, 14.4-31.7] vs. 20.0 months [95% CI, 12.0-28.7]; HR, 0.92 [95% CI, 0.62-1.38]). Among alkylator-refractory patients with a TTP 36 months after a prior ASCT or no prior ASCT (melflufen, n = 54; pomalidomide, n = 53), the observed median PFS and OS were longer in the melflufen arm than the pomalidomide arm. The safety profile of melflufen was consistent with previous reports. These results suggest that melflufen is safe and effective in patients with alkylator-refractory disease, suggesting differentiated activity from other alkylators.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
Overall, the safety profile of melflufen plus dexamethasone in the alkylator-refractory group was consistent between treatment arms (Table 2). In the melflufen and pomalidomide arms, respectively, the frequency of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs; 99% vs. 97%), Grade 3 or 4 TEAEs (85% vs. 82%), serious TEAEs (49% vs. 53%), and fatal TEAEs (19% vs. 16%) were similar (Table 2). However, melflufen compared with pomalidomide saw more dose modifications (76% vs. 67%) and dose reductions (47% vs. 14%), comparable dose delays (57% vs. 51%) but less treatment discontinuation (27% vs. 34%). When comparing patients refractory and not refractory to prior alkylators, rates of TEAEs were generally comparable except for slightly lower rates of serious and fatal TEAEs observed in patients not refractory to alkylators. Among Grade 3 or 4 TEAEs of special interest, melflufen saw more thrombocytopenia (73% vs. 14%), neutropenia (65% vs. 55%), and leukopenia or white blood cell decrease (14% vs. 3%), but less infection (15% vs. 26%), than pomalidomide. Notably, melflufen compared with pomalidomide saw a longer median time to dose reduction (106 days [range, 28-443] vs. 47 days [range, 28-225]), Grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia (52 days [range, 15-451] vs. 19 days [range, 8-91]), and Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia (36 days [range, 8-561] vs. 22 days [range, 8-470]).

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 294 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [9]
Indication Relapsed/Refractory multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Neutropenia concurrent with grade 3/4 infection
2%
Patients Enrolled
145 patients who has relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma with no previous ASCT or TTP >36 month Post-ASCTa.
MOA of PDC
In summary, the interpretation of the results from the OCEAN study were impacted by the heterogeneity of the population, with age and previous success of ASCT therapy identified as prognostic factors with study therapies. The safety profile of melflufen and dexamethasone is primarily characterized by hematologic AEs that are clinically manageable. Observed infection rates, which included COVID-19, were generally low. Taken together, these data support the use of melflufen and dexamethasone in patients who have not received a previous ASCT or who underwent a successful ASCT (ie, TTP >36 months post-ASCT). In addition, the favorable efficacy profile and convenience of monthly outpatient infusions, especially for patients without access to other therapeutics such as CAR T-cell therapy or bispecific antibodies, bode well for this combination translating successfully into real-world practice.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
Given the prognostic importance of TTP <36 months post-ASCT in OCEAN, we evaluated this prognostic factor in a post hoc analysis from the HORIZON study. Among 110 patients with triple-class refractory disease who had received ≥3 prior lines of therapy, 77 (70%) had received a previous ASCT and 58 (53%) had TTP <36 months post-ASCT (Suppl. Table S3). In patients with a TTP >36 months post-ASCT or no ASCT versus patients with a TTP <36 months post-ASCT, ORR was higher (29% vs 22%; Suppl. Table S4) and median DOR (7.6 months vs 3.9 months) and median PFS (4.2 months vs 3.4 months) were longer. Since pomalidomide and lenalidomide both belong to the immunomodulatory drugs, we analyzed if the duration of previous treatment with lenalidomide could have impacted the results. The median duration of lenalidomide was 14.4 months in patients with ASCT and TTP < 36 months, 38.3 months in patients with ASCT and TTP > 36 months, and 14.6 months in patients with no previous ASCT. However, the median PFS for patients treated with pomalidomide did not differ substantially between these groups of patients. The safety profile of melflufen and dexamethasone was generally consistent between patients with a TTP >36 months post-ASCT or no ASCT and patients with a TTP <36 months post-ASCT. In OCEAN among the melflufen group, the frequency of grade 3/4 TEAEs (88% and 92%), serious TEAEs (44% and 38%), and fatal adverse events (AEs; 11% and 13%) was similar in patients with a TTP >36 months post-ASCT or no ASCT and patients with TTP <36 months. However, patients with a TTP >36 months post-ASCT or no ASCT had lower rates of TEAEs leading to treatment discontinuation (23% and 31%), the longer median duration of study treatment (35.1 weeks vs 15.1 weeks), and longer median time to experiencing grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia (11.2 weeks vs 4.1 weeks) and grade 3/4 neutropenia (4.8 weeks vs 2.1 weeks) than patients with a TTP <36 months post-ASCT. In HORIZON, patients with a TTP >36 months post-ASCT or no ASCT had lower rates of grade 3/4 TEAEs (88% and 98%), but higher rates of serious TEAEs (64% and 53%) and similar rates of TEAEs leading to treatment discontinuation (29% and 33%) than patients with a TTP <36 months post-ASCT.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 295 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [9]
Indication Relapsed/Refractory multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Neutropenia concurrent with grade 3/4 infection
4%
Patients Enrolled
101 relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma patients with TTP <36 month Post-ASCTb.
MOA of PDC
In summary, the interpretation of the results from the OCEAN study were impacted by the heterogeneity of the population, with age and previous success of ASCT therapy identified as prognostic factors with study therapies. The safety profile of melflufen and dexamethasone is primarily characterized by hematologic AEs that are clinically manageable. Observed infection rates, which included COVID-19, were generally low. Taken together, these data support the use of melflufen and dexamethasone in patients who have not received a previous ASCT or who underwent a successful ASCT (ie, TTP >36 months post-ASCT). In addition, the favorable efficacy profile and convenience of monthly outpatient infusions, especially for patients without access to other therapeutics such as CAR T-cell therapy or bispecific antibodies, bode well for this combination translating successfully into real-world practice.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
Given the prognostic importance of TTP <36 months post-ASCT in OCEAN, we evaluated this prognostic factor in a post hoc analysis from the HORIZON study. Among 110 patients with triple-class refractory disease who had received ≥3 prior lines of therapy, 77 (70%) had received a previous ASCT and 58 (53%) had TTP <36 months post-ASCT (Suppl. Table S3). In patients with a TTP >36 months post-ASCT or no ASCT versus patients with a TTP <36 months post-ASCT, ORR was higher (29% vs 22%; Suppl. Table S4) and median DOR (7.6 months vs 3.9 months) and median PFS (4.2 months vs 3.4 months) were longer. Since pomalidomide and lenalidomide both belong to the immunomodulatory drugs, we analyzed if the duration of previous treatment with lenalidomide could have impacted the results. The median duration of lenalidomide was 14.4 months in patients with ASCT and TTP < 36 months, 38.3 months in patients with ASCT and TTP > 36 months, and 14.6 months in patients with no previous ASCT. However, the median PFS for patients treated with pomalidomide did not differ substantially between these groups of patients. The safety profile of melflufen and dexamethasone was generally consistent between patients with a TTP >36 months post-ASCT or no ASCT and patients with a TTP <36 months post-ASCT. In OCEAN among the melflufen group, the frequency of grade 3/4 TEAEs (88% and 92%), serious TEAEs (44% and 38%), and fatal adverse events (AEs; 11% and 13%) was similar in patients with a TTP >36 months post-ASCT or no ASCT and patients with TTP <36 months. However, patients with a TTP >36 months post-ASCT or no ASCT had lower rates of TEAEs leading to treatment discontinuation (23% and 31%), the longer median duration of study treatment (35.1 weeks vs 15.1 weeks), and longer median time to experiencing grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia (11.2 weeks vs 4.1 weeks) and grade 3/4 neutropenia (4.8 weeks vs 2.1 weeks) than patients with a TTP <36 months post-ASCT. In HORIZON, patients with a TTP >36 months post-ASCT or no ASCT had lower rates of grade 3/4 TEAEs (88% and 98%), but higher rates of serious TEAEs (64% and 53%) and similar rates of TEAEs leading to treatment discontinuation (29% and 33%) than patients with a TTP <36 months post-ASCT.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 296 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [5]
Indication Relapsed/Refractory multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Neutropenia concurrent with grade 3/4 infection
100%
Patients Enrolled
153 patients refractory to prior alkylators (melflufen, n=78; pomalidomide, n=75).
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (melflufen), a first-in-class alkylating peptide-drug conjugate, plus dexamethasone demonstrated superior progression-free survival (PFS), but not overall survival (OS), versus pomalidomide plus dexamethasone in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma in the OCEAN study. Time to progression (TTP) <36 months after a prior autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) was a negative prognostic factor for OS with melflufen. This post hoc exploratory analysis evaluated patients refractory to prior alkylators (e.g., cyclophosphamide and melphalan) in OCEAN. In 153 patients refractory to prior alkylators (melflufen, n = 78; pomalidomide, n = 75), the melflufen and pomalidomide arms had similar median PFS (5.6 months [95% CI, 4.2-8.3] vs. 4.7 months [95% CI, 3.1-7.3]; hazard ratio [HR], 0.92 [95% CI, 0.63-1.33]) and OS (23.4 months [95% CI, 14.4-31.7] vs. 20.0 months [95% CI, 12.0-28.7]; HR, 0.92 [95% CI, 0.62-1.38]). Among alkylator-refractory patients with a TTP 36 months after a prior ASCT or no prior ASCT (melflufen, n = 54; pomalidomide, n = 53), the observed median PFS and OS were longer in the melflufen arm than the pomalidomide arm. The safety profile of melflufen was consistent with previous reports. These results suggest that melflufen is safe and effective in patients with alkylator-refractory disease, suggesting differentiated activity from other alkylators.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
Overall, the safety profile of melflufen plus dexamethasone in the alkylator-refractory group was consistent between treatment arms (Table 2). In the melflufen and pomalidomide arms, respectively, the frequency of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs; 99% vs. 97%), Grade 3 or 4 TEAEs (85% vs. 82%), serious TEAEs (49% vs. 53%), and fatal TEAEs (19% vs. 16%) were similar (Table 2). However, melflufen compared with pomalidomide saw more dose modifications (76% vs. 67%) and dose reductions (47% vs. 14%), comparable dose delays (57% vs. 51%) but less treatment discontinuation (27% vs. 34%). When comparing patients refractory and not refractory to prior alkylators, rates of TEAEs were generally comparable except for slightly lower rates of serious and fatal TEAEs observed in patients not refractory to alkylators. Among Grade 3 or 4 TEAEs of special interest, melflufen saw more thrombocytopenia (73% vs. 14%), neutropenia (65% vs. 55%), and leukopenia or white blood cell decrease (14% vs. 3%), but less infection (15% vs. 26%), than pomalidomide. Notably, melflufen compared with pomalidomide saw a longer median time to dose reduction (106 days [range, 28-443] vs. 47 days [range, 28-225]), Grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia (52 days [range, 15-451] vs. 19 days [range, 8-91]), and Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia (36 days [range, 8-561] vs. 22 days [range, 8-470]).

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 297 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [2]
Indication Relapsed/Refractory multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Neutrophil count decrease
9%
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (melflufen), a first-in-class alkylating peptide-drug conjugate, plus dexamethasone was approved in Europe for use in patients with triple-class refractory relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) with 3 prior lines of therapy and without prior autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) or with a time to progression >36 months after prior ASCT. The randomized LIGHTHOUSE study (NCT04649060) assessed melflufen plus daratumumab and dexamethasone (melflufen group) versus daratumumab in patients with RRMM with disease refractory to an immunomodulatory agent and a proteasome inhibitor or who had received 3 prior lines of therapy including an immunomodulatory agent and a proteasome inhibitor. A partial clinical hold issued by the US Food and Drug Administration for all melflufen studies led to financial constraints and premature study closure on February 23rd 2022 (data cut-off date). In total, 54 of 240 planned patients were randomized (melflufen group, N=27; daratumumab group, N=27). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was not reached in the melflufen group versus 4.9 months in the daratumumab group (Hazard Ratio: 0.18 [95% Confidence Interval, 0.05-0.65]; P=0.0032) at a median follow-up time of 7.1 and 6.6 months, respectively. Overall response rate (ORR) was 59% in the melflufen group versus 30% in the daratumumab group (P=0.0300). The most common grade 3 treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen group versus daratumumab group were neutropenia (50% vs. 12%), thrombocytopenia (50% vs. 8%), and anemia (32% vs. 19%). Melflufen plus daratumumab and dexamethasone demonstrated superior PFS and ORR versus daratumumab in RRMM and a safety profile comparable to previously published melflufen studies.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
The safety population included patients who received ≥1 dose of melflufen, daratumumab, or dexamethasone (melflufen group) and 26 patients who received daratumumab monotherapy. In the safety population, ≥1 TEAE was reported in 21 patients (96%) with melflufen, daratumumab, and dexamethasone and 22 patients (85%) with daratumumab. Overall, grade ≥3 TEAE occurred in 18 patients (82%) with melflufen, daratumumab, and dexamethasone and 14 patients (54%) with daratumumab. The most common hematologic grade ≥3 TEAE were neutropenia (melflufen group, 11 patients [50%]; daratumumab group, 3 patients [12%]), thrombocytopenia (melflufen group, 11 patients [50%]; daratumumab group, 2 patients [8%]), and anemia (melflufen group, 7 patients [32%]; daratumumab group, 5 patients [19%]). The most common non-hematologic grade ≥3 TEAE were pneumonia (melflufen group, 2 patients [9%]; daratumumab group, 2 patients [8%]) and femur fracture (melflufen group, 0 patients [0%]; daratumumab group, 2 patients [8%]); of these, 1 event (5%) of pneumonia in the melflufen group and 1 event (4%) of femur fracture in the daratumumab group were considered treatment-related TEAE by the investigator. Serious AE occurred in 6 patients (27%) with melflufen, daratumumab, and dexamethasone, and 12 patients (46%) with daratumumab. The most common serious AE (occurring in ≥4 patients overall) were anemia (melflufen group, 2 patients [9%]; daratumumab group, 3 patients [12%]) and pneumonia (melflufen group, 2 patients [9%]; daratumumab group, 2 patients [8%]). TEAE leading to treatment discontinuation occurred in 2 patients (9%) in the melflufen group (neutropenia and thrombocytopenia, N=1 each) and 4 patients (15%) in the daratumumab group (anemia, disease progression, hypercalcemia, and renal failure, N=1 each). Overall, 5 patients died on study before the crossover: 2 patients who received melflufen, daratumumab, and dexamethasone (1 due to disease progression and 1 due to unknown reasons, both >30 days after the last dose of study treatment) and 3 patients who received daratumumab (1 due to disease progression and 1 due to unknown reasons, both ≤30 days after the last dose of study treatment and 1 due to an AE [COVID-19 pneumonia], >30 days after the last dose of study treatment). In addition, one patient who crossed over to receive melflufen, daratumumab, and dexamethasone after progression on daratumumab died.

   Click to Show/Hide
In Vivo Model 22 relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.
Related Clinical Trial
NCT Number NCT04649060 Clinical Status Phase 3
Clinical Description This was a randomized, controlled, open-label, Phase 3 multicenter study which enrolled patients with Relapsed-Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM) who were either double refractory to an Immunomodulatory Drug (IMiD) and a Proteasome Inhibitor (PI) (regardless of the number of prior lines of therapy), or had received at least 3 prior lines of therapy including an IMiD and a PI. Patients received treatment with melflufen+dexamethasone+daratumumab or daratumumab until documented progressive disease, unacceptable toxicity, or patient/treating physician decision. Patients in the daratumumab treatment arm had the option to receive treatment with melflufen+dexamethasone+daratumumab after confirmed progressive disease.
Experiment 298 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [10]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Objective response rate (ORR)
27%
Administration Time 15.5 months
MOA of PDC
Melflufen, a highly lipophilic PDC, takes a novel approach by taking advantage of increased aminopeptidase activity to selectively increase the release and concentration of cytotoxic alkylating agents inside of tumor cells. Being highly lipophilic, melflufen does not require active transport, a process that may be defective in cancer cells and contribute to chemoresistance, but instead rapidly enters cells via passive diffusion. The lipophilic nature of melflufen also likely results in its favorable distribution to bone marrow, a fatty tissue, and the physiological component most relevant to MM. Once inside the tumor cells, melflufen is rapidly hydrolyzed by aminopeptidases, enzymes that are found in normal cells but are overexpressed in MM and upon which cancer cells are particularly dependent. This hydrolysis releases potent alkylating agents - most notably melphalan and des-ethyl melflufen - within the cells. Aminopeptidase-driven release of these hydrophilic molecules, which cannot readily diffuse out, thereby results in intracellular trapping. Leveraging high tumor cell aminopeptidase concentrations to rapidly drive intracellular alkylating agent release may provide a safety advantage over alkylators, such as melphalan, which lack such a mechanism for tumor cell targeting, particularly in tumors with an aggressive phenotype.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
OCEAN randomized patients to 28-day cycles of melflufen 40 mg intravenous on day 1 plus dexamethasone 40 mg oral (days 1, 8, 15, and 22) or pomalidomide 4 mg oral (days 1-21) plus dexamethasone 40 mg oral (days 1, 8, 15, and 22). The primary objective was to compare the PFS of melflufen plus dexamethasone and pomalidomide plus dexamethasone by independent review. Secondary endpoints include comparing ORR, OS, and safety and tolerability. Notably, the OCEAN patient population and study design mirrored those of the MM-003 study to allow for the most robust comparison between melflufen and pomalidomide. Primary results of the OCEAN trial were recently published, with additional survival follow-up ongoing. In total, 495 patients were randomized (246 to the melflufen arm and 249 to the pomalidomide arm). The study met its primary endpoints, with melflufen plus dexamethasone demonstrating a superior PFS to pomalidomide plus dexamethasone (median PFS: 6.8 months vs 4.9 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.79 [95% CI, 0.64-0.98]; P = 0.03), but OS favored pomalidomide plus dexamethasone (median OS: 19.8 months vs 25.0 months; HR, 1.10 [95% CI, 0.85-1.44]; not significant). However, additional exploratory and post-hoc analyses identified previous ASCT and age as significant prognostic factors, which is not surprising given that transplant eligibility and age are generally correlated. Patients who had not received a previous ASCT (melflufen, n = 121; pomalidomide, n = 129) had better PFS and OS with melflufen plus dexamethasone than with pomalidomide plus dexamethasone (median PFS: 9.3 months vs 4.6 months; HR, 0.59 [95% CI, 0.44-0.79]; P < 0.001; median OS: 21.6 months vs 16.5 months; HR, 0.78 [95% CI, 0.55-1.12]; not significant), while patients who had received previous ASCT (melflufen, n = 125; pomalidomide, n = 120) saw similar PFS between groups but worse OS with melflufen plus dexamethasone than with pomalidomide plus dexamethasone (median PFS: 4.4 months vs 5.2 months; HR, 1.06 [95% CI, 0.79-1.43]; not significant; median OS: 16.7 months vs 31.0 months; HR, 1.61 [95% CI, 1.09-2.40]; P = 0.02). In patients aged ≥75, PFS was more favorable with melflufen (HR, 0.43 [95% CI, 0.24-0.76]; P = 0.003) but in patients aged <65, OS data favored pomalidomide (HR, 1.71 [95% CI, 1.09-2.69]; P = 0.02). Safety was evaluated in patients who received at least one dose of study medication (melflufen, n = 228; pomalidomide, n = 246).

   Click to Show/Hide
Related Clinical Trial
NCT Number NCT03151811 Clinical Status Phase 3
Clinical Description This was a randomized, controlled, open-label, Phase 3 multicenter study which enrolled patients with RRMM following 2-4 lines of prior therapy and who were refractory to lenalidomide in the last line of therapy as demonstrated by disease progression on or within 60 days of completion of the last dose of lenalidomide. Patients received either melflufen+dex or pomalidomide+dex.
Experiment 299 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [2]
Indication Relapsed/Refractory multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Objective response rate (ORR)
59% (39-78)
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (melflufen), a first-in-class alkylating peptide-drug conjugate, plus dexamethasone was approved in Europe for use in patients with triple-class refractory relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) with 3 prior lines of therapy and without prior autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) or with a time to progression >36 months after prior ASCT. The randomized LIGHTHOUSE study (NCT04649060) assessed melflufen plus daratumumab and dexamethasone (melflufen group) versus daratumumab in patients with RRMM with disease refractory to an immunomodulatory agent and a proteasome inhibitor or who had received 3 prior lines of therapy including an immunomodulatory agent and a proteasome inhibitor. A partial clinical hold issued by the US Food and Drug Administration for all melflufen studies led to financial constraints and premature study closure on February 23rd 2022 (data cut-off date). In total, 54 of 240 planned patients were randomized (melflufen group, N=27; daratumumab group, N=27). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was not reached in the melflufen group versus 4.9 months in the daratumumab group (Hazard Ratio: 0.18 [95% Confidence Interval, 0.05-0.65]; P=0.0032) at a median follow-up time of 7.1 and 6.6 months, respectively. Overall response rate (ORR) was 59% in the melflufen group versus 30% in the daratumumab group (P=0.0300). The most common grade 3 treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen group versus daratumumab group were neutropenia (50% vs. 12%), thrombocytopenia (50% vs. 8%), and anemia (32% vs. 19%). Melflufen plus daratumumab and dexamethasone demonstrated superior PFS and ORR versus daratumumab in RRMM and a safety profile comparable to previously published melflufen studies.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the ITT population, with a median follow-up of 7.1 months in the melflufen group, the median PFS was not reached (NR) and with a median follow-up of 6.6 months in the daratumumab group, the median PFS was 4.9 months (95% CI: 3.4-NR; HR: 0.18 [95% CI: 0.05-0.65]; log-rankP=0.0032). OS was immature, with 2 events (7%) in the melflufen group and 4 events (15%) in the daratumumab group (HR: 0.47 [95% CI: 0.09-2.57]; log-rankP=0.3721) at a median follow-up of 7.6 months and 6.6 months, respectively. The ORR was 59% (95% CI: 39-78) in the melflufen group and 30% (95% CI: 14-50) in the daratumumab group (P=0.0300). More patients in the melflufen group had a complete response (CR; 1 patient [4%]vs. 0 patients [0%]) and very good partial response (VGPR; 4 patients [15%]vs. 3 patients [11%]) compared with the daratumumab group.

   Click to Show/Hide
In Vivo Model 27 Intent-to-treat (ITT) population.
Related Clinical Trial
NCT Number NCT04649060 Clinical Status Phase 3
Clinical Description This was a randomized, controlled, open-label, Phase 3 multicenter study which enrolled patients with Relapsed-Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM) who were either double refractory to an Immunomodulatory Drug (IMiD) and a Proteasome Inhibitor (PI) (regardless of the number of prior lines of therapy), or had received at least 3 prior lines of therapy including an IMiD and a PI. Patients received treatment with melflufen+dexamethasone+daratumumab or daratumumab until documented progressive disease, unacceptable toxicity, or patient/treating physician decision. Patients in the daratumumab treatment arm had the option to receive treatment with melflufen+dexamethasone+daratumumab after confirmed progressive disease.
Experiment 300 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [2]
Indication Relapsed/Refractory multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Objective response rate (ORR)
64% (35-87)
Patients Enrolled
14 patients no prior ASCT or TTP >36 months after ASCT.
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (melflufen), a first-in-class alkylating peptide-drug conjugate, plus dexamethasone was approved in Europe for use in patients with triple-class refractory relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) with 3 prior lines of therapy and without prior autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) or with a time to progression >36 months after prior ASCT. The randomized LIGHTHOUSE study (NCT04649060) assessed melflufen plus daratumumab and dexamethasone (melflufen group) versus daratumumab in patients with RRMM with disease refractory to an immunomodulatory agent and a proteasome inhibitor or who had received 3 prior lines of therapy including an immunomodulatory agent and a proteasome inhibitor. A partial clinical hold issued by the US Food and Drug Administration for all melflufen studies led to financial constraints and premature study closure on February 23rd 2022 (data cut-off date). In total, 54 of 240 planned patients were randomized (melflufen group, N=27; daratumumab group, N=27). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was not reached in the melflufen group versus 4.9 months in the daratumumab group (Hazard Ratio: 0.18 [95% Confidence Interval, 0.05-0.65]; P=0.0032) at a median follow-up time of 7.1 and 6.6 months, respectively. Overall response rate (ORR) was 59% in the melflufen group versus 30% in the daratumumab group (P=0.0300). The most common grade 3 treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen group versus daratumumab group were neutropenia (50% vs. 12%), thrombocytopenia (50% vs. 8%), and anemia (32% vs. 19%). Melflufen plus daratumumab and dexamethasone demonstrated superior PFS and ORR versus daratumumab in RRMM and a safety profile comparable to previously published melflufen studies.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
Efficacy endpoints were more pronounced in favor of the melflufen group compared with the daratumumab group among patients with no prior ASCT or TTP >36 months after a prior ASCT (melflufen group, N=14; daratumumab group, N=15). Median PFS was NR in the melflufen group and 3.9 months (95% CI: 1.4-4.9) in the daratumumab group (HR, 0.06 [95% CI: 0.01-0.49]; log-rank P=0.0005). Fewer OS events were reported in the melflufen group (1 event [7%] vs. 4 events [27%] in the daratumumab group; log-rank P=0.0369). The ORR was 64% (95% CI: 35-87) in the melflufen group and 13% (95% CI: 2-41) in the daratumumab group (P=0.0055). More patients in the melflufen group had a CR (1 patient [7%] vs. 0 patients [0%]) or VGPR (2 patients [14%] vs. 1 patient [7%]) compared with the daratumumab group.

   Click to Show/Hide
Related Clinical Trial
NCT Number NCT04649060 Clinical Status Phase 3
Clinical Description This was a randomized, controlled, open-label, Phase 3 multicenter study which enrolled patients with Relapsed-Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM) who were either double refractory to an Immunomodulatory Drug (IMiD) and a Proteasome Inhibitor (PI) (regardless of the number of prior lines of therapy), or had received at least 3 prior lines of therapy including an IMiD and a PI. Patients received treatment with melflufen+dexamethasone+daratumumab or daratumumab until documented progressive disease, unacceptable toxicity, or patient/treating physician decision. Patients in the daratumumab treatment arm had the option to receive treatment with melflufen+dexamethasone+daratumumab after confirmed progressive disease.
Experiment 301 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [3]
Indication Relapsed/Refractory multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Objective response rate (ORR)
28.60%
Patients Enrolled
14 patients with relapsed refractory multiple myeloma.
Administration Time 28-day cycle
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that utilizes increased peptidase expression to selectively release potent alkylating agents inside tumor cells. Melflufen is hydrolyzed by peptidases and esterases to melphalan either directly or through an intermediate metabolite, desethyl-melflufen. The high lipophilicity of melflufen facilitates passive diffusion across cell membranes. The activity and tolerability of melflufen in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) were demonstrated in the O-12-M1 (NCT01897714), OCEAN (NCT03151811), and HORIZON (NCT02963493) trials.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In Arm A, 4 of the 14 patients achieved an overall response (ORR 28.6% [95% CI: 8.4-58.1]) including 1 patient with CR, and the CBR was 57.1% (95% CI: 28.9-82.3). In Arm B, 1 of the 13 patients achieved an overall response (ORR 7.7% [95% CI: 0.2-36.0]), consisting of a PR, and the CBR was 15.4% (95% CI: 1.9-45.4). In the overall study population, 5 patients had an overall response (ORR 18.5% [95% CI: 6.3-38.1]). DOR data were insufficient to evaluate due to early termination of the study, the low number of patient events (1 in Arm A, 0 in Arm B), and the limited number of responses. Based on the 5 patients who had a response of PR or better at study termination (4 in Arm A, 1 in Arm B), the median TTR was 2.4 months in Arm A, 5.1 months in Arm B, and 2.6 months overall. Based on the 8 and 5 progression events in Arm A and Arm B, respectively, the median TTP was 5.8 months and 4.8 months, respectively, with a median TTP of 5.8 months in the overall population. The median PFS was 5.2 months (95% CI: 2.7 to not evaluable) and 2.9 months (95% CI: 1.5-4.6) in Arms A and B, respectively. For the overall study population, median PFS was 3.7 months (95% CI: 2.7-5.8).

   Click to Show/Hide
Half life period 75.6 h
Related Clinical Trial
NCT Number NCT04412707 Clinical Status Phase 2
Clinical Description This is a randomized, two-period, cross-over Phase 2 study, comparing PK, and assessing safety and tolerability and efficacy of peripheral and central intravenous administration of melflufen in patients with RRMM. It is an international study, enrolling patients in US and Europe. The study will enroll patients following at least 2 lines of prior therapy.
Experiment 302 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [3]
Indication Relapsed/Refractory multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Objective response rate (ORR)
28.60%
Patients Enrolled
14 patients with relapsed refractory multiple myeloma.
Administration Time 28-day cycle
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that utilizes increased peptidase expression to selectively release potent alkylating agents inside tumor cells. Melflufen is hydrolyzed by peptidases and esterases to melphalan either directly or through an intermediate metabolite, desethyl-melflufen. The high lipophilicity of melflufen facilitates passive diffusion across cell membranes. The activity and tolerability of melflufen in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) were demonstrated in the O-12-M1 (NCT01897714), OCEAN (NCT03151811), and HORIZON (NCT02963493) trials.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In Arm A, 4 of the 14 patients achieved an overall response (ORR 28.6% [95% CI: 8.4-58.1]) including 1 patient with CR, and the CBR was 57.1% (95% CI: 28.9-82.3). In Arm B, 1 of the 13 patients achieved an overall response (ORR 7.7% [95% CI: 0.2-36.0]), consisting of a PR, and the CBR was 15.4% (95% CI: 1.9-45.4). In the overall study population, 5 patients had an overall response (ORR 18.5% [95% CI: 6.3-38.1]). DOR data were insufficient to evaluate due to early termination of the study, the low number of patient events (1 in Arm A, 0 in Arm B), and the limited number of responses. Based on the 5 patients who had a response of PR or better at study termination (4 in Arm A, 1 in Arm B), the median TTR was 2.4 months in Arm A, 5.1 months in Arm B, and 2.6 months overall. Based on the 8 and 5 progression events in Arm A and Arm B, respectively, the median TTP was 5.8 months and 4.8 months, respectively, with a median TTP of 5.8 months in the overall population. The median PFS was 5.2 months (95% CI: 2.7 to not evaluable) and 2.9 months (95% CI: 1.5-4.6) in Arms A and B, respectively. For the overall study population, median PFS was 3.7 months (95% CI: 2.7-5.8).

   Click to Show/Hide
Half life period 75.6 h
Related Clinical Trial
NCT Number NCT04412707 Clinical Status Phase 2
Clinical Description This is a randomized, two-period, cross-over Phase 2 study, comparing PK, and assessing safety and tolerability and efficacy of peripheral and central intravenous administration of melflufen in patients with RRMM. It is an international study, enrolling patients in US and Europe. The study will enroll patients following at least 2 lines of prior therapy.
Experiment 303 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [10]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Objective response rate (ORR)
29% (22-7)
Administration Time 14 months
MOA of PDC
Melflufen, a highly lipophilic PDC, takes a novel approach by taking advantage of increased aminopeptidase activity to selectively increase the release and concentration of cytotoxic alkylating agents inside of tumor cells. Being highly lipophilic, melflufen does not require active transport, a process that may be defective in cancer cells and contribute to chemoresistance, but instead rapidly enters cells via passive diffusion. The lipophilic nature of melflufen also likely results in its favorable distribution to bone marrow, a fatty tissue, and the physiological component most relevant to MM. Once inside the tumor cells, melflufen is rapidly hydrolyzed by aminopeptidases, enzymes that are found in normal cells but are overexpressed in MM and upon which cancer cells are particularly dependent. This hydrolysis releases potent alkylating agents - most notably melphalan and des-ethyl melflufen - within the cells. Aminopeptidase-driven release of these hydrophilic molecules, which cannot readily diffuse out, thereby results in intracellular trapping. Leveraging high tumor cell aminopeptidase concentrations to rapidly drive intracellular alkylating agent release may provide a safety advantage over alkylators, such as melphalan, which lack such a mechanism for tumor cell targeting, particularly in tumors with an aggressive phenotype.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
Extensive subgroup analyses have been carried out using O-12-M1 and HORIZON data. In HORIZON, patients with triple-refractory disease and those with disease refractory to anti-CD38 mAbs in the last line had efficacy outcomes similar to those in the overall patient population. Patients with MM refractory to anti-CD38 mAbs in the last line (n = 63) had better response (ORR 35% versus 31%), median PFS (4.6 versus 3.4 months) and OS (15.4 versus 9.3 months) than patients in the MAMMOTH trial treated with conventional chemotherapy (n = 275). Baseline characteristics were similar in these two trials, except that in HORIZON, patients were more heavily pretreated (median 5 versus 4 therapies). Among patients in HORIZON whose disease was alkylator-refractory in any prior line (n = 92), the ORR was 21% and median PFS was 3.8 months. None of the seven patients with melphalan-refractory disease, however, had an objective response by independent review. This contrasts with the 44% ORR observed in nine patients with melphalan-refractory disease in O-12-M1. All seven patients in HORIZON, however, were at least triple-class refractory, and none had achieved a CR in any prior line.

   Click to Show/Hide
Related Clinical Trial
NCT Number NCT02963493 Clinical Status Phase 2
Clinical Description This study will evaluate melflufen in combination with dexamethasone in adult patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma in whose disease is refractory to pomalidomide and/or an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody. All patients in the study will be treated with melflufen on Day 1 and dexamethasone on Days 1, 8, 15 and 22 of each 28-day cycle.
Experiment 304 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [7]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Objective response rate (ORR)
8%
Administration Time Iv infusion of 40 mg melflufen on day 1 of each 28-day treatment cycle
Administration Dosage Melflufen 40 mg (Single Agent)
MOA of PDC
The antineoplastic activity of melflufen is dependent upon the expression of aminopeptidases, like APN (also known as CD18), which cleave melflufen into melphalan and p-Fluorophenylalanine. Following aminopeptidase-dependent cleavage, the hydrophilic alkylating metabolite melphalan accumulates in myeloma cells. This enrichment of the cytotoxic payload has a substantial impact on the antimyeloma activity of melflufen.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the phase 2 single-agent cohort, the overall response rate was 8% (one of 13 patients; 02-360) and the clinical benefit rate was 23% (three of 13; 5-54).
In Vivo Model Aged 18 years or older, had relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma, had received two or more previous lines of therapy (including lenalidomide and bortezomib).
Related Clinical Trial
NCT Number NCT01897714 Clinical Status Phase 1/2
Clinical Description The study will explore escalating doses of melflufen in combination with dexamethasone in small groups of patients to find the maximum tolerated dose of melflufen. That dose will then be used to determine the efficacy and safety profile of melflufen in combination with dexamethasone in a larger group of patients.
Experiment 305 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [7]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Objective response rate (ORR)
31%
Administration Time Iv infusion of 40 mg melflufen on day 1 of each 21-day or 28-day treatment cycles, in combination with 40 mg dexamet hasone (oral or iv) on days 1, 8 and 15 of each 21-day treatment cycles. for any patients on the 28-day treatment sc hedule, an additional dose of 40 mg dexamet hasone was administered on day 22 of each treatment cycle
Administration Dosage Melflufen 40 mg + Dexamethasone
MOA of PDC
The antineoplastic activity of melflufen is dependent upon the expression of aminopeptidases, like APN (also known as CD18), which cleave melflufen into melphalan and p-Fluorophenylalanine. Following aminopeptidase-dependent cleavage, the hydrophilic alkylating metabolite melphalan accumulates in myeloma cells. This enrichment of the cytotoxic payload has a substantial impact on the antimyeloma activity of melflufen.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In phase 2, patients treated with combination therapy achieved an overall response rate of 31% (14 of 45 patients; 95% CI 18-47) and clinical benefit rate of 49% (22 of 45; 34-64)
In Vivo Model Aged 18 years or older, had relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma, had received two or more previous lines of therapy (including lenalidomide and bortezomib).
Related Clinical Trial
NCT Number NCT01897714 Clinical Status Phase 1/2
Clinical Description The study will explore escalating doses of melflufen in combination with dexamethasone in small groups of patients to find the maximum tolerated dose of melflufen. That dose will then be used to determine the efficacy and safety profile of melflufen in combination with dexamethasone in a larger group of patients.
Experiment 306 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [10]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Objective response rate (ORR)
31% (18-7)
Patients Enrolled
Patients with multiple myeloma.
Administration Time 27.9 months
MOA of PDC
Melflufen, a highly lipophilic PDC, takes a novel approach by taking advantage of increased aminopeptidase activity to selectively increase the release and concentration of cytotoxic alkylating agents inside of tumor cells. Being highly lipophilic, melflufen does not require active transport, a process that may be defective in cancer cells and contribute to chemoresistance, but instead rapidly enters cells via passive diffusion. The lipophilic nature of melflufen also likely results in its favorable distribution to bone marrow, a fatty tissue, and the physiological component most relevant to MM. Once inside the tumor cells, melflufen is rapidly hydrolyzed by aminopeptidases, enzymes that are found in normal cells but are overexpressed in MM and upon which cancer cells are particularly dependent. This hydrolysis releases potent alkylating agents - most notably melphalan and des-ethyl melflufen - within the cells. Aminopeptidase-driven release of these hydrophilic molecules, which cannot readily diffuse out, thereby results in intracellular trapping. Leveraging high tumor cell aminopeptidase concentrations to rapidly drive intracellular alkylating agent release may provide a safety advantage over alkylators, such as melphalan, which lack such a mechanism for tumor cell targeting, particularly in tumors with an aggressive phenotype.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
Forty-five patients received melflufen plus dexamethasone in the phase II portion of the study. The median age was 66 years, 67% were male, the median prior therapies were 4 (range, 3-5), 67% were double refractory (PI and IMiD), 58% had received previous ASCT, 20% had International Staging System (ISS) stage 3 disease, and 44% had high-risk cytogenetics. At a median follow-up time of 27.9 months, the ORR in this cohort was 31% (95% CI: 18-47), including 11% very good partial response (VGPR). No complete responses (CRs) occurred. Interestingly, among patients whose disease was refractory to melphalan in any prior line, the ORR was 44%. The CBR was 49% (95% CI: 34-64), the median duration of response (DOR) was 8.4 months (95% CI: 4.6-9.6), and median PFS was 5.7 months (95% CI: 3.7-9.2). A recently published longer term data analysis reported that at a median 46-month follow-up, the median overall survival (OS) was 20.7 months (95% CI: 11.8-41.3).

   Click to Show/Hide
Related Clinical Trial
NCT Number NCT01897714 Clinical Status Phase 1/2
Clinical Description The study will explore escalating doses of melflufen in combination with dexamethasone in small groups of patients to find the maximum tolerated dose of melflufen. That dose will then be used to determine the efficacy and safety profile of melflufen in combination with dexamethasone in a larger group of patients.
Experiment 307 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [10]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Objective response rate (ORR)
70%
Administration Time 11.9 months
MOA of PDC
Melflufen, a highly lipophilic PDC, takes a novel approach by taking advantage of increased aminopeptidase activity to selectively increase the release and concentration of cytotoxic alkylating agents inside of tumor cells. Being highly lipophilic, melflufen does not require active transport, a process that may be defective in cancer cells and contribute to chemoresistance, but instead rapidly enters cells via passive diffusion. The lipophilic nature of melflufen also likely results in its favorable distribution to bone marrow, a fatty tissue, and the physiological component most relevant to MM. Once inside the tumor cells, melflufen is rapidly hydrolyzed by aminopeptidases, enzymes that are found in normal cells but are overexpressed in MM and upon which cancer cells are particularly dependent. This hydrolysis releases potent alkylating agents - most notably melphalan and des-ethyl melflufen - within the cells. Aminopeptidase-driven release of these hydrophilic molecules, which cannot readily diffuse out, thereby results in intracellular trapping. Leveraging high tumor cell aminopeptidase concentrations to rapidly drive intracellular alkylating agent release may provide a safety advantage over alkylators, such as melphalan, which lack such a mechanism for tumor cell targeting, particularly in tumors with an aggressive phenotype.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
Results for 33 patients in the melflufen/daratumumab/dexamethasone arm and 10 in the melflufen/bortezomib/dexamethasone arm have been previously reported. Patients in the daratumumab-containing arm had a median age of 64, and a median of two prior therapies. High-risk cytogenetics were present in 42%, and 61% were refractory to their last therapy. At a median treatment duration of 8.4 months, the ORR was 70%, consisting of one sCR, one CR, and ten VGPRs, and median PFS was 11.5 months. No DLTS were reported, and the most common grade ≥3 treatment-related AEs were neutropenia (58%) and thrombocytopenia (55%). There were two fatal AEs (myeloma progression and sepsis; general physical health deterioration) of which sepsis was considered treatment related. In the melflufen/bortezomib/dexamethasone arm, the median age was 71 years, and patients had a median

   Click to Show/Hide
Related Clinical Trial
NCT Number NCT03481556 Clinical Status Phase 1/2
Clinical Description This is an open-label Phase 1/2a study which will enroll patients that have relapsed or relapsed-refractory multiple myeloma to combination regimens of melflufen with currently approved agents. Patients will receive either melflufen+dexamethasone+bortezomib or melflufen+dexamethasone+daratumumab.
Experiment 308 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [4]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Overall response rate (ORR)
8.00%
Patients Enrolled
81 patients with multiple myeloma.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melflufen is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate, targeting aminopeptidase which has an increased expression in fast-growing and aggressive malignancies. The lipophilicity of melflufen allows for passive diffusion, selectively targeting myeloma cells. Once inside the cell, melflufen is hydrolyzed to active alkylating metabolites melphalan and desethyl-melflufen. Melflufen and the active metabolites trigger irreversible DNA damage, inhibit proliferation, induces apoptosis, and express antiangiogenic effects. In addition, melflufen demonstrated activity in myeloma cells with documented impaired or absent Tp53 expression and documented resistance to bortezomib, dexamethasone, and melphalan.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
The phase I arm established 40 mg of melflufen as the maximum tolerated dose in combination with dexamethasone. The phase II arm found an overall response rate (ORR) of 31% (14 patients) and clinical benefit rate, defined as first occurrence of disease response including minimal response or better, of 49% (22 patients) in the melflufen and dexamethasone group compared with an ORR of 8% (1 patient) and clinical benefit rate of 23% (3 patients) in the melflufen group. Based on these findings, melflufen 40 mg plus dexamethasone 40 mg was deemed a feasible treatment regimen for relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma and appropriate to proceed to a larger phase II trial.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 309 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [4]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Overall response rate (ORR)
26%
Patients Enrolled
Patients with triple-class refractory disease group multiple myeloma.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melflufen is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate, targeting aminopeptidase which has an increased expression in fast-growing and aggressive malignancies. The lipophilicity of melflufen allows for passive diffusion, selectively targeting myeloma cells. Once inside the cell, melflufen is hydrolyzed to active alkylating metabolites melphalan and desethyl-melflufen. Melflufen and the active metabolites trigger irreversible DNA damage, inhibit proliferation, induces apoptosis, and express antiangiogenic effects. In addition, melflufen demonstrated activity in myeloma cells with documented impaired or absent Tp53 expression and documented resistance to bortezomib, dexamethasone, and melphalan.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
The primary outcome of the study was ORR, defined based on the International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) uniform response criteria. Investigators included a preplanned subgroup analysis in patients with triple-class refractory disease defined as refractory to at least 1 immunomodulator, 1 proteosome inhibitor, and 1 anti-CD38 antibody. From December 28, 2016, to October 14, 2019, investigators enrolled 157 patients across 17 sites that received at least 1 dose of melflufen. Patient baseline demographics included median age of 65 years old, an average of 5 previous lines of therapy, and 98% of patients were refractory to their previous line of therapy. A total of 131 patients (83%) discontinued treatment due to either disease progression or adverse effects. The median ORR was 29% (22%-37%) for the all treatment group and 26% (18%-35%) in the triple-class refractory disease group. The median duration of at least partial response or better was 5.5 months (3.9-7.6 months) in the all treatment group and 4.4 months (3.4-7.6 months) in the triple-class refractory disease group. Median overall survival (OS) was 11.6 months (9.3-15.4 months) in the all treatment group and 16.5 months (11.5-18.5 months) in the triple-class refractory group.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 310 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [4]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Overall response rate (ORR)
29.00%
Patients Enrolled
157 patients with multiple myeloma.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melflufen is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate, targeting aminopeptidase which has an increased expression in fast-growing and aggressive malignancies. The lipophilicity of melflufen allows for passive diffusion, selectively targeting myeloma cells. Once inside the cell, melflufen is hydrolyzed to active alkylating metabolites melphalan and desethyl-melflufen. Melflufen and the active metabolites trigger irreversible DNA damage, inhibit proliferation, induces apoptosis, and express antiangiogenic effects. In addition, melflufen demonstrated activity in myeloma cells with documented impaired or absent Tp53 expression and documented resistance to bortezomib, dexamethasone, and melphalan.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
The primary outcome of the study was ORR, defined based on the International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) uniform response criteria. Investigators included a preplanned subgroup analysis in patients with triple-class refractory disease defined as refractory to at least 1 immunomodulator, 1 proteosome inhibitor, and 1 anti-CD38 antibody. From December 28, 2016, to October 14, 2019, investigators enrolled 157 patients across 17 sites that received at least 1 dose of melflufen. Patient baseline demographics included median age of 65 years old, an average of 5 previous lines of therapy, and 98% of patients were refractory to their previous line of therapy. A total of 131 patients (83%) discontinued treatment due to either disease progression or adverse effects. The median ORR was 29% (22%-37%) for the all treatment group and 26% (18%-35%) in the triple-class refractory disease group. The median duration of at least partial response or better was 5.5 months (3.9-7.6 months) in the all treatment group and 4.4 months (3.4-7.6 months) in the triple-class refractory disease group. Median overall survival (OS) was 11.6 months (9.3-15.4 months) in the all treatment group and 16.5 months (11.5-18.5 months) in the triple-class refractory group.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 311 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [1]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Overall response rate (ORR)
8.00%
Patients Enrolled
Patients with multi-refractory multiple myeloma.
MOA of PDC
Melflufen is highly lipophilic, which promotes its rapid uptake by cells. Once within the cell, melflufen releases its hydrophilic alkylator payloads via the hydrolytic activity of intracellular peptidases (e.g., aminopeptidases). Aminopeptidases are Zn2+-dependent metalloproteinases that remove amino acids at the N-terminal position from oligopeptides and have been associated with multiple tumorigenic processes such as proliferation, apoptosis, differentiation, angiogenesis, and motility. The dependence of melflufen on aminopeptidases was initially demonstrated by the reduced cytotoxic activity of melflufen-but not the alkylator melphalan-when cells were pretreated with bestatin, an antibiotic that is a potent aminopeptidase inhibitor. In addition, structure analogs designed to resist peptide hydrolysis (N-methyl derivative and derivative with D-amino acid) were shown to be almost 100-fold less potent than melflufen. Subsequent in vitro studies demonstrated that hydrolytic cleavage of melflufen by aminopeptidases releases alkylator payloads, including melphalan. In vitro, the activity of melflufen is multi-pronged, including induction of DNA damage, induction of apoptosis, inhibition of VEGF-dependent cell migration, and inhibition of tumor-associated angiogenesis, which have been further reviewed elsewhere. Downregulation of aminopeptidases resulted in reduced melflufen-mediated cytotoxic activity and apoptotic signaling in cultured cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
Among the 13 patients who received single-agent melflufen, the median number of prior therapies was 5 (range, 4-8), the ORR was 8% (1 PR), median PFS was 4.4 months, and median OS was 15.5 months.
Experiment 312 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [1]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Overall response rate (ORR)
21.00%
Patients Enrolled
Patients with high-risk cytogenetics.
MOA of PDC
Melflufen is highly lipophilic, which promotes its rapid uptake by cells. Once within the cell, melflufen releases its hydrophilic alkylator payloads via the hydrolytic activity of intracellular peptidases (e.g., aminopeptidases). Aminopeptidases are Zn2+-dependent metalloproteinases that remove amino acids at the N-terminal position from oligopeptides and have been associated with multiple tumorigenic processes such as proliferation, apoptosis, differentiation, angiogenesis, and motility. The dependence of melflufen on aminopeptidases was initially demonstrated by the reduced cytotoxic activity of melflufen-but not the alkylator melphalan-when cells were pretreated with bestatin, an antibiotic that is a potent aminopeptidase inhibitor. In addition, structure analogs designed to resist peptide hydrolysis (N-methyl derivative and derivative with D-amino acid) were shown to be almost 100-fold less potent than melflufen. Subsequent in vitro studies demonstrated that hydrolytic cleavage of melflufen by aminopeptidases releases alkylator payloads, including melphalan. In vitro, the activity of melflufen is multi-pronged, including induction of DNA damage, induction of apoptosis, inhibition of VEGF-dependent cell migration, and inhibition of tumor-associated angiogenesis, which have been further reviewed elsewhere. Downregulation of aminopeptidases resulted in reduced melflufen-mediated cytotoxic activity and apoptotic signaling in cultured cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
Among 125 patients evaluable for response, the ORR (≥PR) was 29%, with 1 patient achieving a stringent complete response (CR) and 10 patients achieving a VGPR. The median duration of response was 4.4 months. The ORR was 21% among 47 patients with high-risk cytogenetics, 24% among 93 patients with triple-class refractory disease, and 24% among 42 patients with extramedullary disease.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 313 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [1]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Overall response rate (ORR)
24.00%
Patients Enrolled
Patients with triple-class refractory disease.
MOA of PDC
Melflufen is highly lipophilic, which promotes its rapid uptake by cells. Once within the cell, melflufen releases its hydrophilic alkylator payloads via the hydrolytic activity of intracellular peptidases (e.g., aminopeptidases). Aminopeptidases are Zn2+-dependent metalloproteinases that remove amino acids at the N-terminal position from oligopeptides and have been associated with multiple tumorigenic processes such as proliferation, apoptosis, differentiation, angiogenesis, and motility. The dependence of melflufen on aminopeptidases was initially demonstrated by the reduced cytotoxic activity of melflufen-but not the alkylator melphalan-when cells were pretreated with bestatin, an antibiotic that is a potent aminopeptidase inhibitor. In addition, structure analogs designed to resist peptide hydrolysis (N-methyl derivative and derivative with D-amino acid) were shown to be almost 100-fold less potent than melflufen. Subsequent in vitro studies demonstrated that hydrolytic cleavage of melflufen by aminopeptidases releases alkylator payloads, including melphalan. In vitro, the activity of melflufen is multi-pronged, including induction of DNA damage, induction of apoptosis, inhibition of VEGF-dependent cell migration, and inhibition of tumor-associated angiogenesis, which have been further reviewed elsewhere. Downregulation of aminopeptidases resulted in reduced melflufen-mediated cytotoxic activity and apoptotic signaling in cultured cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
Among 125 patients evaluable for response, the ORR (≥PR) was 29%, with 1 patient achieving a stringent complete response (CR) and 10 patients achieving a VGPR. The median duration of response was 4.4 months. The ORR was 21% among 47 patients with high-risk cytogenetics, 24% among 93 patients with triple-class refractory disease, and 24% among 42 patients with extramedullary disease.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 314 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [1]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Overall response rate (ORR)
24.00%
Patients Enrolled
Patients with extramedullary disease.
MOA of PDC
Melflufen is highly lipophilic, which promotes its rapid uptake by cells. Once within the cell, melflufen releases its hydrophilic alkylator payloads via the hydrolytic activity of intracellular peptidases (e.g., aminopeptidases). Aminopeptidases are Zn2+-dependent metalloproteinases that remove amino acids at the N-terminal position from oligopeptides and have been associated with multiple tumorigenic processes such as proliferation, apoptosis, differentiation, angiogenesis, and motility. The dependence of melflufen on aminopeptidases was initially demonstrated by the reduced cytotoxic activity of melflufen-but not the alkylator melphalan-when cells were pretreated with bestatin, an antibiotic that is a potent aminopeptidase inhibitor. In addition, structure analogs designed to resist peptide hydrolysis (N-methyl derivative and derivative with D-amino acid) were shown to be almost 100-fold less potent than melflufen. Subsequent in vitro studies demonstrated that hydrolytic cleavage of melflufen by aminopeptidases releases alkylator payloads, including melphalan. In vitro, the activity of melflufen is multi-pronged, including induction of DNA damage, induction of apoptosis, inhibition of VEGF-dependent cell migration, and inhibition of tumor-associated angiogenesis, which have been further reviewed elsewhere. Downregulation of aminopeptidases resulted in reduced melflufen-mediated cytotoxic activity and apoptotic signaling in cultured cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
Among 125 patients evaluable for response, the ORR (≥PR) was 29%, with 1 patient achieving a stringent complete response (CR) and 10 patients achieving a VGPR. The median duration of response was 4.4 months. The ORR was 21% among 47 patients with high-risk cytogenetics, 24% among 93 patients with triple-class refractory disease, and 24% among 42 patients with extramedullary disease.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 315 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [1]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Overall response rate (ORR)
29.00%
Patients Enrolled
Patients with multi-refractory multiple myeloma.
Administration Time 14.3 week (median)
Administration Dosage 40 mg with dexamethasone (40 mg)
MOA of PDC
Melflufen is highly lipophilic, which promotes its rapid uptake by cells. Once within the cell, melflufen releases its hydrophilic alkylator payloads via the hydrolytic activity of intracellular peptidases (e.g., aminopeptidases). Aminopeptidases are Zn2+-dependent metalloproteinases that remove amino acids at the N-terminal position from oligopeptides and have been associated with multiple tumorigenic processes such as proliferation, apoptosis, differentiation, angiogenesis, and motility. The dependence of melflufen on aminopeptidases was initially demonstrated by the reduced cytotoxic activity of melflufen-but not the alkylator melphalan-when cells were pretreated with bestatin, an antibiotic that is a potent aminopeptidase inhibitor. In addition, structure analogs designed to resist peptide hydrolysis (N-methyl derivative and derivative with D-amino acid) were shown to be almost 100-fold less potent than melflufen. Subsequent in vitro studies demonstrated that hydrolytic cleavage of melflufen by aminopeptidases releases alkylator payloads, including melphalan. In vitro, the activity of melflufen is multi-pronged, including induction of DNA damage, induction of apoptosis, inhibition of VEGF-dependent cell migration, and inhibition of tumor-associated angiogenesis, which have been further reviewed elsewhere. Downregulation of aminopeptidases resulted in reduced melflufen-mediated cytotoxic activity and apoptotic signaling in cultured cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 316 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [1]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Overall response rate (ORR)
29.00%
Patients Enrolled
Patients evaluable for response.
MOA of PDC
Melflufen is highly lipophilic, which promotes its rapid uptake by cells. Once within the cell, melflufen releases its hydrophilic alkylator payloads via the hydrolytic activity of intracellular peptidases (e.g., aminopeptidases). Aminopeptidases are Zn2+-dependent metalloproteinases that remove amino acids at the N-terminal position from oligopeptides and have been associated with multiple tumorigenic processes such as proliferation, apoptosis, differentiation, angiogenesis, and motility. The dependence of melflufen on aminopeptidases was initially demonstrated by the reduced cytotoxic activity of melflufen-but not the alkylator melphalan-when cells were pretreated with bestatin, an antibiotic that is a potent aminopeptidase inhibitor. In addition, structure analogs designed to resist peptide hydrolysis (N-methyl derivative and derivative with D-amino acid) were shown to be almost 100-fold less potent than melflufen. Subsequent in vitro studies demonstrated that hydrolytic cleavage of melflufen by aminopeptidases releases alkylator payloads, including melphalan. In vitro, the activity of melflufen is multi-pronged, including induction of DNA damage, induction of apoptosis, inhibition of VEGF-dependent cell migration, and inhibition of tumor-associated angiogenesis, which have been further reviewed elsewhere. Downregulation of aminopeptidases resulted in reduced melflufen-mediated cytotoxic activity and apoptotic signaling in cultured cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
Among 125 patients evaluable for response, the ORR (≥PR) was 29%, with 1 patient achieving a stringent complete response (CR) and 10 patients achieving a VGPR. The median duration of response was 4.4 months. The ORR was 21% among 47 patients with high-risk cytogenetics, 24% among 93 patients with triple-class refractory disease, and 24% among 42 patients with extramedullary disease.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 317 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [1]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Overall response rate (ORR)
31.00%
Patients Enrolled
Patients with multi-refractory multiple myeloma.
Administration Time 28-day cycle
Administration Dosage 40 mg with dexamethasone (40 mg)
MOA of PDC
Melflufen is highly lipophilic, which promotes its rapid uptake by cells. Once within the cell, melflufen releases its hydrophilic alkylator payloads via the hydrolytic activity of intracellular peptidases (e.g., aminopeptidases). Aminopeptidases are Zn2+-dependent metalloproteinases that remove amino acids at the N-terminal position from oligopeptides and have been associated with multiple tumorigenic processes such as proliferation, apoptosis, differentiation, angiogenesis, and motility. The dependence of melflufen on aminopeptidases was initially demonstrated by the reduced cytotoxic activity of melflufen-but not the alkylator melphalan-when cells were pretreated with bestatin, an antibiotic that is a potent aminopeptidase inhibitor. In addition, structure analogs designed to resist peptide hydrolysis (N-methyl derivative and derivative with D-amino acid) were shown to be almost 100-fold less potent than melflufen. Subsequent in vitro studies demonstrated that hydrolytic cleavage of melflufen by aminopeptidases releases alkylator payloads, including melphalan. In vitro, the activity of melflufen is multi-pronged, including induction of DNA damage, induction of apoptosis, inhibition of VEGF-dependent cell migration, and inhibition of tumor-associated angiogenesis, which have been further reviewed elsewhere. Downregulation of aminopeptidases resulted in reduced melflufen-mediated cytotoxic activity and apoptotic signaling in cultured cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 318 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Overall response rate (ORR)
32.00%
Patients Enrolled
246 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 319 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Overall response rate (ORR)
33.00%
Patients Enrolled
246 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 320 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [1]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Overall response rate (ORR)
67%
Patients Enrolled
Patients with multi-refractory multiple myeloma.
Administration Time 9.3 month (median)
Administration Dosage 30 or 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melflufen is highly lipophilic, which promotes its rapid uptake by cells. Once within the cell, melflufen releases its hydrophilic alkylator payloads via the hydrolytic activity of intracellular peptidases (e.g., aminopeptidases). Aminopeptidases are Zn2+-dependent metalloproteinases that remove amino acids at the N-terminal position from oligopeptides and have been associated with multiple tumorigenic processes such as proliferation, apoptosis, differentiation, angiogenesis, and motility. The dependence of melflufen on aminopeptidases was initially demonstrated by the reduced cytotoxic activity of melflufen-but not the alkylator melphalan-when cells were pretreated with bestatin, an antibiotic that is a potent aminopeptidase inhibitor. In addition, structure analogs designed to resist peptide hydrolysis (N-methyl derivative and derivative with D-amino acid) were shown to be almost 100-fold less potent than melflufen. Subsequent in vitro studies demonstrated that hydrolytic cleavage of melflufen by aminopeptidases releases alkylator payloads, including melphalan. In vitro, the activity of melflufen is multi-pronged, including induction of DNA damage, induction of apoptosis, inhibition of VEGF-dependent cell migration, and inhibition of tumor-associated angiogenesis, which have been further reviewed elsewhere. Downregulation of aminopeptidases resulted in reduced melflufen-mediated cytotoxic activity and apoptotic signaling in cultured cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 321 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [1]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Overall response rate (ORR)
76.00%
Patients Enrolled
Patients with multi-refractory multiple myeloma.
Administration Time 6.2 month (median)
Administration Dosage 30 or 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melflufen is highly lipophilic, which promotes its rapid uptake by cells. Once within the cell, melflufen releases its hydrophilic alkylator payloads via the hydrolytic activity of intracellular peptidases (e.g., aminopeptidases). Aminopeptidases are Zn2+-dependent metalloproteinases that remove amino acids at the N-terminal position from oligopeptides and have been associated with multiple tumorigenic processes such as proliferation, apoptosis, differentiation, angiogenesis, and motility. The dependence of melflufen on aminopeptidases was initially demonstrated by the reduced cytotoxic activity of melflufen-but not the alkylator melphalan-when cells were pretreated with bestatin, an antibiotic that is a potent aminopeptidase inhibitor. In addition, structure analogs designed to resist peptide hydrolysis (N-methyl derivative and derivative with D-amino acid) were shown to be almost 100-fold less potent than melflufen. Subsequent in vitro studies demonstrated that hydrolytic cleavage of melflufen by aminopeptidases releases alkylator payloads, including melphalan. In vitro, the activity of melflufen is multi-pronged, including induction of DNA damage, induction of apoptosis, inhibition of VEGF-dependent cell migration, and inhibition of tumor-associated angiogenesis, which have been further reviewed elsewhere. Downregulation of aminopeptidases resulted in reduced melflufen-mediated cytotoxic activity and apoptotic signaling in cultured cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 322 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [2]
Indication Relapsed/Refractory multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Partial response (PR)
11%
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (melflufen), a first-in-class alkylating peptide-drug conjugate, plus dexamethasone was approved in Europe for use in patients with triple-class refractory relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) with 3 prior lines of therapy and without prior autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) or with a time to progression >36 months after prior ASCT. The randomized LIGHTHOUSE study (NCT04649060) assessed melflufen plus daratumumab and dexamethasone (melflufen group) versus daratumumab in patients with RRMM with disease refractory to an immunomodulatory agent and a proteasome inhibitor or who had received 3 prior lines of therapy including an immunomodulatory agent and a proteasome inhibitor. A partial clinical hold issued by the US Food and Drug Administration for all melflufen studies led to financial constraints and premature study closure on February 23rd 2022 (data cut-off date). In total, 54 of 240 planned patients were randomized (melflufen group, N=27; daratumumab group, N=27). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was not reached in the melflufen group versus 4.9 months in the daratumumab group (Hazard Ratio: 0.18 [95% Confidence Interval, 0.05-0.65]; P=0.0032) at a median follow-up time of 7.1 and 6.6 months, respectively. Overall response rate (ORR) was 59% in the melflufen group versus 30% in the daratumumab group (P=0.0300). The most common grade 3 treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen group versus daratumumab group were neutropenia (50% vs. 12%), thrombocytopenia (50% vs. 8%), and anemia (32% vs. 19%). Melflufen plus daratumumab and dexamethasone demonstrated superior PFS and ORR versus daratumumab in RRMM and a safety profile comparable to previously published melflufen studies.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the ITT population, with a median follow-up of 7.1 months in the melflufen group, the median PFS was not reached (NR) and with a median follow-up of 6.6 months in the daratumumab group, the median PFS was 4.9 months (95% CI: 3.4-NR; HR: 0.18 [95% CI: 0.05-0.65]; log-rankP=0.0032). OS was immature, with 2 events (7%) in the melflufen group and 4 events (15%) in the daratumumab group (HR: 0.47 [95% CI: 0.09-2.57]; log-rankP=0.3721) at a median follow-up of 7.6 months and 6.6 months, respectively. The ORR was 59% (95% CI: 39-78) in the melflufen group and 30% (95% CI: 14-50) in the daratumumab group (P=0.0300). More patients in the melflufen group had a complete response (CR; 1 patient [4%]vs. 0 patients [0%]) and very good partial response (VGPR; 4 patients [15%]vs. 3 patients [11%]) compared with the daratumumab group.

   Click to Show/Hide
In Vivo Model 27 Intent-to-treat (ITT) population.
Related Clinical Trial
NCT Number NCT04649060 Clinical Status Phase 3
Clinical Description This was a randomized, controlled, open-label, Phase 3 multicenter study which enrolled patients with Relapsed-Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM) who were either double refractory to an Immunomodulatory Drug (IMiD) and a Proteasome Inhibitor (PI) (regardless of the number of prior lines of therapy), or had received at least 3 prior lines of therapy including an IMiD and a PI. Patients received treatment with melflufen+dexamethasone+daratumumab or daratumumab until documented progressive disease, unacceptable toxicity, or patient/treating physician decision. Patients in the daratumumab treatment arm had the option to receive treatment with melflufen+dexamethasone+daratumumab after confirmed progressive disease.
Experiment 323 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [2]
Indication Relapsed/Refractory multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Partial response (PR)
11%
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (melflufen), a first-in-class alkylating peptide-drug conjugate, plus dexamethasone was approved in Europe for use in patients with triple-class refractory relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) with 3 prior lines of therapy and without prior autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) or with a time to progression >36 months after prior ASCT. The randomized LIGHTHOUSE study (NCT04649060) assessed melflufen plus daratumumab and dexamethasone (melflufen group) versus daratumumab in patients with RRMM with disease refractory to an immunomodulatory agent and a proteasome inhibitor or who had received 3 prior lines of therapy including an immunomodulatory agent and a proteasome inhibitor. A partial clinical hold issued by the US Food and Drug Administration for all melflufen studies led to financial constraints and premature study closure on February 23rd 2022 (data cut-off date). In total, 54 of 240 planned patients were randomized (melflufen group, N=27; daratumumab group, N=27). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was not reached in the melflufen group versus 4.9 months in the daratumumab group (Hazard Ratio: 0.18 [95% Confidence Interval, 0.05-0.65]; P=0.0032) at a median follow-up time of 7.1 and 6.6 months, respectively. Overall response rate (ORR) was 59% in the melflufen group versus 30% in the daratumumab group (P=0.0300). The most common grade 3 treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen group versus daratumumab group were neutropenia (50% vs. 12%), thrombocytopenia (50% vs. 8%), and anemia (32% vs. 19%). Melflufen plus daratumumab and dexamethasone demonstrated superior PFS and ORR versus daratumumab in RRMM and a safety profile comparable to previously published melflufen studies.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the ITT population, with a median follow-up of 7.1 months in the melflufen group, the median PFS was not reached (NR) and with a median follow-up of 6.6 months in the daratumumab group, the median PFS was 4.9 months (95% CI: 3.4-NR; HR: 0.18 [95% CI: 0.05-0.65]; log-rankP=0.0032). OS was immature, with 2 events (7%) in the melflufen group and 4 events (15%) in the daratumumab group (HR: 0.47 [95% CI: 0.09-2.57]; log-rankP=0.3721) at a median follow-up of 7.6 months and 6.6 months, respectively. The ORR was 59% (95% CI: 39-78) in the melflufen group and 30% (95% CI: 14-50) in the daratumumab group (P=0.0300). More patients in the melflufen group had a complete response (CR; 1 patient [4%]vs. 0 patients [0%]) and very good partial response (VGPR; 4 patients [15%]vs. 3 patients [11%]) compared with the daratumumab group.

   Click to Show/Hide
In Vivo Model 27 Intent-to-treat (ITT) population.
Related Clinical Trial
NCT Number NCT04649060 Clinical Status Phase 3
Clinical Description This was a randomized, controlled, open-label, Phase 3 multicenter study which enrolled patients with Relapsed-Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM) who were either double refractory to an Immunomodulatory Drug (IMiD) and a Proteasome Inhibitor (PI) (regardless of the number of prior lines of therapy), or had received at least 3 prior lines of therapy including an IMiD and a PI. Patients received treatment with melflufen+dexamethasone+daratumumab or daratumumab until documented progressive disease, unacceptable toxicity, or patient/treating physician decision. Patients in the daratumumab treatment arm had the option to receive treatment with melflufen+dexamethasone+daratumumab after confirmed progressive disease.
Experiment 324 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [2]
Indication Relapsed/Refractory multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Partial response (PR)
14%
Patients Enrolled
14 patients no prior ASCT or TTP >36 months after ASCT.
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (melflufen), a first-in-class alkylating peptide-drug conjugate, plus dexamethasone was approved in Europe for use in patients with triple-class refractory relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) with 3 prior lines of therapy and without prior autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) or with a time to progression >36 months after prior ASCT. The randomized LIGHTHOUSE study (NCT04649060) assessed melflufen plus daratumumab and dexamethasone (melflufen group) versus daratumumab in patients with RRMM with disease refractory to an immunomodulatory agent and a proteasome inhibitor or who had received 3 prior lines of therapy including an immunomodulatory agent and a proteasome inhibitor. A partial clinical hold issued by the US Food and Drug Administration for all melflufen studies led to financial constraints and premature study closure on February 23rd 2022 (data cut-off date). In total, 54 of 240 planned patients were randomized (melflufen group, N=27; daratumumab group, N=27). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was not reached in the melflufen group versus 4.9 months in the daratumumab group (Hazard Ratio: 0.18 [95% Confidence Interval, 0.05-0.65]; P=0.0032) at a median follow-up time of 7.1 and 6.6 months, respectively. Overall response rate (ORR) was 59% in the melflufen group versus 30% in the daratumumab group (P=0.0300). The most common grade 3 treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen group versus daratumumab group were neutropenia (50% vs. 12%), thrombocytopenia (50% vs. 8%), and anemia (32% vs. 19%). Melflufen plus daratumumab and dexamethasone demonstrated superior PFS and ORR versus daratumumab in RRMM and a safety profile comparable to previously published melflufen studies.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
Efficacy endpoints were more pronounced in favor of the melflufen group compared with the daratumumab group among patients with no prior ASCT or TTP >36 months after a prior ASCT (melflufen group, N=14; daratumumab group, N=15). Median PFS was NR in the melflufen group and 3.9 months (95% CI: 1.4-4.9) in the daratumumab group (HR, 0.06 [95% CI: 0.01-0.49]; log-rank P=0.0005). Fewer OS events were reported in the melflufen group (1 event [7%] vs. 4 events [27%] in the daratumumab group; log-rank P=0.0369). The ORR was 64% (95% CI: 35-87) in the melflufen group and 13% (95% CI: 2-41) in the daratumumab group (P=0.0055). More patients in the melflufen group had a CR (1 patient [7%] vs. 0 patients [0%]) or VGPR (2 patients [14%] vs. 1 patient [7%]) compared with the daratumumab group.

   Click to Show/Hide
Related Clinical Trial
NCT Number NCT04649060 Clinical Status Phase 3
Clinical Description This was a randomized, controlled, open-label, Phase 3 multicenter study which enrolled patients with Relapsed-Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM) who were either double refractory to an Immunomodulatory Drug (IMiD) and a Proteasome Inhibitor (PI) (regardless of the number of prior lines of therapy), or had received at least 3 prior lines of therapy including an IMiD and a PI. Patients received treatment with melflufen+dexamethasone+daratumumab or daratumumab until documented progressive disease, unacceptable toxicity, or patient/treating physician decision. Patients in the daratumumab treatment arm had the option to receive treatment with melflufen+dexamethasone+daratumumab after confirmed progressive disease.
Experiment 325 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [2]
Indication Relapsed/Refractory multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Partial response (PR)
41%
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (melflufen), a first-in-class alkylating peptide-drug conjugate, plus dexamethasone was approved in Europe for use in patients with triple-class refractory relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) with 3 prior lines of therapy and without prior autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) or with a time to progression >36 months after prior ASCT. The randomized LIGHTHOUSE study (NCT04649060) assessed melflufen plus daratumumab and dexamethasone (melflufen group) versus daratumumab in patients with RRMM with disease refractory to an immunomodulatory agent and a proteasome inhibitor or who had received 3 prior lines of therapy including an immunomodulatory agent and a proteasome inhibitor. A partial clinical hold issued by the US Food and Drug Administration for all melflufen studies led to financial constraints and premature study closure on February 23rd 2022 (data cut-off date). In total, 54 of 240 planned patients were randomized (melflufen group, N=27; daratumumab group, N=27). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was not reached in the melflufen group versus 4.9 months in the daratumumab group (Hazard Ratio: 0.18 [95% Confidence Interval, 0.05-0.65]; P=0.0032) at a median follow-up time of 7.1 and 6.6 months, respectively. Overall response rate (ORR) was 59% in the melflufen group versus 30% in the daratumumab group (P=0.0300). The most common grade 3 treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen group versus daratumumab group were neutropenia (50% vs. 12%), thrombocytopenia (50% vs. 8%), and anemia (32% vs. 19%). Melflufen plus daratumumab and dexamethasone demonstrated superior PFS and ORR versus daratumumab in RRMM and a safety profile comparable to previously published melflufen studies.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the ITT population, with a median follow-up of 7.1 months in the melflufen group, the median PFS was not reached (NR) and with a median follow-up of 6.6 months in the daratumumab group, the median PFS was 4.9 months (95% CI: 3.4-NR; HR: 0.18 [95% CI: 0.05-0.65]; log-rankP=0.0032). OS was immature, with 2 events (7%) in the melflufen group and 4 events (15%) in the daratumumab group (HR: 0.47 [95% CI: 0.09-2.57]; log-rankP=0.3721) at a median follow-up of 7.6 months and 6.6 months, respectively. The ORR was 59% (95% CI: 39-78) in the melflufen group and 30% (95% CI: 14-50) in the daratumumab group (P=0.0300). More patients in the melflufen group had a complete response (CR; 1 patient [4%]vs. 0 patients [0%]) and very good partial response (VGPR; 4 patients [15%]vs. 3 patients [11%]) compared with the daratumumab group.

   Click to Show/Hide
In Vivo Model 27 Intent-to-treat (ITT) population.
Related Clinical Trial
NCT Number NCT04649060 Clinical Status Phase 3
Clinical Description This was a randomized, controlled, open-label, Phase 3 multicenter study which enrolled patients with Relapsed-Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM) who were either double refractory to an Immunomodulatory Drug (IMiD) and a Proteasome Inhibitor (PI) (regardless of the number of prior lines of therapy), or had received at least 3 prior lines of therapy including an IMiD and a PI. Patients received treatment with melflufen+dexamethasone+daratumumab or daratumumab until documented progressive disease, unacceptable toxicity, or patient/treating physician decision. Patients in the daratumumab treatment arm had the option to receive treatment with melflufen+dexamethasone+daratumumab after confirmed progressive disease.
Experiment 326 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [2]
Indication Relapsed/Refractory multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Partial response (PR)
43%
Patients Enrolled
14 patients no prior ASCT or TTP >36 months after ASCT.
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (melflufen), a first-in-class alkylating peptide-drug conjugate, plus dexamethasone was approved in Europe for use in patients with triple-class refractory relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) with 3 prior lines of therapy and without prior autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) or with a time to progression >36 months after prior ASCT. The randomized LIGHTHOUSE study (NCT04649060) assessed melflufen plus daratumumab and dexamethasone (melflufen group) versus daratumumab in patients with RRMM with disease refractory to an immunomodulatory agent and a proteasome inhibitor or who had received 3 prior lines of therapy including an immunomodulatory agent and a proteasome inhibitor. A partial clinical hold issued by the US Food and Drug Administration for all melflufen studies led to financial constraints and premature study closure on February 23rd 2022 (data cut-off date). In total, 54 of 240 planned patients were randomized (melflufen group, N=27; daratumumab group, N=27). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was not reached in the melflufen group versus 4.9 months in the daratumumab group (Hazard Ratio: 0.18 [95% Confidence Interval, 0.05-0.65]; P=0.0032) at a median follow-up time of 7.1 and 6.6 months, respectively. Overall response rate (ORR) was 59% in the melflufen group versus 30% in the daratumumab group (P=0.0300). The most common grade 3 treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen group versus daratumumab group were neutropenia (50% vs. 12%), thrombocytopenia (50% vs. 8%), and anemia (32% vs. 19%). Melflufen plus daratumumab and dexamethasone demonstrated superior PFS and ORR versus daratumumab in RRMM and a safety profile comparable to previously published melflufen studies.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
Efficacy endpoints were more pronounced in favor of the melflufen group compared with the daratumumab group among patients with no prior ASCT or TTP >36 months after a prior ASCT (melflufen group, N=14; daratumumab group, N=15). Median PFS was NR in the melflufen group and 3.9 months (95% CI: 1.4-4.9) in the daratumumab group (HR, 0.06 [95% CI: 0.01-0.49]; log-rank P=0.0005). Fewer OS events were reported in the melflufen group (1 event [7%] vs. 4 events [27%] in the daratumumab group; log-rank P=0.0369). The ORR was 64% (95% CI: 35-87) in the melflufen group and 13% (95% CI: 2-41) in the daratumumab group (P=0.0055). More patients in the melflufen group had a CR (1 patient [7%] vs. 0 patients [0%]) or VGPR (2 patients [14%] vs. 1 patient [7%]) compared with the daratumumab group.

   Click to Show/Hide
Related Clinical Trial
NCT Number NCT04649060 Clinical Status Phase 3
Clinical Description This was a randomized, controlled, open-label, Phase 3 multicenter study which enrolled patients with Relapsed-Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM) who were either double refractory to an Immunomodulatory Drug (IMiD) and a Proteasome Inhibitor (PI) (regardless of the number of prior lines of therapy), or had received at least 3 prior lines of therapy including an IMiD and a PI. Patients received treatment with melflufen+dexamethasone+daratumumab or daratumumab until documented progressive disease, unacceptable toxicity, or patient/treating physician decision. Patients in the daratumumab treatment arm had the option to receive treatment with melflufen+dexamethasone+daratumumab after confirmed progressive disease.
Experiment 327 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [3]
Indication Relapsed/Refractory multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Partial response (PR)
21.40%
Patients Enrolled
14 patients with relapsed refractory multiple myeloma.
Administration Time 28-day cycle
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that utilizes increased peptidase expression to selectively release potent alkylating agents inside tumor cells. Melflufen is hydrolyzed by peptidases and esterases to melphalan either directly or through an intermediate metabolite, desethyl-melflufen. The high lipophilicity of melflufen facilitates passive diffusion across cell membranes. The activity and tolerability of melflufen in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) were demonstrated in the O-12-M1 (NCT01897714), OCEAN (NCT03151811), and HORIZON (NCT02963493) trials.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In Arm A, 4 of the 14 patients achieved an overall response (ORR 28.6% [95% CI: 8.4-58.1]) including 1 patient with CR, and the CBR was 57.1% (95% CI: 28.9-82.3). In Arm B, 1 of the 13 patients achieved an overall response (ORR 7.7% [95% CI: 0.2-36.0]), consisting of a PR, and the CBR was 15.4% (95% CI: 1.9-45.4). In the overall study population, 5 patients had an overall response (ORR 18.5% [95% CI: 6.3-38.1]). DOR data were insufficient to evaluate due to early termination of the study, the low number of patient events (1 in Arm A, 0 in Arm B), and the limited number of responses. Based on the 5 patients who had a response of PR or better at study termination (4 in Arm A, 1 in Arm B), the median TTR was 2.4 months in Arm A, 5.1 months in Arm B, and 2.6 months overall. Based on the 8 and 5 progression events in Arm A and Arm B, respectively, the median TTP was 5.8 months and 4.8 months, respectively, with a median TTP of 5.8 months in the overall population. The median PFS was 5.2 months (95% CI: 2.7 to not evaluable) and 2.9 months (95% CI: 1.5-4.6) in Arms A and B, respectively. For the overall study population, median PFS was 3.7 months (95% CI: 2.7-5.8).

   Click to Show/Hide
Half life period 75.6 h
Related Clinical Trial
NCT Number NCT04412707 Clinical Status Phase 2
Clinical Description This is a randomized, two-period, cross-over Phase 2 study, comparing PK, and assessing safety and tolerability and efficacy of peripheral and central intravenous administration of melflufen in patients with RRMM. It is an international study, enrolling patients in US and Europe. The study will enroll patients following at least 2 lines of prior therapy.
Experiment 328 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Partial response (PR)
9%
Patients Enrolled
246 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 329 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Partial response (PR)
10%
Patients Enrolled
246 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 330 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Partial response (PR)
19%
Patients Enrolled
246 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 331 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Partial response (PR)
20%
Patients Enrolled
246 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 332 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [2]
Indication Relapsed/Refractory multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Pneumonia
9%
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (melflufen), a first-in-class alkylating peptide-drug conjugate, plus dexamethasone was approved in Europe for use in patients with triple-class refractory relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) with 3 prior lines of therapy and without prior autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) or with a time to progression >36 months after prior ASCT. The randomized LIGHTHOUSE study (NCT04649060) assessed melflufen plus daratumumab and dexamethasone (melflufen group) versus daratumumab in patients with RRMM with disease refractory to an immunomodulatory agent and a proteasome inhibitor or who had received 3 prior lines of therapy including an immunomodulatory agent and a proteasome inhibitor. A partial clinical hold issued by the US Food and Drug Administration for all melflufen studies led to financial constraints and premature study closure on February 23rd 2022 (data cut-off date). In total, 54 of 240 planned patients were randomized (melflufen group, N=27; daratumumab group, N=27). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was not reached in the melflufen group versus 4.9 months in the daratumumab group (Hazard Ratio: 0.18 [95% Confidence Interval, 0.05-0.65]; P=0.0032) at a median follow-up time of 7.1 and 6.6 months, respectively. Overall response rate (ORR) was 59% in the melflufen group versus 30% in the daratumumab group (P=0.0300). The most common grade 3 treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen group versus daratumumab group were neutropenia (50% vs. 12%), thrombocytopenia (50% vs. 8%), and anemia (32% vs. 19%). Melflufen plus daratumumab and dexamethasone demonstrated superior PFS and ORR versus daratumumab in RRMM and a safety profile comparable to previously published melflufen studies.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
The safety population included patients who received ≥1 dose of melflufen, daratumumab, or dexamethasone (melflufen group) and 26 patients who received daratumumab monotherapy. In the safety population, ≥1 TEAE was reported in 21 patients (96%) with melflufen, daratumumab, and dexamethasone and 22 patients (85%) with daratumumab. Overall, grade ≥3 TEAE occurred in 18 patients (82%) with melflufen, daratumumab, and dexamethasone and 14 patients (54%) with daratumumab. The most common hematologic grade ≥3 TEAE were neutropenia (melflufen group, 11 patients [50%]; daratumumab group, 3 patients [12%]), thrombocytopenia (melflufen group, 11 patients [50%]; daratumumab group, 2 patients [8%]), and anemia (melflufen group, 7 patients [32%]; daratumumab group, 5 patients [19%]). The most common non-hematologic grade ≥3 TEAE were pneumonia (melflufen group, 2 patients [9%]; daratumumab group, 2 patients [8%]) and femur fracture (melflufen group, 0 patients [0%]; daratumumab group, 2 patients [8%]); of these, 1 event (5%) of pneumonia in the melflufen group and 1 event (4%) of femur fracture in the daratumumab group were considered treatment-related TEAE by the investigator. Serious AE occurred in 6 patients (27%) with melflufen, daratumumab, and dexamethasone, and 12 patients (46%) with daratumumab. The most common serious AE (occurring in ≥4 patients overall) were anemia (melflufen group, 2 patients [9%]; daratumumab group, 3 patients [12%]) and pneumonia (melflufen group, 2 patients [9%]; daratumumab group, 2 patients [8%]). TEAE leading to treatment discontinuation occurred in 2 patients (9%) in the melflufen group (neutropenia and thrombocytopenia, N=1 each) and 4 patients (15%) in the daratumumab group (anemia, disease progression, hypercalcemia, and renal failure, N=1 each). Overall, 5 patients died on study before the crossover: 2 patients who received melflufen, daratumumab, and dexamethasone (1 due to disease progression and 1 due to unknown reasons, both >30 days after the last dose of study treatment) and 3 patients who received daratumumab (1 due to disease progression and 1 due to unknown reasons, both ≤30 days after the last dose of study treatment and 1 due to an AE [COVID-19 pneumonia], >30 days after the last dose of study treatment). In addition, one patient who crossed over to receive melflufen, daratumumab, and dexamethasone after progression on daratumumab died.

   Click to Show/Hide
In Vivo Model 22 relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.
Related Clinical Trial
NCT Number NCT04649060 Clinical Status Phase 3
Clinical Description This was a randomized, controlled, open-label, Phase 3 multicenter study which enrolled patients with Relapsed-Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM) who were either double refractory to an Immunomodulatory Drug (IMiD) and a Proteasome Inhibitor (PI) (regardless of the number of prior lines of therapy), or had received at least 3 prior lines of therapy including an IMiD and a PI. Patients received treatment with melflufen+dexamethasone+daratumumab or daratumumab until documented progressive disease, unacceptable toxicity, or patient/treating physician decision. Patients in the daratumumab treatment arm had the option to receive treatment with melflufen+dexamethasone+daratumumab after confirmed progressive disease.
Experiment 333 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [2]
Indication Relapsed/Refractory multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Pneumonia
9%
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (melflufen), a first-in-class alkylating peptide-drug conjugate, plus dexamethasone was approved in Europe for use in patients with triple-class refractory relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) with 3 prior lines of therapy and without prior autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) or with a time to progression >36 months after prior ASCT. The randomized LIGHTHOUSE study (NCT04649060) assessed melflufen plus daratumumab and dexamethasone (melflufen group) versus daratumumab in patients with RRMM with disease refractory to an immunomodulatory agent and a proteasome inhibitor or who had received 3 prior lines of therapy including an immunomodulatory agent and a proteasome inhibitor. A partial clinical hold issued by the US Food and Drug Administration for all melflufen studies led to financial constraints and premature study closure on February 23rd 2022 (data cut-off date). In total, 54 of 240 planned patients were randomized (melflufen group, N=27; daratumumab group, N=27). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was not reached in the melflufen group versus 4.9 months in the daratumumab group (Hazard Ratio: 0.18 [95% Confidence Interval, 0.05-0.65]; P=0.0032) at a median follow-up time of 7.1 and 6.6 months, respectively. Overall response rate (ORR) was 59% in the melflufen group versus 30% in the daratumumab group (P=0.0300). The most common grade 3 treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen group versus daratumumab group were neutropenia (50% vs. 12%), thrombocytopenia (50% vs. 8%), and anemia (32% vs. 19%). Melflufen plus daratumumab and dexamethasone demonstrated superior PFS and ORR versus daratumumab in RRMM and a safety profile comparable to previously published melflufen studies.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
The safety population included patients who received ≥1 dose of melflufen, daratumumab, or dexamethasone (melflufen group) and 26 patients who received daratumumab monotherapy. In the safety population, ≥1 TEAE was reported in 21 patients (96%) with melflufen, daratumumab, and dexamethasone and 22 patients (85%) with daratumumab. Overall, grade ≥3 TEAE occurred in 18 patients (82%) with melflufen, daratumumab, and dexamethasone and 14 patients (54%) with daratumumab. The most common hematologic grade ≥3 TEAE were neutropenia (melflufen group, 11 patients [50%]; daratumumab group, 3 patients [12%]), thrombocytopenia (melflufen group, 11 patients [50%]; daratumumab group, 2 patients [8%]), and anemia (melflufen group, 7 patients [32%]; daratumumab group, 5 patients [19%]). The most common non-hematologic grade ≥3 TEAE were pneumonia (melflufen group, 2 patients [9%]; daratumumab group, 2 patients [8%]) and femur fracture (melflufen group, 0 patients [0%]; daratumumab group, 2 patients [8%]); of these, 1 event (5%) of pneumonia in the melflufen group and 1 event (4%) of femur fracture in the daratumumab group were considered treatment-related TEAE by the investigator. Serious AE occurred in 6 patients (27%) with melflufen, daratumumab, and dexamethasone, and 12 patients (46%) with daratumumab. The most common serious AE (occurring in ≥4 patients overall) were anemia (melflufen group, 2 patients [9%]; daratumumab group, 3 patients [12%]) and pneumonia (melflufen group, 2 patients [9%]; daratumumab group, 2 patients [8%]). TEAE leading to treatment discontinuation occurred in 2 patients (9%) in the melflufen group (neutropenia and thrombocytopenia, N=1 each) and 4 patients (15%) in the daratumumab group (anemia, disease progression, hypercalcemia, and renal failure, N=1 each). Overall, 5 patients died on study before the crossover: 2 patients who received melflufen, daratumumab, and dexamethasone (1 due to disease progression and 1 due to unknown reasons, both >30 days after the last dose of study treatment) and 3 patients who received daratumumab (1 due to disease progression and 1 due to unknown reasons, both ≤30 days after the last dose of study treatment and 1 due to an AE [COVID-19 pneumonia], >30 days after the last dose of study treatment). In addition, one patient who crossed over to receive melflufen, daratumumab, and dexamethasone after progression on daratumumab died.

   Click to Show/Hide
In Vivo Model 22 relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.
Related Clinical Trial
NCT Number NCT04649060 Clinical Status Phase 3
Clinical Description This was a randomized, controlled, open-label, Phase 3 multicenter study which enrolled patients with Relapsed-Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM) who were either double refractory to an Immunomodulatory Drug (IMiD) and a Proteasome Inhibitor (PI) (regardless of the number of prior lines of therapy), or had received at least 3 prior lines of therapy including an IMiD and a PI. Patients received treatment with melflufen+dexamethasone+daratumumab or daratumumab until documented progressive disease, unacceptable toxicity, or patient/treating physician decision. Patients in the daratumumab treatment arm had the option to receive treatment with melflufen+dexamethasone+daratumumab after confirmed progressive disease.
Experiment 334 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [3]
Indication Relapsed/Refractory multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Pneumonia
21.40%
Patients Enrolled
14 patients with relapsed refractory multiple myeloma.
Administration Time 28-day cycle
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that utilizes increased peptidase expression to selectively release potent alkylating agents inside tumor cells. Melflufen is hydrolyzed by peptidases and esterases to melphalan either directly or through an intermediate metabolite, desethyl-melflufen. The high lipophilicity of melflufen facilitates passive diffusion across cell membranes. The activity and tolerability of melflufen in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) were demonstrated in the O-12-M1 (NCT01897714), OCEAN (NCT03151811), and HORIZON (NCT02963493) trials.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
Overall, at least one TEAE was reported in 13 (92.9%) and 13 (100.0%) patients in Arms A and B, respectively (Table 3). During cycle 1, 9 patients (64.3%) and 12 patients (92.3%), respectively, had at least one TEAE. Cumulatively, grade 3 or 4 AEs occurred in 12 (85.7%) and 12 (92.3%) patients, respectively, and serious AEs were reported in 5 (35.7%) and 9 (69.2%) patients, respectively. The most common any-grade AEs in Arms A and B, respectively, were thrombocytopenia (10 [71.4%]; 10 [76.9%]), neutropenia (9 [64.3%]; 9 [69.2%]), and anemia (9 [64.3%]; 7 [53.8%]). No phlebitis or local-infusion-related reactions were reported based on pre- and post-infusion inspection of the IV site, and there were no extravasations observed in Arm A or B. Similarly, VIP scores collected on Day 1 post-infusion and on Day 8 indicated that patients had healthy IV sites (VIP score of 0) with no signs of phlebitis following PVC administration of melflufen. The most common non-hematological AE was positive SARS-CoV-2 test (Arm A: 2 [14.3%]; Arm B: 4 [30.8%]). Pneumonia was the most common serious AE (Arm A: 2 [14.3%]; Arm B: 2 [15.4%]). The most common AE considered related to melflufen and/or dexamethasone by investigators was thrombocytopenia (Arm A: 10 [71.4%]; Arm B: 10 [76.9%]). AEs led to treatment discontinuation in 3 (21.4%) and 6 (46.2%) patients in Arms A and B, respectively.

   Click to Show/Hide
Half life period 75.6 h
Related Clinical Trial
NCT Number NCT04412707 Clinical Status Phase 2
Clinical Description This is a randomized, two-period, cross-over Phase 2 study, comparing PK, and assessing safety and tolerability and efficacy of peripheral and central intravenous administration of melflufen in patients with RRMM. It is an international study, enrolling patients in US and Europe. The study will enroll patients following at least 2 lines of prior therapy.
Experiment 335 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [2]
Indication Relapsed/Refractory multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Progressive Disease (PD)
14%
Patients Enrolled
14 patients no prior ASCT or TTP >36 months after ASCT.
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (melflufen), a first-in-class alkylating peptide-drug conjugate, plus dexamethasone was approved in Europe for use in patients with triple-class refractory relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) with 3 prior lines of therapy and without prior autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) or with a time to progression >36 months after prior ASCT. The randomized LIGHTHOUSE study (NCT04649060) assessed melflufen plus daratumumab and dexamethasone (melflufen group) versus daratumumab in patients with RRMM with disease refractory to an immunomodulatory agent and a proteasome inhibitor or who had received 3 prior lines of therapy including an immunomodulatory agent and a proteasome inhibitor. A partial clinical hold issued by the US Food and Drug Administration for all melflufen studies led to financial constraints and premature study closure on February 23rd 2022 (data cut-off date). In total, 54 of 240 planned patients were randomized (melflufen group, N=27; daratumumab group, N=27). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was not reached in the melflufen group versus 4.9 months in the daratumumab group (Hazard Ratio: 0.18 [95% Confidence Interval, 0.05-0.65]; P=0.0032) at a median follow-up time of 7.1 and 6.6 months, respectively. Overall response rate (ORR) was 59% in the melflufen group versus 30% in the daratumumab group (P=0.0300). The most common grade 3 treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen group versus daratumumab group were neutropenia (50% vs. 12%), thrombocytopenia (50% vs. 8%), and anemia (32% vs. 19%). Melflufen plus daratumumab and dexamethasone demonstrated superior PFS and ORR versus daratumumab in RRMM and a safety profile comparable to previously published melflufen studies.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
Efficacy endpoints were more pronounced in favor of the melflufen group compared with the daratumumab group among patients with no prior ASCT or TTP >36 months after a prior ASCT (melflufen group, N=14; daratumumab group, N=15). Median PFS was NR in the melflufen group and 3.9 months (95% CI: 1.4-4.9) in the daratumumab group (HR, 0.06 [95% CI: 0.01-0.49]; log-rank P=0.0005). Fewer OS events were reported in the melflufen group (1 event [7%] vs. 4 events [27%] in the daratumumab group; log-rank P=0.0369). The ORR was 64% (95% CI: 35-87) in the melflufen group and 13% (95% CI: 2-41) in the daratumumab group (P=0.0055). More patients in the melflufen group had a CR (1 patient [7%] vs. 0 patients [0%]) or VGPR (2 patients [14%] vs. 1 patient [7%]) compared with the daratumumab group.

   Click to Show/Hide
Related Clinical Trial
NCT Number NCT04649060 Clinical Status Phase 3
Clinical Description This was a randomized, controlled, open-label, Phase 3 multicenter study which enrolled patients with Relapsed-Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM) who were either double refractory to an Immunomodulatory Drug (IMiD) and a Proteasome Inhibitor (PI) (regardless of the number of prior lines of therapy), or had received at least 3 prior lines of therapy including an IMiD and a PI. Patients received treatment with melflufen+dexamethasone+daratumumab or daratumumab until documented progressive disease, unacceptable toxicity, or patient/treating physician decision. Patients in the daratumumab treatment arm had the option to receive treatment with melflufen+dexamethasone+daratumumab after confirmed progressive disease.
Experiment 336 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [2]
Indication Relapsed/Refractory multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Progressive Disease (PD)
15%
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (melflufen), a first-in-class alkylating peptide-drug conjugate, plus dexamethasone was approved in Europe for use in patients with triple-class refractory relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) with 3 prior lines of therapy and without prior autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) or with a time to progression >36 months after prior ASCT. The randomized LIGHTHOUSE study (NCT04649060) assessed melflufen plus daratumumab and dexamethasone (melflufen group) versus daratumumab in patients with RRMM with disease refractory to an immunomodulatory agent and a proteasome inhibitor or who had received 3 prior lines of therapy including an immunomodulatory agent and a proteasome inhibitor. A partial clinical hold issued by the US Food and Drug Administration for all melflufen studies led to financial constraints and premature study closure on February 23rd 2022 (data cut-off date). In total, 54 of 240 planned patients were randomized (melflufen group, N=27; daratumumab group, N=27). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was not reached in the melflufen group versus 4.9 months in the daratumumab group (Hazard Ratio: 0.18 [95% Confidence Interval, 0.05-0.65]; P=0.0032) at a median follow-up time of 7.1 and 6.6 months, respectively. Overall response rate (ORR) was 59% in the melflufen group versus 30% in the daratumumab group (P=0.0300). The most common grade 3 treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen group versus daratumumab group were neutropenia (50% vs. 12%), thrombocytopenia (50% vs. 8%), and anemia (32% vs. 19%). Melflufen plus daratumumab and dexamethasone demonstrated superior PFS and ORR versus daratumumab in RRMM and a safety profile comparable to previously published melflufen studies.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the ITT population, with a median follow-up of 7.1 months in the melflufen group, the median PFS was not reached (NR) and with a median follow-up of 6.6 months in the daratumumab group, the median PFS was 4.9 months (95% CI: 3.4-NR; HR: 0.18 [95% CI: 0.05-0.65]; log-rankP=0.0032). OS was immature, with 2 events (7%) in the melflufen group and 4 events (15%) in the daratumumab group (HR: 0.47 [95% CI: 0.09-2.57]; log-rankP=0.3721) at a median follow-up of 7.6 months and 6.6 months, respectively. The ORR was 59% (95% CI: 39-78) in the melflufen group and 30% (95% CI: 14-50) in the daratumumab group (P=0.0300). More patients in the melflufen group had a complete response (CR; 1 patient [4%]vs. 0 patients [0%]) and very good partial response (VGPR; 4 patients [15%]vs. 3 patients [11%]) compared with the daratumumab group.

   Click to Show/Hide
In Vivo Model 27 Intent-to-treat (ITT) population.
Related Clinical Trial
NCT Number NCT04649060 Clinical Status Phase 3
Clinical Description This was a randomized, controlled, open-label, Phase 3 multicenter study which enrolled patients with Relapsed-Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM) who were either double refractory to an Immunomodulatory Drug (IMiD) and a Proteasome Inhibitor (PI) (regardless of the number of prior lines of therapy), or had received at least 3 prior lines of therapy including an IMiD and a PI. Patients received treatment with melflufen+dexamethasone+daratumumab or daratumumab until documented progressive disease, unacceptable toxicity, or patient/treating physician decision. Patients in the daratumumab treatment arm had the option to receive treatment with melflufen+dexamethasone+daratumumab after confirmed progressive disease.
Experiment 337 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [3]
Indication Relapsed/Refractory multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Progressive Disease (PD)
14.30%
Patients Enrolled
14 patients with relapsed refractory multiple myeloma.
Administration Time 28-day cycle
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that utilizes increased peptidase expression to selectively release potent alkylating agents inside tumor cells. Melflufen is hydrolyzed by peptidases and esterases to melphalan either directly or through an intermediate metabolite, desethyl-melflufen. The high lipophilicity of melflufen facilitates passive diffusion across cell membranes. The activity and tolerability of melflufen in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) were demonstrated in the O-12-M1 (NCT01897714), OCEAN (NCT03151811), and HORIZON (NCT02963493) trials.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In Arm A, 4 of the 14 patients achieved an overall response (ORR 28.6% [95% CI: 8.4-58.1]) including 1 patient with CR, and the CBR was 57.1% (95% CI: 28.9-82.3). In Arm B, 1 of the 13 patients achieved an overall response (ORR 7.7% [95% CI: 0.2-36.0]), consisting of a PR, and the CBR was 15.4% (95% CI: 1.9-45.4). In the overall study population, 5 patients had an overall response (ORR 18.5% [95% CI: 6.3-38.1]). DOR data were insufficient to evaluate due to early termination of the study, the low number of patient events (1 in Arm A, 0 in Arm B), and the limited number of responses. Based on the 5 patients who had a response of PR or better at study termination (4 in Arm A, 1 in Arm B), the median TTR was 2.4 months in Arm A, 5.1 months in Arm B, and 2.6 months overall. Based on the 8 and 5 progression events in Arm A and Arm B, respectively, the median TTP was 5.8 months and 4.8 months, respectively, with a median TTP of 5.8 months in the overall population. The median PFS was 5.2 months (95% CI: 2.7 to not evaluable) and 2.9 months (95% CI: 1.5-4.6) in Arms A and B, respectively. For the overall study population, median PFS was 3.7 months (95% CI: 2.7-5.8).

   Click to Show/Hide
Half life period 75.6 h
Related Clinical Trial
NCT Number NCT04412707 Clinical Status Phase 2
Clinical Description This is a randomized, two-period, cross-over Phase 2 study, comparing PK, and assessing safety and tolerability and efficacy of peripheral and central intravenous administration of melflufen in patients with RRMM. It is an international study, enrolling patients in US and Europe. The study will enroll patients following at least 2 lines of prior therapy.
Experiment 338 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Progressive disease (PD)
15%
Patients Enrolled
246 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 339 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Progressive disease (PD)
19%
Patients Enrolled
246 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 340 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [3]
Indication Relapsed/Refractory multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Pyrexia
14.30%
Patients Enrolled
14 patients with relapsed refractory multiple myeloma.
Administration Time 28-day cycle
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that utilizes increased peptidase expression to selectively release potent alkylating agents inside tumor cells. Melflufen is hydrolyzed by peptidases and esterases to melphalan either directly or through an intermediate metabolite, desethyl-melflufen. The high lipophilicity of melflufen facilitates passive diffusion across cell membranes. The activity and tolerability of melflufen in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) were demonstrated in the O-12-M1 (NCT01897714), OCEAN (NCT03151811), and HORIZON (NCT02963493) trials.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
Overall, at least one TEAE was reported in 13 (92.9%) and 13 (100.0%) patients in Arms A and B, respectively (Table 3). During cycle 1, 9 patients (64.3%) and 12 patients (92.3%), respectively, had at least one TEAE. Cumulatively, grade 3 or 4 AEs occurred in 12 (85.7%) and 12 (92.3%) patients, respectively, and serious AEs were reported in 5 (35.7%) and 9 (69.2%) patients, respectively. The most common any-grade AEs in Arms A and B, respectively, were thrombocytopenia (10 [71.4%]; 10 [76.9%]), neutropenia (9 [64.3%]; 9 [69.2%]), and anemia (9 [64.3%]; 7 [53.8%]). No phlebitis or local-infusion-related reactions were reported based on pre- and post-infusion inspection of the IV site, and there were no extravasations observed in Arm A or B. Similarly, VIP scores collected on Day 1 post-infusion and on Day 8 indicated that patients had healthy IV sites (VIP score of 0) with no signs of phlebitis following PVC administration of melflufen. The most common non-hematological AE was positive SARS-CoV-2 test (Arm A: 2 [14.3%]; Arm B: 4 [30.8%]). Pneumonia was the most common serious AE (Arm A: 2 [14.3%]; Arm B: 2 [15.4%]). The most common AE considered related to melflufen and/or dexamethasone by investigators was thrombocytopenia (Arm A: 10 [71.4%]; Arm B: 10 [76.9%]). AEs led to treatment discontinuation in 3 (21.4%) and 6 (46.2%) patients in Arms A and B, respectively.

   Click to Show/Hide
Half life period 75.6 h
Related Clinical Trial
NCT Number NCT04412707 Clinical Status Phase 2
Clinical Description This is a randomized, two-period, cross-over Phase 2 study, comparing PK, and assessing safety and tolerability and efficacy of peripheral and central intravenous administration of melflufen in patients with RRMM. It is an international study, enrolling patients in US and Europe. The study will enroll patients following at least 2 lines of prior therapy.
Experiment 341 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [4]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Pyrexia
24%
Patients Enrolled
157 patients with multiple myeloma.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melflufen is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate, targeting aminopeptidase which has an increased expression in fast-growing and aggressive malignancies. The lipophilicity of melflufen allows for passive diffusion, selectively targeting myeloma cells. Once inside the cell, melflufen is hydrolyzed to active alkylating metabolites melphalan and desethyl-melflufen. Melflufen and the active metabolites trigger irreversible DNA damage, inhibit proliferation, induces apoptosis, and express antiangiogenic effects. In addition, melflufen demonstrated activity in myeloma cells with documented impaired or absent Tp53 expression and documented resistance to bortezomib, dexamethasone, and melphalan.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
Based on the safety data collected during the HORIZON trial, treatment emergent adverse events occurred in 100% of patients including 100 patients (64%) having at least 1 CTCAE grade 4 adverse effect. Hematologic grade 3 or 4 adverse effects including thrombocytopenia (76%), neutropenia (79%), anemia (43%), and infections (11%) were the most commonly reported. Other adverse effects, such as fatigue (55%), nausea (32%), diarrhea (27%), and decreased appetite (14%), were similar to other alkylating agents. Pyrexia (24%), including febrile neutropenia (5%), and respiratory tract infections (24%) were contributed to hematologic toxicities.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 342 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [1]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Pyrexia
40%
Patients Enrolled
Patients with multi-refractory multiple myeloma.
MOA of PDC
Melflufen is highly lipophilic, which promotes its rapid uptake by cells. Once within the cell, melflufen releases its hydrophilic alkylator payloads via the hydrolytic activity of intracellular peptidases (e.g., aminopeptidases). Aminopeptidases are Zn2+-dependent metalloproteinases that remove amino acids at the N-terminal position from oligopeptides and have been associated with multiple tumorigenic processes such as proliferation, apoptosis, differentiation, angiogenesis, and motility. The dependence of melflufen on aminopeptidases was initially demonstrated by the reduced cytotoxic activity of melflufen-but not the alkylator melphalan-when cells were pretreated with bestatin, an antibiotic that is a potent aminopeptidase inhibitor. In addition, structure analogs designed to resist peptide hydrolysis (N-methyl derivative and derivative with D-amino acid) were shown to be almost 100-fold less potent than melflufen. Subsequent in vitro studies demonstrated that hydrolytic cleavage of melflufen by aminopeptidases releases alkylator payloads, including melphalan. In vitro, the activity of melflufen is multi-pronged, including induction of DNA damage, induction of apoptosis, inhibition of VEGF-dependent cell migration, and inhibition of tumor-associated angiogenesis, which have been further reviewed elsewhere. Downregulation of aminopeptidases resulted in reduced melflufen-mediated cytotoxic activity and apoptotic signaling in cultured cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
Melflufen plus dexamethasone was generally manageable in this heavily pretreated patient population [51]. All patients experienced ≥1 AE, most commonly hematologic AEs including thrombocytopenia (73%), neutropenia (69%), and anemia (64%). The most common non-hematologic AEs included pyrexia (40%), asthenia (31%), fatigue (29%), nausea (27%), and diarrhea (24%).

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 343 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [3]
Indication Relapsed/Refractory multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Rash
14.30%
Patients Enrolled
14 patients with relapsed refractory multiple myeloma.
Administration Time 28-day cycle
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that utilizes increased peptidase expression to selectively release potent alkylating agents inside tumor cells. Melflufen is hydrolyzed by peptidases and esterases to melphalan either directly or through an intermediate metabolite, desethyl-melflufen. The high lipophilicity of melflufen facilitates passive diffusion across cell membranes. The activity and tolerability of melflufen in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) were demonstrated in the O-12-M1 (NCT01897714), OCEAN (NCT03151811), and HORIZON (NCT02963493) trials.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
Overall, at least one TEAE was reported in 13 (92.9%) and 13 (100.0%) patients in Arms A and B, respectively (Table 3). During cycle 1, 9 patients (64.3%) and 12 patients (92.3%), respectively, had at least one TEAE. Cumulatively, grade 3 or 4 AEs occurred in 12 (85.7%) and 12 (92.3%) patients, respectively, and serious AEs were reported in 5 (35.7%) and 9 (69.2%) patients, respectively. The most common any-grade AEs in Arms A and B, respectively, were thrombocytopenia (10 [71.4%]; 10 [76.9%]), neutropenia (9 [64.3%]; 9 [69.2%]), and anemia (9 [64.3%]; 7 [53.8%]). No phlebitis or local-infusion-related reactions were reported based on pre- and post-infusion inspection of the IV site, and there were no extravasations observed in Arm A or B. Similarly, VIP scores collected on Day 1 post-infusion and on Day 8 indicated that patients had healthy IV sites (VIP score of 0) with no signs of phlebitis following PVC administration of melflufen. The most common non-hematological AE was positive SARS-CoV-2 test (Arm A: 2 [14.3%]; Arm B: 4 [30.8%]). Pneumonia was the most common serious AE (Arm A: 2 [14.3%]; Arm B: 2 [15.4%]). The most common AE considered related to melflufen and/or dexamethasone by investigators was thrombocytopenia (Arm A: 10 [71.4%]; Arm B: 10 [76.9%]). AEs led to treatment discontinuation in 3 (21.4%) and 6 (46.2%) patients in Arms A and B, respectively.

   Click to Show/Hide
Half life period 75.6 h
Related Clinical Trial
NCT Number NCT04412707 Clinical Status Phase 2
Clinical Description This is a randomized, two-period, cross-over Phase 2 study, comparing PK, and assessing safety and tolerability and efficacy of peripheral and central intravenous administration of melflufen in patients with RRMM. It is an international study, enrolling patients in US and Europe. The study will enroll patients following at least 2 lines of prior therapy.
Experiment 344 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [1]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Rate of adverse events
36%
Patients Enrolled
Patients with multi-refractory multiple myeloma.
Administration Time 6.2 month (median)
Administration Dosage 30 or 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melflufen is highly lipophilic, which promotes its rapid uptake by cells. Once within the cell, melflufen releases its hydrophilic alkylator payloads via the hydrolytic activity of intracellular peptidases (e.g., aminopeptidases). Aminopeptidases are Zn2+-dependent metalloproteinases that remove amino acids at the N-terminal position from oligopeptides and have been associated with multiple tumorigenic processes such as proliferation, apoptosis, differentiation, angiogenesis, and motility. The dependence of melflufen on aminopeptidases was initially demonstrated by the reduced cytotoxic activity of melflufen-but not the alkylator melphalan-when cells were pretreated with bestatin, an antibiotic that is a potent aminopeptidase inhibitor. In addition, structure analogs designed to resist peptide hydrolysis (N-methyl derivative and derivative with D-amino acid) were shown to be almost 100-fold less potent than melflufen. Subsequent in vitro studies demonstrated that hydrolytic cleavage of melflufen by aminopeptidases releases alkylator payloads, including melphalan. In vitro, the activity of melflufen is multi-pronged, including induction of DNA damage, induction of apoptosis, inhibition of VEGF-dependent cell migration, and inhibition of tumor-associated angiogenesis, which have been further reviewed elsewhere. Downregulation of aminopeptidases resulted in reduced melflufen-mediated cytotoxic activity and apoptotic signaling in cultured cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 345 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [1]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Rate of adverse events
38%
Patients Enrolled
Patients with multi-refractory multiple myeloma.
Administration Time 28-day cycle
Administration Dosage 40 mg with dexamethasone (40 mg)
MOA of PDC
Melflufen is highly lipophilic, which promotes its rapid uptake by cells. Once within the cell, melflufen releases its hydrophilic alkylator payloads via the hydrolytic activity of intracellular peptidases (e.g., aminopeptidases). Aminopeptidases are Zn2+-dependent metalloproteinases that remove amino acids at the N-terminal position from oligopeptides and have been associated with multiple tumorigenic processes such as proliferation, apoptosis, differentiation, angiogenesis, and motility. The dependence of melflufen on aminopeptidases was initially demonstrated by the reduced cytotoxic activity of melflufen-but not the alkylator melphalan-when cells were pretreated with bestatin, an antibiotic that is a potent aminopeptidase inhibitor. In addition, structure analogs designed to resist peptide hydrolysis (N-methyl derivative and derivative with D-amino acid) were shown to be almost 100-fold less potent than melflufen. Subsequent in vitro studies demonstrated that hydrolytic cleavage of melflufen by aminopeptidases releases alkylator payloads, including melphalan. In vitro, the activity of melflufen is multi-pronged, including induction of DNA damage, induction of apoptosis, inhibition of VEGF-dependent cell migration, and inhibition of tumor-associated angiogenesis, which have been further reviewed elsewhere. Downregulation of aminopeptidases resulted in reduced melflufen-mediated cytotoxic activity and apoptotic signaling in cultured cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 346 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [1]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Rate of adverse events
83%
Patients Enrolled
Patients with multi-refractory multiple myeloma.
Administration Time 9.3 month (median)
Administration Dosage 30 or 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melflufen is highly lipophilic, which promotes its rapid uptake by cells. Once within the cell, melflufen releases its hydrophilic alkylator payloads via the hydrolytic activity of intracellular peptidases (e.g., aminopeptidases). Aminopeptidases are Zn2+-dependent metalloproteinases that remove amino acids at the N-terminal position from oligopeptides and have been associated with multiple tumorigenic processes such as proliferation, apoptosis, differentiation, angiogenesis, and motility. The dependence of melflufen on aminopeptidases was initially demonstrated by the reduced cytotoxic activity of melflufen-but not the alkylator melphalan-when cells were pretreated with bestatin, an antibiotic that is a potent aminopeptidase inhibitor. In addition, structure analogs designed to resist peptide hydrolysis (N-methyl derivative and derivative with D-amino acid) were shown to be almost 100-fold less potent than melflufen. Subsequent in vitro studies demonstrated that hydrolytic cleavage of melflufen by aminopeptidases releases alkylator payloads, including melphalan. In vitro, the activity of melflufen is multi-pronged, including induction of DNA damage, induction of apoptosis, inhibition of VEGF-dependent cell migration, and inhibition of tumor-associated angiogenesis, which have been further reviewed elsewhere. Downregulation of aminopeptidases resulted in reduced melflufen-mediated cytotoxic activity and apoptotic signaling in cultured cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 347 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [3]
Indication Relapsed/Refractory multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Respiratory tract infection
14.30%
Patients Enrolled
14 patients with relapsed refractory multiple myeloma.
Administration Time 28-day cycle
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that utilizes increased peptidase expression to selectively release potent alkylating agents inside tumor cells. Melflufen is hydrolyzed by peptidases and esterases to melphalan either directly or through an intermediate metabolite, desethyl-melflufen. The high lipophilicity of melflufen facilitates passive diffusion across cell membranes. The activity and tolerability of melflufen in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) were demonstrated in the O-12-M1 (NCT01897714), OCEAN (NCT03151811), and HORIZON (NCT02963493) trials.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
Overall, at least one TEAE was reported in 13 (92.9%) and 13 (100.0%) patients in Arms A and B, respectively (Table 3). During cycle 1, 9 patients (64.3%) and 12 patients (92.3%), respectively, had at least one TEAE. Cumulatively, grade 3 or 4 AEs occurred in 12 (85.7%) and 12 (92.3%) patients, respectively, and serious AEs were reported in 5 (35.7%) and 9 (69.2%) patients, respectively. The most common any-grade AEs in Arms A and B, respectively, were thrombocytopenia (10 [71.4%]; 10 [76.9%]), neutropenia (9 [64.3%]; 9 [69.2%]), and anemia (9 [64.3%]; 7 [53.8%]). No phlebitis or local-infusion-related reactions were reported based on pre- and post-infusion inspection of the IV site, and there were no extravasations observed in Arm A or B. Similarly, VIP scores collected on Day 1 post-infusion and on Day 8 indicated that patients had healthy IV sites (VIP score of 0) with no signs of phlebitis following PVC administration of melflufen. The most common non-hematological AE was positive SARS-CoV-2 test (Arm A: 2 [14.3%]; Arm B: 4 [30.8%]). Pneumonia was the most common serious AE (Arm A: 2 [14.3%]; Arm B: 2 [15.4%]). The most common AE considered related to melflufen and/or dexamethasone by investigators was thrombocytopenia (Arm A: 10 [71.4%]; Arm B: 10 [76.9%]). AEs led to treatment discontinuation in 3 (21.4%) and 6 (46.2%) patients in Arms A and B, respectively.

   Click to Show/Hide
Half life period 75.6 h
Related Clinical Trial
NCT Number NCT04412707 Clinical Status Phase 2
Clinical Description This is a randomized, two-period, cross-over Phase 2 study, comparing PK, and assessing safety and tolerability and efficacy of peripheral and central intravenous administration of melflufen in patients with RRMM. It is an international study, enrolling patients in US and Europe. The study will enroll patients following at least 2 lines of prior therapy.
Experiment 348 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [4]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Respiratory tract infection
24%
Patients Enrolled
157 patients with multiple myeloma.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melflufen is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate, targeting aminopeptidase which has an increased expression in fast-growing and aggressive malignancies. The lipophilicity of melflufen allows for passive diffusion, selectively targeting myeloma cells. Once inside the cell, melflufen is hydrolyzed to active alkylating metabolites melphalan and desethyl-melflufen. Melflufen and the active metabolites trigger irreversible DNA damage, inhibit proliferation, induces apoptosis, and express antiangiogenic effects. In addition, melflufen demonstrated activity in myeloma cells with documented impaired or absent Tp53 expression and documented resistance to bortezomib, dexamethasone, and melphalan.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
Based on the safety data collected during the HORIZON trial, treatment emergent adverse events occurred in 100% of patients including 100 patients (64%) having at least 1 CTCAE grade 4 adverse effect. Hematologic grade 3 or 4 adverse effects including thrombocytopenia (76%), neutropenia (79%), anemia (43%), and infections (11%) were the most commonly reported. Other adverse effects, such as fatigue (55%), nausea (32%), diarrhea (27%), and decreased appetite (14%), were similar to other alkylating agents. Pyrexia (24%), including febrile neutropenia (5%), and respiratory tract infections (24%) were contributed to hematologic toxicities.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 349 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [2]
Indication Relapsed/Refractory multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Serious adverse event rate
27%
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (melflufen), a first-in-class alkylating peptide-drug conjugate, plus dexamethasone was approved in Europe for use in patients with triple-class refractory relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) with 3 prior lines of therapy and without prior autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) or with a time to progression >36 months after prior ASCT. The randomized LIGHTHOUSE study (NCT04649060) assessed melflufen plus daratumumab and dexamethasone (melflufen group) versus daratumumab in patients with RRMM with disease refractory to an immunomodulatory agent and a proteasome inhibitor or who had received 3 prior lines of therapy including an immunomodulatory agent and a proteasome inhibitor. A partial clinical hold issued by the US Food and Drug Administration for all melflufen studies led to financial constraints and premature study closure on February 23rd 2022 (data cut-off date). In total, 54 of 240 planned patients were randomized (melflufen group, N=27; daratumumab group, N=27). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was not reached in the melflufen group versus 4.9 months in the daratumumab group (Hazard Ratio: 0.18 [95% Confidence Interval, 0.05-0.65]; P=0.0032) at a median follow-up time of 7.1 and 6.6 months, respectively. Overall response rate (ORR) was 59% in the melflufen group versus 30% in the daratumumab group (P=0.0300). The most common grade 3 treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen group versus daratumumab group were neutropenia (50% vs. 12%), thrombocytopenia (50% vs. 8%), and anemia (32% vs. 19%). Melflufen plus daratumumab and dexamethasone demonstrated superior PFS and ORR versus daratumumab in RRMM and a safety profile comparable to previously published melflufen studies.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
The safety population included patients who received ≥1 dose of melflufen, daratumumab, or dexamethasone (melflufen group) and 26 patients who received daratumumab monotherapy. In the safety population, ≥1 TEAE was reported in 21 patients (96%) with melflufen, daratumumab, and dexamethasone and 22 patients (85%) with daratumumab. Overall, grade ≥3 TEAE occurred in 18 patients (82%) with melflufen, daratumumab, and dexamethasone and 14 patients (54%) with daratumumab. The most common hematologic grade ≥3 TEAE were neutropenia (melflufen group, 11 patients [50%]; daratumumab group, 3 patients [12%]), thrombocytopenia (melflufen group, 11 patients [50%]; daratumumab group, 2 patients [8%]), and anemia (melflufen group, 7 patients [32%]; daratumumab group, 5 patients [19%]). The most common non-hematologic grade ≥3 TEAE were pneumonia (melflufen group, 2 patients [9%]; daratumumab group, 2 patients [8%]) and femur fracture (melflufen group, 0 patients [0%]; daratumumab group, 2 patients [8%]); of these, 1 event (5%) of pneumonia in the melflufen group and 1 event (4%) of femur fracture in the daratumumab group were considered treatment-related TEAE by the investigator. Serious AE occurred in 6 patients (27%) with melflufen, daratumumab, and dexamethasone, and 12 patients (46%) with daratumumab. The most common serious AE (occurring in ≥4 patients overall) were anemia (melflufen group, 2 patients [9%]; daratumumab group, 3 patients [12%]) and pneumonia (melflufen group, 2 patients [9%]; daratumumab group, 2 patients [8%]). TEAE leading to treatment discontinuation occurred in 2 patients (9%) in the melflufen group (neutropenia and thrombocytopenia, N=1 each) and 4 patients (15%) in the daratumumab group (anemia, disease progression, hypercalcemia, and renal failure, N=1 each). Overall, 5 patients died on study before the crossover: 2 patients who received melflufen, daratumumab, and dexamethasone (1 due to disease progression and 1 due to unknown reasons, both >30 days after the last dose of study treatment) and 3 patients who received daratumumab (1 due to disease progression and 1 due to unknown reasons, both ≤30 days after the last dose of study treatment and 1 due to an AE [COVID-19 pneumonia], >30 days after the last dose of study treatment). In addition, one patient who crossed over to receive melflufen, daratumumab, and dexamethasone after progression on daratumumab died.

   Click to Show/Hide
In Vivo Model 22 relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.
Related Clinical Trial
NCT Number NCT04649060 Clinical Status Phase 3
Clinical Description This was a randomized, controlled, open-label, Phase 3 multicenter study which enrolled patients with Relapsed-Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM) who were either double refractory to an Immunomodulatory Drug (IMiD) and a Proteasome Inhibitor (PI) (regardless of the number of prior lines of therapy), or had received at least 3 prior lines of therapy including an IMiD and a PI. Patients received treatment with melflufen+dexamethasone+daratumumab or daratumumab until documented progressive disease, unacceptable toxicity, or patient/treating physician decision. Patients in the daratumumab treatment arm had the option to receive treatment with melflufen+dexamethasone+daratumumab after confirmed progressive disease.
Experiment 350 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [2]
Indication Relapsed/Refractory multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Stable disease (SD)
4%
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (melflufen), a first-in-class alkylating peptide-drug conjugate, plus dexamethasone was approved in Europe for use in patients with triple-class refractory relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) with 3 prior lines of therapy and without prior autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) or with a time to progression >36 months after prior ASCT. The randomized LIGHTHOUSE study (NCT04649060) assessed melflufen plus daratumumab and dexamethasone (melflufen group) versus daratumumab in patients with RRMM with disease refractory to an immunomodulatory agent and a proteasome inhibitor or who had received 3 prior lines of therapy including an immunomodulatory agent and a proteasome inhibitor. A partial clinical hold issued by the US Food and Drug Administration for all melflufen studies led to financial constraints and premature study closure on February 23rd 2022 (data cut-off date). In total, 54 of 240 planned patients were randomized (melflufen group, N=27; daratumumab group, N=27). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was not reached in the melflufen group versus 4.9 months in the daratumumab group (Hazard Ratio: 0.18 [95% Confidence Interval, 0.05-0.65]; P=0.0032) at a median follow-up time of 7.1 and 6.6 months, respectively. Overall response rate (ORR) was 59% in the melflufen group versus 30% in the daratumumab group (P=0.0300). The most common grade 3 treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen group versus daratumumab group were neutropenia (50% vs. 12%), thrombocytopenia (50% vs. 8%), and anemia (32% vs. 19%). Melflufen plus daratumumab and dexamethasone demonstrated superior PFS and ORR versus daratumumab in RRMM and a safety profile comparable to previously published melflufen studies.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the ITT population, with a median follow-up of 7.1 months in the melflufen group, the median PFS was not reached (NR) and with a median follow-up of 6.6 months in the daratumumab group, the median PFS was 4.9 months (95% CI: 3.4-NR; HR: 0.18 [95% CI: 0.05-0.65]; log-rankP=0.0032). OS was immature, with 2 events (7%) in the melflufen group and 4 events (15%) in the daratumumab group (HR: 0.47 [95% CI: 0.09-2.57]; log-rankP=0.3721) at a median follow-up of 7.6 months and 6.6 months, respectively. The ORR was 59% (95% CI: 39-78) in the melflufen group and 30% (95% CI: 14-50) in the daratumumab group (P=0.0300). More patients in the melflufen group had a complete response (CR; 1 patient [4%]vs. 0 patients [0%]) and very good partial response (VGPR; 4 patients [15%]vs. 3 patients [11%]) compared with the daratumumab group.

   Click to Show/Hide
In Vivo Model 27 Intent-to-treat (ITT) population.
Related Clinical Trial
NCT Number NCT04649060 Clinical Status Phase 3
Clinical Description This was a randomized, controlled, open-label, Phase 3 multicenter study which enrolled patients with Relapsed-Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM) who were either double refractory to an Immunomodulatory Drug (IMiD) and a Proteasome Inhibitor (PI) (regardless of the number of prior lines of therapy), or had received at least 3 prior lines of therapy including an IMiD and a PI. Patients received treatment with melflufen+dexamethasone+daratumumab or daratumumab until documented progressive disease, unacceptable toxicity, or patient/treating physician decision. Patients in the daratumumab treatment arm had the option to receive treatment with melflufen+dexamethasone+daratumumab after confirmed progressive disease.
Experiment 351 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [2]
Indication Relapsed/Refractory multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Stable disease (SD)
7%
Patients Enrolled
14 patients no prior ASCT or TTP >36 months after ASCT.
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (melflufen), a first-in-class alkylating peptide-drug conjugate, plus dexamethasone was approved in Europe for use in patients with triple-class refractory relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) with 3 prior lines of therapy and without prior autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) or with a time to progression >36 months after prior ASCT. The randomized LIGHTHOUSE study (NCT04649060) assessed melflufen plus daratumumab and dexamethasone (melflufen group) versus daratumumab in patients with RRMM with disease refractory to an immunomodulatory agent and a proteasome inhibitor or who had received 3 prior lines of therapy including an immunomodulatory agent and a proteasome inhibitor. A partial clinical hold issued by the US Food and Drug Administration for all melflufen studies led to financial constraints and premature study closure on February 23rd 2022 (data cut-off date). In total, 54 of 240 planned patients were randomized (melflufen group, N=27; daratumumab group, N=27). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was not reached in the melflufen group versus 4.9 months in the daratumumab group (Hazard Ratio: 0.18 [95% Confidence Interval, 0.05-0.65]; P=0.0032) at a median follow-up time of 7.1 and 6.6 months, respectively. Overall response rate (ORR) was 59% in the melflufen group versus 30% in the daratumumab group (P=0.0300). The most common grade 3 treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen group versus daratumumab group were neutropenia (50% vs. 12%), thrombocytopenia (50% vs. 8%), and anemia (32% vs. 19%). Melflufen plus daratumumab and dexamethasone demonstrated superior PFS and ORR versus daratumumab in RRMM and a safety profile comparable to previously published melflufen studies.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
Efficacy endpoints were more pronounced in favor of the melflufen group compared with the daratumumab group among patients with no prior ASCT or TTP >36 months after a prior ASCT (melflufen group, N=14; daratumumab group, N=15). Median PFS was NR in the melflufen group and 3.9 months (95% CI: 1.4-4.9) in the daratumumab group (HR, 0.06 [95% CI: 0.01-0.49]; log-rank P=0.0005). Fewer OS events were reported in the melflufen group (1 event [7%] vs. 4 events [27%] in the daratumumab group; log-rank P=0.0369). The ORR was 64% (95% CI: 35-87) in the melflufen group and 13% (95% CI: 2-41) in the daratumumab group (P=0.0055). More patients in the melflufen group had a CR (1 patient [7%] vs. 0 patients [0%]) or VGPR (2 patients [14%] vs. 1 patient [7%]) compared with the daratumumab group.

   Click to Show/Hide
Related Clinical Trial
NCT Number NCT04649060 Clinical Status Phase 3
Clinical Description This was a randomized, controlled, open-label, Phase 3 multicenter study which enrolled patients with Relapsed-Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM) who were either double refractory to an Immunomodulatory Drug (IMiD) and a Proteasome Inhibitor (PI) (regardless of the number of prior lines of therapy), or had received at least 3 prior lines of therapy including an IMiD and a PI. Patients received treatment with melflufen+dexamethasone+daratumumab or daratumumab until documented progressive disease, unacceptable toxicity, or patient/treating physician decision. Patients in the daratumumab treatment arm had the option to receive treatment with melflufen+dexamethasone+daratumumab after confirmed progressive disease.
Experiment 352 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [3]
Indication Relapsed/Refractory multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Stable disease (SD)
14.30%
Patients Enrolled
14 patients with relapsed refractory multiple myeloma.
Administration Time 28-day cycle
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that utilizes increased peptidase expression to selectively release potent alkylating agents inside tumor cells. Melflufen is hydrolyzed by peptidases and esterases to melphalan either directly or through an intermediate metabolite, desethyl-melflufen. The high lipophilicity of melflufen facilitates passive diffusion across cell membranes. The activity and tolerability of melflufen in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) were demonstrated in the O-12-M1 (NCT01897714), OCEAN (NCT03151811), and HORIZON (NCT02963493) trials.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In Arm A, 4 of the 14 patients achieved an overall response (ORR 28.6% [95% CI: 8.4-58.1]) including 1 patient with CR, and the CBR was 57.1% (95% CI: 28.9-82.3). In Arm B, 1 of the 13 patients achieved an overall response (ORR 7.7% [95% CI: 0.2-36.0]), consisting of a PR, and the CBR was 15.4% (95% CI: 1.9-45.4). In the overall study population, 5 patients had an overall response (ORR 18.5% [95% CI: 6.3-38.1]). DOR data were insufficient to evaluate due to early termination of the study, the low number of patient events (1 in Arm A, 0 in Arm B), and the limited number of responses. Based on the 5 patients who had a response of PR or better at study termination (4 in Arm A, 1 in Arm B), the median TTR was 2.4 months in Arm A, 5.1 months in Arm B, and 2.6 months overall. Based on the 8 and 5 progression events in Arm A and Arm B, respectively, the median TTP was 5.8 months and 4.8 months, respectively, with a median TTP of 5.8 months in the overall population. The median PFS was 5.2 months (95% CI: 2.7 to not evaluable) and 2.9 months (95% CI: 1.5-4.6) in Arms A and B, respectively. For the overall study population, median PFS was 3.7 months (95% CI: 2.7-5.8).

   Click to Show/Hide
Half life period 75.6 h
Related Clinical Trial
NCT Number NCT04412707 Clinical Status Phase 2
Clinical Description This is a randomized, two-period, cross-over Phase 2 study, comparing PK, and assessing safety and tolerability and efficacy of peripheral and central intravenous administration of melflufen in patients with RRMM. It is an international study, enrolling patients in US and Europe. The study will enroll patients following at least 2 lines of prior therapy.
Experiment 353 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Stable disease (SD)
24%
Patients Enrolled
246 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 354 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [6]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Stable disease (SD)
28%
Patients Enrolled
246 patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (known as melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and thereby rapidly releases alkylating agents inside tumour cells. Due to its high lipophilicity and affinity for aminopeptidases, melflufen can passively enter tumour cells and release cytotoxic, hydrophilic alkylating agents (melphalan and desethyl-melflufen) that remain trapped within cells. Melflufen uses a novel approach, whereby increased aminopeptidase activity is used to achieve selective release of alkylating agents inside tumour cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
In the safety population, the median duration of treatment was 58 months (IQR 28-111) in the melflufen group and 51 months (26-92) in the pomalidomide group. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles in each treatment group (melflufen: IQR 3-11; pomalidomide: IQR 3-10). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events by preferred term and treatment group are summarised in table 2 and the appendix (pp 23-31 ), and disaggregated by sex in the appendix (pp 32-35 ). The most common haematological grade 3 or 4 events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were neutropenia (123 [54%] of 228 vs 102 [41%] of 246), thrombocytopenia (143 [63%] vs 26 [11%]), and anaemia (97 [43%] vs 44 [18%]), and the most common grade 3 or 4 non-haematological event was pneumonia (ten [4%] vs 20 [8%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen and pomalidomide groups were thrombocytopenia (138 [61%] vs 22 [9%]), neutropenia (122 [54%] vs 97 [39%]), anaemia (87 [38%] vs 25 [10%] ). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 95 (42%) patients in the melflufen group and 113 (46%) patients in the pomalidomide group, the most common of which were pneumonia (13 [6%] vs 21 [9%]), COVID-19 pneumonia (11 [5%] vs nine [4%]), and thrombocytopenia (nine [4%] vs three [1%]), and were considered to be treatment related in 42 (18%) in the melflufen group and 52 (21%) in the pomalidomide group. In the safety population, 106 (46%) patients in the melflufen group and 106 (43%) patients in the pomalidomide group died overall. 23 (10%) patients in the melflufen group and 33 (13%) in the pomalidomide group died within 30 days of receiving their last dose of study drug; 83 (36%) in the melflufen group and 73 (30%), in the pomalidomide group died 30 days after having received their last dose of study medication. Additionally, 13 patients who were randomly assigned but not treated died (assigned to melflufen group, 11 [61%] of 18; pomalidomide group, two [67%] of three). In an exploratory analysis of prespecified subgroups of clinical relevance in the ITT population, progression-free survival data favoured melflufen in most subgroups, including patients aged 75 years and older (HR 043 [95% CI 024-076]; p=00031) and patients without a previous autologous HSCT (HR 059 [044-079]; p=00004). By contrast, overall survival data favoured pomalidomide in patients younger than 65 years (HR 171 [95% CI 109-269]; p=0019) and those with a previous autologous HSCT (HR 161 [109-240]; p=0017). Age and previous autologous HSCT remained significant prognostic factors on the basis of an interaction test.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 355 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [2]
Indication Relapsed/Refractory multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Thrombocytopenia
50%
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (melflufen), a first-in-class alkylating peptide-drug conjugate, plus dexamethasone was approved in Europe for use in patients with triple-class refractory relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) with 3 prior lines of therapy and without prior autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) or with a time to progression >36 months after prior ASCT. The randomized LIGHTHOUSE study (NCT04649060) assessed melflufen plus daratumumab and dexamethasone (melflufen group) versus daratumumab in patients with RRMM with disease refractory to an immunomodulatory agent and a proteasome inhibitor or who had received 3 prior lines of therapy including an immunomodulatory agent and a proteasome inhibitor. A partial clinical hold issued by the US Food and Drug Administration for all melflufen studies led to financial constraints and premature study closure on February 23rd 2022 (data cut-off date). In total, 54 of 240 planned patients were randomized (melflufen group, N=27; daratumumab group, N=27). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was not reached in the melflufen group versus 4.9 months in the daratumumab group (Hazard Ratio: 0.18 [95% Confidence Interval, 0.05-0.65]; P=0.0032) at a median follow-up time of 7.1 and 6.6 months, respectively. Overall response rate (ORR) was 59% in the melflufen group versus 30% in the daratumumab group (P=0.0300). The most common grade 3 treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen group versus daratumumab group were neutropenia (50% vs. 12%), thrombocytopenia (50% vs. 8%), and anemia (32% vs. 19%). Melflufen plus daratumumab and dexamethasone demonstrated superior PFS and ORR versus daratumumab in RRMM and a safety profile comparable to previously published melflufen studies.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
The safety population included patients who received ≥1 dose of melflufen, daratumumab, or dexamethasone (melflufen group) and 26 patients who received daratumumab monotherapy. In the safety population, ≥1 TEAE was reported in 21 patients (96%) with melflufen, daratumumab, and dexamethasone and 22 patients (85%) with daratumumab. Overall, grade ≥3 TEAE occurred in 18 patients (82%) with melflufen, daratumumab, and dexamethasone and 14 patients (54%) with daratumumab. The most common hematologic grade ≥3 TEAE were neutropenia (melflufen group, 11 patients [50%]; daratumumab group, 3 patients [12%]), thrombocytopenia (melflufen group, 11 patients [50%]; daratumumab group, 2 patients [8%]), and anemia (melflufen group, 7 patients [32%]; daratumumab group, 5 patients [19%]). The most common non-hematologic grade ≥3 TEAE were pneumonia (melflufen group, 2 patients [9%]; daratumumab group, 2 patients [8%]) and femur fracture (melflufen group, 0 patients [0%]; daratumumab group, 2 patients [8%]); of these, 1 event (5%) of pneumonia in the melflufen group and 1 event (4%) of femur fracture in the daratumumab group were considered treatment-related TEAE by the investigator. Serious AE occurred in 6 patients (27%) with melflufen, daratumumab, and dexamethasone, and 12 patients (46%) with daratumumab. The most common serious AE (occurring in ≥4 patients overall) were anemia (melflufen group, 2 patients [9%]; daratumumab group, 3 patients [12%]) and pneumonia (melflufen group, 2 patients [9%]; daratumumab group, 2 patients [8%]). TEAE leading to treatment discontinuation occurred in 2 patients (9%) in the melflufen group (neutropenia and thrombocytopenia, N=1 each) and 4 patients (15%) in the daratumumab group (anemia, disease progression, hypercalcemia, and renal failure, N=1 each). Overall, 5 patients died on study before the crossover: 2 patients who received melflufen, daratumumab, and dexamethasone (1 due to disease progression and 1 due to unknown reasons, both >30 days after the last dose of study treatment) and 3 patients who received daratumumab (1 due to disease progression and 1 due to unknown reasons, both ≤30 days after the last dose of study treatment and 1 due to an AE [COVID-19 pneumonia], >30 days after the last dose of study treatment). In addition, one patient who crossed over to receive melflufen, daratumumab, and dexamethasone after progression on daratumumab died.

   Click to Show/Hide
In Vivo Model 22 relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.
Related Clinical Trial
NCT Number NCT04649060 Clinical Status Phase 3
Clinical Description This was a randomized, controlled, open-label, Phase 3 multicenter study which enrolled patients with Relapsed-Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM) who were either double refractory to an Immunomodulatory Drug (IMiD) and a Proteasome Inhibitor (PI) (regardless of the number of prior lines of therapy), or had received at least 3 prior lines of therapy including an IMiD and a PI. Patients received treatment with melflufen+dexamethasone+daratumumab or daratumumab until documented progressive disease, unacceptable toxicity, or patient/treating physician decision. Patients in the daratumumab treatment arm had the option to receive treatment with melflufen+dexamethasone+daratumumab after confirmed progressive disease.
Experiment 356 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [3]
Indication Relapsed/Refractory multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Thrombocytopenia
71.40%
Patients Enrolled
14 patients with relapsed refractory multiple myeloma.
Administration Time 28-day cycle
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that utilizes increased peptidase expression to selectively release potent alkylating agents inside tumor cells. Melflufen is hydrolyzed by peptidases and esterases to melphalan either directly or through an intermediate metabolite, desethyl-melflufen. The high lipophilicity of melflufen facilitates passive diffusion across cell membranes. The activity and tolerability of melflufen in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) were demonstrated in the O-12-M1 (NCT01897714), OCEAN (NCT03151811), and HORIZON (NCT02963493) trials.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
Overall, at least one TEAE was reported in 13 (92.9%) and 13 (100.0%) patients in Arms A and B, respectively (Table 3). During cycle 1, 9 patients (64.3%) and 12 patients (92.3%), respectively, had at least one TEAE. Cumulatively, grade 3 or 4 AEs occurred in 12 (85.7%) and 12 (92.3%) patients, respectively, and serious AEs were reported in 5 (35.7%) and 9 (69.2%) patients, respectively. The most common any-grade AEs in Arms A and B, respectively, were thrombocytopenia (10 [71.4%]; 10 [76.9%]), neutropenia (9 [64.3%]; 9 [69.2%]), and anemia (9 [64.3%]; 7 [53.8%]). No phlebitis or local-infusion-related reactions were reported based on pre- and post-infusion inspection of the IV site, and there were no extravasations observed in Arm A or B. Similarly, VIP scores collected on Day 1 post-infusion and on Day 8 indicated that patients had healthy IV sites (VIP score of 0) with no signs of phlebitis following PVC administration of melflufen. The most common non-hematological AE was positive SARS-CoV-2 test (Arm A: 2 [14.3%]; Arm B: 4 [30.8%]). Pneumonia was the most common serious AE (Arm A: 2 [14.3%]; Arm B: 2 [15.4%]). The most common AE considered related to melflufen and/or dexamethasone by investigators was thrombocytopenia (Arm A: 10 [71.4%]; Arm B: 10 [76.9%]). AEs led to treatment discontinuation in 3 (21.4%) and 6 (46.2%) patients in Arms A and B, respectively.

   Click to Show/Hide
Half life period 75.6 h
Related Clinical Trial
NCT Number NCT04412707 Clinical Status Phase 2
Clinical Description This is a randomized, two-period, cross-over Phase 2 study, comparing PK, and assessing safety and tolerability and efficacy of peripheral and central intravenous administration of melflufen in patients with RRMM. It is an international study, enrolling patients in US and Europe. The study will enroll patients following at least 2 lines of prior therapy.
Experiment 357 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [4]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Thrombocytopenia
76.00%
Patients Enrolled
157 patients with multiple myeloma.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melflufen is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate, targeting aminopeptidase which has an increased expression in fast-growing and aggressive malignancies. The lipophilicity of melflufen allows for passive diffusion, selectively targeting myeloma cells. Once inside the cell, melflufen is hydrolyzed to active alkylating metabolites melphalan and desethyl-melflufen. Melflufen and the active metabolites trigger irreversible DNA damage, inhibit proliferation, induces apoptosis, and express antiangiogenic effects. In addition, melflufen demonstrated activity in myeloma cells with documented impaired or absent Tp53 expression and documented resistance to bortezomib, dexamethasone, and melphalan.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
Based on the safety data collected during the HORIZON trial, treatment emergent adverse events occurred in 100% of patients including 100 patients (64%) having at least 1 CTCAE grade 4 adverse effect. Hematologic grade 3 or 4 adverse effects including thrombocytopenia (76%), neutropenia (79%), anemia (43%), and infections (11%) were the most commonly reported. Other adverse effects, such as fatigue (55%), nausea (32%), diarrhea (27%), and decreased appetite (14%), were similar to other alkylating agents. Pyrexia (24%), including febrile neutropenia (5%), and respiratory tract infections (24%) were contributed to hematologic toxicities.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 358 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [9]
Indication Relapsed/Refractory multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Thrombocytopenia
70%
Patients Enrolled
145 patients who has relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma with no previous ASCT or TTP >36 month Post-ASCTa.
MOA of PDC
In summary, the interpretation of the results from the OCEAN study were impacted by the heterogeneity of the population, with age and previous success of ASCT therapy identified as prognostic factors with study therapies. The safety profile of melflufen and dexamethasone is primarily characterized by hematologic AEs that are clinically manageable. Observed infection rates, which included COVID-19, were generally low. Taken together, these data support the use of melflufen and dexamethasone in patients who have not received a previous ASCT or who underwent a successful ASCT (ie, TTP >36 months post-ASCT). In addition, the favorable efficacy profile and convenience of monthly outpatient infusions, especially for patients without access to other therapeutics such as CAR T-cell therapy or bispecific antibodies, bode well for this combination translating successfully into real-world practice.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
Given the prognostic importance of TTP <36 months post-ASCT in OCEAN, we evaluated this prognostic factor in a post hoc analysis from the HORIZON study. Among 110 patients with triple-class refractory disease who had received ≥3 prior lines of therapy, 77 (70%) had received a previous ASCT and 58 (53%) had TTP <36 months post-ASCT (Suppl. Table S3). In patients with a TTP >36 months post-ASCT or no ASCT versus patients with a TTP <36 months post-ASCT, ORR was higher (29% vs 22%; Suppl. Table S4) and median DOR (7.6 months vs 3.9 months) and median PFS (4.2 months vs 3.4 months) were longer. Since pomalidomide and lenalidomide both belong to the immunomodulatory drugs, we analyzed if the duration of previous treatment with lenalidomide could have impacted the results. The median duration of lenalidomide was 14.4 months in patients with ASCT and TTP < 36 months, 38.3 months in patients with ASCT and TTP > 36 months, and 14.6 months in patients with no previous ASCT. However, the median PFS for patients treated with pomalidomide did not differ substantially between these groups of patients. The safety profile of melflufen and dexamethasone was generally consistent between patients with a TTP >36 months post-ASCT or no ASCT and patients with a TTP <36 months post-ASCT. In OCEAN among the melflufen group, the frequency of grade 3/4 TEAEs (88% and 92%), serious TEAEs (44% and 38%), and fatal adverse events (AEs; 11% and 13%) was similar in patients with a TTP >36 months post-ASCT or no ASCT and patients with TTP <36 months. However, patients with a TTP >36 months post-ASCT or no ASCT had lower rates of TEAEs leading to treatment discontinuation (23% and 31%), the longer median duration of study treatment (35.1 weeks vs 15.1 weeks), and longer median time to experiencing grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia (11.2 weeks vs 4.1 weeks) and grade 3/4 neutropenia (4.8 weeks vs 2.1 weeks) than patients with a TTP <36 months post-ASCT. In HORIZON, patients with a TTP >36 months post-ASCT or no ASCT had lower rates of grade 3/4 TEAEs (88% and 98%), but higher rates of serious TEAEs (64% and 53%) and similar rates of TEAEs leading to treatment discontinuation (29% and 33%) than patients with a TTP <36 months post-ASCT.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 359 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [1]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Thrombocytopenia
73.00%
Patients Enrolled
Patients with multi-refractory multiple myeloma.
MOA of PDC
Melflufen is highly lipophilic, which promotes its rapid uptake by cells. Once within the cell, melflufen releases its hydrophilic alkylator payloads via the hydrolytic activity of intracellular peptidases (e.g., aminopeptidases). Aminopeptidases are Zn2+-dependent metalloproteinases that remove amino acids at the N-terminal position from oligopeptides and have been associated with multiple tumorigenic processes such as proliferation, apoptosis, differentiation, angiogenesis, and motility. The dependence of melflufen on aminopeptidases was initially demonstrated by the reduced cytotoxic activity of melflufen-but not the alkylator melphalan-when cells were pretreated with bestatin, an antibiotic that is a potent aminopeptidase inhibitor. In addition, structure analogs designed to resist peptide hydrolysis (N-methyl derivative and derivative with D-amino acid) were shown to be almost 100-fold less potent than melflufen. Subsequent in vitro studies demonstrated that hydrolytic cleavage of melflufen by aminopeptidases releases alkylator payloads, including melphalan. In vitro, the activity of melflufen is multi-pronged, including induction of DNA damage, induction of apoptosis, inhibition of VEGF-dependent cell migration, and inhibition of tumor-associated angiogenesis, which have been further reviewed elsewhere. Downregulation of aminopeptidases resulted in reduced melflufen-mediated cytotoxic activity and apoptotic signaling in cultured cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
Melflufen plus dexamethasone was generally manageable in this heavily pretreated patient population [51]. All patients experienced ≥1 AE, most commonly hematologic AEs including thrombocytopenia (73%), neutropenia (69%), and anemia (64%). The most common non-hematologic AEs included pyrexia (40%), asthenia (31%), fatigue (29%), nausea (27%), and diarrhea (24%).

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 360 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [5]
Indication Relapsed/Refractory multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Thrombocytopenia
73.97%
Patients Enrolled
153 patients refractory to prior alkylators (melflufen, n=78; pomalidomide, n=75).
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (melflufen), a first-in-class alkylating peptide-drug conjugate, plus dexamethasone demonstrated superior progression-free survival (PFS), but not overall survival (OS), versus pomalidomide plus dexamethasone in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma in the OCEAN study. Time to progression (TTP) <36 months after a prior autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) was a negative prognostic factor for OS with melflufen. This post hoc exploratory analysis evaluated patients refractory to prior alkylators (e.g., cyclophosphamide and melphalan) in OCEAN. In 153 patients refractory to prior alkylators (melflufen, n = 78; pomalidomide, n = 75), the melflufen and pomalidomide arms had similar median PFS (5.6 months [95% CI, 4.2-8.3] vs. 4.7 months [95% CI, 3.1-7.3]; hazard ratio [HR], 0.92 [95% CI, 0.63-1.33]) and OS (23.4 months [95% CI, 14.4-31.7] vs. 20.0 months [95% CI, 12.0-28.7]; HR, 0.92 [95% CI, 0.62-1.38]). Among alkylator-refractory patients with a TTP 36 months after a prior ASCT or no prior ASCT (melflufen, n = 54; pomalidomide, n = 53), the observed median PFS and OS were longer in the melflufen arm than the pomalidomide arm. The safety profile of melflufen was consistent with previous reports. These results suggest that melflufen is safe and effective in patients with alkylator-refractory disease, suggesting differentiated activity from other alkylators.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
Overall, the safety profile of melflufen plus dexamethasone in the alkylator-refractory group was consistent between treatment arms (Table 2). In the melflufen and pomalidomide arms, respectively, the frequency of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs; 99% vs. 97%), Grade 3 or 4 TEAEs (85% vs. 82%), serious TEAEs (49% vs. 53%), and fatal TEAEs (19% vs. 16%) were similar (Table 2). However, melflufen compared with pomalidomide saw more dose modifications (76% vs. 67%) and dose reductions (47% vs. 14%), comparable dose delays (57% vs. 51%) but less treatment discontinuation (27% vs. 34%). When comparing patients refractory and not refractory to prior alkylators, rates of TEAEs were generally comparable except for slightly lower rates of serious and fatal TEAEs observed in patients not refractory to alkylators. Among Grade 3 or 4 TEAEs of special interest, melflufen saw more thrombocytopenia (73% vs. 14%), neutropenia (65% vs. 55%), and leukopenia or white blood cell decrease (14% vs. 3%), but less infection (15% vs. 26%), than pomalidomide. Notably, melflufen compared with pomalidomide saw a longer median time to dose reduction (106 days [range, 28-443] vs. 47 days [range, 28-225]), Grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia (52 days [range, 15-451] vs. 19 days [range, 8-91]), and Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia (36 days [range, 8-561] vs. 22 days [range, 8-470]).

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 361 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [9]
Indication Relapsed/Refractory multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Thrombocytopenia
86%
Patients Enrolled
101 relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma patients with TTP <36 month Post-ASCTb.
MOA of PDC
In summary, the interpretation of the results from the OCEAN study were impacted by the heterogeneity of the population, with age and previous success of ASCT therapy identified as prognostic factors with study therapies. The safety profile of melflufen and dexamethasone is primarily characterized by hematologic AEs that are clinically manageable. Observed infection rates, which included COVID-19, were generally low. Taken together, these data support the use of melflufen and dexamethasone in patients who have not received a previous ASCT or who underwent a successful ASCT (ie, TTP >36 months post-ASCT). In addition, the favorable efficacy profile and convenience of monthly outpatient infusions, especially for patients without access to other therapeutics such as CAR T-cell therapy or bispecific antibodies, bode well for this combination translating successfully into real-world practice.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
Given the prognostic importance of TTP <36 months post-ASCT in OCEAN, we evaluated this prognostic factor in a post hoc analysis from the HORIZON study. Among 110 patients with triple-class refractory disease who had received ≥3 prior lines of therapy, 77 (70%) had received a previous ASCT and 58 (53%) had TTP <36 months post-ASCT (Suppl. Table S3). In patients with a TTP >36 months post-ASCT or no ASCT versus patients with a TTP <36 months post-ASCT, ORR was higher (29% vs 22%; Suppl. Table S4) and median DOR (7.6 months vs 3.9 months) and median PFS (4.2 months vs 3.4 months) were longer. Since pomalidomide and lenalidomide both belong to the immunomodulatory drugs, we analyzed if the duration of previous treatment with lenalidomide could have impacted the results. The median duration of lenalidomide was 14.4 months in patients with ASCT and TTP < 36 months, 38.3 months in patients with ASCT and TTP > 36 months, and 14.6 months in patients with no previous ASCT. However, the median PFS for patients treated with pomalidomide did not differ substantially between these groups of patients. The safety profile of melflufen and dexamethasone was generally consistent between patients with a TTP >36 months post-ASCT or no ASCT and patients with a TTP <36 months post-ASCT. In OCEAN among the melflufen group, the frequency of grade 3/4 TEAEs (88% and 92%), serious TEAEs (44% and 38%), and fatal adverse events (AEs; 11% and 13%) was similar in patients with a TTP >36 months post-ASCT or no ASCT and patients with TTP <36 months. However, patients with a TTP >36 months post-ASCT or no ASCT had lower rates of TEAEs leading to treatment discontinuation (23% and 31%), the longer median duration of study treatment (35.1 weeks vs 15.1 weeks), and longer median time to experiencing grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia (11.2 weeks vs 4.1 weeks) and grade 3/4 neutropenia (4.8 weeks vs 2.1 weeks) than patients with a TTP <36 months post-ASCT. In HORIZON, patients with a TTP >36 months post-ASCT or no ASCT had lower rates of grade 3/4 TEAEs (88% and 98%), but higher rates of serious TEAEs (64% and 53%) and similar rates of TEAEs leading to treatment discontinuation (29% and 33%) than patients with a TTP <36 months post-ASCT.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 362 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [5]
Indication Relapsed/Refractory multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Thrombocytopenia concurrent with grade 3/4 bleeding
100%
Patients Enrolled
153 patients refractory to prior alkylators (melflufen, n=78; pomalidomide, n=75).
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (melflufen), a first-in-class alkylating peptide-drug conjugate, plus dexamethasone demonstrated superior progression-free survival (PFS), but not overall survival (OS), versus pomalidomide plus dexamethasone in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma in the OCEAN study. Time to progression (TTP) <36 months after a prior autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) was a negative prognostic factor for OS with melflufen. This post hoc exploratory analysis evaluated patients refractory to prior alkylators (e.g., cyclophosphamide and melphalan) in OCEAN. In 153 patients refractory to prior alkylators (melflufen, n = 78; pomalidomide, n = 75), the melflufen and pomalidomide arms had similar median PFS (5.6 months [95% CI, 4.2-8.3] vs. 4.7 months [95% CI, 3.1-7.3]; hazard ratio [HR], 0.92 [95% CI, 0.63-1.33]) and OS (23.4 months [95% CI, 14.4-31.7] vs. 20.0 months [95% CI, 12.0-28.7]; HR, 0.92 [95% CI, 0.62-1.38]). Among alkylator-refractory patients with a TTP 36 months after a prior ASCT or no prior ASCT (melflufen, n = 54; pomalidomide, n = 53), the observed median PFS and OS were longer in the melflufen arm than the pomalidomide arm. The safety profile of melflufen was consistent with previous reports. These results suggest that melflufen is safe and effective in patients with alkylator-refractory disease, suggesting differentiated activity from other alkylators.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
Overall, the safety profile of melflufen plus dexamethasone in the alkylator-refractory group was consistent between treatment arms (Table 2). In the melflufen and pomalidomide arms, respectively, the frequency of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs; 99% vs. 97%), Grade 3 or 4 TEAEs (85% vs. 82%), serious TEAEs (49% vs. 53%), and fatal TEAEs (19% vs. 16%) were similar (Table 2). However, melflufen compared with pomalidomide saw more dose modifications (76% vs. 67%) and dose reductions (47% vs. 14%), comparable dose delays (57% vs. 51%) but less treatment discontinuation (27% vs. 34%). When comparing patients refractory and not refractory to prior alkylators, rates of TEAEs were generally comparable except for slightly lower rates of serious and fatal TEAEs observed in patients not refractory to alkylators. Among Grade 3 or 4 TEAEs of special interest, melflufen saw more thrombocytopenia (73% vs. 14%), neutropenia (65% vs. 55%), and leukopenia or white blood cell decrease (14% vs. 3%), but less infection (15% vs. 26%), than pomalidomide. Notably, melflufen compared with pomalidomide saw a longer median time to dose reduction (106 days [range, 28-443] vs. 47 days [range, 28-225]), Grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia (52 days [range, 15-451] vs. 19 days [range, 8-91]), and Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia (36 days [range, 8-561] vs. 22 days [range, 8-470]).

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 363 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [9]
Indication Relapsed/Refractory multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Thrombocytopenia concurrent with hemorrhage
0%
Patients Enrolled
101 relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma patients with TTP <36 month Post-ASCTb.
MOA of PDC
In summary, the interpretation of the results from the OCEAN study were impacted by the heterogeneity of the population, with age and previous success of ASCT therapy identified as prognostic factors with study therapies. The safety profile of melflufen and dexamethasone is primarily characterized by hematologic AEs that are clinically manageable. Observed infection rates, which included COVID-19, were generally low. Taken together, these data support the use of melflufen and dexamethasone in patients who have not received a previous ASCT or who underwent a successful ASCT (ie, TTP >36 months post-ASCT). In addition, the favorable efficacy profile and convenience of monthly outpatient infusions, especially for patients without access to other therapeutics such as CAR T-cell therapy or bispecific antibodies, bode well for this combination translating successfully into real-world practice.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
Given the prognostic importance of TTP <36 months post-ASCT in OCEAN, we evaluated this prognostic factor in a post hoc analysis from the HORIZON study. Among 110 patients with triple-class refractory disease who had received ≥3 prior lines of therapy, 77 (70%) had received a previous ASCT and 58 (53%) had TTP <36 months post-ASCT (Suppl. Table S3). In patients with a TTP >36 months post-ASCT or no ASCT versus patients with a TTP <36 months post-ASCT, ORR was higher (29% vs 22%; Suppl. Table S4) and median DOR (7.6 months vs 3.9 months) and median PFS (4.2 months vs 3.4 months) were longer. Since pomalidomide and lenalidomide both belong to the immunomodulatory drugs, we analyzed if the duration of previous treatment with lenalidomide could have impacted the results. The median duration of lenalidomide was 14.4 months in patients with ASCT and TTP < 36 months, 38.3 months in patients with ASCT and TTP > 36 months, and 14.6 months in patients with no previous ASCT. However, the median PFS for patients treated with pomalidomide did not differ substantially between these groups of patients. The safety profile of melflufen and dexamethasone was generally consistent between patients with a TTP >36 months post-ASCT or no ASCT and patients with a TTP <36 months post-ASCT. In OCEAN among the melflufen group, the frequency of grade 3/4 TEAEs (88% and 92%), serious TEAEs (44% and 38%), and fatal adverse events (AEs; 11% and 13%) was similar in patients with a TTP >36 months post-ASCT or no ASCT and patients with TTP <36 months. However, patients with a TTP >36 months post-ASCT or no ASCT had lower rates of TEAEs leading to treatment discontinuation (23% and 31%), the longer median duration of study treatment (35.1 weeks vs 15.1 weeks), and longer median time to experiencing grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia (11.2 weeks vs 4.1 weeks) and grade 3/4 neutropenia (4.8 weeks vs 2.1 weeks) than patients with a TTP <36 months post-ASCT. In HORIZON, patients with a TTP >36 months post-ASCT or no ASCT had lower rates of grade 3/4 TEAEs (88% and 98%), but higher rates of serious TEAEs (64% and 53%) and similar rates of TEAEs leading to treatment discontinuation (29% and 33%) than patients with a TTP <36 months post-ASCT.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 364 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [9]
Indication Relapsed/Refractory multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Thrombocytopenia concurrent with hemorrhage
1%
Patients Enrolled
145 patients who has relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma with no previous ASCT or TTP >36 month Post-ASCTa.
MOA of PDC
In summary, the interpretation of the results from the OCEAN study were impacted by the heterogeneity of the population, with age and previous success of ASCT therapy identified as prognostic factors with study therapies. The safety profile of melflufen and dexamethasone is primarily characterized by hematologic AEs that are clinically manageable. Observed infection rates, which included COVID-19, were generally low. Taken together, these data support the use of melflufen and dexamethasone in patients who have not received a previous ASCT or who underwent a successful ASCT (ie, TTP >36 months post-ASCT). In addition, the favorable efficacy profile and convenience of monthly outpatient infusions, especially for patients without access to other therapeutics such as CAR T-cell therapy or bispecific antibodies, bode well for this combination translating successfully into real-world practice.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
Given the prognostic importance of TTP <36 months post-ASCT in OCEAN, we evaluated this prognostic factor in a post hoc analysis from the HORIZON study. Among 110 patients with triple-class refractory disease who had received ≥3 prior lines of therapy, 77 (70%) had received a previous ASCT and 58 (53%) had TTP <36 months post-ASCT (Suppl. Table S3). In patients with a TTP >36 months post-ASCT or no ASCT versus patients with a TTP <36 months post-ASCT, ORR was higher (29% vs 22%; Suppl. Table S4) and median DOR (7.6 months vs 3.9 months) and median PFS (4.2 months vs 3.4 months) were longer. Since pomalidomide and lenalidomide both belong to the immunomodulatory drugs, we analyzed if the duration of previous treatment with lenalidomide could have impacted the results. The median duration of lenalidomide was 14.4 months in patients with ASCT and TTP < 36 months, 38.3 months in patients with ASCT and TTP > 36 months, and 14.6 months in patients with no previous ASCT. However, the median PFS for patients treated with pomalidomide did not differ substantially between these groups of patients. The safety profile of melflufen and dexamethasone was generally consistent between patients with a TTP >36 months post-ASCT or no ASCT and patients with a TTP <36 months post-ASCT. In OCEAN among the melflufen group, the frequency of grade 3/4 TEAEs (88% and 92%), serious TEAEs (44% and 38%), and fatal adverse events (AEs; 11% and 13%) was similar in patients with a TTP >36 months post-ASCT or no ASCT and patients with TTP <36 months. However, patients with a TTP >36 months post-ASCT or no ASCT had lower rates of TEAEs leading to treatment discontinuation (23% and 31%), the longer median duration of study treatment (35.1 weeks vs 15.1 weeks), and longer median time to experiencing grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia (11.2 weeks vs 4.1 weeks) and grade 3/4 neutropenia (4.8 weeks vs 2.1 weeks) than patients with a TTP <36 months post-ASCT. In HORIZON, patients with a TTP >36 months post-ASCT or no ASCT had lower rates of grade 3/4 TEAEs (88% and 98%), but higher rates of serious TEAEs (64% and 53%) and similar rates of TEAEs leading to treatment discontinuation (29% and 33%) than patients with a TTP <36 months post-ASCT.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 365 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [5]
Indication Relapsed/Refractory multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Time to dose reduction
106 Day
Patients Enrolled
153 patients refractory to prior alkylators (melflufen, n=78; pomalidomide, n=75).
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (melflufen), a first-in-class alkylating peptide-drug conjugate, plus dexamethasone demonstrated superior progression-free survival (PFS), but not overall survival (OS), versus pomalidomide plus dexamethasone in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma in the OCEAN study. Time to progression (TTP) <36 months after a prior autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) was a negative prognostic factor for OS with melflufen. This post hoc exploratory analysis evaluated patients refractory to prior alkylators (e.g., cyclophosphamide and melphalan) in OCEAN. In 153 patients refractory to prior alkylators (melflufen, n = 78; pomalidomide, n = 75), the melflufen and pomalidomide arms had similar median PFS (5.6 months [95% CI, 4.2-8.3] vs. 4.7 months [95% CI, 3.1-7.3]; hazard ratio [HR], 0.92 [95% CI, 0.63-1.33]) and OS (23.4 months [95% CI, 14.4-31.7] vs. 20.0 months [95% CI, 12.0-28.7]; HR, 0.92 [95% CI, 0.62-1.38]). Among alkylator-refractory patients with a TTP 36 months after a prior ASCT or no prior ASCT (melflufen, n = 54; pomalidomide, n = 53), the observed median PFS and OS were longer in the melflufen arm than the pomalidomide arm. The safety profile of melflufen was consistent with previous reports. These results suggest that melflufen is safe and effective in patients with alkylator-refractory disease, suggesting differentiated activity from other alkylators.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
Overall, the safety profile of melflufen plus dexamethasone in the alkylator-refractory group was consistent between treatment arms (Table 2). In the melflufen and pomalidomide arms, respectively, the frequency of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs; 99% vs. 97%), Grade 3 or 4 TEAEs (85% vs. 82%), serious TEAEs (49% vs. 53%), and fatal TEAEs (19% vs. 16%) were similar (Table 2). However, melflufen compared with pomalidomide saw more dose modifications (76% vs. 67%) and dose reductions (47% vs. 14%), comparable dose delays (57% vs. 51%) but less treatment discontinuation (27% vs. 34%). When comparing patients refractory and not refractory to prior alkylators, rates of TEAEs were generally comparable except for slightly lower rates of serious and fatal TEAEs observed in patients not refractory to alkylators. Among Grade 3 or 4 TEAEs of special interest, melflufen saw more thrombocytopenia (73% vs. 14%), neutropenia (65% vs. 55%), and leukopenia or white blood cell decrease (14% vs. 3%), but less infection (15% vs. 26%), than pomalidomide. Notably, melflufen compared with pomalidomide saw a longer median time to dose reduction (106 days [range, 28-443] vs. 47 days [range, 28-225]), Grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia (52 days [range, 15-451] vs. 19 days [range, 8-91]), and Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia (36 days [range, 8-561] vs. 22 days [range, 8-470]).

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 366 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [5]
Indication Relapsed/Refractory multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Time to grade 3/4 neutropenia
36 Day
Patients Enrolled
153 patients refractory to prior alkylators (melflufen, n=78; pomalidomide, n=75).
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (melflufen), a first-in-class alkylating peptide-drug conjugate, plus dexamethasone demonstrated superior progression-free survival (PFS), but not overall survival (OS), versus pomalidomide plus dexamethasone in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma in the OCEAN study. Time to progression (TTP) <36 months after a prior autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) was a negative prognostic factor for OS with melflufen. This post hoc exploratory analysis evaluated patients refractory to prior alkylators (e.g., cyclophosphamide and melphalan) in OCEAN. In 153 patients refractory to prior alkylators (melflufen, n = 78; pomalidomide, n = 75), the melflufen and pomalidomide arms had similar median PFS (5.6 months [95% CI, 4.2-8.3] vs. 4.7 months [95% CI, 3.1-7.3]; hazard ratio [HR], 0.92 [95% CI, 0.63-1.33]) and OS (23.4 months [95% CI, 14.4-31.7] vs. 20.0 months [95% CI, 12.0-28.7]; HR, 0.92 [95% CI, 0.62-1.38]). Among alkylator-refractory patients with a TTP 36 months after a prior ASCT or no prior ASCT (melflufen, n = 54; pomalidomide, n = 53), the observed median PFS and OS were longer in the melflufen arm than the pomalidomide arm. The safety profile of melflufen was consistent with previous reports. These results suggest that melflufen is safe and effective in patients with alkylator-refractory disease, suggesting differentiated activity from other alkylators.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
Overall, the safety profile of melflufen plus dexamethasone in the alkylator-refractory group was consistent between treatment arms (Table 2). In the melflufen and pomalidomide arms, respectively, the frequency of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs; 99% vs. 97%), Grade 3 or 4 TEAEs (85% vs. 82%), serious TEAEs (49% vs. 53%), and fatal TEAEs (19% vs. 16%) were similar (Table 2). However, melflufen compared with pomalidomide saw more dose modifications (76% vs. 67%) and dose reductions (47% vs. 14%), comparable dose delays (57% vs. 51%) but less treatment discontinuation (27% vs. 34%). When comparing patients refractory and not refractory to prior alkylators, rates of TEAEs were generally comparable except for slightly lower rates of serious and fatal TEAEs observed in patients not refractory to alkylators. Among Grade 3 or 4 TEAEs of special interest, melflufen saw more thrombocytopenia (73% vs. 14%), neutropenia (65% vs. 55%), and leukopenia or white blood cell decrease (14% vs. 3%), but less infection (15% vs. 26%), than pomalidomide. Notably, melflufen compared with pomalidomide saw a longer median time to dose reduction (106 days [range, 28-443] vs. 47 days [range, 28-225]), Grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia (52 days [range, 15-451] vs. 19 days [range, 8-91]), and Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia (36 days [range, 8-561] vs. 22 days [range, 8-470]).

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 367 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [5]
Indication Relapsed/Refractory multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Time to grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia
52 Day
Patients Enrolled
153 patients refractory to prior alkylators (melflufen, n=78; pomalidomide, n=75).
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (melflufen), a first-in-class alkylating peptide-drug conjugate, plus dexamethasone demonstrated superior progression-free survival (PFS), but not overall survival (OS), versus pomalidomide plus dexamethasone in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma in the OCEAN study. Time to progression (TTP) <36 months after a prior autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) was a negative prognostic factor for OS with melflufen. This post hoc exploratory analysis evaluated patients refractory to prior alkylators (e.g., cyclophosphamide and melphalan) in OCEAN. In 153 patients refractory to prior alkylators (melflufen, n = 78; pomalidomide, n = 75), the melflufen and pomalidomide arms had similar median PFS (5.6 months [95% CI, 4.2-8.3] vs. 4.7 months [95% CI, 3.1-7.3]; hazard ratio [HR], 0.92 [95% CI, 0.63-1.33]) and OS (23.4 months [95% CI, 14.4-31.7] vs. 20.0 months [95% CI, 12.0-28.7]; HR, 0.92 [95% CI, 0.62-1.38]). Among alkylator-refractory patients with a TTP 36 months after a prior ASCT or no prior ASCT (melflufen, n = 54; pomalidomide, n = 53), the observed median PFS and OS were longer in the melflufen arm than the pomalidomide arm. The safety profile of melflufen was consistent with previous reports. These results suggest that melflufen is safe and effective in patients with alkylator-refractory disease, suggesting differentiated activity from other alkylators.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
Overall, the safety profile of melflufen plus dexamethasone in the alkylator-refractory group was consistent between treatment arms (Table 2). In the melflufen and pomalidomide arms, respectively, the frequency of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs; 99% vs. 97%), Grade 3 or 4 TEAEs (85% vs. 82%), serious TEAEs (49% vs. 53%), and fatal TEAEs (19% vs. 16%) were similar (Table 2). However, melflufen compared with pomalidomide saw more dose modifications (76% vs. 67%) and dose reductions (47% vs. 14%), comparable dose delays (57% vs. 51%) but less treatment discontinuation (27% vs. 34%). When comparing patients refractory and not refractory to prior alkylators, rates of TEAEs were generally comparable except for slightly lower rates of serious and fatal TEAEs observed in patients not refractory to alkylators. Among Grade 3 or 4 TEAEs of special interest, melflufen saw more thrombocytopenia (73% vs. 14%), neutropenia (65% vs. 55%), and leukopenia or white blood cell decrease (14% vs. 3%), but less infection (15% vs. 26%), than pomalidomide. Notably, melflufen compared with pomalidomide saw a longer median time to dose reduction (106 days [range, 28-443] vs. 47 days [range, 28-225]), Grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia (52 days [range, 15-451] vs. 19 days [range, 8-91]), and Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia (36 days [range, 8-561] vs. 22 days [range, 8-470]).

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 368 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [2]
Indication Relapsed/Refractory multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Treatment-emergent adverse event
96%
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (melflufen), a first-in-class alkylating peptide-drug conjugate, plus dexamethasone was approved in Europe for use in patients with triple-class refractory relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) with 3 prior lines of therapy and without prior autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) or with a time to progression >36 months after prior ASCT. The randomized LIGHTHOUSE study (NCT04649060) assessed melflufen plus daratumumab and dexamethasone (melflufen group) versus daratumumab in patients with RRMM with disease refractory to an immunomodulatory agent and a proteasome inhibitor or who had received 3 prior lines of therapy including an immunomodulatory agent and a proteasome inhibitor. A partial clinical hold issued by the US Food and Drug Administration for all melflufen studies led to financial constraints and premature study closure on February 23rd 2022 (data cut-off date). In total, 54 of 240 planned patients were randomized (melflufen group, N=27; daratumumab group, N=27). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was not reached in the melflufen group versus 4.9 months in the daratumumab group (Hazard Ratio: 0.18 [95% Confidence Interval, 0.05-0.65]; P=0.0032) at a median follow-up time of 7.1 and 6.6 months, respectively. Overall response rate (ORR) was 59% in the melflufen group versus 30% in the daratumumab group (P=0.0300). The most common grade 3 treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen group versus daratumumab group were neutropenia (50% vs. 12%), thrombocytopenia (50% vs. 8%), and anemia (32% vs. 19%). Melflufen plus daratumumab and dexamethasone demonstrated superior PFS and ORR versus daratumumab in RRMM and a safety profile comparable to previously published melflufen studies.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
The safety population included patients who received ≥1 dose of melflufen, daratumumab, or dexamethasone (melflufen group) and 26 patients who received daratumumab monotherapy. In the safety population, ≥1 TEAE was reported in 21 patients (96%) with melflufen, daratumumab, and dexamethasone and 22 patients (85%) with daratumumab. Overall, grade ≥3 TEAE occurred in 18 patients (82%) with melflufen, daratumumab, and dexamethasone and 14 patients (54%) with daratumumab. The most common hematologic grade ≥3 TEAE were neutropenia (melflufen group, 11 patients [50%]; daratumumab group, 3 patients [12%]), thrombocytopenia (melflufen group, 11 patients [50%]; daratumumab group, 2 patients [8%]), and anemia (melflufen group, 7 patients [32%]; daratumumab group, 5 patients [19%]). The most common non-hematologic grade ≥3 TEAE were pneumonia (melflufen group, 2 patients [9%]; daratumumab group, 2 patients [8%]) and femur fracture (melflufen group, 0 patients [0%]; daratumumab group, 2 patients [8%]); of these, 1 event (5%) of pneumonia in the melflufen group and 1 event (4%) of femur fracture in the daratumumab group were considered treatment-related TEAE by the investigator. Serious AE occurred in 6 patients (27%) with melflufen, daratumumab, and dexamethasone, and 12 patients (46%) with daratumumab. The most common serious AE (occurring in ≥4 patients overall) were anemia (melflufen group, 2 patients [9%]; daratumumab group, 3 patients [12%]) and pneumonia (melflufen group, 2 patients [9%]; daratumumab group, 2 patients [8%]). TEAE leading to treatment discontinuation occurred in 2 patients (9%) in the melflufen group (neutropenia and thrombocytopenia, N=1 each) and 4 patients (15%) in the daratumumab group (anemia, disease progression, hypercalcemia, and renal failure, N=1 each). Overall, 5 patients died on study before the crossover: 2 patients who received melflufen, daratumumab, and dexamethasone (1 due to disease progression and 1 due to unknown reasons, both >30 days after the last dose of study treatment) and 3 patients who received daratumumab (1 due to disease progression and 1 due to unknown reasons, both ≤30 days after the last dose of study treatment and 1 due to an AE [COVID-19 pneumonia], >30 days after the last dose of study treatment). In addition, one patient who crossed over to receive melflufen, daratumumab, and dexamethasone after progression on daratumumab died.

   Click to Show/Hide
In Vivo Model 22 relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.
Related Clinical Trial
NCT Number NCT04649060 Clinical Status Phase 3
Clinical Description This was a randomized, controlled, open-label, Phase 3 multicenter study which enrolled patients with Relapsed-Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM) who were either double refractory to an Immunomodulatory Drug (IMiD) and a Proteasome Inhibitor (PI) (regardless of the number of prior lines of therapy), or had received at least 3 prior lines of therapy including an IMiD and a PI. Patients received treatment with melflufen+dexamethasone+daratumumab or daratumumab until documented progressive disease, unacceptable toxicity, or patient/treating physician decision. Patients in the daratumumab treatment arm had the option to receive treatment with melflufen+dexamethasone+daratumumab after confirmed progressive disease.
Experiment 369 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [3]
Indication Relapsed/Refractory multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Treatment-emergent adverse event
7.10%
Patients Enrolled
14 patients with relapsed refractory multiple myeloma.
Administration Time 28-day cycle
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that utilizes increased peptidase expression to selectively release potent alkylating agents inside tumor cells. Melflufen is hydrolyzed by peptidases and esterases to melphalan either directly or through an intermediate metabolite, desethyl-melflufen. The high lipophilicity of melflufen facilitates passive diffusion across cell membranes. The activity and tolerability of melflufen in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) were demonstrated in the O-12-M1 (NCT01897714), OCEAN (NCT03151811), and HORIZON (NCT02963493) trials.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
Overall, at least one TEAE was reported in 13 (92.9%) and 13 (100.0%) patients in Arms A and B, respectively (Table 3). During cycle 1, 9 patients (64.3%) and 12 patients (92.3%), respectively, had at least one TEAE. Cumulatively, grade 3 or 4 AEs occurred in 12 (85.7%) and 12 (92.3%) patients, respectively, and serious AEs were reported in 5 (35.7%) and 9 (69.2%) patients, respectively. The most common any-grade AEs in Arms A and B, respectively, were thrombocytopenia (10 [71.4%]; 10 [76.9%]), neutropenia (9 [64.3%]; 9 [69.2%]), and anemia (9 [64.3%]; 7 [53.8%]). No phlebitis or local-infusion-related reactions were reported based on pre- and post-infusion inspection of the IV site, and there were no extravasations observed in Arm A or B. Similarly, VIP scores collected on Day 1 post-infusion and on Day 8 indicated that patients had healthy IV sites (VIP score of 0) with no signs of phlebitis following PVC administration of melflufen. The most common non-hematological AE was positive SARS-CoV-2 test (Arm A: 2 [14.3%]; Arm B: 4 [30.8%]). Pneumonia was the most common serious AE (Arm A: 2 [14.3%]; Arm B: 2 [15.4%]). The most common AE considered related to melflufen and/or dexamethasone by investigators was thrombocytopenia (Arm A: 10 [71.4%]; Arm B: 10 [76.9%]). AEs led to treatment discontinuation in 3 (21.4%) and 6 (46.2%) patients in Arms A and B, respectively.

   Click to Show/Hide
Half life period 75.6 h
Related Clinical Trial
NCT Number NCT04412707 Clinical Status Phase 2
Clinical Description This is a randomized, two-period, cross-over Phase 2 study, comparing PK, and assessing safety and tolerability and efficacy of peripheral and central intravenous administration of melflufen in patients with RRMM. It is an international study, enrolling patients in US and Europe. The study will enroll patients following at least 2 lines of prior therapy.
Experiment 370 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [3]
Indication Relapsed/Refractory multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Treatment-emergent adverse event
21.40%
Patients Enrolled
14 patients with relapsed refractory multiple myeloma.
Administration Time 28-day cycle
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that utilizes increased peptidase expression to selectively release potent alkylating agents inside tumor cells. Melflufen is hydrolyzed by peptidases and esterases to melphalan either directly or through an intermediate metabolite, desethyl-melflufen. The high lipophilicity of melflufen facilitates passive diffusion across cell membranes. The activity and tolerability of melflufen in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) were demonstrated in the O-12-M1 (NCT01897714), OCEAN (NCT03151811), and HORIZON (NCT02963493) trials.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
Overall, at least one TEAE was reported in 13 (92.9%) and 13 (100.0%) patients in Arms A and B, respectively (Table 3). During cycle 1, 9 patients (64.3%) and 12 patients (92.3%), respectively, had at least one TEAE. Cumulatively, grade 3 or 4 AEs occurred in 12 (85.7%) and 12 (92.3%) patients, respectively, and serious AEs were reported in 5 (35.7%) and 9 (69.2%) patients, respectively. The most common any-grade AEs in Arms A and B, respectively, were thrombocytopenia (10 [71.4%]; 10 [76.9%]), neutropenia (9 [64.3%]; 9 [69.2%]), and anemia (9 [64.3%]; 7 [53.8%]). No phlebitis or local-infusion-related reactions were reported based on pre- and post-infusion inspection of the IV site, and there were no extravasations observed in Arm A or B. Similarly, VIP scores collected on Day 1 post-infusion and on Day 8 indicated that patients had healthy IV sites (VIP score of 0) with no signs of phlebitis following PVC administration of melflufen. The most common non-hematological AE was positive SARS-CoV-2 test (Arm A: 2 [14.3%]; Arm B: 4 [30.8%]). Pneumonia was the most common serious AE (Arm A: 2 [14.3%]; Arm B: 2 [15.4%]). The most common AE considered related to melflufen and/or dexamethasone by investigators was thrombocytopenia (Arm A: 10 [71.4%]; Arm B: 10 [76.9%]). AEs led to treatment discontinuation in 3 (21.4%) and 6 (46.2%) patients in Arms A and B, respectively.

   Click to Show/Hide
Half life period 75.6 h
Related Clinical Trial
NCT Number NCT04412707 Clinical Status Phase 2
Clinical Description This is a randomized, two-period, cross-over Phase 2 study, comparing PK, and assessing safety and tolerability and efficacy of peripheral and central intravenous administration of melflufen in patients with RRMM. It is an international study, enrolling patients in US and Europe. The study will enroll patients following at least 2 lines of prior therapy.
Experiment 371 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [3]
Indication Relapsed/Refractory multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Treatment-emergent adverse event
21.40%
Patients Enrolled
14 patients with relapsed refractory multiple myeloma.
Administration Time 28-day cycle
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that utilizes increased peptidase expression to selectively release potent alkylating agents inside tumor cells. Melflufen is hydrolyzed by peptidases and esterases to melphalan either directly or through an intermediate metabolite, desethyl-melflufen. The high lipophilicity of melflufen facilitates passive diffusion across cell membranes. The activity and tolerability of melflufen in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) were demonstrated in the O-12-M1 (NCT01897714), OCEAN (NCT03151811), and HORIZON (NCT02963493) trials.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
Overall, at least one TEAE was reported in 13 (92.9%) and 13 (100.0%) patients in Arms A and B, respectively (Table 3). During cycle 1, 9 patients (64.3%) and 12 patients (92.3%), respectively, had at least one TEAE. Cumulatively, grade 3 or 4 AEs occurred in 12 (85.7%) and 12 (92.3%) patients, respectively, and serious AEs were reported in 5 (35.7%) and 9 (69.2%) patients, respectively. The most common any-grade AEs in Arms A and B, respectively, were thrombocytopenia (10 [71.4%]; 10 [76.9%]), neutropenia (9 [64.3%]; 9 [69.2%]), and anemia (9 [64.3%]; 7 [53.8%]). No phlebitis or local-infusion-related reactions were reported based on pre- and post-infusion inspection of the IV site, and there were no extravasations observed in Arm A or B. Similarly, VIP scores collected on Day 1 post-infusion and on Day 8 indicated that patients had healthy IV sites (VIP score of 0) with no signs of phlebitis following PVC administration of melflufen. The most common non-hematological AE was positive SARS-CoV-2 test (Arm A: 2 [14.3%]; Arm B: 4 [30.8%]). Pneumonia was the most common serious AE (Arm A: 2 [14.3%]; Arm B: 2 [15.4%]). The most common AE considered related to melflufen and/or dexamethasone by investigators was thrombocytopenia (Arm A: 10 [71.4%]; Arm B: 10 [76.9%]). AEs led to treatment discontinuation in 3 (21.4%) and 6 (46.2%) patients in Arms A and B, respectively.

   Click to Show/Hide
Half life period 75.6 h
Related Clinical Trial
NCT Number NCT04412707 Clinical Status Phase 2
Clinical Description This is a randomized, two-period, cross-over Phase 2 study, comparing PK, and assessing safety and tolerability and efficacy of peripheral and central intravenous administration of melflufen in patients with RRMM. It is an international study, enrolling patients in US and Europe. The study will enroll patients following at least 2 lines of prior therapy.
Experiment 372 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [3]
Indication Relapsed/Refractory multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Treatment-emergent adverse event
35.70%
Patients Enrolled
14 patients with relapsed refractory multiple myeloma.
Administration Time 28-day cycle
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that utilizes increased peptidase expression to selectively release potent alkylating agents inside tumor cells. Melflufen is hydrolyzed by peptidases and esterases to melphalan either directly or through an intermediate metabolite, desethyl-melflufen. The high lipophilicity of melflufen facilitates passive diffusion across cell membranes. The activity and tolerability of melflufen in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) were demonstrated in the O-12-M1 (NCT01897714), OCEAN (NCT03151811), and HORIZON (NCT02963493) trials.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
Overall, at least one TEAE was reported in 13 (92.9%) and 13 (100.0%) patients in Arms A and B, respectively (Table 3). During cycle 1, 9 patients (64.3%) and 12 patients (92.3%), respectively, had at least one TEAE. Cumulatively, grade 3 or 4 AEs occurred in 12 (85.7%) and 12 (92.3%) patients, respectively, and serious AEs were reported in 5 (35.7%) and 9 (69.2%) patients, respectively. The most common any-grade AEs in Arms A and B, respectively, were thrombocytopenia (10 [71.4%]; 10 [76.9%]), neutropenia (9 [64.3%]; 9 [69.2%]), and anemia (9 [64.3%]; 7 [53.8%]). No phlebitis or local-infusion-related reactions were reported based on pre- and post-infusion inspection of the IV site, and there were no extravasations observed in Arm A or B. Similarly, VIP scores collected on Day 1 post-infusion and on Day 8 indicated that patients had healthy IV sites (VIP score of 0) with no signs of phlebitis following PVC administration of melflufen. The most common non-hematological AE was positive SARS-CoV-2 test (Arm A: 2 [14.3%]; Arm B: 4 [30.8%]). Pneumonia was the most common serious AE (Arm A: 2 [14.3%]; Arm B: 2 [15.4%]). The most common AE considered related to melflufen and/or dexamethasone by investigators was thrombocytopenia (Arm A: 10 [71.4%]; Arm B: 10 [76.9%]). AEs led to treatment discontinuation in 3 (21.4%) and 6 (46.2%) patients in Arms A and B, respectively.

   Click to Show/Hide
Half life period 75.6 h
Related Clinical Trial
NCT Number NCT04412707 Clinical Status Phase 2
Clinical Description This is a randomized, two-period, cross-over Phase 2 study, comparing PK, and assessing safety and tolerability and efficacy of peripheral and central intravenous administration of melflufen in patients with RRMM. It is an international study, enrolling patients in US and Europe. The study will enroll patients following at least 2 lines of prior therapy.
Experiment 373 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [3]
Indication Relapsed/Refractory multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Treatment-emergent adverse event
71.40%
Patients Enrolled
14 patients with relapsed refractory multiple myeloma.
Administration Time 28-day cycle
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that utilizes increased peptidase expression to selectively release potent alkylating agents inside tumor cells. Melflufen is hydrolyzed by peptidases and esterases to melphalan either directly or through an intermediate metabolite, desethyl-melflufen. The high lipophilicity of melflufen facilitates passive diffusion across cell membranes. The activity and tolerability of melflufen in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) were demonstrated in the O-12-M1 (NCT01897714), OCEAN (NCT03151811), and HORIZON (NCT02963493) trials.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
Overall, at least one TEAE was reported in 13 (92.9%) and 13 (100.0%) patients in Arms A and B, respectively (Table 3). During cycle 1, 9 patients (64.3%) and 12 patients (92.3%), respectively, had at least one TEAE. Cumulatively, grade 3 or 4 AEs occurred in 12 (85.7%) and 12 (92.3%) patients, respectively, and serious AEs were reported in 5 (35.7%) and 9 (69.2%) patients, respectively. The most common any-grade AEs in Arms A and B, respectively, were thrombocytopenia (10 [71.4%]; 10 [76.9%]), neutropenia (9 [64.3%]; 9 [69.2%]), and anemia (9 [64.3%]; 7 [53.8%]). No phlebitis or local-infusion-related reactions were reported based on pre- and post-infusion inspection of the IV site, and there were no extravasations observed in Arm A or B. Similarly, VIP scores collected on Day 1 post-infusion and on Day 8 indicated that patients had healthy IV sites (VIP score of 0) with no signs of phlebitis following PVC administration of melflufen. The most common non-hematological AE was positive SARS-CoV-2 test (Arm A: 2 [14.3%]; Arm B: 4 [30.8%]). Pneumonia was the most common serious AE (Arm A: 2 [14.3%]; Arm B: 2 [15.4%]). The most common AE considered related to melflufen and/or dexamethasone by investigators was thrombocytopenia (Arm A: 10 [71.4%]; Arm B: 10 [76.9%]). AEs led to treatment discontinuation in 3 (21.4%) and 6 (46.2%) patients in Arms A and B, respectively.

   Click to Show/Hide
Half life period 75.6 h
Related Clinical Trial
NCT Number NCT04412707 Clinical Status Phase 2
Clinical Description This is a randomized, two-period, cross-over Phase 2 study, comparing PK, and assessing safety and tolerability and efficacy of peripheral and central intravenous administration of melflufen in patients with RRMM. It is an international study, enrolling patients in US and Europe. The study will enroll patients following at least 2 lines of prior therapy.
Experiment 374 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [3]
Indication Relapsed/Refractory multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Treatment-emergent adverse event
92.90%
Patients Enrolled
14 patients with relapsed refractory multiple myeloma.
Administration Time 28-day cycle
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that utilizes increased peptidase expression to selectively release potent alkylating agents inside tumor cells. Melflufen is hydrolyzed by peptidases and esterases to melphalan either directly or through an intermediate metabolite, desethyl-melflufen. The high lipophilicity of melflufen facilitates passive diffusion across cell membranes. The activity and tolerability of melflufen in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) were demonstrated in the O-12-M1 (NCT01897714), OCEAN (NCT03151811), and HORIZON (NCT02963493) trials.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
Overall, at least one TEAE was reported in 13 (92.9%) and 13 (100.0%) patients in Arms A and B, respectively (Table 3). During cycle 1, 9 patients (64.3%) and 12 patients (92.3%), respectively, had at least one TEAE. Cumulatively, grade 3 or 4 AEs occurred in 12 (85.7%) and 12 (92.3%) patients, respectively, and serious AEs were reported in 5 (35.7%) and 9 (69.2%) patients, respectively. The most common any-grade AEs in Arms A and B, respectively, were thrombocytopenia (10 [71.4%]; 10 [76.9%]), neutropenia (9 [64.3%]; 9 [69.2%]), and anemia (9 [64.3%]; 7 [53.8%]). No phlebitis or local-infusion-related reactions were reported based on pre- and post-infusion inspection of the IV site, and there were no extravasations observed in Arm A or B. Similarly, VIP scores collected on Day 1 post-infusion and on Day 8 indicated that patients had healthy IV sites (VIP score of 0) with no signs of phlebitis following PVC administration of melflufen. The most common non-hematological AE was positive SARS-CoV-2 test (Arm A: 2 [14.3%]; Arm B: 4 [30.8%]). Pneumonia was the most common serious AE (Arm A: 2 [14.3%]; Arm B: 2 [15.4%]). The most common AE considered related to melflufen and/or dexamethasone by investigators was thrombocytopenia (Arm A: 10 [71.4%]; Arm B: 10 [76.9%]). AEs led to treatment discontinuation in 3 (21.4%) and 6 (46.2%) patients in Arms A and B, respectively.

   Click to Show/Hide
Half life period 75.6 h
Related Clinical Trial
NCT Number NCT04412707 Clinical Status Phase 2
Clinical Description This is a randomized, two-period, cross-over Phase 2 study, comparing PK, and assessing safety and tolerability and efficacy of peripheral and central intravenous administration of melflufen in patients with RRMM. It is an international study, enrolling patients in US and Europe. The study will enroll patients following at least 2 lines of prior therapy.
Experiment 375 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [3]
Indication Relapsed/Refractory multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Treatment-emergent adverse event
92.90%
Patients Enrolled
14 patients with relapsed refractory multiple myeloma.
Administration Time 28-day cycle
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that utilizes increased peptidase expression to selectively release potent alkylating agents inside tumor cells. Melflufen is hydrolyzed by peptidases and esterases to melphalan either directly or through an intermediate metabolite, desethyl-melflufen. The high lipophilicity of melflufen facilitates passive diffusion across cell membranes. The activity and tolerability of melflufen in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) were demonstrated in the O-12-M1 (NCT01897714), OCEAN (NCT03151811), and HORIZON (NCT02963493) trials.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
Overall, at least one TEAE was reported in 13 (92.9%) and 13 (100.0%) patients in Arms A and B, respectively (Table 3). During cycle 1, 9 patients (64.3%) and 12 patients (92.3%), respectively, had at least one TEAE. Cumulatively, grade 3 or 4 AEs occurred in 12 (85.7%) and 12 (92.3%) patients, respectively, and serious AEs were reported in 5 (35.7%) and 9 (69.2%) patients, respectively. The most common any-grade AEs in Arms A and B, respectively, were thrombocytopenia (10 [71.4%]; 10 [76.9%]), neutropenia (9 [64.3%]; 9 [69.2%]), and anemia (9 [64.3%]; 7 [53.8%]). No phlebitis or local-infusion-related reactions were reported based on pre- and post-infusion inspection of the IV site, and there were no extravasations observed in Arm A or B. Similarly, VIP scores collected on Day 1 post-infusion and on Day 8 indicated that patients had healthy IV sites (VIP score of 0) with no signs of phlebitis following PVC administration of melflufen. The most common non-hematological AE was positive SARS-CoV-2 test (Arm A: 2 [14.3%]; Arm B: 4 [30.8%]). Pneumonia was the most common serious AE (Arm A: 2 [14.3%]; Arm B: 2 [15.4%]). The most common AE considered related to melflufen and/or dexamethasone by investigators was thrombocytopenia (Arm A: 10 [71.4%]; Arm B: 10 [76.9%]). AEs led to treatment discontinuation in 3 (21.4%) and 6 (46.2%) patients in Arms A and B, respectively.

   Click to Show/Hide
Half life period 75.6 h
Related Clinical Trial
NCT Number NCT04412707 Clinical Status Phase 2
Clinical Description This is a randomized, two-period, cross-over Phase 2 study, comparing PK, and assessing safety and tolerability and efficacy of peripheral and central intravenous administration of melflufen in patients with RRMM. It is an international study, enrolling patients in US and Europe. The study will enroll patients following at least 2 lines of prior therapy.
Experiment 376 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [4]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Treatment-emergent adverse event
100.00%
Patients Enrolled
157 patients with multiple myeloma.
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melflufen is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate, targeting aminopeptidase which has an increased expression in fast-growing and aggressive malignancies. The lipophilicity of melflufen allows for passive diffusion, selectively targeting myeloma cells. Once inside the cell, melflufen is hydrolyzed to active alkylating metabolites melphalan and desethyl-melflufen. Melflufen and the active metabolites trigger irreversible DNA damage, inhibit proliferation, induces apoptosis, and express antiangiogenic effects. In addition, melflufen demonstrated activity in myeloma cells with documented impaired or absent Tp53 expression and documented resistance to bortezomib, dexamethasone, and melphalan.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
Based on the safety data collected during the HORIZON trial, treatment emergent adverse events occurred in 100% of patients including 100 patients (64%) having at least 1 CTCAE grade 4 adverse effect. Hematologic grade 3 or 4 adverse effects including thrombocytopenia (76%), neutropenia (79%), anemia (43%), and infections (11%) were the most commonly reported. Other adverse effects, such as fatigue (55%), nausea (32%), diarrhea (27%), and decreased appetite (14%), were similar to other alkylating agents. Pyrexia (24%), including febrile neutropenia (5%), and respiratory tract infections (24%) were contributed to hematologic toxicities.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 377 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [9]
Indication Relapsed/Refractory multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Treatment-emergent adverse event
11%
Patients Enrolled
145 patients who has relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma with no previous ASCT or TTP >36 month Post-ASCTa.
MOA of PDC
In summary, the interpretation of the results from the OCEAN study were impacted by the heterogeneity of the population, with age and previous success of ASCT therapy identified as prognostic factors with study therapies. The safety profile of melflufen and dexamethasone is primarily characterized by hematologic AEs that are clinically manageable. Observed infection rates, which included COVID-19, were generally low. Taken together, these data support the use of melflufen and dexamethasone in patients who have not received a previous ASCT or who underwent a successful ASCT (ie, TTP >36 months post-ASCT). In addition, the favorable efficacy profile and convenience of monthly outpatient infusions, especially for patients without access to other therapeutics such as CAR T-cell therapy or bispecific antibodies, bode well for this combination translating successfully into real-world practice.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
Given the prognostic importance of TTP <36 months post-ASCT in OCEAN, we evaluated this prognostic factor in a post hoc analysis from the HORIZON study. Among 110 patients with triple-class refractory disease who had received ≥3 prior lines of therapy, 77 (70%) had received a previous ASCT and 58 (53%) had TTP <36 months post-ASCT (Suppl. Table S3). In patients with a TTP >36 months post-ASCT or no ASCT versus patients with a TTP <36 months post-ASCT, ORR was higher (29% vs 22%; Suppl. Table S4) and median DOR (7.6 months vs 3.9 months) and median PFS (4.2 months vs 3.4 months) were longer. Since pomalidomide and lenalidomide both belong to the immunomodulatory drugs, we analyzed if the duration of previous treatment with lenalidomide could have impacted the results. The median duration of lenalidomide was 14.4 months in patients with ASCT and TTP < 36 months, 38.3 months in patients with ASCT and TTP > 36 months, and 14.6 months in patients with no previous ASCT. However, the median PFS for patients treated with pomalidomide did not differ substantially between these groups of patients. The safety profile of melflufen and dexamethasone was generally consistent between patients with a TTP >36 months post-ASCT or no ASCT and patients with a TTP <36 months post-ASCT. In OCEAN among the melflufen group, the frequency of grade 3/4 TEAEs (88% and 92%), serious TEAEs (44% and 38%), and fatal adverse events (AEs; 11% and 13%) was similar in patients with a TTP >36 months post-ASCT or no ASCT and patients with TTP <36 months. However, patients with a TTP >36 months post-ASCT or no ASCT had lower rates of TEAEs leading to treatment discontinuation (23% and 31%), the longer median duration of study treatment (35.1 weeks vs 15.1 weeks), and longer median time to experiencing grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia (11.2 weeks vs 4.1 weeks) and grade 3/4 neutropenia (4.8 weeks vs 2.1 weeks) than patients with a TTP <36 months post-ASCT. In HORIZON, patients with a TTP >36 months post-ASCT or no ASCT had lower rates of grade 3/4 TEAEs (88% and 98%), but higher rates of serious TEAEs (64% and 53%) and similar rates of TEAEs leading to treatment discontinuation (29% and 33%) than patients with a TTP <36 months post-ASCT.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 378 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [9]
Indication Relapsed/Refractory multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Treatment-emergent adverse event
13%
Patients Enrolled
101 relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma patients with TTP <36 month Post-ASCTb.
MOA of PDC
In summary, the interpretation of the results from the OCEAN study were impacted by the heterogeneity of the population, with age and previous success of ASCT therapy identified as prognostic factors with study therapies. The safety profile of melflufen and dexamethasone is primarily characterized by hematologic AEs that are clinically manageable. Observed infection rates, which included COVID-19, were generally low. Taken together, these data support the use of melflufen and dexamethasone in patients who have not received a previous ASCT or who underwent a successful ASCT (ie, TTP >36 months post-ASCT). In addition, the favorable efficacy profile and convenience of monthly outpatient infusions, especially for patients without access to other therapeutics such as CAR T-cell therapy or bispecific antibodies, bode well for this combination translating successfully into real-world practice.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
Given the prognostic importance of TTP <36 months post-ASCT in OCEAN, we evaluated this prognostic factor in a post hoc analysis from the HORIZON study. Among 110 patients with triple-class refractory disease who had received ≥3 prior lines of therapy, 77 (70%) had received a previous ASCT and 58 (53%) had TTP <36 months post-ASCT (Suppl. Table S3). In patients with a TTP >36 months post-ASCT or no ASCT versus patients with a TTP <36 months post-ASCT, ORR was higher (29% vs 22%; Suppl. Table S4) and median DOR (7.6 months vs 3.9 months) and median PFS (4.2 months vs 3.4 months) were longer. Since pomalidomide and lenalidomide both belong to the immunomodulatory drugs, we analyzed if the duration of previous treatment with lenalidomide could have impacted the results. The median duration of lenalidomide was 14.4 months in patients with ASCT and TTP < 36 months, 38.3 months in patients with ASCT and TTP > 36 months, and 14.6 months in patients with no previous ASCT. However, the median PFS for patients treated with pomalidomide did not differ substantially between these groups of patients. The safety profile of melflufen and dexamethasone was generally consistent between patients with a TTP >36 months post-ASCT or no ASCT and patients with a TTP <36 months post-ASCT. In OCEAN among the melflufen group, the frequency of grade 3/4 TEAEs (88% and 92%), serious TEAEs (44% and 38%), and fatal adverse events (AEs; 11% and 13%) was similar in patients with a TTP >36 months post-ASCT or no ASCT and patients with TTP <36 months. However, patients with a TTP >36 months post-ASCT or no ASCT had lower rates of TEAEs leading to treatment discontinuation (23% and 31%), the longer median duration of study treatment (35.1 weeks vs 15.1 weeks), and longer median time to experiencing grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia (11.2 weeks vs 4.1 weeks) and grade 3/4 neutropenia (4.8 weeks vs 2.1 weeks) than patients with a TTP <36 months post-ASCT. In HORIZON, patients with a TTP >36 months post-ASCT or no ASCT had lower rates of grade 3/4 TEAEs (88% and 98%), but higher rates of serious TEAEs (64% and 53%) and similar rates of TEAEs leading to treatment discontinuation (29% and 33%) than patients with a TTP <36 months post-ASCT.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 379 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [1]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Treatment-emergent adverse event
17.00%
Patients Enrolled
Patients with multi-refractory multiple myeloma.
Administration Time 9.3 month (median)
Administration Dosage 30 or 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melflufen is highly lipophilic, which promotes its rapid uptake by cells. Once within the cell, melflufen releases its hydrophilic alkylator payloads via the hydrolytic activity of intracellular peptidases (e.g., aminopeptidases). Aminopeptidases are Zn2+-dependent metalloproteinases that remove amino acids at the N-terminal position from oligopeptides and have been associated with multiple tumorigenic processes such as proliferation, apoptosis, differentiation, angiogenesis, and motility. The dependence of melflufen on aminopeptidases was initially demonstrated by the reduced cytotoxic activity of melflufen-but not the alkylator melphalan-when cells were pretreated with bestatin, an antibiotic that is a potent aminopeptidase inhibitor. In addition, structure analogs designed to resist peptide hydrolysis (N-methyl derivative and derivative with D-amino acid) were shown to be almost 100-fold less potent than melflufen. Subsequent in vitro studies demonstrated that hydrolytic cleavage of melflufen by aminopeptidases releases alkylator payloads, including melphalan. In vitro, the activity of melflufen is multi-pronged, including induction of DNA damage, induction of apoptosis, inhibition of VEGF-dependent cell migration, and inhibition of tumor-associated angiogenesis, which have been further reviewed elsewhere. Downregulation of aminopeptidases resulted in reduced melflufen-mediated cytotoxic activity and apoptotic signaling in cultured cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 380 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [1]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Treatment-emergent adverse event
18.00%
Patients Enrolled
Patients with multi-refractory multiple myeloma.
Administration Time 6.2 month (median)
Administration Dosage 30 or 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melflufen is highly lipophilic, which promotes its rapid uptake by cells. Once within the cell, melflufen releases its hydrophilic alkylator payloads via the hydrolytic activity of intracellular peptidases (e.g., aminopeptidases). Aminopeptidases are Zn2+-dependent metalloproteinases that remove amino acids at the N-terminal position from oligopeptides and have been associated with multiple tumorigenic processes such as proliferation, apoptosis, differentiation, angiogenesis, and motility. The dependence of melflufen on aminopeptidases was initially demonstrated by the reduced cytotoxic activity of melflufen-but not the alkylator melphalan-when cells were pretreated with bestatin, an antibiotic that is a potent aminopeptidase inhibitor. In addition, structure analogs designed to resist peptide hydrolysis (N-methyl derivative and derivative with D-amino acid) were shown to be almost 100-fold less potent than melflufen. Subsequent in vitro studies demonstrated that hydrolytic cleavage of melflufen by aminopeptidases releases alkylator payloads, including melphalan. In vitro, the activity of melflufen is multi-pronged, including induction of DNA damage, induction of apoptosis, inhibition of VEGF-dependent cell migration, and inhibition of tumor-associated angiogenesis, which have been further reviewed elsewhere. Downregulation of aminopeptidases resulted in reduced melflufen-mediated cytotoxic activity and apoptotic signaling in cultured cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 381 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [9]
Indication Relapsed/Refractory multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Treatment-emergent adverse event
23%
Patients Enrolled
145 patients who has relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma with no previous ASCT or TTP >36 month Post-ASCTa.
MOA of PDC
In summary, the interpretation of the results from the OCEAN study were impacted by the heterogeneity of the population, with age and previous success of ASCT therapy identified as prognostic factors with study therapies. The safety profile of melflufen and dexamethasone is primarily characterized by hematologic AEs that are clinically manageable. Observed infection rates, which included COVID-19, were generally low. Taken together, these data support the use of melflufen and dexamethasone in patients who have not received a previous ASCT or who underwent a successful ASCT (ie, TTP >36 months post-ASCT). In addition, the favorable efficacy profile and convenience of monthly outpatient infusions, especially for patients without access to other therapeutics such as CAR T-cell therapy or bispecific antibodies, bode well for this combination translating successfully into real-world practice.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
Given the prognostic importance of TTP <36 months post-ASCT in OCEAN, we evaluated this prognostic factor in a post hoc analysis from the HORIZON study. Among 110 patients with triple-class refractory disease who had received ≥3 prior lines of therapy, 77 (70%) had received a previous ASCT and 58 (53%) had TTP <36 months post-ASCT (Suppl. Table S3). In patients with a TTP >36 months post-ASCT or no ASCT versus patients with a TTP <36 months post-ASCT, ORR was higher (29% vs 22%; Suppl. Table S4) and median DOR (7.6 months vs 3.9 months) and median PFS (4.2 months vs 3.4 months) were longer. Since pomalidomide and lenalidomide both belong to the immunomodulatory drugs, we analyzed if the duration of previous treatment with lenalidomide could have impacted the results. The median duration of lenalidomide was 14.4 months in patients with ASCT and TTP < 36 months, 38.3 months in patients with ASCT and TTP > 36 months, and 14.6 months in patients with no previous ASCT. However, the median PFS for patients treated with pomalidomide did not differ substantially between these groups of patients. The safety profile of melflufen and dexamethasone was generally consistent between patients with a TTP >36 months post-ASCT or no ASCT and patients with a TTP <36 months post-ASCT. In OCEAN among the melflufen group, the frequency of grade 3/4 TEAEs (88% and 92%), serious TEAEs (44% and 38%), and fatal adverse events (AEs; 11% and 13%) was similar in patients with a TTP >36 months post-ASCT or no ASCT and patients with TTP <36 months. However, patients with a TTP >36 months post-ASCT or no ASCT had lower rates of TEAEs leading to treatment discontinuation (23% and 31%), the longer median duration of study treatment (35.1 weeks vs 15.1 weeks), and longer median time to experiencing grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia (11.2 weeks vs 4.1 weeks) and grade 3/4 neutropenia (4.8 weeks vs 2.1 weeks) than patients with a TTP <36 months post-ASCT. In HORIZON, patients with a TTP >36 months post-ASCT or no ASCT had lower rates of grade 3/4 TEAEs (88% and 98%), but higher rates of serious TEAEs (64% and 53%) and similar rates of TEAEs leading to treatment discontinuation (29% and 33%) than patients with a TTP <36 months post-ASCT.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 382 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [1]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Treatment-emergent adverse event
27.00%
Patients Enrolled
Patients with multi-refractory multiple myeloma.
Administration Time 28-day cycle
Administration Dosage 40 mg with dexamethasone (40 mg)
MOA of PDC
Melflufen is highly lipophilic, which promotes its rapid uptake by cells. Once within the cell, melflufen releases its hydrophilic alkylator payloads via the hydrolytic activity of intracellular peptidases (e.g., aminopeptidases). Aminopeptidases are Zn2+-dependent metalloproteinases that remove amino acids at the N-terminal position from oligopeptides and have been associated with multiple tumorigenic processes such as proliferation, apoptosis, differentiation, angiogenesis, and motility. The dependence of melflufen on aminopeptidases was initially demonstrated by the reduced cytotoxic activity of melflufen-but not the alkylator melphalan-when cells were pretreated with bestatin, an antibiotic that is a potent aminopeptidase inhibitor. In addition, structure analogs designed to resist peptide hydrolysis (N-methyl derivative and derivative with D-amino acid) were shown to be almost 100-fold less potent than melflufen. Subsequent in vitro studies demonstrated that hydrolytic cleavage of melflufen by aminopeptidases releases alkylator payloads, including melphalan. In vitro, the activity of melflufen is multi-pronged, including induction of DNA damage, induction of apoptosis, inhibition of VEGF-dependent cell migration, and inhibition of tumor-associated angiogenesis, which have been further reviewed elsewhere. Downregulation of aminopeptidases resulted in reduced melflufen-mediated cytotoxic activity and apoptotic signaling in cultured cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 383 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [9]
Indication Relapsed/Refractory multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Treatment-emergent adverse event
31%
Patients Enrolled
101 relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma patients with TTP <36 month Post-ASCTb.
MOA of PDC
In summary, the interpretation of the results from the OCEAN study were impacted by the heterogeneity of the population, with age and previous success of ASCT therapy identified as prognostic factors with study therapies. The safety profile of melflufen and dexamethasone is primarily characterized by hematologic AEs that are clinically manageable. Observed infection rates, which included COVID-19, were generally low. Taken together, these data support the use of melflufen and dexamethasone in patients who have not received a previous ASCT or who underwent a successful ASCT (ie, TTP >36 months post-ASCT). In addition, the favorable efficacy profile and convenience of monthly outpatient infusions, especially for patients without access to other therapeutics such as CAR T-cell therapy or bispecific antibodies, bode well for this combination translating successfully into real-world practice.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
Given the prognostic importance of TTP <36 months post-ASCT in OCEAN, we evaluated this prognostic factor in a post hoc analysis from the HORIZON study. Among 110 patients with triple-class refractory disease who had received ≥3 prior lines of therapy, 77 (70%) had received a previous ASCT and 58 (53%) had TTP <36 months post-ASCT (Suppl. Table S3). In patients with a TTP >36 months post-ASCT or no ASCT versus patients with a TTP <36 months post-ASCT, ORR was higher (29% vs 22%; Suppl. Table S4) and median DOR (7.6 months vs 3.9 months) and median PFS (4.2 months vs 3.4 months) were longer. Since pomalidomide and lenalidomide both belong to the immunomodulatory drugs, we analyzed if the duration of previous treatment with lenalidomide could have impacted the results. The median duration of lenalidomide was 14.4 months in patients with ASCT and TTP < 36 months, 38.3 months in patients with ASCT and TTP > 36 months, and 14.6 months in patients with no previous ASCT. However, the median PFS for patients treated with pomalidomide did not differ substantially between these groups of patients. The safety profile of melflufen and dexamethasone was generally consistent between patients with a TTP >36 months post-ASCT or no ASCT and patients with a TTP <36 months post-ASCT. In OCEAN among the melflufen group, the frequency of grade 3/4 TEAEs (88% and 92%), serious TEAEs (44% and 38%), and fatal adverse events (AEs; 11% and 13%) was similar in patients with a TTP >36 months post-ASCT or no ASCT and patients with TTP <36 months. However, patients with a TTP >36 months post-ASCT or no ASCT had lower rates of TEAEs leading to treatment discontinuation (23% and 31%), the longer median duration of study treatment (35.1 weeks vs 15.1 weeks), and longer median time to experiencing grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia (11.2 weeks vs 4.1 weeks) and grade 3/4 neutropenia (4.8 weeks vs 2.1 weeks) than patients with a TTP <36 months post-ASCT. In HORIZON, patients with a TTP >36 months post-ASCT or no ASCT had lower rates of grade 3/4 TEAEs (88% and 98%), but higher rates of serious TEAEs (64% and 53%) and similar rates of TEAEs leading to treatment discontinuation (29% and 33%) than patients with a TTP <36 months post-ASCT.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 384 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [9]
Indication Relapsed/Refractory multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Treatment-emergent adverse event
38%
Patients Enrolled
101 relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma patients with TTP <36 month Post-ASCTb.
MOA of PDC
In summary, the interpretation of the results from the OCEAN study were impacted by the heterogeneity of the population, with age and previous success of ASCT therapy identified as prognostic factors with study therapies. The safety profile of melflufen and dexamethasone is primarily characterized by hematologic AEs that are clinically manageable. Observed infection rates, which included COVID-19, were generally low. Taken together, these data support the use of melflufen and dexamethasone in patients who have not received a previous ASCT or who underwent a successful ASCT (ie, TTP >36 months post-ASCT). In addition, the favorable efficacy profile and convenience of monthly outpatient infusions, especially for patients without access to other therapeutics such as CAR T-cell therapy or bispecific antibodies, bode well for this combination translating successfully into real-world practice.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
Given the prognostic importance of TTP <36 months post-ASCT in OCEAN, we evaluated this prognostic factor in a post hoc analysis from the HORIZON study. Among 110 patients with triple-class refractory disease who had received ≥3 prior lines of therapy, 77 (70%) had received a previous ASCT and 58 (53%) had TTP <36 months post-ASCT (Suppl. Table S3). In patients with a TTP >36 months post-ASCT or no ASCT versus patients with a TTP <36 months post-ASCT, ORR was higher (29% vs 22%; Suppl. Table S4) and median DOR (7.6 months vs 3.9 months) and median PFS (4.2 months vs 3.4 months) were longer. Since pomalidomide and lenalidomide both belong to the immunomodulatory drugs, we analyzed if the duration of previous treatment with lenalidomide could have impacted the results. The median duration of lenalidomide was 14.4 months in patients with ASCT and TTP < 36 months, 38.3 months in patients with ASCT and TTP > 36 months, and 14.6 months in patients with no previous ASCT. However, the median PFS for patients treated with pomalidomide did not differ substantially between these groups of patients. The safety profile of melflufen and dexamethasone was generally consistent between patients with a TTP >36 months post-ASCT or no ASCT and patients with a TTP <36 months post-ASCT. In OCEAN among the melflufen group, the frequency of grade 3/4 TEAEs (88% and 92%), serious TEAEs (44% and 38%), and fatal adverse events (AEs; 11% and 13%) was similar in patients with a TTP >36 months post-ASCT or no ASCT and patients with TTP <36 months. However, patients with a TTP >36 months post-ASCT or no ASCT had lower rates of TEAEs leading to treatment discontinuation (23% and 31%), the longer median duration of study treatment (35.1 weeks vs 15.1 weeks), and longer median time to experiencing grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia (11.2 weeks vs 4.1 weeks) and grade 3/4 neutropenia (4.8 weeks vs 2.1 weeks) than patients with a TTP <36 months post-ASCT. In HORIZON, patients with a TTP >36 months post-ASCT or no ASCT had lower rates of grade 3/4 TEAEs (88% and 98%), but higher rates of serious TEAEs (64% and 53%) and similar rates of TEAEs leading to treatment discontinuation (29% and 33%) than patients with a TTP <36 months post-ASCT.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 385 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [9]
Indication Relapsed/Refractory multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Treatment-emergent adverse event
44%
Patients Enrolled
145 patients who has relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma with no previous ASCT or TTP >36 month Post-ASCTa.
MOA of PDC
In summary, the interpretation of the results from the OCEAN study were impacted by the heterogeneity of the population, with age and previous success of ASCT therapy identified as prognostic factors with study therapies. The safety profile of melflufen and dexamethasone is primarily characterized by hematologic AEs that are clinically manageable. Observed infection rates, which included COVID-19, were generally low. Taken together, these data support the use of melflufen and dexamethasone in patients who have not received a previous ASCT or who underwent a successful ASCT (ie, TTP >36 months post-ASCT). In addition, the favorable efficacy profile and convenience of monthly outpatient infusions, especially for patients without access to other therapeutics such as CAR T-cell therapy or bispecific antibodies, bode well for this combination translating successfully into real-world practice.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
Given the prognostic importance of TTP <36 months post-ASCT in OCEAN, we evaluated this prognostic factor in a post hoc analysis from the HORIZON study. Among 110 patients with triple-class refractory disease who had received ≥3 prior lines of therapy, 77 (70%) had received a previous ASCT and 58 (53%) had TTP <36 months post-ASCT (Suppl. Table S3). In patients with a TTP >36 months post-ASCT or no ASCT versus patients with a TTP <36 months post-ASCT, ORR was higher (29% vs 22%; Suppl. Table S4) and median DOR (7.6 months vs 3.9 months) and median PFS (4.2 months vs 3.4 months) were longer. Since pomalidomide and lenalidomide both belong to the immunomodulatory drugs, we analyzed if the duration of previous treatment with lenalidomide could have impacted the results. The median duration of lenalidomide was 14.4 months in patients with ASCT and TTP < 36 months, 38.3 months in patients with ASCT and TTP > 36 months, and 14.6 months in patients with no previous ASCT. However, the median PFS for patients treated with pomalidomide did not differ substantially between these groups of patients. The safety profile of melflufen and dexamethasone was generally consistent between patients with a TTP >36 months post-ASCT or no ASCT and patients with a TTP <36 months post-ASCT. In OCEAN among the melflufen group, the frequency of grade 3/4 TEAEs (88% and 92%), serious TEAEs (44% and 38%), and fatal adverse events (AEs; 11% and 13%) was similar in patients with a TTP >36 months post-ASCT or no ASCT and patients with TTP <36 months. However, patients with a TTP >36 months post-ASCT or no ASCT had lower rates of TEAEs leading to treatment discontinuation (23% and 31%), the longer median duration of study treatment (35.1 weeks vs 15.1 weeks), and longer median time to experiencing grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia (11.2 weeks vs 4.1 weeks) and grade 3/4 neutropenia (4.8 weeks vs 2.1 weeks) than patients with a TTP <36 months post-ASCT. In HORIZON, patients with a TTP >36 months post-ASCT or no ASCT had lower rates of grade 3/4 TEAEs (88% and 98%), but higher rates of serious TEAEs (64% and 53%) and similar rates of TEAEs leading to treatment discontinuation (29% and 33%) than patients with a TTP <36 months post-ASCT.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 386 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [9]
Indication Relapsed/Refractory multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Treatment-emergent adverse event
45%
Patients Enrolled
101 relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma patients with TTP <36 month Post-ASCTb.
MOA of PDC
In summary, the interpretation of the results from the OCEAN study were impacted by the heterogeneity of the population, with age and previous success of ASCT therapy identified as prognostic factors with study therapies. The safety profile of melflufen and dexamethasone is primarily characterized by hematologic AEs that are clinically manageable. Observed infection rates, which included COVID-19, were generally low. Taken together, these data support the use of melflufen and dexamethasone in patients who have not received a previous ASCT or who underwent a successful ASCT (ie, TTP >36 months post-ASCT). In addition, the favorable efficacy profile and convenience of monthly outpatient infusions, especially for patients without access to other therapeutics such as CAR T-cell therapy or bispecific antibodies, bode well for this combination translating successfully into real-world practice.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
Given the prognostic importance of TTP <36 months post-ASCT in OCEAN, we evaluated this prognostic factor in a post hoc analysis from the HORIZON study. Among 110 patients with triple-class refractory disease who had received ≥3 prior lines of therapy, 77 (70%) had received a previous ASCT and 58 (53%) had TTP <36 months post-ASCT (Suppl. Table S3). In patients with a TTP >36 months post-ASCT or no ASCT versus patients with a TTP <36 months post-ASCT, ORR was higher (29% vs 22%; Suppl. Table S4) and median DOR (7.6 months vs 3.9 months) and median PFS (4.2 months vs 3.4 months) were longer. Since pomalidomide and lenalidomide both belong to the immunomodulatory drugs, we analyzed if the duration of previous treatment with lenalidomide could have impacted the results. The median duration of lenalidomide was 14.4 months in patients with ASCT and TTP < 36 months, 38.3 months in patients with ASCT and TTP > 36 months, and 14.6 months in patients with no previous ASCT. However, the median PFS for patients treated with pomalidomide did not differ substantially between these groups of patients. The safety profile of melflufen and dexamethasone was generally consistent between patients with a TTP >36 months post-ASCT or no ASCT and patients with a TTP <36 months post-ASCT. In OCEAN among the melflufen group, the frequency of grade 3/4 TEAEs (88% and 92%), serious TEAEs (44% and 38%), and fatal adverse events (AEs; 11% and 13%) was similar in patients with a TTP >36 months post-ASCT or no ASCT and patients with TTP <36 months. However, patients with a TTP >36 months post-ASCT or no ASCT had lower rates of TEAEs leading to treatment discontinuation (23% and 31%), the longer median duration of study treatment (35.1 weeks vs 15.1 weeks), and longer median time to experiencing grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia (11.2 weeks vs 4.1 weeks) and grade 3/4 neutropenia (4.8 weeks vs 2.1 weeks) than patients with a TTP <36 months post-ASCT. In HORIZON, patients with a TTP >36 months post-ASCT or no ASCT had lower rates of grade 3/4 TEAEs (88% and 98%), but higher rates of serious TEAEs (64% and 53%) and similar rates of TEAEs leading to treatment discontinuation (29% and 33%) than patients with a TTP <36 months post-ASCT.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 387 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [9]
Indication Relapsed/Refractory multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Treatment-emergent adverse event
48%
Patients Enrolled
145 patients who has relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma with no previous ASCT or TTP >36 month Post-ASCTa.
MOA of PDC
In summary, the interpretation of the results from the OCEAN study were impacted by the heterogeneity of the population, with age and previous success of ASCT therapy identified as prognostic factors with study therapies. The safety profile of melflufen and dexamethasone is primarily characterized by hematologic AEs that are clinically manageable. Observed infection rates, which included COVID-19, were generally low. Taken together, these data support the use of melflufen and dexamethasone in patients who have not received a previous ASCT or who underwent a successful ASCT (ie, TTP >36 months post-ASCT). In addition, the favorable efficacy profile and convenience of monthly outpatient infusions, especially for patients without access to other therapeutics such as CAR T-cell therapy or bispecific antibodies, bode well for this combination translating successfully into real-world practice.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
Given the prognostic importance of TTP <36 months post-ASCT in OCEAN, we evaluated this prognostic factor in a post hoc analysis from the HORIZON study. Among 110 patients with triple-class refractory disease who had received ≥3 prior lines of therapy, 77 (70%) had received a previous ASCT and 58 (53%) had TTP <36 months post-ASCT (Suppl. Table S3). In patients with a TTP >36 months post-ASCT or no ASCT versus patients with a TTP <36 months post-ASCT, ORR was higher (29% vs 22%; Suppl. Table S4) and median DOR (7.6 months vs 3.9 months) and median PFS (4.2 months vs 3.4 months) were longer. Since pomalidomide and lenalidomide both belong to the immunomodulatory drugs, we analyzed if the duration of previous treatment with lenalidomide could have impacted the results. The median duration of lenalidomide was 14.4 months in patients with ASCT and TTP < 36 months, 38.3 months in patients with ASCT and TTP > 36 months, and 14.6 months in patients with no previous ASCT. However, the median PFS for patients treated with pomalidomide did not differ substantially between these groups of patients. The safety profile of melflufen and dexamethasone was generally consistent between patients with a TTP >36 months post-ASCT or no ASCT and patients with a TTP <36 months post-ASCT. In OCEAN among the melflufen group, the frequency of grade 3/4 TEAEs (88% and 92%), serious TEAEs (44% and 38%), and fatal adverse events (AEs; 11% and 13%) was similar in patients with a TTP >36 months post-ASCT or no ASCT and patients with TTP <36 months. However, patients with a TTP >36 months post-ASCT or no ASCT had lower rates of TEAEs leading to treatment discontinuation (23% and 31%), the longer median duration of study treatment (35.1 weeks vs 15.1 weeks), and longer median time to experiencing grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia (11.2 weeks vs 4.1 weeks) and grade 3/4 neutropenia (4.8 weeks vs 2.1 weeks) than patients with a TTP <36 months post-ASCT. In HORIZON, patients with a TTP >36 months post-ASCT or no ASCT had lower rates of grade 3/4 TEAEs (88% and 98%), but higher rates of serious TEAEs (64% and 53%) and similar rates of TEAEs leading to treatment discontinuation (29% and 33%) than patients with a TTP <36 months post-ASCT.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 388 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [9]
Indication Relapsed/Refractory multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Treatment-emergent adverse event
58%
Patients Enrolled
145 patients who has relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma with no previous ASCT or TTP >36 month Post-ASCTa.
MOA of PDC
In summary, the interpretation of the results from the OCEAN study were impacted by the heterogeneity of the population, with age and previous success of ASCT therapy identified as prognostic factors with study therapies. The safety profile of melflufen and dexamethasone is primarily characterized by hematologic AEs that are clinically manageable. Observed infection rates, which included COVID-19, were generally low. Taken together, these data support the use of melflufen and dexamethasone in patients who have not received a previous ASCT or who underwent a successful ASCT (ie, TTP >36 months post-ASCT). In addition, the favorable efficacy profile and convenience of monthly outpatient infusions, especially for patients without access to other therapeutics such as CAR T-cell therapy or bispecific antibodies, bode well for this combination translating successfully into real-world practice.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
Given the prognostic importance of TTP <36 months post-ASCT in OCEAN, we evaluated this prognostic factor in a post hoc analysis from the HORIZON study. Among 110 patients with triple-class refractory disease who had received ≥3 prior lines of therapy, 77 (70%) had received a previous ASCT and 58 (53%) had TTP <36 months post-ASCT (Suppl. Table S3). In patients with a TTP >36 months post-ASCT or no ASCT versus patients with a TTP <36 months post-ASCT, ORR was higher (29% vs 22%; Suppl. Table S4) and median DOR (7.6 months vs 3.9 months) and median PFS (4.2 months vs 3.4 months) were longer. Since pomalidomide and lenalidomide both belong to the immunomodulatory drugs, we analyzed if the duration of previous treatment with lenalidomide could have impacted the results. The median duration of lenalidomide was 14.4 months in patients with ASCT and TTP < 36 months, 38.3 months in patients with ASCT and TTP > 36 months, and 14.6 months in patients with no previous ASCT. However, the median PFS for patients treated with pomalidomide did not differ substantially between these groups of patients. The safety profile of melflufen and dexamethasone was generally consistent between patients with a TTP >36 months post-ASCT or no ASCT and patients with a TTP <36 months post-ASCT. In OCEAN among the melflufen group, the frequency of grade 3/4 TEAEs (88% and 92%), serious TEAEs (44% and 38%), and fatal adverse events (AEs; 11% and 13%) was similar in patients with a TTP >36 months post-ASCT or no ASCT and patients with TTP <36 months. However, patients with a TTP >36 months post-ASCT or no ASCT had lower rates of TEAEs leading to treatment discontinuation (23% and 31%), the longer median duration of study treatment (35.1 weeks vs 15.1 weeks), and longer median time to experiencing grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia (11.2 weeks vs 4.1 weeks) and grade 3/4 neutropenia (4.8 weeks vs 2.1 weeks) than patients with a TTP <36 months post-ASCT. In HORIZON, patients with a TTP >36 months post-ASCT or no ASCT had lower rates of grade 3/4 TEAEs (88% and 98%), but higher rates of serious TEAEs (64% and 53%) and similar rates of TEAEs leading to treatment discontinuation (29% and 33%) than patients with a TTP <36 months post-ASCT.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 389 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [9]
Indication Relapsed/Refractory multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Treatment-emergent adverse event
63%
Patients Enrolled
101 relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma patients with TTP <36 month Post-ASCTb.
MOA of PDC
In summary, the interpretation of the results from the OCEAN study were impacted by the heterogeneity of the population, with age and previous success of ASCT therapy identified as prognostic factors with study therapies. The safety profile of melflufen and dexamethasone is primarily characterized by hematologic AEs that are clinically manageable. Observed infection rates, which included COVID-19, were generally low. Taken together, these data support the use of melflufen and dexamethasone in patients who have not received a previous ASCT or who underwent a successful ASCT (ie, TTP >36 months post-ASCT). In addition, the favorable efficacy profile and convenience of monthly outpatient infusions, especially for patients without access to other therapeutics such as CAR T-cell therapy or bispecific antibodies, bode well for this combination translating successfully into real-world practice.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
Given the prognostic importance of TTP <36 months post-ASCT in OCEAN, we evaluated this prognostic factor in a post hoc analysis from the HORIZON study. Among 110 patients with triple-class refractory disease who had received ≥3 prior lines of therapy, 77 (70%) had received a previous ASCT and 58 (53%) had TTP <36 months post-ASCT (Suppl. Table S3). In patients with a TTP >36 months post-ASCT or no ASCT versus patients with a TTP <36 months post-ASCT, ORR was higher (29% vs 22%; Suppl. Table S4) and median DOR (7.6 months vs 3.9 months) and median PFS (4.2 months vs 3.4 months) were longer. Since pomalidomide and lenalidomide both belong to the immunomodulatory drugs, we analyzed if the duration of previous treatment with lenalidomide could have impacted the results. The median duration of lenalidomide was 14.4 months in patients with ASCT and TTP < 36 months, 38.3 months in patients with ASCT and TTP > 36 months, and 14.6 months in patients with no previous ASCT. However, the median PFS for patients treated with pomalidomide did not differ substantially between these groups of patients. The safety profile of melflufen and dexamethasone was generally consistent between patients with a TTP >36 months post-ASCT or no ASCT and patients with a TTP <36 months post-ASCT. In OCEAN among the melflufen group, the frequency of grade 3/4 TEAEs (88% and 92%), serious TEAEs (44% and 38%), and fatal adverse events (AEs; 11% and 13%) was similar in patients with a TTP >36 months post-ASCT or no ASCT and patients with TTP <36 months. However, patients with a TTP >36 months post-ASCT or no ASCT had lower rates of TEAEs leading to treatment discontinuation (23% and 31%), the longer median duration of study treatment (35.1 weeks vs 15.1 weeks), and longer median time to experiencing grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia (11.2 weeks vs 4.1 weeks) and grade 3/4 neutropenia (4.8 weeks vs 2.1 weeks) than patients with a TTP <36 months post-ASCT. In HORIZON, patients with a TTP >36 months post-ASCT or no ASCT had lower rates of grade 3/4 TEAEs (88% and 98%), but higher rates of serious TEAEs (64% and 53%) and similar rates of TEAEs leading to treatment discontinuation (29% and 33%) than patients with a TTP <36 months post-ASCT.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 390 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [5]
Indication Relapsed/Refractory multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Treatment-emergent adverse event
73.47%
Patients Enrolled
153 patients refractory to prior alkylators (melflufen, n=78; pomalidomide, n=75).
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (melflufen), a first-in-class alkylating peptide-drug conjugate, plus dexamethasone demonstrated superior progression-free survival (PFS), but not overall survival (OS), versus pomalidomide plus dexamethasone in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma in the OCEAN study. Time to progression (TTP) <36 months after a prior autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) was a negative prognostic factor for OS with melflufen. This post hoc exploratory analysis evaluated patients refractory to prior alkylators (e.g., cyclophosphamide and melphalan) in OCEAN. In 153 patients refractory to prior alkylators (melflufen, n = 78; pomalidomide, n = 75), the melflufen and pomalidomide arms had similar median PFS (5.6 months [95% CI, 4.2-8.3] vs. 4.7 months [95% CI, 3.1-7.3]; hazard ratio [HR], 0.92 [95% CI, 0.63-1.33]) and OS (23.4 months [95% CI, 14.4-31.7] vs. 20.0 months [95% CI, 12.0-28.7]; HR, 0.92 [95% CI, 0.62-1.38]). Among alkylator-refractory patients with a TTP 36 months after a prior ASCT or no prior ASCT (melflufen, n = 54; pomalidomide, n = 53), the observed median PFS and OS were longer in the melflufen arm than the pomalidomide arm. The safety profile of melflufen was consistent with previous reports. These results suggest that melflufen is safe and effective in patients with alkylator-refractory disease, suggesting differentiated activity from other alkylators.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
Overall, the safety profile of melflufen plus dexamethasone in the alkylator-refractory group was consistent between treatment arms (Table 2). In the melflufen and pomalidomide arms, respectively, the frequency of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs; 99% vs. 97%), Grade 3 or 4 TEAEs (85% vs. 82%), serious TEAEs (49% vs. 53%), and fatal TEAEs (19% vs. 16%) were similar (Table 2). However, melflufen compared with pomalidomide saw more dose modifications (76% vs. 67%) and dose reductions (47% vs. 14%), comparable dose delays (57% vs. 51%) but less treatment discontinuation (27% vs. 34%). When comparing patients refractory and not refractory to prior alkylators, rates of TEAEs were generally comparable except for slightly lower rates of serious and fatal TEAEs observed in patients not refractory to alkylators. Among Grade 3 or 4 TEAEs of special interest, melflufen saw more thrombocytopenia (73% vs. 14%), neutropenia (65% vs. 55%), and leukopenia or white blood cell decrease (14% vs. 3%), but less infection (15% vs. 26%), than pomalidomide. Notably, melflufen compared with pomalidomide saw a longer median time to dose reduction (106 days [range, 28-443] vs. 47 days [range, 28-225]), Grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia (52 days [range, 15-451] vs. 19 days [range, 8-91]), and Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia (36 days [range, 8-561] vs. 22 days [range, 8-470]).

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 391 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [5]
Indication Relapsed/Refractory multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Treatment-emergent adverse event
73.68%
Patients Enrolled
153 patients refractory to prior alkylators (melflufen, n=78; pomalidomide, n=75).
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (melflufen), a first-in-class alkylating peptide-drug conjugate, plus dexamethasone demonstrated superior progression-free survival (PFS), but not overall survival (OS), versus pomalidomide plus dexamethasone in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma in the OCEAN study. Time to progression (TTP) <36 months after a prior autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) was a negative prognostic factor for OS with melflufen. This post hoc exploratory analysis evaluated patients refractory to prior alkylators (e.g., cyclophosphamide and melphalan) in OCEAN. In 153 patients refractory to prior alkylators (melflufen, n = 78; pomalidomide, n = 75), the melflufen and pomalidomide arms had similar median PFS (5.6 months [95% CI, 4.2-8.3] vs. 4.7 months [95% CI, 3.1-7.3]; hazard ratio [HR], 0.92 [95% CI, 0.63-1.33]) and OS (23.4 months [95% CI, 14.4-31.7] vs. 20.0 months [95% CI, 12.0-28.7]; HR, 0.92 [95% CI, 0.62-1.38]). Among alkylator-refractory patients with a TTP 36 months after a prior ASCT or no prior ASCT (melflufen, n = 54; pomalidomide, n = 53), the observed median PFS and OS were longer in the melflufen arm than the pomalidomide arm. The safety profile of melflufen was consistent with previous reports. These results suggest that melflufen is safe and effective in patients with alkylator-refractory disease, suggesting differentiated activity from other alkylators.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
Overall, the safety profile of melflufen plus dexamethasone in the alkylator-refractory group was consistent between treatment arms (Table 2). In the melflufen and pomalidomide arms, respectively, the frequency of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs; 99% vs. 97%), Grade 3 or 4 TEAEs (85% vs. 82%), serious TEAEs (49% vs. 53%), and fatal TEAEs (19% vs. 16%) were similar (Table 2). However, melflufen compared with pomalidomide saw more dose modifications (76% vs. 67%) and dose reductions (47% vs. 14%), comparable dose delays (57% vs. 51%) but less treatment discontinuation (27% vs. 34%). When comparing patients refractory and not refractory to prior alkylators, rates of TEAEs were generally comparable except for slightly lower rates of serious and fatal TEAEs observed in patients not refractory to alkylators. Among Grade 3 or 4 TEAEs of special interest, melflufen saw more thrombocytopenia (73% vs. 14%), neutropenia (65% vs. 55%), and leukopenia or white blood cell decrease (14% vs. 3%), but less infection (15% vs. 26%), than pomalidomide. Notably, melflufen compared with pomalidomide saw a longer median time to dose reduction (106 days [range, 28-443] vs. 47 days [range, 28-225]), Grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia (52 days [range, 15-451] vs. 19 days [range, 8-91]), and Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia (36 days [range, 8-561] vs. 22 days [range, 8-470]).

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 392 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [5]
Indication Relapsed/Refractory multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Treatment-emergent adverse event
73.74%
Patients Enrolled
153 patients refractory to prior alkylators (melflufen, n=78; pomalidomide, n=75).
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (melflufen), a first-in-class alkylating peptide-drug conjugate, plus dexamethasone demonstrated superior progression-free survival (PFS), but not overall survival (OS), versus pomalidomide plus dexamethasone in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma in the OCEAN study. Time to progression (TTP) <36 months after a prior autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) was a negative prognostic factor for OS with melflufen. This post hoc exploratory analysis evaluated patients refractory to prior alkylators (e.g., cyclophosphamide and melphalan) in OCEAN. In 153 patients refractory to prior alkylators (melflufen, n = 78; pomalidomide, n = 75), the melflufen and pomalidomide arms had similar median PFS (5.6 months [95% CI, 4.2-8.3] vs. 4.7 months [95% CI, 3.1-7.3]; hazard ratio [HR], 0.92 [95% CI, 0.63-1.33]) and OS (23.4 months [95% CI, 14.4-31.7] vs. 20.0 months [95% CI, 12.0-28.7]; HR, 0.92 [95% CI, 0.62-1.38]). Among alkylator-refractory patients with a TTP 36 months after a prior ASCT or no prior ASCT (melflufen, n = 54; pomalidomide, n = 53), the observed median PFS and OS were longer in the melflufen arm than the pomalidomide arm. The safety profile of melflufen was consistent with previous reports. These results suggest that melflufen is safe and effective in patients with alkylator-refractory disease, suggesting differentiated activity from other alkylators.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
Overall, the safety profile of melflufen plus dexamethasone in the alkylator-refractory group was consistent between treatment arms (Table 2). In the melflufen and pomalidomide arms, respectively, the frequency of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs; 99% vs. 97%), Grade 3 or 4 TEAEs (85% vs. 82%), serious TEAEs (49% vs. 53%), and fatal TEAEs (19% vs. 16%) were similar (Table 2). However, melflufen compared with pomalidomide saw more dose modifications (76% vs. 67%) and dose reductions (47% vs. 14%), comparable dose delays (57% vs. 51%) but less treatment discontinuation (27% vs. 34%). When comparing patients refractory and not refractory to prior alkylators, rates of TEAEs were generally comparable except for slightly lower rates of serious and fatal TEAEs observed in patients not refractory to alkylators. Among Grade 3 or 4 TEAEs of special interest, melflufen saw more thrombocytopenia (73% vs. 14%), neutropenia (65% vs. 55%), and leukopenia or white blood cell decrease (14% vs. 3%), but less infection (15% vs. 26%), than pomalidomide. Notably, melflufen compared with pomalidomide saw a longer median time to dose reduction (106 days [range, 28-443] vs. 47 days [range, 28-225]), Grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia (52 days [range, 15-451] vs. 19 days [range, 8-91]), and Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia (36 days [range, 8-561] vs. 22 days [range, 8-470]).

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 393 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [5]
Indication Relapsed/Refractory multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Treatment-emergent adverse event
74.07%
Patients Enrolled
153 patients refractory to prior alkylators (melflufen, n=78; pomalidomide, n=75).
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (melflufen), a first-in-class alkylating peptide-drug conjugate, plus dexamethasone demonstrated superior progression-free survival (PFS), but not overall survival (OS), versus pomalidomide plus dexamethasone in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma in the OCEAN study. Time to progression (TTP) <36 months after a prior autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) was a negative prognostic factor for OS with melflufen. This post hoc exploratory analysis evaluated patients refractory to prior alkylators (e.g., cyclophosphamide and melphalan) in OCEAN. In 153 patients refractory to prior alkylators (melflufen, n = 78; pomalidomide, n = 75), the melflufen and pomalidomide arms had similar median PFS (5.6 months [95% CI, 4.2-8.3] vs. 4.7 months [95% CI, 3.1-7.3]; hazard ratio [HR], 0.92 [95% CI, 0.63-1.33]) and OS (23.4 months [95% CI, 14.4-31.7] vs. 20.0 months [95% CI, 12.0-28.7]; HR, 0.92 [95% CI, 0.62-1.38]). Among alkylator-refractory patients with a TTP 36 months after a prior ASCT or no prior ASCT (melflufen, n = 54; pomalidomide, n = 53), the observed median PFS and OS were longer in the melflufen arm than the pomalidomide arm. The safety profile of melflufen was consistent with previous reports. These results suggest that melflufen is safe and effective in patients with alkylator-refractory disease, suggesting differentiated activity from other alkylators.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
Overall, the safety profile of melflufen plus dexamethasone in the alkylator-refractory group was consistent between treatment arms (Table 2). In the melflufen and pomalidomide arms, respectively, the frequency of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs; 99% vs. 97%), Grade 3 or 4 TEAEs (85% vs. 82%), serious TEAEs (49% vs. 53%), and fatal TEAEs (19% vs. 16%) were similar (Table 2). However, melflufen compared with pomalidomide saw more dose modifications (76% vs. 67%) and dose reductions (47% vs. 14%), comparable dose delays (57% vs. 51%) but less treatment discontinuation (27% vs. 34%). When comparing patients refractory and not refractory to prior alkylators, rates of TEAEs were generally comparable except for slightly lower rates of serious and fatal TEAEs observed in patients not refractory to alkylators. Among Grade 3 or 4 TEAEs of special interest, melflufen saw more thrombocytopenia (73% vs. 14%), neutropenia (65% vs. 55%), and leukopenia or white blood cell decrease (14% vs. 3%), but less infection (15% vs. 26%), than pomalidomide. Notably, melflufen compared with pomalidomide saw a longer median time to dose reduction (106 days [range, 28-443] vs. 47 days [range, 28-225]), Grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia (52 days [range, 15-451] vs. 19 days [range, 8-91]), and Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia (36 days [range, 8-561] vs. 22 days [range, 8-470]).

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 394 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [5]
Indication Relapsed/Refractory multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Treatment-emergent adverse event
74.12%
Patients Enrolled
153 patients refractory to prior alkylators (melflufen, n=78; pomalidomide, n=75).
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (melflufen), a first-in-class alkylating peptide-drug conjugate, plus dexamethasone demonstrated superior progression-free survival (PFS), but not overall survival (OS), versus pomalidomide plus dexamethasone in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma in the OCEAN study. Time to progression (TTP) <36 months after a prior autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) was a negative prognostic factor for OS with melflufen. This post hoc exploratory analysis evaluated patients refractory to prior alkylators (e.g., cyclophosphamide and melphalan) in OCEAN. In 153 patients refractory to prior alkylators (melflufen, n = 78; pomalidomide, n = 75), the melflufen and pomalidomide arms had similar median PFS (5.6 months [95% CI, 4.2-8.3] vs. 4.7 months [95% CI, 3.1-7.3]; hazard ratio [HR], 0.92 [95% CI, 0.63-1.33]) and OS (23.4 months [95% CI, 14.4-31.7] vs. 20.0 months [95% CI, 12.0-28.7]; HR, 0.92 [95% CI, 0.62-1.38]). Among alkylator-refractory patients with a TTP 36 months after a prior ASCT or no prior ASCT (melflufen, n = 54; pomalidomide, n = 53), the observed median PFS and OS were longer in the melflufen arm than the pomalidomide arm. The safety profile of melflufen was consistent with previous reports. These results suggest that melflufen is safe and effective in patients with alkylator-refractory disease, suggesting differentiated activity from other alkylators.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
Overall, the safety profile of melflufen plus dexamethasone in the alkylator-refractory group was consistent between treatment arms (Table 2). In the melflufen and pomalidomide arms, respectively, the frequency of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs; 99% vs. 97%), Grade 3 or 4 TEAEs (85% vs. 82%), serious TEAEs (49% vs. 53%), and fatal TEAEs (19% vs. 16%) were similar (Table 2). However, melflufen compared with pomalidomide saw more dose modifications (76% vs. 67%) and dose reductions (47% vs. 14%), comparable dose delays (57% vs. 51%) but less treatment discontinuation (27% vs. 34%). When comparing patients refractory and not refractory to prior alkylators, rates of TEAEs were generally comparable except for slightly lower rates of serious and fatal TEAEs observed in patients not refractory to alkylators. Among Grade 3 or 4 TEAEs of special interest, melflufen saw more thrombocytopenia (73% vs. 14%), neutropenia (65% vs. 55%), and leukopenia or white blood cell decrease (14% vs. 3%), but less infection (15% vs. 26%), than pomalidomide. Notably, melflufen compared with pomalidomide saw a longer median time to dose reduction (106 days [range, 28-443] vs. 47 days [range, 28-225]), Grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia (52 days [range, 15-451] vs. 19 days [range, 8-91]), and Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia (36 days [range, 8-561] vs. 22 days [range, 8-470]).

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 395 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [5]
Indication Relapsed/Refractory multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Treatment-emergent adverse event
74.47%
Patients Enrolled
153 patients refractory to prior alkylators (melflufen, n=78; pomalidomide, n=75).
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (melflufen), a first-in-class alkylating peptide-drug conjugate, plus dexamethasone demonstrated superior progression-free survival (PFS), but not overall survival (OS), versus pomalidomide plus dexamethasone in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma in the OCEAN study. Time to progression (TTP) <36 months after a prior autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) was a negative prognostic factor for OS with melflufen. This post hoc exploratory analysis evaluated patients refractory to prior alkylators (e.g., cyclophosphamide and melphalan) in OCEAN. In 153 patients refractory to prior alkylators (melflufen, n = 78; pomalidomide, n = 75), the melflufen and pomalidomide arms had similar median PFS (5.6 months [95% CI, 4.2-8.3] vs. 4.7 months [95% CI, 3.1-7.3]; hazard ratio [HR], 0.92 [95% CI, 0.63-1.33]) and OS (23.4 months [95% CI, 14.4-31.7] vs. 20.0 months [95% CI, 12.0-28.7]; HR, 0.92 [95% CI, 0.62-1.38]). Among alkylator-refractory patients with a TTP 36 months after a prior ASCT or no prior ASCT (melflufen, n = 54; pomalidomide, n = 53), the observed median PFS and OS were longer in the melflufen arm than the pomalidomide arm. The safety profile of melflufen was consistent with previous reports. These results suggest that melflufen is safe and effective in patients with alkylator-refractory disease, suggesting differentiated activity from other alkylators.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
Overall, the safety profile of melflufen plus dexamethasone in the alkylator-refractory group was consistent between treatment arms (Table 2). In the melflufen and pomalidomide arms, respectively, the frequency of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs; 99% vs. 97%), Grade 3 or 4 TEAEs (85% vs. 82%), serious TEAEs (49% vs. 53%), and fatal TEAEs (19% vs. 16%) were similar (Table 2). However, melflufen compared with pomalidomide saw more dose modifications (76% vs. 67%) and dose reductions (47% vs. 14%), comparable dose delays (57% vs. 51%) but less treatment discontinuation (27% vs. 34%). When comparing patients refractory and not refractory to prior alkylators, rates of TEAEs were generally comparable except for slightly lower rates of serious and fatal TEAEs observed in patients not refractory to alkylators. Among Grade 3 or 4 TEAEs of special interest, melflufen saw more thrombocytopenia (73% vs. 14%), neutropenia (65% vs. 55%), and leukopenia or white blood cell decrease (14% vs. 3%), but less infection (15% vs. 26%), than pomalidomide. Notably, melflufen compared with pomalidomide saw a longer median time to dose reduction (106 days [range, 28-443] vs. 47 days [range, 28-225]), Grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia (52 days [range, 15-451] vs. 19 days [range, 8-91]), and Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia (36 days [range, 8-561] vs. 22 days [range, 8-470]).

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 396 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [1]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Treatment-emergent adverse event
82.00%
Patients Enrolled
Patients with multi-refractory multiple myeloma.
Administration Time 6.2 month (median)
Administration Dosage 30 or 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melflufen is highly lipophilic, which promotes its rapid uptake by cells. Once within the cell, melflufen releases its hydrophilic alkylator payloads via the hydrolytic activity of intracellular peptidases (e.g., aminopeptidases). Aminopeptidases are Zn2+-dependent metalloproteinases that remove amino acids at the N-terminal position from oligopeptides and have been associated with multiple tumorigenic processes such as proliferation, apoptosis, differentiation, angiogenesis, and motility. The dependence of melflufen on aminopeptidases was initially demonstrated by the reduced cytotoxic activity of melflufen-but not the alkylator melphalan-when cells were pretreated with bestatin, an antibiotic that is a potent aminopeptidase inhibitor. In addition, structure analogs designed to resist peptide hydrolysis (N-methyl derivative and derivative with D-amino acid) were shown to be almost 100-fold less potent than melflufen. Subsequent in vitro studies demonstrated that hydrolytic cleavage of melflufen by aminopeptidases releases alkylator payloads, including melphalan. In vitro, the activity of melflufen is multi-pronged, including induction of DNA damage, induction of apoptosis, inhibition of VEGF-dependent cell migration, and inhibition of tumor-associated angiogenesis, which have been further reviewed elsewhere. Downregulation of aminopeptidases resulted in reduced melflufen-mediated cytotoxic activity and apoptotic signaling in cultured cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 397 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [9]
Indication Relapsed/Refractory multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Treatment-emergent adverse event
88%
Patients Enrolled
145 patients who has relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma with no previous ASCT or TTP >36 month Post-ASCTa.
MOA of PDC
In summary, the interpretation of the results from the OCEAN study were impacted by the heterogeneity of the population, with age and previous success of ASCT therapy identified as prognostic factors with study therapies. The safety profile of melflufen and dexamethasone is primarily characterized by hematologic AEs that are clinically manageable. Observed infection rates, which included COVID-19, were generally low. Taken together, these data support the use of melflufen and dexamethasone in patients who have not received a previous ASCT or who underwent a successful ASCT (ie, TTP >36 months post-ASCT). In addition, the favorable efficacy profile and convenience of monthly outpatient infusions, especially for patients without access to other therapeutics such as CAR T-cell therapy or bispecific antibodies, bode well for this combination translating successfully into real-world practice.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
Given the prognostic importance of TTP <36 months post-ASCT in OCEAN, we evaluated this prognostic factor in a post hoc analysis from the HORIZON study. Among 110 patients with triple-class refractory disease who had received ≥3 prior lines of therapy, 77 (70%) had received a previous ASCT and 58 (53%) had TTP <36 months post-ASCT (Suppl. Table S3). In patients with a TTP >36 months post-ASCT or no ASCT versus patients with a TTP <36 months post-ASCT, ORR was higher (29% vs 22%; Suppl. Table S4) and median DOR (7.6 months vs 3.9 months) and median PFS (4.2 months vs 3.4 months) were longer. Since pomalidomide and lenalidomide both belong to the immunomodulatory drugs, we analyzed if the duration of previous treatment with lenalidomide could have impacted the results. The median duration of lenalidomide was 14.4 months in patients with ASCT and TTP < 36 months, 38.3 months in patients with ASCT and TTP > 36 months, and 14.6 months in patients with no previous ASCT. However, the median PFS for patients treated with pomalidomide did not differ substantially between these groups of patients. The safety profile of melflufen and dexamethasone was generally consistent between patients with a TTP >36 months post-ASCT or no ASCT and patients with a TTP <36 months post-ASCT. In OCEAN among the melflufen group, the frequency of grade 3/4 TEAEs (88% and 92%), serious TEAEs (44% and 38%), and fatal adverse events (AEs; 11% and 13%) was similar in patients with a TTP >36 months post-ASCT or no ASCT and patients with TTP <36 months. However, patients with a TTP >36 months post-ASCT or no ASCT had lower rates of TEAEs leading to treatment discontinuation (23% and 31%), the longer median duration of study treatment (35.1 weeks vs 15.1 weeks), and longer median time to experiencing grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia (11.2 weeks vs 4.1 weeks) and grade 3/4 neutropenia (4.8 weeks vs 2.1 weeks) than patients with a TTP <36 months post-ASCT. In HORIZON, patients with a TTP >36 months post-ASCT or no ASCT had lower rates of grade 3/4 TEAEs (88% and 98%), but higher rates of serious TEAEs (64% and 53%) and similar rates of TEAEs leading to treatment discontinuation (29% and 33%) than patients with a TTP <36 months post-ASCT.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 398 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [9]
Indication Relapsed/Refractory multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Treatment-emergent adverse event
92%
Patients Enrolled
101 relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma patients with TTP <36 month Post-ASCTb.
MOA of PDC
In summary, the interpretation of the results from the OCEAN study were impacted by the heterogeneity of the population, with age and previous success of ASCT therapy identified as prognostic factors with study therapies. The safety profile of melflufen and dexamethasone is primarily characterized by hematologic AEs that are clinically manageable. Observed infection rates, which included COVID-19, were generally low. Taken together, these data support the use of melflufen and dexamethasone in patients who have not received a previous ASCT or who underwent a successful ASCT (ie, TTP >36 months post-ASCT). In addition, the favorable efficacy profile and convenience of monthly outpatient infusions, especially for patients without access to other therapeutics such as CAR T-cell therapy or bispecific antibodies, bode well for this combination translating successfully into real-world practice.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
Given the prognostic importance of TTP <36 months post-ASCT in OCEAN, we evaluated this prognostic factor in a post hoc analysis from the HORIZON study. Among 110 patients with triple-class refractory disease who had received ≥3 prior lines of therapy, 77 (70%) had received a previous ASCT and 58 (53%) had TTP <36 months post-ASCT (Suppl. Table S3). In patients with a TTP >36 months post-ASCT or no ASCT versus patients with a TTP <36 months post-ASCT, ORR was higher (29% vs 22%; Suppl. Table S4) and median DOR (7.6 months vs 3.9 months) and median PFS (4.2 months vs 3.4 months) were longer. Since pomalidomide and lenalidomide both belong to the immunomodulatory drugs, we analyzed if the duration of previous treatment with lenalidomide could have impacted the results. The median duration of lenalidomide was 14.4 months in patients with ASCT and TTP < 36 months, 38.3 months in patients with ASCT and TTP > 36 months, and 14.6 months in patients with no previous ASCT. However, the median PFS for patients treated with pomalidomide did not differ substantially between these groups of patients. The safety profile of melflufen and dexamethasone was generally consistent between patients with a TTP >36 months post-ASCT or no ASCT and patients with a TTP <36 months post-ASCT. In OCEAN among the melflufen group, the frequency of grade 3/4 TEAEs (88% and 92%), serious TEAEs (44% and 38%), and fatal adverse events (AEs; 11% and 13%) was similar in patients with a TTP >36 months post-ASCT or no ASCT and patients with TTP <36 months. However, patients with a TTP >36 months post-ASCT or no ASCT had lower rates of TEAEs leading to treatment discontinuation (23% and 31%), the longer median duration of study treatment (35.1 weeks vs 15.1 weeks), and longer median time to experiencing grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia (11.2 weeks vs 4.1 weeks) and grade 3/4 neutropenia (4.8 weeks vs 2.1 weeks) than patients with a TTP <36 months post-ASCT. In HORIZON, patients with a TTP >36 months post-ASCT or no ASCT had lower rates of grade 3/4 TEAEs (88% and 98%), but higher rates of serious TEAEs (64% and 53%) and similar rates of TEAEs leading to treatment discontinuation (29% and 33%) than patients with a TTP <36 months post-ASCT.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 399 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [9]
Indication Relapsed/Refractory multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Treatment-emergent adverse event
99%
Patients Enrolled
145 patients who has relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma with no previous ASCT or TTP >36 month Post-ASCTa.
MOA of PDC
In summary, the interpretation of the results from the OCEAN study were impacted by the heterogeneity of the population, with age and previous success of ASCT therapy identified as prognostic factors with study therapies. The safety profile of melflufen and dexamethasone is primarily characterized by hematologic AEs that are clinically manageable. Observed infection rates, which included COVID-19, were generally low. Taken together, these data support the use of melflufen and dexamethasone in patients who have not received a previous ASCT or who underwent a successful ASCT (ie, TTP >36 months post-ASCT). In addition, the favorable efficacy profile and convenience of monthly outpatient infusions, especially for patients without access to other therapeutics such as CAR T-cell therapy or bispecific antibodies, bode well for this combination translating successfully into real-world practice.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
Given the prognostic importance of TTP <36 months post-ASCT in OCEAN, we evaluated this prognostic factor in a post hoc analysis from the HORIZON study. Among 110 patients with triple-class refractory disease who had received ≥3 prior lines of therapy, 77 (70%) had received a previous ASCT and 58 (53%) had TTP <36 months post-ASCT (Suppl. Table S3). In patients with a TTP >36 months post-ASCT or no ASCT versus patients with a TTP <36 months post-ASCT, ORR was higher (29% vs 22%; Suppl. Table S4) and median DOR (7.6 months vs 3.9 months) and median PFS (4.2 months vs 3.4 months) were longer. Since pomalidomide and lenalidomide both belong to the immunomodulatory drugs, we analyzed if the duration of previous treatment with lenalidomide could have impacted the results. The median duration of lenalidomide was 14.4 months in patients with ASCT and TTP < 36 months, 38.3 months in patients with ASCT and TTP > 36 months, and 14.6 months in patients with no previous ASCT. However, the median PFS for patients treated with pomalidomide did not differ substantially between these groups of patients. The safety profile of melflufen and dexamethasone was generally consistent between patients with a TTP >36 months post-ASCT or no ASCT and patients with a TTP <36 months post-ASCT. In OCEAN among the melflufen group, the frequency of grade 3/4 TEAEs (88% and 92%), serious TEAEs (44% and 38%), and fatal adverse events (AEs; 11% and 13%) was similar in patients with a TTP >36 months post-ASCT or no ASCT and patients with TTP <36 months. However, patients with a TTP >36 months post-ASCT or no ASCT had lower rates of TEAEs leading to treatment discontinuation (23% and 31%), the longer median duration of study treatment (35.1 weeks vs 15.1 weeks), and longer median time to experiencing grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia (11.2 weeks vs 4.1 weeks) and grade 3/4 neutropenia (4.8 weeks vs 2.1 weeks) than patients with a TTP <36 months post-ASCT. In HORIZON, patients with a TTP >36 months post-ASCT or no ASCT had lower rates of grade 3/4 TEAEs (88% and 98%), but higher rates of serious TEAEs (64% and 53%) and similar rates of TEAEs leading to treatment discontinuation (29% and 33%) than patients with a TTP <36 months post-ASCT.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 400 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [9]
Indication Relapsed/Refractory multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Treatment-emergent adverse event
99%
Patients Enrolled
101 relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma patients with TTP <36 month Post-ASCTb.
MOA of PDC
In summary, the interpretation of the results from the OCEAN study were impacted by the heterogeneity of the population, with age and previous success of ASCT therapy identified as prognostic factors with study therapies. The safety profile of melflufen and dexamethasone is primarily characterized by hematologic AEs that are clinically manageable. Observed infection rates, which included COVID-19, were generally low. Taken together, these data support the use of melflufen and dexamethasone in patients who have not received a previous ASCT or who underwent a successful ASCT (ie, TTP >36 months post-ASCT). In addition, the favorable efficacy profile and convenience of monthly outpatient infusions, especially for patients without access to other therapeutics such as CAR T-cell therapy or bispecific antibodies, bode well for this combination translating successfully into real-world practice.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
Given the prognostic importance of TTP <36 months post-ASCT in OCEAN, we evaluated this prognostic factor in a post hoc analysis from the HORIZON study. Among 110 patients with triple-class refractory disease who had received ≥3 prior lines of therapy, 77 (70%) had received a previous ASCT and 58 (53%) had TTP <36 months post-ASCT (Suppl. Table S3). In patients with a TTP >36 months post-ASCT or no ASCT versus patients with a TTP <36 months post-ASCT, ORR was higher (29% vs 22%; Suppl. Table S4) and median DOR (7.6 months vs 3.9 months) and median PFS (4.2 months vs 3.4 months) were longer. Since pomalidomide and lenalidomide both belong to the immunomodulatory drugs, we analyzed if the duration of previous treatment with lenalidomide could have impacted the results. The median duration of lenalidomide was 14.4 months in patients with ASCT and TTP < 36 months, 38.3 months in patients with ASCT and TTP > 36 months, and 14.6 months in patients with no previous ASCT. However, the median PFS for patients treated with pomalidomide did not differ substantially between these groups of patients. The safety profile of melflufen and dexamethasone was generally consistent between patients with a TTP >36 months post-ASCT or no ASCT and patients with a TTP <36 months post-ASCT. In OCEAN among the melflufen group, the frequency of grade 3/4 TEAEs (88% and 92%), serious TEAEs (44% and 38%), and fatal adverse events (AEs; 11% and 13%) was similar in patients with a TTP >36 months post-ASCT or no ASCT and patients with TTP <36 months. However, patients with a TTP >36 months post-ASCT or no ASCT had lower rates of TEAEs leading to treatment discontinuation (23% and 31%), the longer median duration of study treatment (35.1 weeks vs 15.1 weeks), and longer median time to experiencing grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia (11.2 weeks vs 4.1 weeks) and grade 3/4 neutropenia (4.8 weeks vs 2.1 weeks) than patients with a TTP <36 months post-ASCT. In HORIZON, patients with a TTP >36 months post-ASCT or no ASCT had lower rates of grade 3/4 TEAEs (88% and 98%), but higher rates of serious TEAEs (64% and 53%) and similar rates of TEAEs leading to treatment discontinuation (29% and 33%) than patients with a TTP <36 months post-ASCT.

   Click to Show/Hide
Experiment 401 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [2]
Indication Relapsed/Refractory multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Treatment-emergent adverse event rate
82%
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (melflufen), a first-in-class alkylating peptide-drug conjugate, plus dexamethasone was approved in Europe for use in patients with triple-class refractory relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) with 3 prior lines of therapy and without prior autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) or with a time to progression >36 months after prior ASCT. The randomized LIGHTHOUSE study (NCT04649060) assessed melflufen plus daratumumab and dexamethasone (melflufen group) versus daratumumab in patients with RRMM with disease refractory to an immunomodulatory agent and a proteasome inhibitor or who had received 3 prior lines of therapy including an immunomodulatory agent and a proteasome inhibitor. A partial clinical hold issued by the US Food and Drug Administration for all melflufen studies led to financial constraints and premature study closure on February 23rd 2022 (data cut-off date). In total, 54 of 240 planned patients were randomized (melflufen group, N=27; daratumumab group, N=27). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was not reached in the melflufen group versus 4.9 months in the daratumumab group (Hazard Ratio: 0.18 [95% Confidence Interval, 0.05-0.65]; P=0.0032) at a median follow-up time of 7.1 and 6.6 months, respectively. Overall response rate (ORR) was 59% in the melflufen group versus 30% in the daratumumab group (P=0.0300). The most common grade 3 treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen group versus daratumumab group were neutropenia (50% vs. 12%), thrombocytopenia (50% vs. 8%), and anemia (32% vs. 19%). Melflufen plus daratumumab and dexamethasone demonstrated superior PFS and ORR versus daratumumab in RRMM and a safety profile comparable to previously published melflufen studies.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
The safety population included patients who received ≥1 dose of melflufen, daratumumab, or dexamethasone (melflufen group) and 26 patients who received daratumumab monotherapy. In the safety population, ≥1 TEAE was reported in 21 patients (96%) with melflufen, daratumumab, and dexamethasone and 22 patients (85%) with daratumumab. Overall, grade ≥3 TEAE occurred in 18 patients (82%) with melflufen, daratumumab, and dexamethasone and 14 patients (54%) with daratumumab. The most common hematologic grade ≥3 TEAE were neutropenia (melflufen group, 11 patients [50%]; daratumumab group, 3 patients [12%]), thrombocytopenia (melflufen group, 11 patients [50%]; daratumumab group, 2 patients [8%]), and anemia (melflufen group, 7 patients [32%]; daratumumab group, 5 patients [19%]). The most common non-hematologic grade ≥3 TEAE were pneumonia (melflufen group, 2 patients [9%]; daratumumab group, 2 patients [8%]) and femur fracture (melflufen group, 0 patients [0%]; daratumumab group, 2 patients [8%]); of these, 1 event (5%) of pneumonia in the melflufen group and 1 event (4%) of femur fracture in the daratumumab group were considered treatment-related TEAE by the investigator. Serious AE occurred in 6 patients (27%) with melflufen, daratumumab, and dexamethasone, and 12 patients (46%) with daratumumab. The most common serious AE (occurring in ≥4 patients overall) were anemia (melflufen group, 2 patients [9%]; daratumumab group, 3 patients [12%]) and pneumonia (melflufen group, 2 patients [9%]; daratumumab group, 2 patients [8%]). TEAE leading to treatment discontinuation occurred in 2 patients (9%) in the melflufen group (neutropenia and thrombocytopenia, N=1 each) and 4 patients (15%) in the daratumumab group (anemia, disease progression, hypercalcemia, and renal failure, N=1 each). Overall, 5 patients died on study before the crossover: 2 patients who received melflufen, daratumumab, and dexamethasone (1 due to disease progression and 1 due to unknown reasons, both >30 days after the last dose of study treatment) and 3 patients who received daratumumab (1 due to disease progression and 1 due to unknown reasons, both ≤30 days after the last dose of study treatment and 1 due to an AE [COVID-19 pneumonia], >30 days after the last dose of study treatment). In addition, one patient who crossed over to receive melflufen, daratumumab, and dexamethasone after progression on daratumumab died.

   Click to Show/Hide
In Vivo Model 22 relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.
Related Clinical Trial
NCT Number NCT04649060 Clinical Status Phase 3
Clinical Description This was a randomized, controlled, open-label, Phase 3 multicenter study which enrolled patients with Relapsed-Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM) who were either double refractory to an Immunomodulatory Drug (IMiD) and a Proteasome Inhibitor (PI) (regardless of the number of prior lines of therapy), or had received at least 3 prior lines of therapy including an IMiD and a PI. Patients received treatment with melflufen+dexamethasone+daratumumab or daratumumab until documented progressive disease, unacceptable toxicity, or patient/treating physician decision. Patients in the daratumumab treatment arm had the option to receive treatment with melflufen+dexamethasone+daratumumab after confirmed progressive disease.
Experiment 402 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [3]
Indication Relapsed/Refractory multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Treatment-emergent adverse event rate
85.70%
Patients Enrolled
14 patients with relapsed refractory multiple myeloma.
Administration Time 28-day cycle
Administration Dosage 40 mg
MOA of PDC
Melphalan flufenamide (melflufen) is a first-in-class peptide-drug conjugate that utilizes increased peptidase expression to selectively release potent alkylating agents inside tumor cells. Melflufen is hydrolyzed by peptidases and esterases to melphalan either directly or through an intermediate metabolite, desethyl-melflufen. The high lipophilicity of melflufen facilitates passive diffusion across cell membranes. The activity and tolerability of melflufen in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) were demonstrated in the O-12-M1 (NCT01897714), OCEAN (NCT03151811), and HORIZON (NCT02963493) trials.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
Overall, at least one TEAE was reported in 13 (92.9%) and 13 (100.0%) patients in Arms A and B, respectively (Table 3). During cycle 1, 9 patients (64.3%) and 12 patients (92.3%), respectively, had at least one TEAE. Cumulatively, grade 3 or 4 AEs occurred in 12 (85.7%) and 12 (92.3%) patients, respectively, and serious AEs were reported in 5 (35.7%) and 9 (69.2%) patients, respectively. The most common any-grade AEs in Arms A and B, respectively, were thrombocytopenia (10 [71.4%]; 10 [76.9%]), neutropenia (9 [64.3%]; 9 [69.2%]), and anemia (9 [64.3%]; 7 [53.8%]). No phlebitis or local-infusion-related reactions were reported based on pre- and post-infusion inspection of the IV site, and there were no extravasations observed in Arm A or B. Similarly, VIP scores collected on Day 1 post-infusion and on Day 8 indicated that patients had healthy IV sites (VIP score of 0) with no signs of phlebitis following PVC administration of melflufen. The most common non-hematological AE was positive SARS-CoV-2 test (Arm A: 2 [14.3%]; Arm B: 4 [30.8%]). Pneumonia was the most common serious AE (Arm A: 2 [14.3%]; Arm B: 2 [15.4%]). The most common AE considered related to melflufen and/or dexamethasone by investigators was thrombocytopenia (Arm A: 10 [71.4%]; Arm B: 10 [76.9%]). AEs led to treatment discontinuation in 3 (21.4%) and 6 (46.2%) patients in Arms A and B, respectively.

   Click to Show/Hide
Half life period 75.6 h
Related Clinical Trial
NCT Number NCT04412707 Clinical Status Phase 2
Clinical Description This is a randomized, two-period, cross-over Phase 2 study, comparing PK, and assessing safety and tolerability and efficacy of peripheral and central intravenous administration of melflufen in patients with RRMM. It is an international study, enrolling patients in US and Europe. The study will enroll patients following at least 2 lines of prior therapy.
Revealed Based on the Cell Line Data
Click To Hide/Show 59 Activity Data Related to This Level
Experiment 1 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [11]
Indication Breast cancer
Efficacy Data Cell viability
20%
Administration Time 48 h
Administration Dosage 100 μM
MOA of PDC
Melphalan is a wellknown cancer drug used for decades for the treatment of various cancer types, and it is still widely used for hematological cancers today. It is an alkylating agent that works by adding an alkyl group to the guanine base of the DNA, resulting in an aberrant linkage between DNA strands, DNA breakage, and inhibition of DNA synthesis. Melphalan is a hydrophilic drug, and as such, it does not penetrate cell membranes easily, which is limiting to its anticancer potential. In contrast, melflufen (melphalan flufenamide), a new peptideconjugated alkylator, is highly lipophilic and therefore penetrates the cell membrane easily. Inside the cell, melflufen is rapidly hydrolyzed into less lipophilic metabolites that retain high alkylating potential, leading to their entrapment and accumulation. Aminopeptidases belong to a large family of enzymes that catalyze the cleavage of amino acids from the amino terminus of proteins or peptides and are shown to facilitate intracellular hydrolysis of melflufen. Aminopeptidases are involved in multiple cellular processes, and their expression and activity are frequently deregulated in cancer cells. For this reason, aminopeptidase inhibitors bestatin and tosedostat have been investigated in the clinical settings. Exploiting aminopeptidase activity to convert a lipophilic drug such as melflufen to an intracellular hydrophilic metabolite with high alkylating potential may offer an effective alternative therapeutic approach. Previously it has been shown that aminopeptidase N (ANPEP or CD13) can hydrolyze melflufen, but it is largely unknown whether melflufen can be a substrate for other aminopeptidases. Application of melflufen has mainly been focused on multiple myeloma, where it has shown promising results in phase 3 clinical trial in relapse and refractory patient population. 13 Yet it is unexplored whether melflufen can be effective in other cancer types such as breast cancer. Here, we demonstrate the efficacy of melflufen in D492HER2 breast epithelial cells overexpressing the HER2 oncogene and the triplenegative cell line MDAMB231.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
D492HER2 cells showed increased sensitivity to melphalan compared to the progenitor cell line D492. However, concentration as high as 100 μmol/L was insufficient to kill the whole cell population. In both cell lines, around 40% of D492 cells and at least 20% of D492HER2 cells were still viable after incubation with 100 μmol/L melphalan. On the contrary, melflufen decreased viability of both D492 and D492HER2 cells at much lower doses.

   Click to Show/Hide
In Vitro Model Normal D492 cell CVCL_D1HJ
Experiment 2 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [11]
Indication Breast cancer
Efficacy Data Cell viability
20%
Administration Time 48 h
Administration Dosage 10 μM
MOA of PDC
Melphalan is a wellknown cancer drug used for decades for the treatment of various cancer types, and it is still widely used for hematological cancers today. It is an alkylating agent that works by adding an alkyl group to the guanine base of the DNA, resulting in an aberrant linkage between DNA strands, DNA breakage, and inhibition of DNA synthesis. Melphalan is a hydrophilic drug, and as such, it does not penetrate cell membranes easily, which is limiting to its anticancer potential. In contrast, melflufen (melphalan flufenamide), a new peptideconjugated alkylator, is highly lipophilic and therefore penetrates the cell membrane easily. Inside the cell, melflufen is rapidly hydrolyzed into less lipophilic metabolites that retain high alkylating potential, leading to their entrapment and accumulation. Aminopeptidases belong to a large family of enzymes that catalyze the cleavage of amino acids from the amino terminus of proteins or peptides and are shown to facilitate intracellular hydrolysis of melflufen. Aminopeptidases are involved in multiple cellular processes, and their expression and activity are frequently deregulated in cancer cells. For this reason, aminopeptidase inhibitors bestatin and tosedostat have been investigated in the clinical settings. Exploiting aminopeptidase activity to convert a lipophilic drug such as melflufen to an intracellular hydrophilic metabolite with high alkylating potential may offer an effective alternative therapeutic approach. Previously it has been shown that aminopeptidase N (ANPEP or CD13) can hydrolyze melflufen, but it is largely unknown whether melflufen can be a substrate for other aminopeptidases. Application of melflufen has mainly been focused on multiple myeloma, where it has shown promising results in phase 3 clinical trial in relapse and refractory patient population. 13 Yet it is unexplored whether melflufen can be effective in other cancer types such as breast cancer. Here, we demonstrate the efficacy of melflufen in D492HER2 breast epithelial cells overexpressing the HER2 oncogene and the triplenegative cell line MDAMB231.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
While these cells tolerated higher drug concentrations for both drugs compared to our D492 cell lines, melflufen was significantly more efficient than doxorubicin in killing the MDAMB231 cells (Figure 3C).
In Vitro Model Breast adenocarcinoma MDA-MB-231 cell CVCL_0062
Experiment 3 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [11]
Indication Breast cancer
Efficacy Data Cell viability
22%
Administration Time 48 h
Administration Dosage 2.0 μM; with bestatin (10 μmol/L)
MOA of PDC
Melphalan is a wellknown cancer drug used for decades for the treatment of various cancer types, and it is still widely used for hematological cancers today. It is an alkylating agent that works by adding an alkyl group to the guanine base of the DNA, resulting in an aberrant linkage between DNA strands, DNA breakage, and inhibition of DNA synthesis. Melphalan is a hydrophilic drug, and as such, it does not penetrate cell membranes easily, which is limiting to its anticancer potential. In contrast, melflufen (melphalan flufenamide), a new peptideconjugated alkylator, is highly lipophilic and therefore penetrates the cell membrane easily. Inside the cell, melflufen is rapidly hydrolyzed into less lipophilic metabolites that retain high alkylating potential, leading to their entrapment and accumulation. Aminopeptidases belong to a large family of enzymes that catalyze the cleavage of amino acids from the amino terminus of proteins or peptides and are shown to facilitate intracellular hydrolysis of melflufen. Aminopeptidases are involved in multiple cellular processes, and their expression and activity are frequently deregulated in cancer cells. For this reason, aminopeptidase inhibitors bestatin and tosedostat have been investigated in the clinical settings. Exploiting aminopeptidase activity to convert a lipophilic drug such as melflufen to an intracellular hydrophilic metabolite with high alkylating potential may offer an effective alternative therapeutic approach. Previously it has been shown that aminopeptidase N (ANPEP or CD13) can hydrolyze melflufen, but it is largely unknown whether melflufen can be a substrate for other aminopeptidases. Application of melflufen has mainly been focused on multiple myeloma, where it has shown promising results in phase 3 clinical trial in relapse and refractory patient population. 13 Yet it is unexplored whether melflufen can be effective in other cancer types such as breast cancer. Here, we demonstrate the efficacy of melflufen in D492HER2 breast epithelial cells overexpressing the HER2 oncogene and the triplenegative cell line MDAMB231.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
Aminopeptidases are thought to be responsible for the cleavage of melflufen, and indeed, in our model, the aminopeptidase inhibitor bestatin attenuated the activity of melflufen in D492HER2 cells. Interestingly, in D492 cells, preincubation with bestatin showed no effect on melflufen activity.
In Vitro Model Normal D492 cell CVCL_D1HJ
Experiment 4 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [11]
Indication Breast cancer
Efficacy Data Cell viability
25%
Administration Time 48 h
Administration Dosage 10 μM
MOA of PDC
Melphalan is a wellknown cancer drug used for decades for the treatment of various cancer types, and it is still widely used for hematological cancers today. It is an alkylating agent that works by adding an alkyl group to the guanine base of the DNA, resulting in an aberrant linkage between DNA strands, DNA breakage, and inhibition of DNA synthesis. Melphalan is a hydrophilic drug, and as such, it does not penetrate cell membranes easily, which is limiting to its anticancer potential. In contrast, melflufen (melphalan flufenamide), a new peptideconjugated alkylator, is highly lipophilic and therefore penetrates the cell membrane easily. Inside the cell, melflufen is rapidly hydrolyzed into less lipophilic metabolites that retain high alkylating potential, leading to their entrapment and accumulation. Aminopeptidases belong to a large family of enzymes that catalyze the cleavage of amino acids from the amino terminus of proteins or peptides and are shown to facilitate intracellular hydrolysis of melflufen. Aminopeptidases are involved in multiple cellular processes, and their expression and activity are frequently deregulated in cancer cells. For this reason, aminopeptidase inhibitors bestatin and tosedostat have been investigated in the clinical settings. Exploiting aminopeptidase activity to convert a lipophilic drug such as melflufen to an intracellular hydrophilic metabolite with high alkylating potential may offer an effective alternative therapeutic approach. Previously it has been shown that aminopeptidase N (ANPEP or CD13) can hydrolyze melflufen, but it is largely unknown whether melflufen can be a substrate for other aminopeptidases. Application of melflufen has mainly been focused on multiple myeloma, where it has shown promising results in phase 3 clinical trial in relapse and refractory patient population. 13 Yet it is unexplored whether melflufen can be effective in other cancer types such as breast cancer. Here, we demonstrate the efficacy of melflufen in D492HER2 breast epithelial cells overexpressing the HER2 oncogene and the triplenegative cell line MDAMB231.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
D492HER2 cells showed increased sensitivity to melphalan compared to the progenitor cell line D492. However, concentration as high as 100 μmol/L was insufficient to kill the whole cell population. In both cell lines, around 40% of D492 cells and at least 20% of D492HER2 cells were still viable after incubation with 100 μmol/L melphalan. On the contrary, melflufen decreased viability of both D492 and D492HER2 cells at much lower doses.

   Click to Show/Hide
In Vitro Model Normal D492 cell CVCL_D1HJ
Experiment 5 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [11]
Indication Breast cancer
Efficacy Data Cell viability
25%
Administration Time 48 h
Administration Dosage 75 μM
MOA of PDC
Melphalan is a wellknown cancer drug used for decades for the treatment of various cancer types, and it is still widely used for hematological cancers today. It is an alkylating agent that works by adding an alkyl group to the guanine base of the DNA, resulting in an aberrant linkage between DNA strands, DNA breakage, and inhibition of DNA synthesis. Melphalan is a hydrophilic drug, and as such, it does not penetrate cell membranes easily, which is limiting to its anticancer potential. In contrast, melflufen (melphalan flufenamide), a new peptideconjugated alkylator, is highly lipophilic and therefore penetrates the cell membrane easily. Inside the cell, melflufen is rapidly hydrolyzed into less lipophilic metabolites that retain high alkylating potential, leading to their entrapment and accumulation. Aminopeptidases belong to a large family of enzymes that catalyze the cleavage of amino acids from the amino terminus of proteins or peptides and are shown to facilitate intracellular hydrolysis of melflufen. Aminopeptidases are involved in multiple cellular processes, and their expression and activity are frequently deregulated in cancer cells. For this reason, aminopeptidase inhibitors bestatin and tosedostat have been investigated in the clinical settings. Exploiting aminopeptidase activity to convert a lipophilic drug such as melflufen to an intracellular hydrophilic metabolite with high alkylating potential may offer an effective alternative therapeutic approach. Previously it has been shown that aminopeptidase N (ANPEP or CD13) can hydrolyze melflufen, but it is largely unknown whether melflufen can be a substrate for other aminopeptidases. Application of melflufen has mainly been focused on multiple myeloma, where it has shown promising results in phase 3 clinical trial in relapse and refractory patient population. 13 Yet it is unexplored whether melflufen can be effective in other cancer types such as breast cancer. Here, we demonstrate the efficacy of melflufen in D492HER2 breast epithelial cells overexpressing the HER2 oncogene and the triplenegative cell line MDAMB231.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
D492HER2 cells showed increased sensitivity to melphalan compared to the progenitor cell line D492. However, concentration as high as 100 μmol/L was insufficient to kill the whole cell population. In both cell lines, around 40% of D492 cells and at least 20% of D492HER2 cells were still viable after incubation with 100 μmol/L melphalan. On the contrary, melflufen decreased viability of both D492 and D492HER2 cells at much lower doses.

   Click to Show/Hide
In Vitro Model Normal D492 cell CVCL_D1HJ
Experiment 6 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [11]
Indication Breast cancer
Efficacy Data Cell viability
25%
Administration Time 48 h
Administration Dosage 2.0 μM
MOA of PDC
Melphalan is a wellknown cancer drug used for decades for the treatment of various cancer types, and it is still widely used for hematological cancers today. It is an alkylating agent that works by adding an alkyl group to the guanine base of the DNA, resulting in an aberrant linkage between DNA strands, DNA breakage, and inhibition of DNA synthesis. Melphalan is a hydrophilic drug, and as such, it does not penetrate cell membranes easily, which is limiting to its anticancer potential. In contrast, melflufen (melphalan flufenamide), a new peptideconjugated alkylator, is highly lipophilic and therefore penetrates the cell membrane easily. Inside the cell, melflufen is rapidly hydrolyzed into less lipophilic metabolites that retain high alkylating potential, leading to their entrapment and accumulation. Aminopeptidases belong to a large family of enzymes that catalyze the cleavage of amino acids from the amino terminus of proteins or peptides and are shown to facilitate intracellular hydrolysis of melflufen. Aminopeptidases are involved in multiple cellular processes, and their expression and activity are frequently deregulated in cancer cells. For this reason, aminopeptidase inhibitors bestatin and tosedostat have been investigated in the clinical settings. Exploiting aminopeptidase activity to convert a lipophilic drug such as melflufen to an intracellular hydrophilic metabolite with high alkylating potential may offer an effective alternative therapeutic approach. Previously it has been shown that aminopeptidase N (ANPEP or CD13) can hydrolyze melflufen, but it is largely unknown whether melflufen can be a substrate for other aminopeptidases. Application of melflufen has mainly been focused on multiple myeloma, where it has shown promising results in phase 3 clinical trial in relapse and refractory patient population. 13 Yet it is unexplored whether melflufen can be effective in other cancer types such as breast cancer. Here, we demonstrate the efficacy of melflufen in D492HER2 breast epithelial cells overexpressing the HER2 oncogene and the triplenegative cell line MDAMB231.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
Aminopeptidases are thought to be responsible for the cleavage of melflufen, and indeed, in our model, the aminopeptidase inhibitor bestatin attenuated the activity of melflufen in D492HER2 cells. Interestingly, in D492 cells, preincubation with bestatin showed no effect on melflufen activity.
In Vitro Model Normal D492 cell CVCL_D1HJ
Experiment 7 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [11]
Indication Breast cancer
Efficacy Data Cell viability
25%
Administration Time 48 h
Administration Dosage 2.0 μM
MOA of PDC
Melphalan is a wellknown cancer drug used for decades for the treatment of various cancer types, and it is still widely used for hematological cancers today. It is an alkylating agent that works by adding an alkyl group to the guanine base of the DNA, resulting in an aberrant linkage between DNA strands, DNA breakage, and inhibition of DNA synthesis. Melphalan is a hydrophilic drug, and as such, it does not penetrate cell membranes easily, which is limiting to its anticancer potential. In contrast, melflufen (melphalan flufenamide), a new peptideconjugated alkylator, is highly lipophilic and therefore penetrates the cell membrane easily. Inside the cell, melflufen is rapidly hydrolyzed into less lipophilic metabolites that retain high alkylating potential, leading to their entrapment and accumulation. Aminopeptidases belong to a large family of enzymes that catalyze the cleavage of amino acids from the amino terminus of proteins or peptides and are shown to facilitate intracellular hydrolysis of melflufen. Aminopeptidases are involved in multiple cellular processes, and their expression and activity are frequently deregulated in cancer cells. For this reason, aminopeptidase inhibitors bestatin and tosedostat have been investigated in the clinical settings. Exploiting aminopeptidase activity to convert a lipophilic drug such as melflufen to an intracellular hydrophilic metabolite with high alkylating potential may offer an effective alternative therapeutic approach. Previously it has been shown that aminopeptidase N (ANPEP or CD13) can hydrolyze melflufen, but it is largely unknown whether melflufen can be a substrate for other aminopeptidases. Application of melflufen has mainly been focused on multiple myeloma, where it has shown promising results in phase 3 clinical trial in relapse and refractory patient population. 13 Yet it is unexplored whether melflufen can be effective in other cancer types such as breast cancer. Here, we demonstrate the efficacy of melflufen in D492HER2 breast epithelial cells overexpressing the HER2 oncogene and the triplenegative cell line MDAMB231.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
Aminopeptidases are thought to be responsible for the cleavage of melflufen, and indeed, in our model, the aminopeptidase inhibitor bestatin attenuated the activity of melflufen in D492HER2 cells. Interestingly, in D492 cells, preincubation with bestatin showed no effect on melflufen activity.
In Vitro Model Normal D492 cell CVCL_D1HJ
Experiment 8 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [11]
Indication Breast cancer
Efficacy Data Cell viability
25%
Administration Time 48 h
Administration Dosage 5 μM
MOA of PDC
Melphalan is a wellknown cancer drug used for decades for the treatment of various cancer types, and it is still widely used for hematological cancers today. It is an alkylating agent that works by adding an alkyl group to the guanine base of the DNA, resulting in an aberrant linkage between DNA strands, DNA breakage, and inhibition of DNA synthesis. Melphalan is a hydrophilic drug, and as such, it does not penetrate cell membranes easily, which is limiting to its anticancer potential. In contrast, melflufen (melphalan flufenamide), a new peptideconjugated alkylator, is highly lipophilic and therefore penetrates the cell membrane easily. Inside the cell, melflufen is rapidly hydrolyzed into less lipophilic metabolites that retain high alkylating potential, leading to their entrapment and accumulation. Aminopeptidases belong to a large family of enzymes that catalyze the cleavage of amino acids from the amino terminus of proteins or peptides and are shown to facilitate intracellular hydrolysis of melflufen. Aminopeptidases are involved in multiple cellular processes, and their expression and activity are frequently deregulated in cancer cells. For this reason, aminopeptidase inhibitors bestatin and tosedostat have been investigated in the clinical settings. Exploiting aminopeptidase activity to convert a lipophilic drug such as melflufen to an intracellular hydrophilic metabolite with high alkylating potential may offer an effective alternative therapeutic approach. Previously it has been shown that aminopeptidase N (ANPEP or CD13) can hydrolyze melflufen, but it is largely unknown whether melflufen can be a substrate for other aminopeptidases. Application of melflufen has mainly been focused on multiple myeloma, where it has shown promising results in phase 3 clinical trial in relapse and refractory patient population. 13 Yet it is unexplored whether melflufen can be effective in other cancer types such as breast cancer. Here, we demonstrate the efficacy of melflufen in D492HER2 breast epithelial cells overexpressing the HER2 oncogene and the triplenegative cell line MDAMB231.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
While these cells tolerated higher drug concentrations for both drugs compared to our D492 cell lines, melflufen was significantly more efficient than doxorubicin in killing the MDAMB231 cells (Figure 3C).
In Vitro Model Breast adenocarcinoma MDA-MB-231 cell CVCL_0062
Experiment 9 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [11]
Indication Breast cancer
Efficacy Data Cell viability
30%
Administration Time 48 h
Administration Dosage 50 μM
MOA of PDC
Melphalan is a wellknown cancer drug used for decades for the treatment of various cancer types, and it is still widely used for hematological cancers today. It is an alkylating agent that works by adding an alkyl group to the guanine base of the DNA, resulting in an aberrant linkage between DNA strands, DNA breakage, and inhibition of DNA synthesis. Melphalan is a hydrophilic drug, and as such, it does not penetrate cell membranes easily, which is limiting to its anticancer potential. In contrast, melflufen (melphalan flufenamide), a new peptideconjugated alkylator, is highly lipophilic and therefore penetrates the cell membrane easily. Inside the cell, melflufen is rapidly hydrolyzed into less lipophilic metabolites that retain high alkylating potential, leading to their entrapment and accumulation. Aminopeptidases belong to a large family of enzymes that catalyze the cleavage of amino acids from the amino terminus of proteins or peptides and are shown to facilitate intracellular hydrolysis of melflufen. Aminopeptidases are involved in multiple cellular processes, and their expression and activity are frequently deregulated in cancer cells. For this reason, aminopeptidase inhibitors bestatin and tosedostat have been investigated in the clinical settings. Exploiting aminopeptidase activity to convert a lipophilic drug such as melflufen to an intracellular hydrophilic metabolite with high alkylating potential may offer an effective alternative therapeutic approach. Previously it has been shown that aminopeptidase N (ANPEP or CD13) can hydrolyze melflufen, but it is largely unknown whether melflufen can be a substrate for other aminopeptidases. Application of melflufen has mainly been focused on multiple myeloma, where it has shown promising results in phase 3 clinical trial in relapse and refractory patient population. 13 Yet it is unexplored whether melflufen can be effective in other cancer types such as breast cancer. Here, we demonstrate the efficacy of melflufen in D492HER2 breast epithelial cells overexpressing the HER2 oncogene and the triplenegative cell line MDAMB231.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
D492HER2 cells showed increased sensitivity to melphalan compared to the progenitor cell line D492. However, concentration as high as 100 μmol/L was insufficient to kill the whole cell population. In both cell lines, around 40% of D492 cells and at least 20% of D492HER2 cells were still viable after incubation with 100 μmol/L melphalan. On the contrary, melflufen decreased viability of both D492 and D492HER2 cells at much lower doses.

   Click to Show/Hide
In Vitro Model Normal D492 cell CVCL_D1HJ
Experiment 10 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [11]
Indication Breast cancer
Efficacy Data Cell viability
30%
Administration Time 48 h
Administration Dosage 1.5 μM; with bestatin (10 μmol/L)
MOA of PDC
Melphalan is a wellknown cancer drug used for decades for the treatment of various cancer types, and it is still widely used for hematological cancers today. It is an alkylating agent that works by adding an alkyl group to the guanine base of the DNA, resulting in an aberrant linkage between DNA strands, DNA breakage, and inhibition of DNA synthesis. Melphalan is a hydrophilic drug, and as such, it does not penetrate cell membranes easily, which is limiting to its anticancer potential. In contrast, melflufen (melphalan flufenamide), a new peptideconjugated alkylator, is highly lipophilic and therefore penetrates the cell membrane easily. Inside the cell, melflufen is rapidly hydrolyzed into less lipophilic metabolites that retain high alkylating potential, leading to their entrapment and accumulation. Aminopeptidases belong to a large family of enzymes that catalyze the cleavage of amino acids from the amino terminus of proteins or peptides and are shown to facilitate intracellular hydrolysis of melflufen. Aminopeptidases are involved in multiple cellular processes, and their expression and activity are frequently deregulated in cancer cells. For this reason, aminopeptidase inhibitors bestatin and tosedostat have been investigated in the clinical settings. Exploiting aminopeptidase activity to convert a lipophilic drug such as melflufen to an intracellular hydrophilic metabolite with high alkylating potential may offer an effective alternative therapeutic approach. Previously it has been shown that aminopeptidase N (ANPEP or CD13) can hydrolyze melflufen, but it is largely unknown whether melflufen can be a substrate for other aminopeptidases. Application of melflufen has mainly been focused on multiple myeloma, where it has shown promising results in phase 3 clinical trial in relapse and refractory patient population. 13 Yet it is unexplored whether melflufen can be effective in other cancer types such as breast cancer. Here, we demonstrate the efficacy of melflufen in D492HER2 breast epithelial cells overexpressing the HER2 oncogene and the triplenegative cell line MDAMB231.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
Aminopeptidases are thought to be responsible for the cleavage of melflufen, and indeed, in our model, the aminopeptidase inhibitor bestatin attenuated the activity of melflufen in D492HER2 cells. Interestingly, in D492 cells, preincubation with bestatin showed no effect on melflufen activity.
In Vitro Model Normal D492 cell CVCL_D1HJ
Experiment 11 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [11]
Indication Breast cancer
Efficacy Data Cell viability
30%
Administration Time 48 h
Administration Dosage 1.5 μM
MOA of PDC
Melphalan is a wellknown cancer drug used for decades for the treatment of various cancer types, and it is still widely used for hematological cancers today. It is an alkylating agent that works by adding an alkyl group to the guanine base of the DNA, resulting in an aberrant linkage between DNA strands, DNA breakage, and inhibition of DNA synthesis. Melphalan is a hydrophilic drug, and as such, it does not penetrate cell membranes easily, which is limiting to its anticancer potential. In contrast, melflufen (melphalan flufenamide), a new peptideconjugated alkylator, is highly lipophilic and therefore penetrates the cell membrane easily. Inside the cell, melflufen is rapidly hydrolyzed into less lipophilic metabolites that retain high alkylating potential, leading to their entrapment and accumulation. Aminopeptidases belong to a large family of enzymes that catalyze the cleavage of amino acids from the amino terminus of proteins or peptides and are shown to facilitate intracellular hydrolysis of melflufen. Aminopeptidases are involved in multiple cellular processes, and their expression and activity are frequently deregulated in cancer cells. For this reason, aminopeptidase inhibitors bestatin and tosedostat have been investigated in the clinical settings. Exploiting aminopeptidase activity to convert a lipophilic drug such as melflufen to an intracellular hydrophilic metabolite with high alkylating potential may offer an effective alternative therapeutic approach. Previously it has been shown that aminopeptidase N (ANPEP or CD13) can hydrolyze melflufen, but it is largely unknown whether melflufen can be a substrate for other aminopeptidases. Application of melflufen has mainly been focused on multiple myeloma, where it has shown promising results in phase 3 clinical trial in relapse and refractory patient population. 13 Yet it is unexplored whether melflufen can be effective in other cancer types such as breast cancer. Here, we demonstrate the efficacy of melflufen in D492HER2 breast epithelial cells overexpressing the HER2 oncogene and the triplenegative cell line MDAMB231.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
Aminopeptidases are thought to be responsible for the cleavage of melflufen, and indeed, in our model, the aminopeptidase inhibitor bestatin attenuated the activity of melflufen in D492HER2 cells. Interestingly, in D492 cells, preincubation with bestatin showed no effect on melflufen activity.
In Vitro Model Normal D492 cell CVCL_D1HJ
Experiment 12 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [11]
Indication Breast cancer
Efficacy Data Cell viability
35%
Administration Time 48 h
Administration Dosage 1.0 μM
MOA of PDC
Melphalan is a wellknown cancer drug used for decades for the treatment of various cancer types, and it is still widely used for hematological cancers today. It is an alkylating agent that works by adding an alkyl group to the guanine base of the DNA, resulting in an aberrant linkage between DNA strands, DNA breakage, and inhibition of DNA synthesis. Melphalan is a hydrophilic drug, and as such, it does not penetrate cell membranes easily, which is limiting to its anticancer potential. In contrast, melflufen (melphalan flufenamide), a new peptideconjugated alkylator, is highly lipophilic and therefore penetrates the cell membrane easily. Inside the cell, melflufen is rapidly hydrolyzed into less lipophilic metabolites that retain high alkylating potential, leading to their entrapment and accumulation. Aminopeptidases belong to a large family of enzymes that catalyze the cleavage of amino acids from the amino terminus of proteins or peptides and are shown to facilitate intracellular hydrolysis of melflufen. Aminopeptidases are involved in multiple cellular processes, and their expression and activity are frequently deregulated in cancer cells. For this reason, aminopeptidase inhibitors bestatin and tosedostat have been investigated in the clinical settings. Exploiting aminopeptidase activity to convert a lipophilic drug such as melflufen to an intracellular hydrophilic metabolite with high alkylating potential may offer an effective alternative therapeutic approach. Previously it has been shown that aminopeptidase N (ANPEP or CD13) can hydrolyze melflufen, but it is largely unknown whether melflufen can be a substrate for other aminopeptidases. Application of melflufen has mainly been focused on multiple myeloma, where it has shown promising results in phase 3 clinical trial in relapse and refractory patient population. 13 Yet it is unexplored whether melflufen can be effective in other cancer types such as breast cancer. Here, we demonstrate the efficacy of melflufen in D492HER2 breast epithelial cells overexpressing the HER2 oncogene and the triplenegative cell line MDAMB231.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
D492HER2 cells showed increased sensitivity to melphalan compared to the progenitor cell line D492. However, concentration as high as 100 μmol/L was insufficient to kill the whole cell population. In both cell lines, around 40% of D492 cells and at least 20% of D492HER2 cells were still viable after incubation with 100 μmol/L melphalan. On the contrary, melflufen decreased viability of both D492 and D492HER2 cells at much lower doses.

   Click to Show/Hide
In Vitro Model Normal D492 cell CVCL_D1HJ
Experiment 13 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [11]
Indication Breast cancer
Efficacy Data Cell viability
40%
Administration Time 48 h
Administration Dosage 100 μM
MOA of PDC
Melphalan is a wellknown cancer drug used for decades for the treatment of various cancer types, and it is still widely used for hematological cancers today. It is an alkylating agent that works by adding an alkyl group to the guanine base of the DNA, resulting in an aberrant linkage between DNA strands, DNA breakage, and inhibition of DNA synthesis. Melphalan is a hydrophilic drug, and as such, it does not penetrate cell membranes easily, which is limiting to its anticancer potential. In contrast, melflufen (melphalan flufenamide), a new peptideconjugated alkylator, is highly lipophilic and therefore penetrates the cell membrane easily. Inside the cell, melflufen is rapidly hydrolyzed into less lipophilic metabolites that retain high alkylating potential, leading to their entrapment and accumulation. Aminopeptidases belong to a large family of enzymes that catalyze the cleavage of amino acids from the amino terminus of proteins or peptides and are shown to facilitate intracellular hydrolysis of melflufen. Aminopeptidases are involved in multiple cellular processes, and their expression and activity are frequently deregulated in cancer cells. For this reason, aminopeptidase inhibitors bestatin and tosedostat have been investigated in the clinical settings. Exploiting aminopeptidase activity to convert a lipophilic drug such as melflufen to an intracellular hydrophilic metabolite with high alkylating potential may offer an effective alternative therapeutic approach. Previously it has been shown that aminopeptidase N (ANPEP or CD13) can hydrolyze melflufen, but it is largely unknown whether melflufen can be a substrate for other aminopeptidases. Application of melflufen has mainly been focused on multiple myeloma, where it has shown promising results in phase 3 clinical trial in relapse and refractory patient population. 13 Yet it is unexplored whether melflufen can be effective in other cancer types such as breast cancer. Here, we demonstrate the efficacy of melflufen in D492HER2 breast epithelial cells overexpressing the HER2 oncogene and the triplenegative cell line MDAMB231.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
D492HER2 cells showed increased sensitivity to melphalan compared to the progenitor cell line D492. However, concentration as high as 100 μmol/L was insufficient to kill the whole cell population. In both cell lines, around 40% of D492 cells and at least 20% of D492HER2 cells were still viable after incubation with 100 μmol/L melphalan. On the contrary, melflufen decreased viability of both D492 and D492HER2 cells at much lower doses.

   Click to Show/Hide
In Vitro Model Normal D492 cell CVCL_D1HJ
Experiment 14 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [11]
Indication Breast cancer
Efficacy Data Cell viability
40%
Administration Time 48 h
Administration Dosage 2 μM
MOA of PDC
Melphalan is a wellknown cancer drug used for decades for the treatment of various cancer types, and it is still widely used for hematological cancers today. It is an alkylating agent that works by adding an alkyl group to the guanine base of the DNA, resulting in an aberrant linkage between DNA strands, DNA breakage, and inhibition of DNA synthesis. Melphalan is a hydrophilic drug, and as such, it does not penetrate cell membranes easily, which is limiting to its anticancer potential. In contrast, melflufen (melphalan flufenamide), a new peptideconjugated alkylator, is highly lipophilic and therefore penetrates the cell membrane easily. Inside the cell, melflufen is rapidly hydrolyzed into less lipophilic metabolites that retain high alkylating potential, leading to their entrapment and accumulation. Aminopeptidases belong to a large family of enzymes that catalyze the cleavage of amino acids from the amino terminus of proteins or peptides and are shown to facilitate intracellular hydrolysis of melflufen. Aminopeptidases are involved in multiple cellular processes, and their expression and activity are frequently deregulated in cancer cells. For this reason, aminopeptidase inhibitors bestatin and tosedostat have been investigated in the clinical settings. Exploiting aminopeptidase activity to convert a lipophilic drug such as melflufen to an intracellular hydrophilic metabolite with high alkylating potential may offer an effective alternative therapeutic approach. Previously it has been shown that aminopeptidase N (ANPEP or CD13) can hydrolyze melflufen, but it is largely unknown whether melflufen can be a substrate for other aminopeptidases. Application of melflufen has mainly been focused on multiple myeloma, where it has shown promising results in phase 3 clinical trial in relapse and refractory patient population. 13 Yet it is unexplored whether melflufen can be effective in other cancer types such as breast cancer. Here, we demonstrate the efficacy of melflufen in D492HER2 breast epithelial cells overexpressing the HER2 oncogene and the triplenegative cell line MDAMB231.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
While these cells tolerated higher drug concentrations for both drugs compared to our D492 cell lines, melflufen was significantly more efficient than doxorubicin in killing the MDAMB231 cells (Figure 3C).
In Vitro Model Breast adenocarcinoma MDA-MB-231 cell CVCL_0062
Experiment 15 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [11]
Indication Breast cancer
Efficacy Data Cell viability
45%
Administration Time 48 h
Administration Dosage 2.0 μM; with bestatin (10 μmol/L)
MOA of PDC
Melphalan is a wellknown cancer drug used for decades for the treatment of various cancer types, and it is still widely used for hematological cancers today. It is an alkylating agent that works by adding an alkyl group to the guanine base of the DNA, resulting in an aberrant linkage between DNA strands, DNA breakage, and inhibition of DNA synthesis. Melphalan is a hydrophilic drug, and as such, it does not penetrate cell membranes easily, which is limiting to its anticancer potential. In contrast, melflufen (melphalan flufenamide), a new peptideconjugated alkylator, is highly lipophilic and therefore penetrates the cell membrane easily. Inside the cell, melflufen is rapidly hydrolyzed into less lipophilic metabolites that retain high alkylating potential, leading to their entrapment and accumulation. Aminopeptidases belong to a large family of enzymes that catalyze the cleavage of amino acids from the amino terminus of proteins or peptides and are shown to facilitate intracellular hydrolysis of melflufen. Aminopeptidases are involved in multiple cellular processes, and their expression and activity are frequently deregulated in cancer cells. For this reason, aminopeptidase inhibitors bestatin and tosedostat have been investigated in the clinical settings. Exploiting aminopeptidase activity to convert a lipophilic drug such as melflufen to an intracellular hydrophilic metabolite with high alkylating potential may offer an effective alternative therapeutic approach. Previously it has been shown that aminopeptidase N (ANPEP or CD13) can hydrolyze melflufen, but it is largely unknown whether melflufen can be a substrate for other aminopeptidases. Application of melflufen has mainly been focused on multiple myeloma, where it has shown promising results in phase 3 clinical trial in relapse and refractory patient population. 13 Yet it is unexplored whether melflufen can be effective in other cancer types such as breast cancer. Here, we demonstrate the efficacy of melflufen in D492HER2 breast epithelial cells overexpressing the HER2 oncogene and the triplenegative cell line MDAMB231.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
Aminopeptidases are thought to be responsible for the cleavage of melflufen, and indeed, in our model, the aminopeptidase inhibitor bestatin attenuated the activity of melflufen in D492HER2 cells. Interestingly, in D492 cells, preincubation with bestatin showed no effect on melflufen activity.
In Vitro Model Normal D492 cell CVCL_D1HJ
Experiment 16 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [11]
Indication Breast cancer
Efficacy Data Cell viability
48%
Administration Time 48 h
Administration Dosage 1.5 μM
MOA of PDC
Melphalan is a wellknown cancer drug used for decades for the treatment of various cancer types, and it is still widely used for hematological cancers today. It is an alkylating agent that works by adding an alkyl group to the guanine base of the DNA, resulting in an aberrant linkage between DNA strands, DNA breakage, and inhibition of DNA synthesis. Melphalan is a hydrophilic drug, and as such, it does not penetrate cell membranes easily, which is limiting to its anticancer potential. In contrast, melflufen (melphalan flufenamide), a new peptideconjugated alkylator, is highly lipophilic and therefore penetrates the cell membrane easily. Inside the cell, melflufen is rapidly hydrolyzed into less lipophilic metabolites that retain high alkylating potential, leading to their entrapment and accumulation. Aminopeptidases belong to a large family of enzymes that catalyze the cleavage of amino acids from the amino terminus of proteins or peptides and are shown to facilitate intracellular hydrolysis of melflufen. Aminopeptidases are involved in multiple cellular processes, and their expression and activity are frequently deregulated in cancer cells. For this reason, aminopeptidase inhibitors bestatin and tosedostat have been investigated in the clinical settings. Exploiting aminopeptidase activity to convert a lipophilic drug such as melflufen to an intracellular hydrophilic metabolite with high alkylating potential may offer an effective alternative therapeutic approach. Previously it has been shown that aminopeptidase N (ANPEP or CD13) can hydrolyze melflufen, but it is largely unknown whether melflufen can be a substrate for other aminopeptidases. Application of melflufen has mainly been focused on multiple myeloma, where it has shown promising results in phase 3 clinical trial in relapse and refractory patient population. 13 Yet it is unexplored whether melflufen can be effective in other cancer types such as breast cancer. Here, we demonstrate the efficacy of melflufen in D492HER2 breast epithelial cells overexpressing the HER2 oncogene and the triplenegative cell line MDAMB231.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
Aminopeptidases are thought to be responsible for the cleavage of melflufen, and indeed, in our model, the aminopeptidase inhibitor bestatin attenuated the activity of melflufen in D492HER2 cells. Interestingly, in D492 cells, preincubation with bestatin showed no effect on melflufen activity.
In Vitro Model Normal D492 cell CVCL_D1HJ
Experiment 17 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [11]
Indication Breast cancer
Efficacy Data Cell viability
50%
Administration Time 48 h
Administration Dosage 75 μM
MOA of PDC
Melphalan is a wellknown cancer drug used for decades for the treatment of various cancer types, and it is still widely used for hematological cancers today. It is an alkylating agent that works by adding an alkyl group to the guanine base of the DNA, resulting in an aberrant linkage between DNA strands, DNA breakage, and inhibition of DNA synthesis. Melphalan is a hydrophilic drug, and as such, it does not penetrate cell membranes easily, which is limiting to its anticancer potential. In contrast, melflufen (melphalan flufenamide), a new peptideconjugated alkylator, is highly lipophilic and therefore penetrates the cell membrane easily. Inside the cell, melflufen is rapidly hydrolyzed into less lipophilic metabolites that retain high alkylating potential, leading to their entrapment and accumulation. Aminopeptidases belong to a large family of enzymes that catalyze the cleavage of amino acids from the amino terminus of proteins or peptides and are shown to facilitate intracellular hydrolysis of melflufen. Aminopeptidases are involved in multiple cellular processes, and their expression and activity are frequently deregulated in cancer cells. For this reason, aminopeptidase inhibitors bestatin and tosedostat have been investigated in the clinical settings. Exploiting aminopeptidase activity to convert a lipophilic drug such as melflufen to an intracellular hydrophilic metabolite with high alkylating potential may offer an effective alternative therapeutic approach. Previously it has been shown that aminopeptidase N (ANPEP or CD13) can hydrolyze melflufen, but it is largely unknown whether melflufen can be a substrate for other aminopeptidases. Application of melflufen has mainly been focused on multiple myeloma, where it has shown promising results in phase 3 clinical trial in relapse and refractory patient population. 13 Yet it is unexplored whether melflufen can be effective in other cancer types such as breast cancer. Here, we demonstrate the efficacy of melflufen in D492HER2 breast epithelial cells overexpressing the HER2 oncogene and the triplenegative cell line MDAMB231.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
D492HER2 cells showed increased sensitivity to melphalan compared to the progenitor cell line D492. However, concentration as high as 100 μmol/L was insufficient to kill the whole cell population. In both cell lines, around 40% of D492 cells and at least 20% of D492HER2 cells were still viable after incubation with 100 μmol/L melphalan. On the contrary, melflufen decreased viability of both D492 and D492HER2 cells at much lower doses.

   Click to Show/Hide
In Vitro Model Normal D492 cell CVCL_D1HJ
Experiment 18 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [11]
Indication Breast cancer
Efficacy Data Cell viability
50%
Administration Time 48 h
Administration Dosage 1.0 μM; with bestatin (10 μmol/L)
MOA of PDC
Melphalan is a wellknown cancer drug used for decades for the treatment of various cancer types, and it is still widely used for hematological cancers today. It is an alkylating agent that works by adding an alkyl group to the guanine base of the DNA, resulting in an aberrant linkage between DNA strands, DNA breakage, and inhibition of DNA synthesis. Melphalan is a hydrophilic drug, and as such, it does not penetrate cell membranes easily, which is limiting to its anticancer potential. In contrast, melflufen (melphalan flufenamide), a new peptideconjugated alkylator, is highly lipophilic and therefore penetrates the cell membrane easily. Inside the cell, melflufen is rapidly hydrolyzed into less lipophilic metabolites that retain high alkylating potential, leading to their entrapment and accumulation. Aminopeptidases belong to a large family of enzymes that catalyze the cleavage of amino acids from the amino terminus of proteins or peptides and are shown to facilitate intracellular hydrolysis of melflufen. Aminopeptidases are involved in multiple cellular processes, and their expression and activity are frequently deregulated in cancer cells. For this reason, aminopeptidase inhibitors bestatin and tosedostat have been investigated in the clinical settings. Exploiting aminopeptidase activity to convert a lipophilic drug such as melflufen to an intracellular hydrophilic metabolite with high alkylating potential may offer an effective alternative therapeutic approach. Previously it has been shown that aminopeptidase N (ANPEP or CD13) can hydrolyze melflufen, but it is largely unknown whether melflufen can be a substrate for other aminopeptidases. Application of melflufen has mainly been focused on multiple myeloma, where it has shown promising results in phase 3 clinical trial in relapse and refractory patient population. 13 Yet it is unexplored whether melflufen can be effective in other cancer types such as breast cancer. Here, we demonstrate the efficacy of melflufen in D492HER2 breast epithelial cells overexpressing the HER2 oncogene and the triplenegative cell line MDAMB231.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
Aminopeptidases are thought to be responsible for the cleavage of melflufen, and indeed, in our model, the aminopeptidase inhibitor bestatin attenuated the activity of melflufen in D492HER2 cells. Interestingly, in D492 cells, preincubation with bestatin showed no effect on melflufen activity.
In Vitro Model Normal D492 cell CVCL_D1HJ
Experiment 19 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [11]
Indication Breast cancer
Efficacy Data Cell viability
55%
Administration Time 48 h
Administration Dosage 0.1 μM
MOA of PDC
Melphalan is a wellknown cancer drug used for decades for the treatment of various cancer types, and it is still widely used for hematological cancers today. It is an alkylating agent that works by adding an alkyl group to the guanine base of the DNA, resulting in an aberrant linkage between DNA strands, DNA breakage, and inhibition of DNA synthesis. Melphalan is a hydrophilic drug, and as such, it does not penetrate cell membranes easily, which is limiting to its anticancer potential. In contrast, melflufen (melphalan flufenamide), a new peptideconjugated alkylator, is highly lipophilic and therefore penetrates the cell membrane easily. Inside the cell, melflufen is rapidly hydrolyzed into less lipophilic metabolites that retain high alkylating potential, leading to their entrapment and accumulation. Aminopeptidases belong to a large family of enzymes that catalyze the cleavage of amino acids from the amino terminus of proteins or peptides and are shown to facilitate intracellular hydrolysis of melflufen. Aminopeptidases are involved in multiple cellular processes, and their expression and activity are frequently deregulated in cancer cells. For this reason, aminopeptidase inhibitors bestatin and tosedostat have been investigated in the clinical settings. Exploiting aminopeptidase activity to convert a lipophilic drug such as melflufen to an intracellular hydrophilic metabolite with high alkylating potential may offer an effective alternative therapeutic approach. Previously it has been shown that aminopeptidase N (ANPEP or CD13) can hydrolyze melflufen, but it is largely unknown whether melflufen can be a substrate for other aminopeptidases. Application of melflufen has mainly been focused on multiple myeloma, where it has shown promising results in phase 3 clinical trial in relapse and refractory patient population. 13 Yet it is unexplored whether melflufen can be effective in other cancer types such as breast cancer. Here, we demonstrate the efficacy of melflufen in D492HER2 breast epithelial cells overexpressing the HER2 oncogene and the triplenegative cell line MDAMB231.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
D492HER2 cells showed increased sensitivity to melphalan compared to the progenitor cell line D492. However, concentration as high as 100 μmol/L was insufficient to kill the whole cell population. In both cell lines, around 40% of D492 cells and at least 20% of D492HER2 cells were still viable after incubation with 100 μmol/L melphalan. On the contrary, melflufen decreased viability of both D492 and D492HER2 cells at much lower doses.

   Click to Show/Hide
In Vitro Model Normal D492 cell CVCL_D1HJ
Experiment 20 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [11]
Indication Breast cancer
Efficacy Data Cell viability
55%
Administration Time 48 h
Administration Dosage 1.0 μM
MOA of PDC
Melphalan is a wellknown cancer drug used for decades for the treatment of various cancer types, and it is still widely used for hematological cancers today. It is an alkylating agent that works by adding an alkyl group to the guanine base of the DNA, resulting in an aberrant linkage between DNA strands, DNA breakage, and inhibition of DNA synthesis. Melphalan is a hydrophilic drug, and as such, it does not penetrate cell membranes easily, which is limiting to its anticancer potential. In contrast, melflufen (melphalan flufenamide), a new peptideconjugated alkylator, is highly lipophilic and therefore penetrates the cell membrane easily. Inside the cell, melflufen is rapidly hydrolyzed into less lipophilic metabolites that retain high alkylating potential, leading to their entrapment and accumulation. Aminopeptidases belong to a large family of enzymes that catalyze the cleavage of amino acids from the amino terminus of proteins or peptides and are shown to facilitate intracellular hydrolysis of melflufen. Aminopeptidases are involved in multiple cellular processes, and their expression and activity are frequently deregulated in cancer cells. For this reason, aminopeptidase inhibitors bestatin and tosedostat have been investigated in the clinical settings. Exploiting aminopeptidase activity to convert a lipophilic drug such as melflufen to an intracellular hydrophilic metabolite with high alkylating potential may offer an effective alternative therapeutic approach. Previously it has been shown that aminopeptidase N (ANPEP or CD13) can hydrolyze melflufen, but it is largely unknown whether melflufen can be a substrate for other aminopeptidases. Application of melflufen has mainly been focused on multiple myeloma, where it has shown promising results in phase 3 clinical trial in relapse and refractory patient population. 13 Yet it is unexplored whether melflufen can be effective in other cancer types such as breast cancer. Here, we demonstrate the efficacy of melflufen in D492HER2 breast epithelial cells overexpressing the HER2 oncogene and the triplenegative cell line MDAMB231.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
Aminopeptidases are thought to be responsible for the cleavage of melflufen, and indeed, in our model, the aminopeptidase inhibitor bestatin attenuated the activity of melflufen in D492HER2 cells. Interestingly, in D492 cells, preincubation with bestatin showed no effect on melflufen activity.
In Vitro Model Normal D492 cell CVCL_D1HJ
Experiment 21 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [11]
Indication Breast cancer
Efficacy Data Cell viability
60%
Administration Time 48 h
Administration Dosage 0.7 μM; with bestatin (10 μmol/L)
MOA of PDC
Melphalan is a wellknown cancer drug used for decades for the treatment of various cancer types, and it is still widely used for hematological cancers today. It is an alkylating agent that works by adding an alkyl group to the guanine base of the DNA, resulting in an aberrant linkage between DNA strands, DNA breakage, and inhibition of DNA synthesis. Melphalan is a hydrophilic drug, and as such, it does not penetrate cell membranes easily, which is limiting to its anticancer potential. In contrast, melflufen (melphalan flufenamide), a new peptideconjugated alkylator, is highly lipophilic and therefore penetrates the cell membrane easily. Inside the cell, melflufen is rapidly hydrolyzed into less lipophilic metabolites that retain high alkylating potential, leading to their entrapment and accumulation. Aminopeptidases belong to a large family of enzymes that catalyze the cleavage of amino acids from the amino terminus of proteins or peptides and are shown to facilitate intracellular hydrolysis of melflufen. Aminopeptidases are involved in multiple cellular processes, and their expression and activity are frequently deregulated in cancer cells. For this reason, aminopeptidase inhibitors bestatin and tosedostat have been investigated in the clinical settings. Exploiting aminopeptidase activity to convert a lipophilic drug such as melflufen to an intracellular hydrophilic metabolite with high alkylating potential may offer an effective alternative therapeutic approach. Previously it has been shown that aminopeptidase N (ANPEP or CD13) can hydrolyze melflufen, but it is largely unknown whether melflufen can be a substrate for other aminopeptidases. Application of melflufen has mainly been focused on multiple myeloma, where it has shown promising results in phase 3 clinical trial in relapse and refractory patient population. 13 Yet it is unexplored whether melflufen can be effective in other cancer types such as breast cancer. Here, we demonstrate the efficacy of melflufen in D492HER2 breast epithelial cells overexpressing the HER2 oncogene and the triplenegative cell line MDAMB231.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
Aminopeptidases are thought to be responsible for the cleavage of melflufen, and indeed, in our model, the aminopeptidase inhibitor bestatin attenuated the activity of melflufen in D492HER2 cells. Interestingly, in D492 cells, preincubation with bestatin showed no effect on melflufen activity.
In Vitro Model Normal D492 cell CVCL_D1HJ
Experiment 22 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [11]
Indication Breast cancer
Efficacy Data Cell viability
65%
Administration Time 48 h
Administration Dosage 1.0 μM
MOA of PDC
Melphalan is a wellknown cancer drug used for decades for the treatment of various cancer types, and it is still widely used for hematological cancers today. It is an alkylating agent that works by adding an alkyl group to the guanine base of the DNA, resulting in an aberrant linkage between DNA strands, DNA breakage, and inhibition of DNA synthesis. Melphalan is a hydrophilic drug, and as such, it does not penetrate cell membranes easily, which is limiting to its anticancer potential. In contrast, melflufen (melphalan flufenamide), a new peptideconjugated alkylator, is highly lipophilic and therefore penetrates the cell membrane easily. Inside the cell, melflufen is rapidly hydrolyzed into less lipophilic metabolites that retain high alkylating potential, leading to their entrapment and accumulation. Aminopeptidases belong to a large family of enzymes that catalyze the cleavage of amino acids from the amino terminus of proteins or peptides and are shown to facilitate intracellular hydrolysis of melflufen. Aminopeptidases are involved in multiple cellular processes, and their expression and activity are frequently deregulated in cancer cells. For this reason, aminopeptidase inhibitors bestatin and tosedostat have been investigated in the clinical settings. Exploiting aminopeptidase activity to convert a lipophilic drug such as melflufen to an intracellular hydrophilic metabolite with high alkylating potential may offer an effective alternative therapeutic approach. Previously it has been shown that aminopeptidase N (ANPEP or CD13) can hydrolyze melflufen, but it is largely unknown whether melflufen can be a substrate for other aminopeptidases. Application of melflufen has mainly been focused on multiple myeloma, where it has shown promising results in phase 3 clinical trial in relapse and refractory patient population. 13 Yet it is unexplored whether melflufen can be effective in other cancer types such as breast cancer. Here, we demonstrate the efficacy of melflufen in D492HER2 breast epithelial cells overexpressing the HER2 oncogene and the triplenegative cell line MDAMB231.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
D492HER2 cells showed increased sensitivity to melphalan compared to the progenitor cell line D492. However, concentration as high as 100 μmol/L was insufficient to kill the whole cell population. In both cell lines, around 40% of D492 cells and at least 20% of D492HER2 cells were still viable after incubation with 100 μmol/L melphalan. On the contrary, melflufen decreased viability of both D492 and D492HER2 cells at much lower doses.

   Click to Show/Hide
In Vitro Model Normal D492 cell CVCL_D1HJ
Experiment 23 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [11]
Indication Breast cancer
Efficacy Data Cell viability
65%
Administration Time 48 h
Administration Dosage 0.7 μM
MOA of PDC
Melphalan is a wellknown cancer drug used for decades for the treatment of various cancer types, and it is still widely used for hematological cancers today. It is an alkylating agent that works by adding an alkyl group to the guanine base of the DNA, resulting in an aberrant linkage between DNA strands, DNA breakage, and inhibition of DNA synthesis. Melphalan is a hydrophilic drug, and as such, it does not penetrate cell membranes easily, which is limiting to its anticancer potential. In contrast, melflufen (melphalan flufenamide), a new peptideconjugated alkylator, is highly lipophilic and therefore penetrates the cell membrane easily. Inside the cell, melflufen is rapidly hydrolyzed into less lipophilic metabolites that retain high alkylating potential, leading to their entrapment and accumulation. Aminopeptidases belong to a large family of enzymes that catalyze the cleavage of amino acids from the amino terminus of proteins or peptides and are shown to facilitate intracellular hydrolysis of melflufen. Aminopeptidases are involved in multiple cellular processes, and their expression and activity are frequently deregulated in cancer cells. For this reason, aminopeptidase inhibitors bestatin and tosedostat have been investigated in the clinical settings. Exploiting aminopeptidase activity to convert a lipophilic drug such as melflufen to an intracellular hydrophilic metabolite with high alkylating potential may offer an effective alternative therapeutic approach. Previously it has been shown that aminopeptidase N (ANPEP or CD13) can hydrolyze melflufen, but it is largely unknown whether melflufen can be a substrate for other aminopeptidases. Application of melflufen has mainly been focused on multiple myeloma, where it has shown promising results in phase 3 clinical trial in relapse and refractory patient population. 13 Yet it is unexplored whether melflufen can be effective in other cancer types such as breast cancer. Here, we demonstrate the efficacy of melflufen in D492HER2 breast epithelial cells overexpressing the HER2 oncogene and the triplenegative cell line MDAMB231.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
Aminopeptidases are thought to be responsible for the cleavage of melflufen, and indeed, in our model, the aminopeptidase inhibitor bestatin attenuated the activity of melflufen in D492HER2 cells. Interestingly, in D492 cells, preincubation with bestatin showed no effect on melflufen activity.
In Vitro Model Normal D492 cell CVCL_D1HJ
Experiment 24 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [11]
Indication Breast cancer
Efficacy Data Cell viability
70%
Administration Time 48 h
Administration Dosage 1.0 μM
MOA of PDC
Melphalan is a wellknown cancer drug used for decades for the treatment of various cancer types, and it is still widely used for hematological cancers today. It is an alkylating agent that works by adding an alkyl group to the guanine base of the DNA, resulting in an aberrant linkage between DNA strands, DNA breakage, and inhibition of DNA synthesis. Melphalan is a hydrophilic drug, and as such, it does not penetrate cell membranes easily, which is limiting to its anticancer potential. In contrast, melflufen (melphalan flufenamide), a new peptideconjugated alkylator, is highly lipophilic and therefore penetrates the cell membrane easily. Inside the cell, melflufen is rapidly hydrolyzed into less lipophilic metabolites that retain high alkylating potential, leading to their entrapment and accumulation. Aminopeptidases belong to a large family of enzymes that catalyze the cleavage of amino acids from the amino terminus of proteins or peptides and are shown to facilitate intracellular hydrolysis of melflufen. Aminopeptidases are involved in multiple cellular processes, and their expression and activity are frequently deregulated in cancer cells. For this reason, aminopeptidase inhibitors bestatin and tosedostat have been investigated in the clinical settings. Exploiting aminopeptidase activity to convert a lipophilic drug such as melflufen to an intracellular hydrophilic metabolite with high alkylating potential may offer an effective alternative therapeutic approach. Previously it has been shown that aminopeptidase N (ANPEP or CD13) can hydrolyze melflufen, but it is largely unknown whether melflufen can be a substrate for other aminopeptidases. Application of melflufen has mainly been focused on multiple myeloma, where it has shown promising results in phase 3 clinical trial in relapse and refractory patient population. 13 Yet it is unexplored whether melflufen can be effective in other cancer types such as breast cancer. Here, we demonstrate the efficacy of melflufen in D492HER2 breast epithelial cells overexpressing the HER2 oncogene and the triplenegative cell line MDAMB231.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
Aminopeptidases are thought to be responsible for the cleavage of melflufen, and indeed, in our model, the aminopeptidase inhibitor bestatin attenuated the activity of melflufen in D492HER2 cells. Interestingly, in D492 cells, preincubation with bestatin showed no effect on melflufen activity.
In Vitro Model Normal D492 cell CVCL_D1HJ
Experiment 25 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [11]
Indication Breast cancer
Efficacy Data Cell viability
70%
Administration Time 48 h
Administration Dosage 0.5 μM
MOA of PDC
Melphalan is a wellknown cancer drug used for decades for the treatment of various cancer types, and it is still widely used for hematological cancers today. It is an alkylating agent that works by adding an alkyl group to the guanine base of the DNA, resulting in an aberrant linkage between DNA strands, DNA breakage, and inhibition of DNA synthesis. Melphalan is a hydrophilic drug, and as such, it does not penetrate cell membranes easily, which is limiting to its anticancer potential. In contrast, melflufen (melphalan flufenamide), a new peptideconjugated alkylator, is highly lipophilic and therefore penetrates the cell membrane easily. Inside the cell, melflufen is rapidly hydrolyzed into less lipophilic metabolites that retain high alkylating potential, leading to their entrapment and accumulation. Aminopeptidases belong to a large family of enzymes that catalyze the cleavage of amino acids from the amino terminus of proteins or peptides and are shown to facilitate intracellular hydrolysis of melflufen. Aminopeptidases are involved in multiple cellular processes, and their expression and activity are frequently deregulated in cancer cells. For this reason, aminopeptidase inhibitors bestatin and tosedostat have been investigated in the clinical settings. Exploiting aminopeptidase activity to convert a lipophilic drug such as melflufen to an intracellular hydrophilic metabolite with high alkylating potential may offer an effective alternative therapeutic approach. Previously it has been shown that aminopeptidase N (ANPEP or CD13) can hydrolyze melflufen, but it is largely unknown whether melflufen can be a substrate for other aminopeptidases. Application of melflufen has mainly been focused on multiple myeloma, where it has shown promising results in phase 3 clinical trial in relapse and refractory patient population. 13 Yet it is unexplored whether melflufen can be effective in other cancer types such as breast cancer. Here, we demonstrate the efficacy of melflufen in D492HER2 breast epithelial cells overexpressing the HER2 oncogene and the triplenegative cell line MDAMB231.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
Aminopeptidases are thought to be responsible for the cleavage of melflufen, and indeed, in our model, the aminopeptidase inhibitor bestatin attenuated the activity of melflufen in D492HER2 cells. Interestingly, in D492 cells, preincubation with bestatin showed no effect on melflufen activity.
In Vitro Model Normal D492 cell CVCL_D1HJ
Experiment 26 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [11]
Indication Breast cancer
Efficacy Data Cell viability
73%
Administration Time 48 h
Administration Dosage 1 μM
MOA of PDC
Melphalan is a wellknown cancer drug used for decades for the treatment of various cancer types, and it is still widely used for hematological cancers today. It is an alkylating agent that works by adding an alkyl group to the guanine base of the DNA, resulting in an aberrant linkage between DNA strands, DNA breakage, and inhibition of DNA synthesis. Melphalan is a hydrophilic drug, and as such, it does not penetrate cell membranes easily, which is limiting to its anticancer potential. In contrast, melflufen (melphalan flufenamide), a new peptideconjugated alkylator, is highly lipophilic and therefore penetrates the cell membrane easily. Inside the cell, melflufen is rapidly hydrolyzed into less lipophilic metabolites that retain high alkylating potential, leading to their entrapment and accumulation. Aminopeptidases belong to a large family of enzymes that catalyze the cleavage of amino acids from the amino terminus of proteins or peptides and are shown to facilitate intracellular hydrolysis of melflufen. Aminopeptidases are involved in multiple cellular processes, and their expression and activity are frequently deregulated in cancer cells. For this reason, aminopeptidase inhibitors bestatin and tosedostat have been investigated in the clinical settings. Exploiting aminopeptidase activity to convert a lipophilic drug such as melflufen to an intracellular hydrophilic metabolite with high alkylating potential may offer an effective alternative therapeutic approach. Previously it has been shown that aminopeptidase N (ANPEP or CD13) can hydrolyze melflufen, but it is largely unknown whether melflufen can be a substrate for other aminopeptidases. Application of melflufen has mainly been focused on multiple myeloma, where it has shown promising results in phase 3 clinical trial in relapse and refractory patient population. 13 Yet it is unexplored whether melflufen can be effective in other cancer types such as breast cancer. Here, we demonstrate the efficacy of melflufen in D492HER2 breast epithelial cells overexpressing the HER2 oncogene and the triplenegative cell line MDAMB231.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
While these cells tolerated higher drug concentrations for both drugs compared to our D492 cell lines, melflufen was significantly more efficient than doxorubicin in killing the MDAMB231 cells (Figure 3C).
In Vitro Model Breast adenocarcinoma MDA-MB-231 cell CVCL_0062
Experiment 27 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [11]
Indication Breast cancer
Efficacy Data Cell viability
74%
Administration Time 48 h
Administration Dosage 0.5 μM
MOA of PDC
Melphalan is a wellknown cancer drug used for decades for the treatment of various cancer types, and it is still widely used for hematological cancers today. It is an alkylating agent that works by adding an alkyl group to the guanine base of the DNA, resulting in an aberrant linkage between DNA strands, DNA breakage, and inhibition of DNA synthesis. Melphalan is a hydrophilic drug, and as such, it does not penetrate cell membranes easily, which is limiting to its anticancer potential. In contrast, melflufen (melphalan flufenamide), a new peptideconjugated alkylator, is highly lipophilic and therefore penetrates the cell membrane easily. Inside the cell, melflufen is rapidly hydrolyzed into less lipophilic metabolites that retain high alkylating potential, leading to their entrapment and accumulation. Aminopeptidases belong to a large family of enzymes that catalyze the cleavage of amino acids from the amino terminus of proteins or peptides and are shown to facilitate intracellular hydrolysis of melflufen. Aminopeptidases are involved in multiple cellular processes, and their expression and activity are frequently deregulated in cancer cells. For this reason, aminopeptidase inhibitors bestatin and tosedostat have been investigated in the clinical settings. Exploiting aminopeptidase activity to convert a lipophilic drug such as melflufen to an intracellular hydrophilic metabolite with high alkylating potential may offer an effective alternative therapeutic approach. Previously it has been shown that aminopeptidase N (ANPEP or CD13) can hydrolyze melflufen, but it is largely unknown whether melflufen can be a substrate for other aminopeptidases. Application of melflufen has mainly been focused on multiple myeloma, where it has shown promising results in phase 3 clinical trial in relapse and refractory patient population. 13 Yet it is unexplored whether melflufen can be effective in other cancer types such as breast cancer. Here, we demonstrate the efficacy of melflufen in D492HER2 breast epithelial cells overexpressing the HER2 oncogene and the triplenegative cell line MDAMB231.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
While these cells tolerated higher drug concentrations for both drugs compared to our D492 cell lines, melflufen was significantly more efficient than doxorubicin in killing the MDAMB231 cells (Figure 3C).
In Vitro Model Breast adenocarcinoma MDA-MB-231 cell CVCL_0062
Experiment 28 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [11]
Indication Breast cancer
Efficacy Data Cell viability
75%
Administration Time 48 h
Administration Dosage 50 μM
MOA of PDC
Melphalan is a wellknown cancer drug used for decades for the treatment of various cancer types, and it is still widely used for hematological cancers today. It is an alkylating agent that works by adding an alkyl group to the guanine base of the DNA, resulting in an aberrant linkage between DNA strands, DNA breakage, and inhibition of DNA synthesis. Melphalan is a hydrophilic drug, and as such, it does not penetrate cell membranes easily, which is limiting to its anticancer potential. In contrast, melflufen (melphalan flufenamide), a new peptideconjugated alkylator, is highly lipophilic and therefore penetrates the cell membrane easily. Inside the cell, melflufen is rapidly hydrolyzed into less lipophilic metabolites that retain high alkylating potential, leading to their entrapment and accumulation. Aminopeptidases belong to a large family of enzymes that catalyze the cleavage of amino acids from the amino terminus of proteins or peptides and are shown to facilitate intracellular hydrolysis of melflufen. Aminopeptidases are involved in multiple cellular processes, and their expression and activity are frequently deregulated in cancer cells. For this reason, aminopeptidase inhibitors bestatin and tosedostat have been investigated in the clinical settings. Exploiting aminopeptidase activity to convert a lipophilic drug such as melflufen to an intracellular hydrophilic metabolite with high alkylating potential may offer an effective alternative therapeutic approach. Previously it has been shown that aminopeptidase N (ANPEP or CD13) can hydrolyze melflufen, but it is largely unknown whether melflufen can be a substrate for other aminopeptidases. Application of melflufen has mainly been focused on multiple myeloma, where it has shown promising results in phase 3 clinical trial in relapse and refractory patient population. 13 Yet it is unexplored whether melflufen can be effective in other cancer types such as breast cancer. Here, we demonstrate the efficacy of melflufen in D492HER2 breast epithelial cells overexpressing the HER2 oncogene and the triplenegative cell line MDAMB231.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
D492HER2 cells showed increased sensitivity to melphalan compared to the progenitor cell line D492. However, concentration as high as 100 μmol/L was insufficient to kill the whole cell population. In both cell lines, around 40% of D492 cells and at least 20% of D492HER2 cells were still viable after incubation with 100 μmol/L melphalan. On the contrary, melflufen decreased viability of both D492 and D492HER2 cells at much lower doses.

   Click to Show/Hide
In Vitro Model Normal D492 cell CVCL_D1HJ
Experiment 29 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [11]
Indication Breast cancer
Efficacy Data Cell viability
75%
Administration Time 48 h
Administration Dosage 0.5 μM
MOA of PDC
Melphalan is a wellknown cancer drug used for decades for the treatment of various cancer types, and it is still widely used for hematological cancers today. It is an alkylating agent that works by adding an alkyl group to the guanine base of the DNA, resulting in an aberrant linkage between DNA strands, DNA breakage, and inhibition of DNA synthesis. Melphalan is a hydrophilic drug, and as such, it does not penetrate cell membranes easily, which is limiting to its anticancer potential. In contrast, melflufen (melphalan flufenamide), a new peptideconjugated alkylator, is highly lipophilic and therefore penetrates the cell membrane easily. Inside the cell, melflufen is rapidly hydrolyzed into less lipophilic metabolites that retain high alkylating potential, leading to their entrapment and accumulation. Aminopeptidases belong to a large family of enzymes that catalyze the cleavage of amino acids from the amino terminus of proteins or peptides and are shown to facilitate intracellular hydrolysis of melflufen. Aminopeptidases are involved in multiple cellular processes, and their expression and activity are frequently deregulated in cancer cells. For this reason, aminopeptidase inhibitors bestatin and tosedostat have been investigated in the clinical settings. Exploiting aminopeptidase activity to convert a lipophilic drug such as melflufen to an intracellular hydrophilic metabolite with high alkylating potential may offer an effective alternative therapeutic approach. Previously it has been shown that aminopeptidase N (ANPEP or CD13) can hydrolyze melflufen, but it is largely unknown whether melflufen can be a substrate for other aminopeptidases. Application of melflufen has mainly been focused on multiple myeloma, where it has shown promising results in phase 3 clinical trial in relapse and refractory patient population. 13 Yet it is unexplored whether melflufen can be effective in other cancer types such as breast cancer. Here, we demonstrate the efficacy of melflufen in D492HER2 breast epithelial cells overexpressing the HER2 oncogene and the triplenegative cell line MDAMB231.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
D492HER2 cells showed increased sensitivity to melphalan compared to the progenitor cell line D492. However, concentration as high as 100 μmol/L was insufficient to kill the whole cell population. In both cell lines, around 40% of D492 cells and at least 20% of D492HER2 cells were still viable after incubation with 100 μmol/L melphalan. On the contrary, melflufen decreased viability of both D492 and D492HER2 cells at much lower doses.

   Click to Show/Hide
In Vitro Model Normal D492 cell CVCL_D1HJ
Experiment 30 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [11]
Indication Breast cancer
Efficacy Data Cell viability
75%
Administration Time 48 h
Administration Dosage 0.1 μM
MOA of PDC
Melphalan is a wellknown cancer drug used for decades for the treatment of various cancer types, and it is still widely used for hematological cancers today. It is an alkylating agent that works by adding an alkyl group to the guanine base of the DNA, resulting in an aberrant linkage between DNA strands, DNA breakage, and inhibition of DNA synthesis. Melphalan is a hydrophilic drug, and as such, it does not penetrate cell membranes easily, which is limiting to its anticancer potential. In contrast, melflufen (melphalan flufenamide), a new peptideconjugated alkylator, is highly lipophilic and therefore penetrates the cell membrane easily. Inside the cell, melflufen is rapidly hydrolyzed into less lipophilic metabolites that retain high alkylating potential, leading to their entrapment and accumulation. Aminopeptidases belong to a large family of enzymes that catalyze the cleavage of amino acids from the amino terminus of proteins or peptides and are shown to facilitate intracellular hydrolysis of melflufen. Aminopeptidases are involved in multiple cellular processes, and their expression and activity are frequently deregulated in cancer cells. For this reason, aminopeptidase inhibitors bestatin and tosedostat have been investigated in the clinical settings. Exploiting aminopeptidase activity to convert a lipophilic drug such as melflufen to an intracellular hydrophilic metabolite with high alkylating potential may offer an effective alternative therapeutic approach. Previously it has been shown that aminopeptidase N (ANPEP or CD13) can hydrolyze melflufen, but it is largely unknown whether melflufen can be a substrate for other aminopeptidases. Application of melflufen has mainly been focused on multiple myeloma, where it has shown promising results in phase 3 clinical trial in relapse and refractory patient population. 13 Yet it is unexplored whether melflufen can be effective in other cancer types such as breast cancer. Here, we demonstrate the efficacy of melflufen in D492HER2 breast epithelial cells overexpressing the HER2 oncogene and the triplenegative cell line MDAMB231.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
While these cells tolerated higher drug concentrations for both drugs compared to our D492 cell lines, melflufen was significantly more efficient than doxorubicin in killing the MDAMB231 cells (Figure 3C).
In Vitro Model Breast adenocarcinoma MDA-MB-231 cell CVCL_0062
Experiment 31 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [11]
Indication Breast cancer
Efficacy Data Cell viability
80%
Administration Time 48 h
Administration Dosage 0.1 μM
MOA of PDC
Melphalan is a wellknown cancer drug used for decades for the treatment of various cancer types, and it is still widely used for hematological cancers today. It is an alkylating agent that works by adding an alkyl group to the guanine base of the DNA, resulting in an aberrant linkage between DNA strands, DNA breakage, and inhibition of DNA synthesis. Melphalan is a hydrophilic drug, and as such, it does not penetrate cell membranes easily, which is limiting to its anticancer potential. In contrast, melflufen (melphalan flufenamide), a new peptideconjugated alkylator, is highly lipophilic and therefore penetrates the cell membrane easily. Inside the cell, melflufen is rapidly hydrolyzed into less lipophilic metabolites that retain high alkylating potential, leading to their entrapment and accumulation. Aminopeptidases belong to a large family of enzymes that catalyze the cleavage of amino acids from the amino terminus of proteins or peptides and are shown to facilitate intracellular hydrolysis of melflufen. Aminopeptidases are involved in multiple cellular processes, and their expression and activity are frequently deregulated in cancer cells. For this reason, aminopeptidase inhibitors bestatin and tosedostat have been investigated in the clinical settings. Exploiting aminopeptidase activity to convert a lipophilic drug such as melflufen to an intracellular hydrophilic metabolite with high alkylating potential may offer an effective alternative therapeutic approach. Previously it has been shown that aminopeptidase N (ANPEP or CD13) can hydrolyze melflufen, but it is largely unknown whether melflufen can be a substrate for other aminopeptidases. Application of melflufen has mainly been focused on multiple myeloma, where it has shown promising results in phase 3 clinical trial in relapse and refractory patient population. 13 Yet it is unexplored whether melflufen can be effective in other cancer types such as breast cancer. Here, we demonstrate the efficacy of melflufen in D492HER2 breast epithelial cells overexpressing the HER2 oncogene and the triplenegative cell line MDAMB231.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
Aminopeptidases are thought to be responsible for the cleavage of melflufen, and indeed, in our model, the aminopeptidase inhibitor bestatin attenuated the activity of melflufen in D492HER2 cells. Interestingly, in D492 cells, preincubation with bestatin showed no effect on melflufen activity.
In Vitro Model Normal D492 cell CVCL_D1HJ
Experiment 32 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [11]
Indication Breast cancer
Efficacy Data Cell viability
80%
Administration Time 48 h
Administration Dosage 1.5 μM; with bestatin (10 μmol/L)
MOA of PDC
Melphalan is a wellknown cancer drug used for decades for the treatment of various cancer types, and it is still widely used for hematological cancers today. It is an alkylating agent that works by adding an alkyl group to the guanine base of the DNA, resulting in an aberrant linkage between DNA strands, DNA breakage, and inhibition of DNA synthesis. Melphalan is a hydrophilic drug, and as such, it does not penetrate cell membranes easily, which is limiting to its anticancer potential. In contrast, melflufen (melphalan flufenamide), a new peptideconjugated alkylator, is highly lipophilic and therefore penetrates the cell membrane easily. Inside the cell, melflufen is rapidly hydrolyzed into less lipophilic metabolites that retain high alkylating potential, leading to their entrapment and accumulation. Aminopeptidases belong to a large family of enzymes that catalyze the cleavage of amino acids from the amino terminus of proteins or peptides and are shown to facilitate intracellular hydrolysis of melflufen. Aminopeptidases are involved in multiple cellular processes, and their expression and activity are frequently deregulated in cancer cells. For this reason, aminopeptidase inhibitors bestatin and tosedostat have been investigated in the clinical settings. Exploiting aminopeptidase activity to convert a lipophilic drug such as melflufen to an intracellular hydrophilic metabolite with high alkylating potential may offer an effective alternative therapeutic approach. Previously it has been shown that aminopeptidase N (ANPEP or CD13) can hydrolyze melflufen, but it is largely unknown whether melflufen can be a substrate for other aminopeptidases. Application of melflufen has mainly been focused on multiple myeloma, where it has shown promising results in phase 3 clinical trial in relapse and refractory patient population. 13 Yet it is unexplored whether melflufen can be effective in other cancer types such as breast cancer. Here, we demonstrate the efficacy of melflufen in D492HER2 breast epithelial cells overexpressing the HER2 oncogene and the triplenegative cell line MDAMB231.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
Aminopeptidases are thought to be responsible for the cleavage of melflufen, and indeed, in our model, the aminopeptidase inhibitor bestatin attenuated the activity of melflufen in D492HER2 cells. Interestingly, in D492 cells, preincubation with bestatin showed no effect on melflufen activity.
In Vitro Model Normal D492 cell CVCL_D1HJ
Experiment 33 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [11]
Indication Breast cancer
Efficacy Data Cell viability
82%
Administration Time 48 h
Administration Dosage 0.5 μM; with bestatin (10 μmol/L)
MOA of PDC
Melphalan is a wellknown cancer drug used for decades for the treatment of various cancer types, and it is still widely used for hematological cancers today. It is an alkylating agent that works by adding an alkyl group to the guanine base of the DNA, resulting in an aberrant linkage between DNA strands, DNA breakage, and inhibition of DNA synthesis. Melphalan is a hydrophilic drug, and as such, it does not penetrate cell membranes easily, which is limiting to its anticancer potential. In contrast, melflufen (melphalan flufenamide), a new peptideconjugated alkylator, is highly lipophilic and therefore penetrates the cell membrane easily. Inside the cell, melflufen is rapidly hydrolyzed into less lipophilic metabolites that retain high alkylating potential, leading to their entrapment and accumulation. Aminopeptidases belong to a large family of enzymes that catalyze the cleavage of amino acids from the amino terminus of proteins or peptides and are shown to facilitate intracellular hydrolysis of melflufen. Aminopeptidases are involved in multiple cellular processes, and their expression and activity are frequently deregulated in cancer cells. For this reason, aminopeptidase inhibitors bestatin and tosedostat have been investigated in the clinical settings. Exploiting aminopeptidase activity to convert a lipophilic drug such as melflufen to an intracellular hydrophilic metabolite with high alkylating potential may offer an effective alternative therapeutic approach. Previously it has been shown that aminopeptidase N (ANPEP or CD13) can hydrolyze melflufen, but it is largely unknown whether melflufen can be a substrate for other aminopeptidases. Application of melflufen has mainly been focused on multiple myeloma, where it has shown promising results in phase 3 clinical trial in relapse and refractory patient population. 13 Yet it is unexplored whether melflufen can be effective in other cancer types such as breast cancer. Here, we demonstrate the efficacy of melflufen in D492HER2 breast epithelial cells overexpressing the HER2 oncogene and the triplenegative cell line MDAMB231.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
Aminopeptidases are thought to be responsible for the cleavage of melflufen, and indeed, in our model, the aminopeptidase inhibitor bestatin attenuated the activity of melflufen in D492HER2 cells. Interestingly, in D492 cells, preincubation with bestatin showed no effect on melflufen activity.
In Vitro Model Normal D492 cell CVCL_D1HJ
Experiment 34 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [11]
Indication Breast cancer
Efficacy Data Cell viability
84%
Administration Time 48 h
Administration Dosage 0.5 μM
MOA of PDC
Melphalan is a wellknown cancer drug used for decades for the treatment of various cancer types, and it is still widely used for hematological cancers today. It is an alkylating agent that works by adding an alkyl group to the guanine base of the DNA, resulting in an aberrant linkage between DNA strands, DNA breakage, and inhibition of DNA synthesis. Melphalan is a hydrophilic drug, and as such, it does not penetrate cell membranes easily, which is limiting to its anticancer potential. In contrast, melflufen (melphalan flufenamide), a new peptideconjugated alkylator, is highly lipophilic and therefore penetrates the cell membrane easily. Inside the cell, melflufen is rapidly hydrolyzed into less lipophilic metabolites that retain high alkylating potential, leading to their entrapment and accumulation. Aminopeptidases belong to a large family of enzymes that catalyze the cleavage of amino acids from the amino terminus of proteins or peptides and are shown to facilitate intracellular hydrolysis of melflufen. Aminopeptidases are involved in multiple cellular processes, and their expression and activity are frequently deregulated in cancer cells. For this reason, aminopeptidase inhibitors bestatin and tosedostat have been investigated in the clinical settings. Exploiting aminopeptidase activity to convert a lipophilic drug such as melflufen to an intracellular hydrophilic metabolite with high alkylating potential may offer an effective alternative therapeutic approach. Previously it has been shown that aminopeptidase N (ANPEP or CD13) can hydrolyze melflufen, but it is largely unknown whether melflufen can be a substrate for other aminopeptidases. Application of melflufen has mainly been focused on multiple myeloma, where it has shown promising results in phase 3 clinical trial in relapse and refractory patient population. 13 Yet it is unexplored whether melflufen can be effective in other cancer types such as breast cancer. Here, we demonstrate the efficacy of melflufen in D492HER2 breast epithelial cells overexpressing the HER2 oncogene and the triplenegative cell line MDAMB231.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
Aminopeptidases are thought to be responsible for the cleavage of melflufen, and indeed, in our model, the aminopeptidase inhibitor bestatin attenuated the activity of melflufen in D492HER2 cells. Interestingly, in D492 cells, preincubation with bestatin showed no effect on melflufen activity.
In Vitro Model Normal D492 cell CVCL_D1HJ
Experiment 35 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [11]
Indication Breast cancer
Efficacy Data Cell viability
86%
Administration Time 48 h
Administration Dosage 0.1 μM; with bestatin (10 μmol/L)
MOA of PDC
Melphalan is a wellknown cancer drug used for decades for the treatment of various cancer types, and it is still widely used for hematological cancers today. It is an alkylating agent that works by adding an alkyl group to the guanine base of the DNA, resulting in an aberrant linkage between DNA strands, DNA breakage, and inhibition of DNA synthesis. Melphalan is a hydrophilic drug, and as such, it does not penetrate cell membranes easily, which is limiting to its anticancer potential. In contrast, melflufen (melphalan flufenamide), a new peptideconjugated alkylator, is highly lipophilic and therefore penetrates the cell membrane easily. Inside the cell, melflufen is rapidly hydrolyzed into less lipophilic metabolites that retain high alkylating potential, leading to their entrapment and accumulation. Aminopeptidases belong to a large family of enzymes that catalyze the cleavage of amino acids from the amino terminus of proteins or peptides and are shown to facilitate intracellular hydrolysis of melflufen. Aminopeptidases are involved in multiple cellular processes, and their expression and activity are frequently deregulated in cancer cells. For this reason, aminopeptidase inhibitors bestatin and tosedostat have been investigated in the clinical settings. Exploiting aminopeptidase activity to convert a lipophilic drug such as melflufen to an intracellular hydrophilic metabolite with high alkylating potential may offer an effective alternative therapeutic approach. Previously it has been shown that aminopeptidase N (ANPEP or CD13) can hydrolyze melflufen, but it is largely unknown whether melflufen can be a substrate for other aminopeptidases. Application of melflufen has mainly been focused on multiple myeloma, where it has shown promising results in phase 3 clinical trial in relapse and refractory patient population. 13 Yet it is unexplored whether melflufen can be effective in other cancer types such as breast cancer. Here, we demonstrate the efficacy of melflufen in D492HER2 breast epithelial cells overexpressing the HER2 oncogene and the triplenegative cell line MDAMB231.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
Aminopeptidases are thought to be responsible for the cleavage of melflufen, and indeed, in our model, the aminopeptidase inhibitor bestatin attenuated the activity of melflufen in D492HER2 cells. Interestingly, in D492 cells, preincubation with bestatin showed no effect on melflufen activity.
In Vitro Model Normal D492 cell CVCL_D1HJ
Experiment 36 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [11]
Indication Breast cancer
Efficacy Data Cell viability
90%
Administration Time 48 h
Administration Dosage 1.0 μM; with bestatin (10 μmol/L)
MOA of PDC
Melphalan is a wellknown cancer drug used for decades for the treatment of various cancer types, and it is still widely used for hematological cancers today. It is an alkylating agent that works by adding an alkyl group to the guanine base of the DNA, resulting in an aberrant linkage between DNA strands, DNA breakage, and inhibition of DNA synthesis. Melphalan is a hydrophilic drug, and as such, it does not penetrate cell membranes easily, which is limiting to its anticancer potential. In contrast, melflufen (melphalan flufenamide), a new peptideconjugated alkylator, is highly lipophilic and therefore penetrates the cell membrane easily. Inside the cell, melflufen is rapidly hydrolyzed into less lipophilic metabolites that retain high alkylating potential, leading to their entrapment and accumulation. Aminopeptidases belong to a large family of enzymes that catalyze the cleavage of amino acids from the amino terminus of proteins or peptides and are shown to facilitate intracellular hydrolysis of melflufen. Aminopeptidases are involved in multiple cellular processes, and their expression and activity are frequently deregulated in cancer cells. For this reason, aminopeptidase inhibitors bestatin and tosedostat have been investigated in the clinical settings. Exploiting aminopeptidase activity to convert a lipophilic drug such as melflufen to an intracellular hydrophilic metabolite with high alkylating potential may offer an effective alternative therapeutic approach. Previously it has been shown that aminopeptidase N (ANPEP or CD13) can hydrolyze melflufen, but it is largely unknown whether melflufen can be a substrate for other aminopeptidases. Application of melflufen has mainly been focused on multiple myeloma, where it has shown promising results in phase 3 clinical trial in relapse and refractory patient population. 13 Yet it is unexplored whether melflufen can be effective in other cancer types such as breast cancer. Here, we demonstrate the efficacy of melflufen in D492HER2 breast epithelial cells overexpressing the HER2 oncogene and the triplenegative cell line MDAMB231.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
Aminopeptidases are thought to be responsible for the cleavage of melflufen, and indeed, in our model, the aminopeptidase inhibitor bestatin attenuated the activity of melflufen in D492HER2 cells. Interestingly, in D492 cells, preincubation with bestatin showed no effect on melflufen activity.
In Vitro Model Normal D492 cell CVCL_D1HJ
Experiment 37 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [11]
Indication Breast cancer
Efficacy Data Cell viability
95%
Administration Time 48 h
Administration Dosage 0.7 μM
MOA of PDC
Melphalan is a wellknown cancer drug used for decades for the treatment of various cancer types, and it is still widely used for hematological cancers today. It is an alkylating agent that works by adding an alkyl group to the guanine base of the DNA, resulting in an aberrant linkage between DNA strands, DNA breakage, and inhibition of DNA synthesis. Melphalan is a hydrophilic drug, and as such, it does not penetrate cell membranes easily, which is limiting to its anticancer potential. In contrast, melflufen (melphalan flufenamide), a new peptideconjugated alkylator, is highly lipophilic and therefore penetrates the cell membrane easily. Inside the cell, melflufen is rapidly hydrolyzed into less lipophilic metabolites that retain high alkylating potential, leading to their entrapment and accumulation. Aminopeptidases belong to a large family of enzymes that catalyze the cleavage of amino acids from the amino terminus of proteins or peptides and are shown to facilitate intracellular hydrolysis of melflufen. Aminopeptidases are involved in multiple cellular processes, and their expression and activity are frequently deregulated in cancer cells. For this reason, aminopeptidase inhibitors bestatin and tosedostat have been investigated in the clinical settings. Exploiting aminopeptidase activity to convert a lipophilic drug such as melflufen to an intracellular hydrophilic metabolite with high alkylating potential may offer an effective alternative therapeutic approach. Previously it has been shown that aminopeptidase N (ANPEP or CD13) can hydrolyze melflufen, but it is largely unknown whether melflufen can be a substrate for other aminopeptidases. Application of melflufen has mainly been focused on multiple myeloma, where it has shown promising results in phase 3 clinical trial in relapse and refractory patient population. 13 Yet it is unexplored whether melflufen can be effective in other cancer types such as breast cancer. Here, we demonstrate the efficacy of melflufen in D492HER2 breast epithelial cells overexpressing the HER2 oncogene and the triplenegative cell line MDAMB231.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
Aminopeptidases are thought to be responsible for the cleavage of melflufen, and indeed, in our model, the aminopeptidase inhibitor bestatin attenuated the activity of melflufen in D492HER2 cells. Interestingly, in D492 cells, preincubation with bestatin showed no effect on melflufen activity.
In Vitro Model Normal D492 cell CVCL_D1HJ
Experiment 38 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [11]
Indication Breast cancer
Efficacy Data Cell viability
97%
Administration Time 48 h
Administration Dosage 0.7 μM; with bestatin (10 μmol/L)
MOA of PDC
Melphalan is a wellknown cancer drug used for decades for the treatment of various cancer types, and it is still widely used for hematological cancers today. It is an alkylating agent that works by adding an alkyl group to the guanine base of the DNA, resulting in an aberrant linkage between DNA strands, DNA breakage, and inhibition of DNA synthesis. Melphalan is a hydrophilic drug, and as such, it does not penetrate cell membranes easily, which is limiting to its anticancer potential. In contrast, melflufen (melphalan flufenamide), a new peptideconjugated alkylator, is highly lipophilic and therefore penetrates the cell membrane easily. Inside the cell, melflufen is rapidly hydrolyzed into less lipophilic metabolites that retain high alkylating potential, leading to their entrapment and accumulation. Aminopeptidases belong to a large family of enzymes that catalyze the cleavage of amino acids from the amino terminus of proteins or peptides and are shown to facilitate intracellular hydrolysis of melflufen. Aminopeptidases are involved in multiple cellular processes, and their expression and activity are frequently deregulated in cancer cells. For this reason, aminopeptidase inhibitors bestatin and tosedostat have been investigated in the clinical settings. Exploiting aminopeptidase activity to convert a lipophilic drug such as melflufen to an intracellular hydrophilic metabolite with high alkylating potential may offer an effective alternative therapeutic approach. Previously it has been shown that aminopeptidase N (ANPEP or CD13) can hydrolyze melflufen, but it is largely unknown whether melflufen can be a substrate for other aminopeptidases. Application of melflufen has mainly been focused on multiple myeloma, where it has shown promising results in phase 3 clinical trial in relapse and refractory patient population. 13 Yet it is unexplored whether melflufen can be effective in other cancer types such as breast cancer. Here, we demonstrate the efficacy of melflufen in D492HER2 breast epithelial cells overexpressing the HER2 oncogene and the triplenegative cell line MDAMB231.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
Aminopeptidases are thought to be responsible for the cleavage of melflufen, and indeed, in our model, the aminopeptidase inhibitor bestatin attenuated the activity of melflufen in D492HER2 cells. Interestingly, in D492 cells, preincubation with bestatin showed no effect on melflufen activity.
In Vitro Model Normal D492 cell CVCL_D1HJ
Experiment 39 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [11]
Indication Breast cancer
Efficacy Data Cell viability
98%
Administration Time 48 h
Administration Dosage 0.1 μM
MOA of PDC
Melphalan is a wellknown cancer drug used for decades for the treatment of various cancer types, and it is still widely used for hematological cancers today. It is an alkylating agent that works by adding an alkyl group to the guanine base of the DNA, resulting in an aberrant linkage between DNA strands, DNA breakage, and inhibition of DNA synthesis. Melphalan is a hydrophilic drug, and as such, it does not penetrate cell membranes easily, which is limiting to its anticancer potential. In contrast, melflufen (melphalan flufenamide), a new peptideconjugated alkylator, is highly lipophilic and therefore penetrates the cell membrane easily. Inside the cell, melflufen is rapidly hydrolyzed into less lipophilic metabolites that retain high alkylating potential, leading to their entrapment and accumulation. Aminopeptidases belong to a large family of enzymes that catalyze the cleavage of amino acids from the amino terminus of proteins or peptides and are shown to facilitate intracellular hydrolysis of melflufen. Aminopeptidases are involved in multiple cellular processes, and their expression and activity are frequently deregulated in cancer cells. For this reason, aminopeptidase inhibitors bestatin and tosedostat have been investigated in the clinical settings. Exploiting aminopeptidase activity to convert a lipophilic drug such as melflufen to an intracellular hydrophilic metabolite with high alkylating potential may offer an effective alternative therapeutic approach. Previously it has been shown that aminopeptidase N (ANPEP or CD13) can hydrolyze melflufen, but it is largely unknown whether melflufen can be a substrate for other aminopeptidases. Application of melflufen has mainly been focused on multiple myeloma, where it has shown promising results in phase 3 clinical trial in relapse and refractory patient population. 13 Yet it is unexplored whether melflufen can be effective in other cancer types such as breast cancer. Here, we demonstrate the efficacy of melflufen in D492HER2 breast epithelial cells overexpressing the HER2 oncogene and the triplenegative cell line MDAMB231.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
Aminopeptidases are thought to be responsible for the cleavage of melflufen, and indeed, in our model, the aminopeptidase inhibitor bestatin attenuated the activity of melflufen in D492HER2 cells. Interestingly, in D492 cells, preincubation with bestatin showed no effect on melflufen activity.
In Vitro Model Normal D492 cell CVCL_D1HJ
Experiment 40 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [11]
Indication Breast cancer
Efficacy Data Cell viability
99%
Administration Time 48 h
Administration Dosage 0.1 μM; with bestatin (10 μmol/L)
MOA of PDC
Melphalan is a wellknown cancer drug used for decades for the treatment of various cancer types, and it is still widely used for hematological cancers today. It is an alkylating agent that works by adding an alkyl group to the guanine base of the DNA, resulting in an aberrant linkage between DNA strands, DNA breakage, and inhibition of DNA synthesis. Melphalan is a hydrophilic drug, and as such, it does not penetrate cell membranes easily, which is limiting to its anticancer potential. In contrast, melflufen (melphalan flufenamide), a new peptideconjugated alkylator, is highly lipophilic and therefore penetrates the cell membrane easily. Inside the cell, melflufen is rapidly hydrolyzed into less lipophilic metabolites that retain high alkylating potential, leading to their entrapment and accumulation. Aminopeptidases belong to a large family of enzymes that catalyze the cleavage of amino acids from the amino terminus of proteins or peptides and are shown to facilitate intracellular hydrolysis of melflufen. Aminopeptidases are involved in multiple cellular processes, and their expression and activity are frequently deregulated in cancer cells. For this reason, aminopeptidase inhibitors bestatin and tosedostat have been investigated in the clinical settings. Exploiting aminopeptidase activity to convert a lipophilic drug such as melflufen to an intracellular hydrophilic metabolite with high alkylating potential may offer an effective alternative therapeutic approach. Previously it has been shown that aminopeptidase N (ANPEP or CD13) can hydrolyze melflufen, but it is largely unknown whether melflufen can be a substrate for other aminopeptidases. Application of melflufen has mainly been focused on multiple myeloma, where it has shown promising results in phase 3 clinical trial in relapse and refractory patient population. 13 Yet it is unexplored whether melflufen can be effective in other cancer types such as breast cancer. Here, we demonstrate the efficacy of melflufen in D492HER2 breast epithelial cells overexpressing the HER2 oncogene and the triplenegative cell line MDAMB231.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
Aminopeptidases are thought to be responsible for the cleavage of melflufen, and indeed, in our model, the aminopeptidase inhibitor bestatin attenuated the activity of melflufen in D492HER2 cells. Interestingly, in D492 cells, preincubation with bestatin showed no effect on melflufen activity.
In Vitro Model Normal D492 cell CVCL_D1HJ
Experiment 41 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [11]
Indication Breast cancer
Efficacy Data Cell viability
100%
Administration Time 48 h
Administration Dosage 0.5 μM
MOA of PDC
Melphalan is a wellknown cancer drug used for decades for the treatment of various cancer types, and it is still widely used for hematological cancers today. It is an alkylating agent that works by adding an alkyl group to the guanine base of the DNA, resulting in an aberrant linkage between DNA strands, DNA breakage, and inhibition of DNA synthesis. Melphalan is a hydrophilic drug, and as such, it does not penetrate cell membranes easily, which is limiting to its anticancer potential. In contrast, melflufen (melphalan flufenamide), a new peptideconjugated alkylator, is highly lipophilic and therefore penetrates the cell membrane easily. Inside the cell, melflufen is rapidly hydrolyzed into less lipophilic metabolites that retain high alkylating potential, leading to their entrapment and accumulation. Aminopeptidases belong to a large family of enzymes that catalyze the cleavage of amino acids from the amino terminus of proteins or peptides and are shown to facilitate intracellular hydrolysis of melflufen. Aminopeptidases are involved in multiple cellular processes, and their expression and activity are frequently deregulated in cancer cells. For this reason, aminopeptidase inhibitors bestatin and tosedostat have been investigated in the clinical settings. Exploiting aminopeptidase activity to convert a lipophilic drug such as melflufen to an intracellular hydrophilic metabolite with high alkylating potential may offer an effective alternative therapeutic approach. Previously it has been shown that aminopeptidase N (ANPEP or CD13) can hydrolyze melflufen, but it is largely unknown whether melflufen can be a substrate for other aminopeptidases. Application of melflufen has mainly been focused on multiple myeloma, where it has shown promising results in phase 3 clinical trial in relapse and refractory patient population. 13 Yet it is unexplored whether melflufen can be effective in other cancer types such as breast cancer. Here, we demonstrate the efficacy of melflufen in D492HER2 breast epithelial cells overexpressing the HER2 oncogene and the triplenegative cell line MDAMB231.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
D492HER2 cells showed increased sensitivity to melphalan compared to the progenitor cell line D492. However, concentration as high as 100 μmol/L was insufficient to kill the whole cell population. In both cell lines, around 40% of D492 cells and at least 20% of D492HER2 cells were still viable after incubation with 100 μmol/L melphalan. On the contrary, melflufen decreased viability of both D492 and D492HER2 cells at much lower doses.

   Click to Show/Hide
In Vitro Model Normal D492 cell CVCL_D1HJ
Experiment 42 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [11]
Indication Breast cancer
Efficacy Data Cell viability
100%
Administration Time 48 h
Administration Dosage 10 μM
MOA of PDC
Melphalan is a wellknown cancer drug used for decades for the treatment of various cancer types, and it is still widely used for hematological cancers today. It is an alkylating agent that works by adding an alkyl group to the guanine base of the DNA, resulting in an aberrant linkage between DNA strands, DNA breakage, and inhibition of DNA synthesis. Melphalan is a hydrophilic drug, and as such, it does not penetrate cell membranes easily, which is limiting to its anticancer potential. In contrast, melflufen (melphalan flufenamide), a new peptideconjugated alkylator, is highly lipophilic and therefore penetrates the cell membrane easily. Inside the cell, melflufen is rapidly hydrolyzed into less lipophilic metabolites that retain high alkylating potential, leading to their entrapment and accumulation. Aminopeptidases belong to a large family of enzymes that catalyze the cleavage of amino acids from the amino terminus of proteins or peptides and are shown to facilitate intracellular hydrolysis of melflufen. Aminopeptidases are involved in multiple cellular processes, and their expression and activity are frequently deregulated in cancer cells. For this reason, aminopeptidase inhibitors bestatin and tosedostat have been investigated in the clinical settings. Exploiting aminopeptidase activity to convert a lipophilic drug such as melflufen to an intracellular hydrophilic metabolite with high alkylating potential may offer an effective alternative therapeutic approach. Previously it has been shown that aminopeptidase N (ANPEP or CD13) can hydrolyze melflufen, but it is largely unknown whether melflufen can be a substrate for other aminopeptidases. Application of melflufen has mainly been focused on multiple myeloma, where it has shown promising results in phase 3 clinical trial in relapse and refractory patient population. 13 Yet it is unexplored whether melflufen can be effective in other cancer types such as breast cancer. Here, we demonstrate the efficacy of melflufen in D492HER2 breast epithelial cells overexpressing the HER2 oncogene and the triplenegative cell line MDAMB231.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
D492HER2 cells showed increased sensitivity to melphalan compared to the progenitor cell line D492. However, concentration as high as 100 μmol/L was insufficient to kill the whole cell population. In both cell lines, around 40% of D492 cells and at least 20% of D492HER2 cells were still viable after incubation with 100 μmol/L melphalan. On the contrary, melflufen decreased viability of both D492 and D492HER2 cells at much lower doses.

   Click to Show/Hide
In Vitro Model Normal D492 cell CVCL_D1HJ
Experiment 43 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [11]
Indication Breast cancer
Efficacy Data Cell viability
101%
Administration Time 48 h
Administration Dosage 0.1 μM
MOA of PDC
Melphalan is a wellknown cancer drug used for decades for the treatment of various cancer types, and it is still widely used for hematological cancers today. It is an alkylating agent that works by adding an alkyl group to the guanine base of the DNA, resulting in an aberrant linkage between DNA strands, DNA breakage, and inhibition of DNA synthesis. Melphalan is a hydrophilic drug, and as such, it does not penetrate cell membranes easily, which is limiting to its anticancer potential. In contrast, melflufen (melphalan flufenamide), a new peptideconjugated alkylator, is highly lipophilic and therefore penetrates the cell membrane easily. Inside the cell, melflufen is rapidly hydrolyzed into less lipophilic metabolites that retain high alkylating potential, leading to their entrapment and accumulation. Aminopeptidases belong to a large family of enzymes that catalyze the cleavage of amino acids from the amino terminus of proteins or peptides and are shown to facilitate intracellular hydrolysis of melflufen. Aminopeptidases are involved in multiple cellular processes, and their expression and activity are frequently deregulated in cancer cells. For this reason, aminopeptidase inhibitors bestatin and tosedostat have been investigated in the clinical settings. Exploiting aminopeptidase activity to convert a lipophilic drug such as melflufen to an intracellular hydrophilic metabolite with high alkylating potential may offer an effective alternative therapeutic approach. Previously it has been shown that aminopeptidase N (ANPEP or CD13) can hydrolyze melflufen, but it is largely unknown whether melflufen can be a substrate for other aminopeptidases. Application of melflufen has mainly been focused on multiple myeloma, where it has shown promising results in phase 3 clinical trial in relapse and refractory patient population. 13 Yet it is unexplored whether melflufen can be effective in other cancer types such as breast cancer. Here, we demonstrate the efficacy of melflufen in D492HER2 breast epithelial cells overexpressing the HER2 oncogene and the triplenegative cell line MDAMB231.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
D492HER2 cells showed increased sensitivity to melphalan compared to the progenitor cell line D492. However, concentration as high as 100 μmol/L was insufficient to kill the whole cell population. In both cell lines, around 40% of D492 cells and at least 20% of D492HER2 cells were still viable after incubation with 100 μmol/L melphalan. On the contrary, melflufen decreased viability of both D492 and D492HER2 cells at much lower doses.

   Click to Show/Hide
In Vitro Model Normal D492 cell CVCL_D1HJ
Experiment 44 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [11]
Indication Breast cancer
Efficacy Data Cell viability
120%
Administration Time 48 h
Administration Dosage 0.5 μM; with bestatin (10 μmol/L)
MOA of PDC
Melphalan is a wellknown cancer drug used for decades for the treatment of various cancer types, and it is still widely used for hematological cancers today. It is an alkylating agent that works by adding an alkyl group to the guanine base of the DNA, resulting in an aberrant linkage between DNA strands, DNA breakage, and inhibition of DNA synthesis. Melphalan is a hydrophilic drug, and as such, it does not penetrate cell membranes easily, which is limiting to its anticancer potential. In contrast, melflufen (melphalan flufenamide), a new peptideconjugated alkylator, is highly lipophilic and therefore penetrates the cell membrane easily. Inside the cell, melflufen is rapidly hydrolyzed into less lipophilic metabolites that retain high alkylating potential, leading to their entrapment and accumulation. Aminopeptidases belong to a large family of enzymes that catalyze the cleavage of amino acids from the amino terminus of proteins or peptides and are shown to facilitate intracellular hydrolysis of melflufen. Aminopeptidases are involved in multiple cellular processes, and their expression and activity are frequently deregulated in cancer cells. For this reason, aminopeptidase inhibitors bestatin and tosedostat have been investigated in the clinical settings. Exploiting aminopeptidase activity to convert a lipophilic drug such as melflufen to an intracellular hydrophilic metabolite with high alkylating potential may offer an effective alternative therapeutic approach. Previously it has been shown that aminopeptidase N (ANPEP or CD13) can hydrolyze melflufen, but it is largely unknown whether melflufen can be a substrate for other aminopeptidases. Application of melflufen has mainly been focused on multiple myeloma, where it has shown promising results in phase 3 clinical trial in relapse and refractory patient population. 13 Yet it is unexplored whether melflufen can be effective in other cancer types such as breast cancer. Here, we demonstrate the efficacy of melflufen in D492HER2 breast epithelial cells overexpressing the HER2 oncogene and the triplenegative cell line MDAMB231.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
Aminopeptidases are thought to be responsible for the cleavage of melflufen, and indeed, in our model, the aminopeptidase inhibitor bestatin attenuated the activity of melflufen in D492HER2 cells. Interestingly, in D492 cells, preincubation with bestatin showed no effect on melflufen activity.
In Vitro Model Normal D492 cell CVCL_D1HJ
Experiment 45 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [8]
Indication lymphoma
Efficacy Data Half Maximal Inhibitory Concentration (IC50)
0.011 μM
Description
Cell cycle distribution analyses were performed on melflufen treated (0.1, 0.2 and 0.4 uM) and control cells from the KM-H2 and SU-DHL-10 cell lines in which the cytotoxic activity of melflufen during the 72 h FMCA assay was calculated as 0.92, 0.22, and 0.71 uM respectively (see Table3). To minimize potential artifacts emanating from cells exiting the analyzed cell populations, e.g. due to early and/or extensive cell death, the cells were subjected to basal cell culture conditions for 40 h (preincubation) followed by 12, 24 and 48 h treatments with melflufen. Propidium iodide (PI) staining of DNA using Vindelovs technique was followed by quantitation with flow cytometry analysis. The percentage of cells in each cell cycle phase was determined with the ModFit LT software.

   Click to Show/Hide
In Vitro Model Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma cell Ly-3 Homo sapiens
Experiment 46 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [11]
Indication Breast cancer
Efficacy Data Half maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50)
0.046 μmol/L
MOA of PDC
Melphalan is a wellknown cancer drug used for decades for the treatment of various cancer types, and it is still widely used for hematological cancers today. It is an alkylating agent that works by adding an alkyl group to the guanine base of the DNA, resulting in an aberrant linkage between DNA strands, DNA breakage, and inhibition of DNA synthesis. Melphalan is a hydrophilic drug, and as such, it does not penetrate cell membranes easily, which is limiting to its anticancer potential. In contrast, melflufen (melphalan flufenamide), a new peptideconjugated alkylator, is highly lipophilic and therefore penetrates the cell membrane easily. Inside the cell, melflufen is rapidly hydrolyzed into less lipophilic metabolites that retain high alkylating potential, leading to their entrapment and accumulation. Aminopeptidases belong to a large family of enzymes that catalyze the cleavage of amino acids from the amino terminus of proteins or peptides and are shown to facilitate intracellular hydrolysis of melflufen. Aminopeptidases are involved in multiple cellular processes, and their expression and activity are frequently deregulated in cancer cells. For this reason, aminopeptidase inhibitors bestatin and tosedostat have been investigated in the clinical settings. Exploiting aminopeptidase activity to convert a lipophilic drug such as melflufen to an intracellular hydrophilic metabolite with high alkylating potential may offer an effective alternative therapeutic approach. Previously it has been shown that aminopeptidase N (ANPEP or CD13) can hydrolyze melflufen, but it is largely unknown whether melflufen can be a substrate for other aminopeptidases. Application of melflufen has mainly been focused on multiple myeloma, where it has shown promising results in phase 3 clinical trial in relapse and refractory patient population. 13 Yet it is unexplored whether melflufen can be effective in other cancer types such as breast cancer. Here, we demonstrate the efficacy of melflufen in D492HER2 breast epithelial cells overexpressing the HER2 oncogene and the triplenegative cell line MDAMB231.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
IC50 values for melflufen of 0.046 μmol/L in D492HER2 cells and 0.52 μmol/L in D492 cells compared to doxorubicin values of 0.92 μmol/L for D492HER2 cells and 1.8 μmol/L for D492 underpin these findings (Figure 3B).
In Vitro Model Normal D492 cell CVCL_D1HJ
Experiment 47 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [1]
Indication Multiple myeloma
Efficacy Data Half maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50)
0.05 μM
MOA of PDC
Melflufen is highly lipophilic, which promotes its rapid uptake by cells. Once within the cell, melflufen releases its hydrophilic alkylator payloads via the hydrolytic activity of intracellular peptidases (e.g., aminopeptidases). Aminopeptidases are Zn2+-dependent metalloproteinases that remove amino acids at the N-terminal position from oligopeptides and have been associated with multiple tumorigenic processes such as proliferation, apoptosis, differentiation, angiogenesis, and motility. The dependence of melflufen on aminopeptidases was initially demonstrated by the reduced cytotoxic activity of melflufen-but not the alkylator melphalan-when cells were pretreated with bestatin, an antibiotic that is a potent aminopeptidase inhibitor. In addition, structure analogs designed to resist peptide hydrolysis (N-methyl derivative and derivative with D-amino acid) were shown to be almost 100-fold less potent than melflufen. Subsequent in vitro studies demonstrated that hydrolytic cleavage of melflufen by aminopeptidases releases alkylator payloads, including melphalan. In vitro, the activity of melflufen is multi-pronged, including induction of DNA damage, induction of apoptosis, inhibition of VEGF-dependent cell migration, and inhibition of tumor-associated angiogenesis, which have been further reviewed elsewhere. Downregulation of aminopeptidases resulted in reduced melflufen-mediated cytotoxic activity and apoptotic signaling in cultured cells.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
Compared with the known alkylator melphalan, melflufen had a higher cytotoxic activity in this broad range of malignant human cells, with a mean IC50 value that was 35-fold lower with melflufen than melphalan.
In Vitro Model Lung large cell carcinoma U-1810 cell CVCL_D054
Experiment 48 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [8]
Indication lymphoma
Efficacy Data Half Maximal Inhibitory Concentration (IC50)
0.077 μM
Description
Cell cycle distribution analyses were performed on melflufen treated (0.1, 0.2 and 0.4 uM) and control cells from the KM-H2 and SU-DHL-10 cell lines in which the cytotoxic activity of melflufen during the 72 h FMCA assay was calculated as 0.92, 0.22, and 0.71 uM respectively (see Table3). To minimize potential artifacts emanating from cells exiting the analyzed cell populations, e.g. due to early and/or extensive cell death, the cells were subjected to basal cell culture conditions for 40 h (preincubation) followed by 12, 24 and 48 h treatments with melflufen. Propidium iodide (PI) staining of DNA using Vindelovs technique was followed by quantitation with flow cytometry analysis. The percentage of cells in each cell cycle phase was determined with the ModFit LT software.

   Click to Show/Hide
In Vitro Model Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma WSU-NHL cell CVCL_1793
Experiment 49 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [8]
Indication lymphoma
Efficacy Data Half Maximal Inhibitory Concentration (IC50)
0.088 μM
Description
Cell cycle distribution analyses were performed on melflufen treated (0.1, 0.2 and 0.4 uM) and control cells from the KM-H2 and SU-DHL-10 cell lines in which the cytotoxic activity of melflufen during the 72 h FMCA assay was calculated as 0.92, 0.22, and 0.71 uM respectively (see Table3). To minimize potential artifacts emanating from cells exiting the analyzed cell populations, e.g. due to early and/or extensive cell death, the cells were subjected to basal cell culture conditions for 40 h (preincubation) followed by 12, 24 and 48 h treatments with melflufen. Propidium iodide (PI) staining of DNA using Vindelovs technique was followed by quantitation with flow cytometry analysis. The percentage of cells in each cell cycle phase was determined with the ModFit LT software.

   Click to Show/Hide
In Vitro Model Hodgkin lymphoma HDLM-2 cell CVCL_0009
Experiment 50 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [8]
Indication lymphoma
Efficacy Data Half Maximal Inhibitory Concentration (IC50)
0.12 μM
Description
Cell cycle distribution analyses were performed on melflufen treated (0.1, 0.2 and 0.4 uM) and control cells from the KM-H2 and SU-DHL-10 cell lines in which the cytotoxic activity of melflufen during the 72 h FMCA assay was calculated as 0.92, 0.22, and 0.71 uM respectively (see Table3). To minimize potential artifacts emanating from cells exiting the analyzed cell populations, e.g. due to early and/or extensive cell death, the cells were subjected to basal cell culture conditions for 40 h (preincubation) followed by 12, 24 and 48 h treatments with melflufen. Propidium iodide (PI) staining of DNA using Vindelovs technique was followed by quantitation with flow cytometry analysis. The percentage of cells in each cell cycle phase was determined with the ModFit LT software.

   Click to Show/Hide
In Vitro Model Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma U-2940 cell CVCL_1897
Experiment 51 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [8]
Indication lymphoma
Efficacy Data Half Maximal Inhibitory Concentration (IC50)
0.22 μM
Description
Cell cycle distribution analyses were performed on melflufen treated (0.1, 0.2 and 0.4 uM) and control cells from the KM-H2 and SU-DHL-10 cell lines in which the cytotoxic activity of melflufen during the 72 h FMCA assay was calculated as 0.92, 0.22, and 0.71 uM respectively (see Table3). To minimize potential artifacts emanating from cells exiting the analyzed cell populations, e.g. due to early and/or extensive cell death, the cells were subjected to basal cell culture conditions for 40 h (preincubation) followed by 12, 24 and 48 h treatments with melflufen. Propidium iodide (PI) staining of DNA using Vindelovs technique was followed by quantitation with flow cytometry analysis. The percentage of cells in each cell cycle phase was determined with the ModFit LT software.

   Click to Show/Hide
In Vitro Model Hodgkin lymphoma KM-H2 cell CVCL_1330
Experiment 52 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [8]
Indication lymphoma
Efficacy Data Half Maximal Inhibitory Concentration (IC50)
0.39 μM
Description
Cell cycle distribution analyses were performed on melflufen treated (0.1, 0.2 and 0.4 uM) and control cells from the KM-H2 and SU-DHL-10 cell lines in which the cytotoxic activity of melflufen during the 72 h FMCA assay was calculated as 0.92, 0.22, and 0.71 uM respectively (see Table3). To minimize potential artifacts emanating from cells exiting the analyzed cell populations, e.g. due to early and/or extensive cell death, the cells were subjected to basal cell culture conditions for 40 h (preincubation) followed by 12, 24 and 48 h treatments with melflufen. Propidium iodide (PI) staining of DNA using Vindelovs technique was followed by quantitation with flow cytometry analysis. The percentage of cells in each cell cycle phase was determined with the ModFit LT software.

   Click to Show/Hide
In Vitro Model Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma germinal center B-cell type DoHH2 cell CVCL_1179
Experiment 53 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [8]
Indication lymphoma
Efficacy Data Half Maximal Inhibitory Concentration (IC50)
0.42 μM
Description
Cell cycle distribution analyses were performed on melflufen treated (0.1, 0.2 and 0.4 uM) and control cells from the KM-H2 and SU-DHL-10 cell lines in which the cytotoxic activity of melflufen during the 72 h FMCA assay was calculated as 0.92, 0.22, and 0.71 uM respectively (see Table3). To minimize potential artifacts emanating from cells exiting the analyzed cell populations, e.g. due to early and/or extensive cell death, the cells were subjected to basal cell culture conditions for 40 h (preincubation) followed by 12, 24 and 48 h treatments with melflufen. Propidium iodide (PI) staining of DNA using Vindelovs technique was followed by quantitation with flow cytometry analysis. The percentage of cells in each cell cycle phase was determined with the ModFit LT software.

   Click to Show/Hide
In Vitro Model Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma SU-DHL-6 cell CVCL_2206
Experiment 54 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [8]
Indication lymphoma
Efficacy Data Half Maximal Inhibitory Concentration (IC50)
0.45 μM
Description
Cell cycle distribution analyses were performed on melflufen treated (0.1, 0.2 and 0.4 uM) and control cells from the KM-H2 and SU-DHL-10 cell lines in which the cytotoxic activity of melflufen during the 72 h FMCA assay was calculated as 0.92, 0.22, and 0.71 uM respectively (see Table3). To minimize potential artifacts emanating from cells exiting the analyzed cell populations, e.g. due to early and/or extensive cell death, the cells were subjected to basal cell culture conditions for 40 h (preincubation) followed by 12, 24 and 48 h treatments with melflufen. Propidium iodide (PI) staining of DNA using Vindelovs technique was followed by quantitation with flow cytometry analysis. The percentage of cells in each cell cycle phase was determined with the ModFit LT software.

   Click to Show/Hide
In Vitro Model Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma germinal center B-cell type RC-K8 cell CVCL_1883
Experiment 55 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [8]
Indication lymphoma
Efficacy Data Half Maximal Inhibitory Concentration (IC50)
0.52 μM
Description
Cell cycle distribution analyses were performed on melflufen treated (0.1, 0.2 and 0.4 uM) and control cells from the KM-H2 and SU-DHL-10 cell lines in which the cytotoxic activity of melflufen during the 72 h FMCA assay was calculated as 0.92, 0.22, and 0.71 uM respectively (see Table3). To minimize potential artifacts emanating from cells exiting the analyzed cell populations, e.g. due to early and/or extensive cell death, the cells were subjected to basal cell culture conditions for 40 h (preincubation) followed by 12, 24 and 48 h treatments with melflufen. Propidium iodide (PI) staining of DNA using Vindelovs technique was followed by quantitation with flow cytometry analysis. The percentage of cells in each cell cycle phase was determined with the ModFit LT software.

   Click to Show/Hide
In Vitro Model Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma U-2932 cell CVCL_1896
Experiment 56 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [11]
Indication Breast cancer
Efficacy Data Half maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50)
0.52 μmol/L
MOA of PDC
Melphalan is a wellknown cancer drug used for decades for the treatment of various cancer types, and it is still widely used for hematological cancers today. It is an alkylating agent that works by adding an alkyl group to the guanine base of the DNA, resulting in an aberrant linkage between DNA strands, DNA breakage, and inhibition of DNA synthesis. Melphalan is a hydrophilic drug, and as such, it does not penetrate cell membranes easily, which is limiting to its anticancer potential. In contrast, melflufen (melphalan flufenamide), a new peptideconjugated alkylator, is highly lipophilic and therefore penetrates the cell membrane easily. Inside the cell, melflufen is rapidly hydrolyzed into less lipophilic metabolites that retain high alkylating potential, leading to their entrapment and accumulation. Aminopeptidases belong to a large family of enzymes that catalyze the cleavage of amino acids from the amino terminus of proteins or peptides and are shown to facilitate intracellular hydrolysis of melflufen. Aminopeptidases are involved in multiple cellular processes, and their expression and activity are frequently deregulated in cancer cells. For this reason, aminopeptidase inhibitors bestatin and tosedostat have been investigated in the clinical settings. Exploiting aminopeptidase activity to convert a lipophilic drug such as melflufen to an intracellular hydrophilic metabolite with high alkylating potential may offer an effective alternative therapeutic approach. Previously it has been shown that aminopeptidase N (ANPEP or CD13) can hydrolyze melflufen, but it is largely unknown whether melflufen can be a substrate for other aminopeptidases. Application of melflufen has mainly been focused on multiple myeloma, where it has shown promising results in phase 3 clinical trial in relapse and refractory patient population. 13 Yet it is unexplored whether melflufen can be effective in other cancer types such as breast cancer. Here, we demonstrate the efficacy of melflufen in D492HER2 breast epithelial cells overexpressing the HER2 oncogene and the triplenegative cell line MDAMB231.

   Click to Show/Hide
Description
IC50 values for melflufen of 0.046 μmol/L in D492HER2 cells and 0.52 μmol/L in D492 cells compared to doxorubicin values of 0.92 μmol/L for D492HER2 cells and 1.8 μmol/L for D492 underpin these findings (Figure 4B).
In Vitro Model Normal D492 cell CVCL_D1HJ
Experiment 57 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [8]
Indication lymphoma
Efficacy Data Half Maximal Inhibitory Concentration (IC50)
0.71 μM
Description
Cell cycle distribution analyses were performed on melflufen treated (0.1, 0.2 and 0.4 uM) and control cells from the KM-H2 and SU-DHL-10 cell lines in which the cytotoxic activity of melflufen during the 72 h FMCA assay was calculated as 0.92, 0.22, and 0.71 uM respectively (see Table3). To minimize potential artifacts emanating from cells exiting the analyzed cell populations, e.g. due to early and/or extensive cell death, the cells were subjected to basal cell culture conditions for 40 h (preincubation) followed by 12, 24 and 48 h treatments with melflufen. Propidium iodide (PI) staining of DNA using Vindelovs technique was followed by quantitation with flow cytometry analysis. The percentage of cells in each cell cycle phase was determined with the ModFit LT software.

   Click to Show/Hide
In Vitro Model Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma SU-DHL-10 cell CVCL_1889
Experiment 58 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [8]
Indication lymphoma
Efficacy Data Half Maximal Inhibitory Concentration (IC50)
0.73 μM
Description
Cell cycle distribution analyses were performed on melflufen treated (0.1, 0.2 and 0.4 uM) and control cells from the KM-H2 and SU-DHL-10 cell lines in which the cytotoxic activity of melflufen during the 72 h FMCA assay was calculated as 0.92, 0.22, and 0.71 uM respectively (see Table3). To minimize potential artifacts emanating from cells exiting the analyzed cell populations, e.g. due to early and/or extensive cell death, the cells were subjected to basal cell culture conditions for 40 h (preincubation) followed by 12, 24 and 48 h treatments with melflufen. Propidium iodide (PI) staining of DNA using Vindelovs technique was followed by quantitation with flow cytometry analysis. The percentage of cells in each cell cycle phase was determined with the ModFit LT software.

   Click to Show/Hide
In Vitro Model Hodgkin lymphoma L-428 cell CVCL_1361
Experiment 59 Reporting the Activity Data of This PDC [8]
Indication lymphoma
Efficacy Data Half Maximal Inhibitory Concentration (IC50)
0.92 μM
Description
Cell cycle distribution analyses were performed on melflufen treated (0.1, 0.2 and 0.4 uM) and control cells from the KM-H2 and SU-DHL-10 cell lines in which the cytotoxic activity of melflufen during the 72 h FMCA assay was calculated as 0.92, 0.22, and 0.71 uM respectively (see Table3). To minimize potential artifacts emanating from cells exiting the analyzed cell populations, e.g. due to early and/or extensive cell death, the cells were subjected to basal cell culture conditions for 40 h (preincubation) followed by 12, 24 and 48 h treatments with melflufen. Propidium iodide (PI) staining of DNA using Vindelovs technique was followed by quantitation with flow cytometry analysis. The percentage of cells in each cell cycle phase was determined with the ModFit LT software.

   Click to Show/Hide
In Vitro Model Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma DB cell CVCL_1168
References
Ref 1 Melflufen: A Peptide-Drug Conjugate for the Treatment of Multiple Myeloma. J Clin Med. 2020 Sep 27;9(10):3120. doi: 10.3390/jcm9103120.
Ref 2 Efficacy and safety of melflufen plus daratumumab and dexamethasone in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: results from the randomized, open-label, phase III LIGHTHOUSE study. Haematologica. 2024 Mar 1;109(3):895-905. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2023.283509.
Ref 3 PORT: A Randomized, Cross-Over, Phase 2 Study of Melflufen Peripheral Versus Central Intravenous Administration in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2024 Jun;24(6):e267-e275.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.clml.2024.02.012. Epub 2024 Feb 23.
Ref 4 Pepaxto: A New Peptide-Drug Conjugate for Heavily Pretreated Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma. Ann Pharmacother. 2022 Aug;56(8):951-957. doi: 10.1177/10600280211058388. Epub 2021 Dec 28.
Ref 5 Melflufen in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma refractory to prior alkylators: A subgroup analysis from the OCEAN study. Eur J Haematol. 2024 Mar;112(3):402-411. doi: 10.1111/ejh.14127. Epub 2023 Nov 15.
Ref 6 Melflufen or pomalidomide plus dexamethasone for patients with multiple myeloma refractory to lenalidomide (OCEAN): a randomised, head-to-head, open-label, phase 3 study. Lancet Haematol. 2022 Feb;9(2):e98-e110. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(21)00381-1. Epub 2022 Jan 12.
Ref 7 Melflufen plus dexamethasone in relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (O-12-M1): a multicentre, international, open-label, phase 1-2 study. Lancet Haematol. 2020 May;7(5):e395-e407. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(20)30044-2. Epub 2020 Mar 23.
Ref 8 In vitro and in vivo activity of melflufen (J1)in lymphoma. BMC Cancer. 2016 Apr 4;16:263. doi: 10.1186/s12885-016-2299-9.
Ref 9 Benefit Versus Risk Assessment of Melflufen and Dexamethasone in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Analyses From Longer Follow-up of the OCEAN and HORIZON Studies. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2023 Sep;23(9):687-696. doi: 10.1016/j.clml.2023.05.004. Epub 2023 May 6.
Ref 10 Melflufen for the treatment of multiple myeloma. Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol. 2022 Apr;15(4):371-382. doi: 10.1080/17512433.2022.2075847. Epub 2022 Jun 19.
Ref 11 Melflufen, a peptide-conjugated alkylator, is an efficient anti-neo-plastic drug in breast cancer cell lines. Cancer Med. 2020 Sep;9(18):6726-6738. doi: 10.1002/cam4.3300. Epub 2020 Jul 27.